Guest guest Posted June 19, 2007 Report Share Posted June 19, 2007 Astrology, India's National Science Delivering the first Centenarian Memorial Lecture on " Astrology, Science and Superstition " , organized by the Centenarian Trust at the jam-packed auditorium of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Madras on 4th February 1996, Dr. Raman said that " many English educated Indians while showing a high level of intellectual ability are generally alienated from their own scientific heritage of which Jyotish or astronomy-cum-astrology forms an integral part. ASTROLOGY, INDIA'S NATIONAL SCIENCE The Astrological Magazine May, 1996 Delivering the first Centenarian Memorial Lecture on " Astrology, Science and Superstition " , organized by the Centenarian Trust at the jam-packed auditorium of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Madras on 4th February 1996, Dr. Raman said that " many English educated Indians while showing a high level of intellectual ability are generally alienated from their own scientific heritage of which Jyotisha or astronomy-cum-astrology forms an integral part. They are not aware, because they are not taught, or they have not learnt, of the original contributions made in ancient India to various branches of knowledge, independent of Western influence. They naturally suffer from a sense of inferiority complex; of course there may be exceptions. " Dr. Raman said that while some of the Western scientists are more guarded in their criticism of astrology, it had become a fashion of the day with some of our own men of science to air flippant and derogatory views in the name of `scientific temper', `rationalism', etc. In any case there could be no excuse for the exploitation of horoscopes as a cheap sensation in the popular press and indeed these irresponsible predictions based usually on inadequate data for their purpose are condemned by none more strongly than by serious astrologers themselves. Commending to the dubious critic of astrology that he should begin consideration of those branches of the subject that refer to the objective world such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods etc., and not to experience, Dr. Raman said it was not at the bar of science that astrology in its very nature could stand or fall. The charge that the assumptions of an astrologer were hypothetical could not be tenable in view of the fact that some of the fundamental assumptions of the scientists such as the existence of ether and the issuing links in the chain of evolution, etc., were purely hypothetical. Elaborating on some of the theories of astrology, Dr. Raman observed that the astrologer's assumptions were demonstrable because it was often found that a person, say with Mars or Aries on the ascendant had a notably aggressive personality and was, generally speaking, independent, active, energetic, quarrelsome and enterprising while on the other hand the scientist's assumptions bearing on the origin of the universe existed in his own imagination. Argumentum adhoninem would be hurled against all those who differed from the scientists. The intelligent public would have a right to call into question their wild speculations about which they made much of. The ancient sages revealed that the world was four dimensional and time was intrinsic to things; and hence past, present and future existed simultaneously. The astrological interpretation of a chart was only the opening of a chapter in which the writing had been there all the time but which was shut off from our knowledge till now. Continuing his 90 minute lecture, Dr. Raman regretted that among today's breed of scientists in India some had developed a growing infatuation with `scientific temper' which was to say the least, rationalizing their irrational prejudice, a tendency to lean heavily on Western thinking and not on their own study and investigation into the claims of astrology. Their pre-occupation with filling facts to the prevalent theories of the day had led them into a wild goose chase. For instance, the scientists had not been able to outgrow the concept of gravity which itself remained unexplained. Dr. Raman said that in condemning astrology the methods used by some of those professing scientific temper appeared to be rather amusing and infantile. Their stock of astrological knowledge appeared to center round a wrong understanding of Rahukalam and births in Moola Nakshatra, as if only these two phenomena constituted the entire range of astrological knowledge. Dr. Raman asserted that while astrology on the national level could predict long-range weather, floods, earthquakes etc., on the individual level the horoscope can reveal one's mental structure, likes and dislikes, strong and weak points, abilities and aptitudes etc., giving scope for further improvements. It could diagnose disease and thus supplement medicine. He decried fortune-telling, the so-called aspect of astrology which is generously exploited by the news-media for the sales of their journals. He wished to know if any seismologist had ever predicted any earthquake while astrologically there were several instances of correct earthquake forecasts ? " Is seismology a science or superstition? " the speaker wanted an explanation from the critics of astrology. Dr. Raman said that the majority of Indian astrologers, ignoring for the time being astrologers who rushed to the press vying with one another for cheap publicity, knew the ethics of their profession and the law of the land. Their motto was to be sweet as well as truthful -- Satyambrooyat Priyambrooyat. If following this code, unpalatable events in respect of individuals and nations were predicted in cautious terms, they became the target of attack from self-styled busters of superstition! That Astrology was a science concerning postulated correlations between perceived movements of heavenly bodies and perceived events (natural, physical, psychological, social etc.) on earth. The forecasts made through Astrology were indicative or probabilistic rather than so-called unchangeable `fate'. There were a number of technique-systems in astrology and a philosophical basis viz., the theory of Karma. Astrology required many years of both study and practice before one could give accurate forecasts based on horoscopes. Astrologers were not perfect, pointed out Dr. Raman. There were crooked and incompetent astrologers to the same extent as engineers, astronomers, psychologists, politicians etc., no more and possibly no less. It had to be noted that campaigns against astrology were unconstitutional infringements on the freedom of belief of millions of Indian citizens. Dr. Raman observed that while recently an Indian astro-physicist took pleasure in denigrating astrology, it was refreshing to note that a leading British astro-physicist, Percy Seymour observing: " The history of science shows us that scientific theories are constantly being changed and replaced by others, no matter how permanent they may seem at a given time. " The scientific evidence that supports some of the basic concepts of astrology does not require such an approach to the foundations of present day science. Thus on the basis of what we know at the moment we cannot dismiss some of the basic concepts of astrology, and indeed a few of the contentions of astrologers are underpinned by recent advances in scientific research. " Dr. Raman said astrology was the national science of India and had permeated the entire fabric of Indian civilisation and culture. It was India's national attempt at fashioning a working scheme of scientific humanism, befitting man's kinship with the stars. In conclusion, Dr. Raman sounded a note of warning not to be beguiled by the passing show of technological achievements of the so-called space age but to retain a sense of values befitting our culture and civilisation. For man was still man in spite of all space exploration and it was here that astrology had its validity and utility. End of article courtesy of THE ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZINE Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi http://www.mantra.com/jyotish Om Shanti ______________________________\ ____ Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.