Guest guest Posted March 19, 2007 Report Share Posted March 19, 2007 Rk ji, It happenes due to life circumstances. But still you were all here, right?! So I think revival is always possible, and is so easy. Now to Astrology:- ******************************************* " Dridhadi karma treyakalameeswara kalasworoopa pradadati dehinam " ******************************************* In Dasadhyayi there is a sloka- " Dridhadi karma treyakalameeswara kalasworoopa pradadati dehinam " Meaning, The effect of space-time continuem on living beings can be of 3 type - 1) Dridha = Which can not be modified 2) Dridhadridha = Which can be modified if we know about it (We have a choice) 3) Adridha = Which may or may not happen (Jut a simple possibility) This is one of the concepts that is very fundamental to Ancient Indian Astrology. Instead of me speaking elaborately on the subject, I quote the words of Osho, when he spoke about the same- Note:- I have just inserted some headings in between the words of Osho for better understanding and co-relating of the same with the above sloka. ******************************************************** ============ The 3 Parts ============ " Astrology can be divided into three parts. The first part is the core, the essence; it is the essentials, and cannot be changed. It is the part which is most difficult to understand. The second part is the middle layer, in which one can make whatever changes one wants. It is the semi-essential portion in which you can make changes if you know how, but without knowing, no changes are possible at all. The third part is the outermost layer which is nonessential, but about which we are all very curious. The first is the essence, in which no changes can be made. When it is known, the only way is to cooperate with it. Religions have devised astrology in order to know and decipher this essential destiny. The semi-essential part of astrology is such that if we know about it we can change our lives -- otherwise not. If we do not know, then whatsoever was going to happen will happen. If there is knowledge, there are alternatives to choose between. There is a possibility of transformation if the right choice is made. The third, nonessential part is just the periphery, the outer surface. There is nothing essential in it; everything is circumstantial. But we go to consult astrologers only for the nonessential things. Someone goes and asks an astrologer when he will get employment -- there is no relationship between your employment and the moon and stars. Someone asks whether he will marry or not.... There can be a society without marriage. Someone asks whether he will remain poor or become rich.... There can be a socialist or communist society where there will be no rich and no poor people. So these are nonessential questions.... An eighty years old man was walking along when his foot slipped on some orange peel thrown onto the road. Now, is it possible to inquire of an astrologer and know from the moon and stars on which road and on which orange peel the foot will slip? Such queries are foolish, but you are curious to know in advance whether your foot will land on an orange skin and slip if you go out on the road today. This is nonessential. This has nothing to do with your being or your soul. These events happen on the periphery, and astrology has nothing to do with them. But because the astrologers were busy talking only about such things, the great establishment of astrology collapsed. This was the only reason. No intelligent person will be prepared to believe that when he was born it was written by destiny that on a particular day on Marine Drive his foot would land on some orange peel and he would fall.... Neither the falling down nor the orange peel have any relationship to the stars. Astrology has lost respect because it became connected with such things. At one time or the other we all have wanted to know such things from astrologers -- but these things are nonessential. But there are certain semi-essential matters such as the birth or death of a person: if you can know everything about these, you can take precautionary measures. If you do not know anything, you can't do anything. If our knowledge about the diagnosis of disease is increased, we will be able to increase the life-span of human beings. We have been doing it. If our research to make deadlier atom bombs succeeds, we will be able to kill hundreds of thousands of people at a time -- we have done it. This semi-essential world presents a possibility for our being able to do certain things, if we know in advance what is going to happen. If we do not know, nothing can be done. By our knowing in advance, alternatives can be sorted out and selected. Beyond this, the world of the essential exists -- you cannot do anything about it. However, our curiosity is to know only about nonessential things. Seldom does someone reach out to know the semi-essential. Our curiosity or desire never extends to knowing that which is essential and unavoidable, that which cannot be changed even if known. ================ Dridha = Essential ================ The astrology I am talking about concerns the essential, the fundamental. At best your curiosity as far as the semi-essential. You want to know how long you will live or whether or not you will suddenly die. But you are not curious to know what you will do if you live -- how you will live. You do want to know how you will die when the time comes or what you will be doing at that time. Your curiosity extends to events, not to the soul. ------------------------------- The projections of the future also determine the present moments. This present moment could not be if there were no future moments. Only with the support of future moments can the present moment occur. Our hands are resting on the shoulders of the future, our feet are on the shoulders of our past. It is very obvious that if that which is below me -- on which I am standing and which I can see -- slips away, I will fall. But if the shoulders of the future -- on which my outstretched hands are resting -- slip away then I will also fall. When a person finds himself connected with this inner unity of past and future he will be able to understand astrology. Then astrology becomes a religion, then astrology becomes spiritual. ======================= Dridhadridha = Semi-Essential ======================= I will tell you a very interesting story so that you may understand.... Mohammed had a disciple named Ali. Ali once asked Mohammed's opinion about whether a man is independent and free to do what he wants, or whether he is bound by his destiny in everything he does. Ali asked, " Can one do as one wants or not? " -- and man has been asking this question for a long, long time. " If a man is not able to do as he desires, " Ali said, " then it is useless and foolish to preach to him not to steal, not to tell lies, not to be dishonest. Or is it destiny that one man should always be there to preach to others not to steal or not to do this or that, knowing full well that it is also destiny for a dishonest man to remain dishonest, for a thief to remain a thief, for a murderer to remain a murderer? All this appears absurd. If everything is predestined, all education is useless -- all prophets, all saints and all teachers are useless. " People have asked such questions to Mahavira and to Buddha also. If what is going to happen is predestined, why should Mahavira or Buddha take so much trouble to explain what is right and what is wrong? So, Ali asked Mohammed what he thought about this controversial matter. If such a question was asked to Mahavira or Buddha, they would have given a very complicated and deep reply, but Mohammed gave a reply which Ali could understand. Many of Mohammed's replies were direct and straightforward. Ordinarily, answers given by people who are uneducated or less educated, or who are simple villagers, are direct and frank. People like Kabir, Nanak, Mohammed and Jesus were simple in that way. Answers by people like Buddha, Mahavira and Krishna were complex -- Buddha and Mahavira were the cream of a rich and highly developed civilization. The words of Jesus were direct, like a blow on the head. Kabir has actually sung: " Kabir is standing in the open market with a hammer in his hand to hit you! " If anyone came near him he would, so to speak, break open his head to remove all the rubbish that was lying inside. Mohammed did not give any metaphysical reply. He asked Ali to lift one leg and stand on it. Ali had asked a question about whether a man is free to do what he wants. Why should Ali stand on one leg? Mohammed said, " First lift one leg. " Poor Ali lifted his left leg and stood there on one leg. Mohammed then asked him, " Now lift the right leg also. " Ali was puzzled and asked how it was possible. Then Mohammed said, " If you had wanted to, you could have lifted the right leg first, but now you cannot.... A man is always free to lift the first leg -- it can be whichever he wants -- but no sooner has the first been lifted when the other becomes bound to the earth. " With regard to the nonessential part of life, we are always free to lift the first leg. But once that is done it becomes a bondage for the essential part. We take steps that are nonessential, become entangled, and then we are not able to do the essential. So Mohammed said to Ali that he had all the freedom to lift the right or the left leg first. But once he exercised that freedom and lifted one left leg, he was incapable of lifting the other leg. So freedom is there within certain limits, but beyond those limits there is bondage. ================== Adirdha = Non-Essential ================== Aall ordinary astrologers are asked about nonessentials. An ordinary astrologer is asked questions like: " Shall we win the elections or not? " How are the elections connected with the moon and the stars? The ordinary astrologer who replies, " Everything is predetermined, and no changes, not even as much as one inch, can be made, " is making a false statement. On the other hand there is the rationalist. He says that nothing is connected inevitably: whatsoever happens is coincidental, circumstantial and a matter of chance. There is no law, everything is anarchic. He is also making a false statement. ================== Back to the 3 Divisions =================== There is a law: A rationalist is never found so full of joy and bliss as a buddha. The rationalist denies God, soul and religion with the help of logic, but he can never attain the joy of Mahavira. It is definite that Mahavira must have done something that earned him his joy, Buddha must have done something that liberated him, and Krishna must also have done something which made it possible for him to give out such distinctly unique magical notes through his flute. The real thing is the third, which is the quintessence of everything, which belongs to the innermost and which is absolutely predetermined. The more one moves toward one's center, the nearer one comes to the essential, predetermined part. As we move towards the periphery, we move towards coincidence. The more we talk about external happenings, the more there is coincidence. When we talk about inner phenomena, things begin to appear scientific, as if based on a certain law, and they become more and more decisive. Between these two conditions -- the essential and the peripheral -- there is ample room for changes through the exercise of choice. Here, a person of knowledge makes the correct choice, while a person who is without knowledge, who is in the darkness of ignorance, drifts to his destiny. In darkness, circumstance catches hold of him. So there are three areas of life. In one area, that which is the essential core, everything is predetermined. Knowing this is knowing the essence of astrology. In another area, that which is peripheral, everything is uncertain. To know this is to know the everyday unpredictable world. There is another area which is in the middle. By knowing this, a person can save himself from trying to do the impossible, and can do what is possible. ******************************************************** OK. That were the words of the Osho. Now do you want to look into the above sloka? And want to know what else, it say? In which way you are interested in astrology – In essential? Semi-essential? Non- essential? Hope to have many replays on the same. Love, Sreenadh , rk dash <arkaydash wrote: > > Interested? No, nobody is. Only you are. And what is your explanation for the French leave? > RK > > Sreenadh <sreesog wrote: > Hi All, > Why this group becomes inactive when I am not here. Is it that no > body is interested in astrology? Is it that you don't like this group? > With such good members with knowledge, this shouldn't happen to this > group. And will not happen I know. Come back and let us restart! > Love, > Sreenadh > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Dear Sree Good to have you back. So you want to excite me. My excited desire on this forum will be to test my fundamentals in light of the views and insights of fellow members (Dr K, Shree Madhu, Sreenivas, to name a few). Put also them (all members) on notice if you want to excite me. RKSreenadh <sreesog wrote: Rk ji,It happenes due to life circumstances. But still you were all here, right?! So I think revival is always possible, and is so easy. :)Now to Astrology:-*******************************************"Dridhadi karma treyakalameeswara kalasworoopa pradadati dehinam"*******************************************In Dasadhyayi there is a sloka-"Dridhadi karma treyakalameeswara kalasworoopa pradadati dehinam"Meaning, The effect of space-time continuem on living beings can be of 3 type - 1) Dridha = Which can not be modified2) Dridhadridha = Which can be modified if we know about it (We have a choice)3) Adridha = Which may or may not happen (Jut a simple possibility)This is one of the concepts that is very fundamental to Ancient Indian Astrology. Instead of me speaking elaborately on the subject, I quote the words of Osho, when he spoke about the same-Note:- I have just inserted some headings in between the words of Osho for better understanding and co-relating of the same with the above sloka.********************************************************============The 3 Parts============" Astrology can be divided into three parts. The first part is the core,the essence; it is the essentials, and cannot be changed. It is thepart which is most difficult to understand. The second part is themiddle layer, in which one can make whatever changes one wants. It isthe semi-essential portion in which you can make changes if you knowhow, but without knowing, no changes are possible at all. The thirdpart is the outermost layer which is nonessential, but about which weare all very curious.The first is the essence, in which no changes can be made. When it isknown, the only way is to cooperate with it. Religions have devisedastrology in order to know and decipher this essential destiny. Thesemi-essential part of astrology is such that if we know about it wecan change our lives -- otherwise not.If we do not know, then whatsoever was going to happen will happen. Ifthere is knowledge, there are alternatives to choose between. There isa possibility of transformation if the right choice is made. Thethird, nonessential part is just the periphery, the outer surface.There is nothing essential in it; everything is circumstantial.But we go to consult astrologers only for the nonessential things.Someone goes and asks an astrologer when he will get employment --there is no relationship between your employment and the moon andstars. Someone asks whether he will marry or not.... There can be asociety without marriage. Someone asks whether he will remain poor orbecome rich.... There can be a socialist or communist society wherethere will be no rich and no poor people. So these are nonessentialquestions....An eighty years old man was walking along when his foot slipped onsome orange peel thrown onto the road. Now, is it possible to inquireof an astrologer and know from the moon and stars on which road and onwhich orange peel the foot will slip? Such queries are foolish, butyou are curious to know in advance whether your foot will land on anorange skin and slip if you go out on the road today. This isnonessential. This has nothing to do with your being or your soul.These events happen on the periphery, and astrology has nothing to dowith them. But because the astrologers were busy talking only aboutsuch things, the great establishment of astrology collapsed. This wasthe only reason.No intelligent person will be prepared to believe that when he wasborn it was written by destiny that on a particular day on MarineDrive his foot would land on some orange peel and he would fall....Neither the falling down nor the orange peel have any relationship tothe stars. Astrology has lost respect because it became connected withsuch things. At one time or the other we all have wanted to know suchthings from astrologers -- but these things are nonessential. Butthere are certain semi-essential matters such as the birth or death ofa person: if you can know everything about these, you can takeprecautionary measures. If you do not know anything, you can't doanything.If our knowledge about the diagnosis of disease is increased, we willbe able to increase the life-span of human beings. We have been doingit. If our research to make deadlier atom bombs succeeds, we will beable to kill hundreds of thousands of people at a time -- we have doneit. This semi-essential world presents a possibility for our beingable to do certain things, if we know in advance what is going tohappen. If we do not know, nothing can be done. By our knowing inadvance, alternatives can be sorted out and selected.Beyond this, the world of the essential exists -- you cannot doanything about it. However, our curiosity is to know only aboutnonessential things. Seldom does someone reach out to know thesemi-essential. Our curiosity or desire never extends to knowing thatwhich is essential and unavoidable, that which cannot be changed evenif known.================Dridha = Essential================The astrology I am talking about concerns the essential, thefundamental. At best your curiosity as far as the semi-essential. Youwant to know how long you will live or whether or not you willsuddenly die. But you are not curious to know what you will do if youlive -- how you will live. You do want to know how you will die whenthe time comes or what you will be doing at that time. Your curiosityextends to events, not to the soul.-------------------------------The projections of the future also determine the present moments. Thispresent moment could not be if there were no future moments. Only withthe support of future moments can the present moment occur. Our handsare resting on the shoulders of the future, our feet are on theshoulders of our past. It is very obvious that if that which is belowme -- on which I am standing and which I can see -- slips away, I willfall. But if the shoulders of the future -- on which my outstretchedhands are resting -- slip away then I will also fall.When a person finds himself connected with this inner unity of pastand future he will be able to understand astrology. Then astrologybecomes a religion, then astrology becomes spiritual.=======================Dridhadridha = Semi-Essential=======================I will tell you a very interesting story so that you mayunderstand.... Mohammed had a disciple named Ali. Ali once askedMohammed's opinion about whether a man is independent and free to dowhat he wants, or whether he is bound by his destiny in everything hedoes. Ali asked, "Can one do as one wants or not?" -- and man hasbeen asking this question for a long, long time. "If a man is not ableto do as he desires," Ali said, "then it is useless and foolish topreach to him not to steal, not to tell lies, not to be dishonest. Oris it destiny that one man should always be there to preach to othersnot to steal or not to do this or that, knowing full well that it isalso destiny for a dishonest man to remain dishonest, for a thief toremain a thief, for a murderer to remain a murderer? All this appearsabsurd. If everything is predestined, all education is useless -- allprophets, all saints and all teachers are useless."People have asked such questions to Mahavira and to Buddha also. Ifwhat is going to happen is predestined, why should Mahavira or Buddhatake so much trouble to explain what is right and what is wrong? So,Ali asked Mohammed what he thought about this controversial matter. Ifsuch a question was asked to Mahavira or Buddha, they would have givena very complicated and deep reply, but Mohammed gave a reply which Alicould understand. Many of Mohammed's replies were direct andstraightforward. Ordinarily, answers given by people who areuneducated or less educated, or who are simple villagers, are directand frank. People like Kabir, Nanak, Mohammed and Jesus were simple inthat way. Answers by people like Buddha, Mahavira and Krishna werecomplex -- Buddha and Mahavira were the cream of a rich and highlydeveloped civilization. The words of Jesus were direct, like a blow onthe head. Kabir has actually sung: "Kabir is standing in the openmarket with a hammer in his hand to hit you!" If anyone came near himhe would, so to speak, break open his head to remove all the rubbishthat was lying inside.Mohammed did not give any metaphysical reply. He asked Ali to lift oneleg and stand on it. Ali had asked a question about whether a man isfree to do what he wants. Why should Ali stand on one leg? Mohammedsaid, "First lift one leg."Poor Ali lifted his left leg and stood there on one leg.Mohammed then asked him, "Now lift the right leg also."Ali was puzzled and asked how it was possible. Then Mohammed said, "Ifyou had wanted to, you could have lifted the right leg first, but nowyou cannot.... A man is always free to lift the first leg -- it can bewhichever he wants -- but no sooner has the first been lifted when theother becomes bound to the earth."With regard to the nonessential part of life, we are always free tolift the first leg. But once that is done it becomes a bondage for theessential part. We take steps that are nonessential, become entangled,and then we are not able to do the essential. So Mohammed said to Alithat he had all the freedom to lift the right or the left leg first.But once he exercised that freedom and lifted one left leg, he wasincapable of lifting the other leg. So freedom is there within certainlimits, but beyond those limits there is bondage.==================Adirdha = Non-Essential==================Aall ordinary astrologers are asked about nonessentials. An ordinary astrologer isasked questions like: "Shall we win the elections or not?" How are theelections connected with the moon and the stars? The ordinaryastrologer who replies, "Everything is predetermined, and no changes,not even as much as one inch, can be made," is making a false statement.On the other hand there is the rationalist. He says that nothing isconnected inevitably: whatsoever happens is coincidental,circumstantial and a matter of chance. There is no law, everything isanarchic. He is also making a false statement. ==================Back to the 3 Divisions=================== There is a law: A rationalist is never found so full of joy and blissas a buddha.The rationalist denies God, soul and religion with the help of logic,but he can never attain the joy of Mahavira. It is definite thatMahavira must have done something that earned him his joy, Buddha musthave done something that liberated him, and Krishna must also havedone something which made it possible for him to give out suchdistinctly unique magical notes through his flute.The real thing is the third, which is the quintessence of everything,which belongs to the innermost and which is absolutely predetermined.The more one moves toward one's center, the nearer one comes to theessential, predetermined part. As we move towards the periphery, wemove towards coincidence. The more we talk about external happenings,the more there is coincidence. When we talk about inner phenomena,things begin to appear scientific, as if based on a certain law, andthey become more and more decisive.Between these two conditions -- the essential and the peripheral --there is ample room for changes through the exercise of choice. Here,a person of knowledge makes the correct choice, while a person who iswithout knowledge, who is in the darkness of ignorance, drifts to hisdestiny. In darkness, circumstance catches hold of him.So there are three areas of life. In one area, that which is theessential core, everything is predetermined. Knowing this is knowingthe essence of astrology. In another area, that which is peripheral,everything is uncertain. To know this is to know the everydayunpredictable world. There is another area which is in the middle. Byknowing this, a person can save himself from trying to do theimpossible, and can do what is possible.********************************************************OK. That were the words of the Osho. Now do you want to look into the above sloka? And want to know what else, it say? In which way you are interested in astrology – In essential? Semi-essential? Non-essential?Hope to have many replays on the same.Love,Sreenadh , rk dash <arkaydash wrote:>> Interested? No, nobody is. Only you are. And what is your explanation for the French leave? > RK > > Sreenadh <sreesog wrote:> Hi All,> Why this group becomes inactive when I am not here. Is it that no > body is interested in astrology? Is it that you don't like this group? > With such good members with knowledge, this shouldn't happen to this > group. And will not happen I know. Come back and let us restart! > Love,> Sreenadh> > Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.