Attn: P. Kumar

[Guest guest]

Kindly clarify what time is considered as Time of Birth - when umbical cord is cut or when the baby is touched to the mother earth ( traditional or orthodox method ) or when the baby's first cry....( what if the baby does not cry ??? as it happened in a very closely known case where the baby did not cry for first few days..!!.).etc..

For in all this cases there is a perceptible time difference going by your logics of counting minutes & seconds..... a little clarification would us in understanding .....

 

with regards,

 

sreeram srinivas

 

 

 

On Behalf Of P.KumarSaturday, July 22, 2006 12:19 AMvedic astrology ; KNRaoJyotish Cc: Subject: Re: [KNRaoJyotish] Anwer to Question 2 - Attn: P. Kumar

 

 

You wrote:"...Sri KN Rao takes the 5th house as well since the 5th house is the house of intelligence."No, Shri K.N.Rao takes 'primarily' the 5th house for education and not 'as well'.Then you wrote:"It is not primarily the house of education but of ones intelligence which is so important for education."Is it not your own verdict ? Further, it lacks astrological contents.Now see the conditions and pre-qualifications I had referred to:1) Before posing such queries, correctness of a chart must be assured or helpful hints must be provided for rectification. That is why I always ask for 'source of TOB' and 'margin of error possible'. From Rasi to Shashtyamsha every chart has its own importance. Shashtyamsha changes every 2 minutes. Thus, need of rectification can never be undermined.2) The person posing such queries and commenting on responses received must be a good astrologer himself. Only then a person can appreciates the depth of astrology and will never comment on an analysis the way you had commented on the one given by Sreenivas. I consider it quite misguiding and hence most irresposible. Most persons deviate from basics and start justifying the events on any given chart as though giving astrological prediction is a child's play. One should always stick to basics, follow undisputed classical dictums and apply sound common sense. I always try to stick to basics illustration of which can be seen in my article on the website of respected Shri K.N.Rao at the link given below:http://www.journalofastrology.com/ARTICLES/professional_crises.htmP.Kumar - Vinay Kumar KNRaoJyotish Friday, July 21, 2006 10:25 PM[KNRaoJyotish] Anwer to Question 2 - Attn: P. KumarDear Kumar,4th house is the house of formal education. You can refer to anyclassic and it will say 4th house as the house of formal education. Ido know that Sri KN Rao takes the 5th house as well since the 5thhouse is the house of intelligence. It is not primarily the house ofeducation but of ones intelligence which is so important foreducation. So when the 5th house or the 5th lord is strong that alsofurthers education. In this way the 5th can also be used for educationand it is not wrong. Remember that a graha in the 5th house has anargala (intervention) on the 4th house, meaning that for goodeducation (4th house) the 5th house of intelligence is important. Abenefic in the 5th (Mercury, Guru) is a boon for good education. Apartfrom this the 3rd house can be taken for education up to the basic orprimary level. The 9th house can be taken for education of the highestlevel, like Phd, doctorates etc.Agreed that an instance or two of correct predictions is not enough,but at least Sreeram made a start. My compliments for him were onlyfor this question which he got it right. I personally do not know ofhow many such correct predictions he has given; or his depth of theunderstanding of the subject or his talent in vast field of Jyotish.BTW what are the conditions and pre-qualifications necessary forposting queries like the one that I did?Regards,Vinay

..