Moon lagna, Classic support

[Guest guest]

Dear Shree Shreenadh,

I went back to msg 635. I had missed it. The questions in re to

which you posted these answers have many others in their league, and

we will have to take them up one by one as Panditji suggest in his

post. And that will be no small task if we are to renew the subject

(our own astrologies) going back to the right source and go about it

systematically.

 

[Vinita, Shree Shreenadh is right in insisiting on 'systematic'.

`Scientific' has been appropriated by the loosy-goosy astrology

which hundreds of practising Indian astrologers of 21-century India

are presiding over.]

 

 

Now, consider this:

 

" ...We apply both these conditions to Lagna sign and Moon sign,

which ever is getting more points are considered stronger (more

important). So here the traditional answer is pretty clear. Other

related relevant (but not that important) points to remember -

* Lagna is important as far as body is concerned.

* The importance of Mo increases as the years (age) increases. "

 

YOu say the importance of Moon increases with yrs of age. Is that

supported by classics?

 

Because Moon lagna vs Udaya lagna is not something easily resolved?

 

I will furnish some example charts soon.

 

RK

[Guest guest]

Dear RK ji, Proceed It is my pleasure to hear that. You are hinting at a really valid point. There is some ideas connected with, which needs to be clarified (or straightened) through discussion and study of charts among all of us. ==> YOu say the importance of Moon increases with yrs of age. <== I have Malayalam slokas but yet to find the related Sanskrit verses - but there should be / and I hope would be But first things first - so let us discuss the first point of ascertaining or comparing the strength of Lagna sign and Moon sign first and then only we will consider those secondary points Love, Sreenadh arkaydash <arkaydash wrote: Dear Shree Shreenadh,I went back to msg 635. I had missed it.

The questions in re to which you posted these answers have many others in their league, and we will have to take them up one by one as Panditji suggest in his post. And that will be no small task if we are to renew the subject (our own astrologies) going back to the right source and go about it systematically. [Vinita, Shree Shreenadh is right in insisiting on 'systematic'. `Scientific' has been appropriated by the loosy-goosy astrology which hundreds of practising Indian astrologers of 21-century India are presiding over.] Now, consider this:"...We apply both these conditions to Lagna sign and Moon sign, which ever is getting more points are considered stronger (more important). So here the traditional answer is pretty clear. Other related relevant (but not that important) points to remember -* Lagna is important as far as body is concerned.* The importance of Mo increases as the years (age)

increases."YOu say the importance of Moon increases with yrs of age. Is that supported by classics? Because Moon lagna vs Udaya lagna is not something easily resolved?I will furnish some example charts soon.RK