Guest guest Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 Respected Seniors Forums are true to be meant in persuit of the truth, understand and absorb. These are virtual class rooms. WE are proud to have this forum as a step towards subject. 2. Here prior knowledge to express, question and follow at its own pace is a requisite. 3. There is much more of service to this science, if we collaborate together at a place, physically, move further to our set objectives, every week/fortnight, try to make a goal for the next 52 weeks, 104 weeks.. 4. The bigger the scope and depth of the subject, more systematic and professional methods are appreciated. Regards JYO - " Sreenadh " <sreesog Friday, May 26, 2006 11:28 AM Re: Number of issues > Dear Arjun ji, > That was very good observations and I agree with it. > Love, > Sreenadh > > , " panditarjun2004 " > <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > > > namaste bharat ji > > > > before we talk of sreenadh ji's classes, i wish to put few of my > > observations: > > > > 1. institutions like ICAS, Bharatiya Vidya Bhawan and SJC have > > contributed a lot in spreading the light of jyotish to aspiring > > astro students since ages. however, they are institutes and > lessons > > are taught like a curriculum. few individual heroes of modern > > jyotish too have produced thousands of students on their own. > > > > 2. jyotish is such a kind of subject that it cannot be taught like > > other subjects or read from books. it is best learnt in a two way > > interface or in a open house discussion between many students. in > > such manner a student get answers to all his 1001 doubts and learn > > the subject FULLY without any gaps. > > > > 3. sreenadh ji and his group is found as one such source where > there > > is no nonsense which creeps in other groups and jyotish alone is > > discussed here SERIOUSLY in a friendly manner with everyone trying > > to be as humble a student to learn as much. there is another such > > serious group but i found so much sycophancy and if the so called > > gurus does not have answers, the queries are just ignored and even > > the reminders are just ignored whereas in this group, all queries > > get answered and if one does not have an answer members strive to > > search for an answer and if he fails to find one, he would go to > the > > extent of exploring new logics/answers or invent new logics/answers > > and put before the audience. > > > > unlike the gurukool system, unlike the school type sysem, this free > > open house way of spreading jyotish or learning jyotish is ideal > for > > today's man. > > > > in case sreenadh ji cant find time for your noble idea of a free > > class in delhi, it would be a better idea if we all collectively > > start learning the jyotish again " from scratch " with all our 1001 > > doubts getting cleared in that learning process. > > > > with best wishes > > pandit arjun > > > > , " Bharat Hindu > > Astrology " <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaskaar Sri Arjun > > > > > > I have offered place for starting of classes in Delhi whenever > Sri > > Sreenadh > > > is back here. He still waits for everyone's response. > > > > > > I hope the classes can start. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear sreenadh ji > > > > > > > > the way you explain rules in simple and easily understandable > way > > > > makes you an ideal teacher. if and when you decide to teach > > > > astrology, i would be your first student. > > > > > > > > could you please advise is there any way to figure out the total > > > > number of children for a 'man' from one wife or two wives or how > > > > many children from each wife. > > > > > > > > for example, one person has two wives. he begets three children > > > > from 1st wife and two children from the second wife. does his > > chart > > > > suggests that he would be having a total of five children along > > with > > > > the genders of the children. what if a person like osama bin > > laden > > > > having a dozen wives and several dozens of children. does that > > big > > > > figure fits in the formulae mentioned by you. > > > > > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > pandit arjun > > > > > > > > , " Sreenadh " > > > > > > > > <sreesog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Panditji, > > > > > Any amsa should be a continuous counting from Aries. As you > > can > > > > see > > > > > in the case of Navamsa it is clear. > > > > > => > > > > > > Is this kind of counting done anywhere where the use of the > > > > navashas > > > > > > traversed is mentioned in tha classics ? > > > > > <= > > > > > You mean the countining mentioning Chara-sthira-dwiswabhava > > > > > variation. I thik there is probably a sloka in Prasnamarga. > > (Have > > > > to > > > > > check) > > > > > The counting is just a technique to get Navamsa position in > an > > > > easy > > > > > method and it is not necessory that Rishi horas should mention > > > > them, > > > > > even after stating that is 1/9th of a sign (Navamsa). > > > > > We can see planty of places where navamsa is used in Rishi > > horas. > > > > I > > > > > will give some examples in some other mail, quoting those > > slokas. > > > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > P.S. Lets do the same exercise for number of siblings. > > > > > <= > > > > > Not much difference - It is the same method used to find the > > > > number > > > > > of children. One just need to change the significator, house > > etc - > > > > > that is all. > > > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > Also,lets discuss the > > > > > > SAV points to do the same calculations > > > > > <= > > > > > > > > > > I am not an expert in SAV and is still in search, who created > > > > this > > > > > Ashtavarga system? If you discuss it I will listen. > > > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > Sreenadh > > > > > , Panditji > > > > > <navagraha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Navansha in each sign starts > > > > > > > > > > > > Same sign for chara > > > > > > 9th from the sign in sthir and > > > > > > 5th from the sign in dwiswabaha. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this kind of counting done anywhere where the use of the > > > > navashas > > > > > > traversed is mentioned in tha classics ? > > > > > > > > > > > > This technique like you said is not foolproof, and will not > > work > > > > if > > > > > one had > > > > > > more than 7-8 kids. As number of navashas traversed will be > > 12 > > > > max > > > > > and then > > > > > > when one takes out malefic signs and malefic planets out of > > it, > > > > it > > > > > would be > > > > > > tough to get more than a few kids. > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. Lets do the same exercise for number of siblings. > > Also,lets > > > > > discuss the > > > > > > SAV points to do the same calculations > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, sree nadh <sreesog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Panditji, > > > > > > > => > > > > > > > > In your example of navansh, you said 2 male children ( > > Li > > > > and > > > > > Sg) is it > > > > > > > because li > > > > > > > > and Sg are odd and hence male signs ? > > > > > > > <= > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > > > Secondly, For sthir sign the counting starts from 9th > ( > > Is > > > > it > > > > > because > > > > > > > of badhaka sign > > > > > > > > for sthir rashi is 9th from it ? What the logic behind > > this > > > > > counting ?) > > > > > > > <= > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No - it is not conected to the badhaka concept. Navamsa > > > > couting > > > > > technique > > > > > > > is a simplefied version of Rx9 maths that is fundamental > to > > > > > Navamsa. I will > > > > > > > explain. > > > > > > > For Aries how many Navamsas are there? 9 right? For Aries > > > > > Navamsha count > > > > > > > starts from Aries and ends in Sg. So where shold the > > counting > > > > of > > > > > Navamsha > > > > > > > for Tarus should start? From the next sign Cp right? This > > Cp > > > > is > > > > > the 9th from > > > > > > > Tarus, that is just co-insidance. So for Tarus the > > conting > > > > > starts from Cp > > > > > > > and ends in Virgo, sice only 9 amsas are there. The next > > sign > > > > is > > > > > Ge. For > > > > > > > geminy from where the counting should start? The sign > next > > to > > > > > Virgo - right? > > > > > > > So fo Ge the counting starts from Libra. Now Libra is the > > 5th > > > > > from Gemini, > > > > > > > that is just co-insidance. So the actual concept > behind > > is : > > > > > > > Navamsa is the 9th paripriti (harmonic) of Rasi. > > > > > > > If anyone what to find in which sign navamsa falls he > > can > > > > > simply use > > > > > > > the formula > > > > > > > R x9 as well. > > > > > > > Fro example, If Mo is in 7th degree of Aries, then, > > > > > > > 7 deg x 9 = 63 deg > > > > > > > Every body knows that a sign is 30 deg and there fore 63 > > deg > > > > > should fall > > > > > > > in Gemini. Or in otherwords 7 deg aries is the 3rd > > Navamsa > > > > and > > > > > it, ranges > > > > > > > from 6 deg 40 min to 10 deg 00 min in Aries, and is > > alotted to > > > > > Gemini > > > > > > > for navamsa rulership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This kind of mixing of the charecteristics of the signs > is > > the > > > > > fundamental > > > > > > > concept behind astrology. That is why parasara said about > > > > Hora - > > > > > > > " Parivritti dwayam tesham meshadou kremaso vadet " > > > > > > > Hora is the second harmonic of Rasi (R x 2) > > > > > > > And about Drekkana - > > > > > > > " Parivritti treyam tesham meshadou kremaso vadet " > > > > > > > Drekkana is the third harmonic of Rasi (R x 3) > > > > > > > Yes, this kind of mixing of the charecteristics of Rasis > > is > > > > the > > > > > concept > > > > > > > behind Dwadasa varga system.And Navamsa is the 9th Varga > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > > > Sreenadh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Panditji <navagraha@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Sreenadhji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In your example of navansh, you said 2 male children ( Li > > and > > > > Sg) > > > > > is it > > > > > > > because li and Sg are odd and hence male signs ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, For sthir sign the counting starts from 9th ( > Is > > it > > > > > because of > > > > > > > badhaka sign for sthir rashi is 9th from it ? What the > > logic > > > > > behind this > > > > > > > counting ?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about counting for Char and dwiswabhav rashis ? Where > > > > does > > > > > the > > > > > > > counting begin ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, sree nadh <sreesog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Panditji, > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > > > > When you say navansha of 5th lord, meaning the > > number > > > > of > > > > > signs > > > > > > > > traversed by 5th > > > > > > > > > lord from the rashi position ? i.e. If 5th lord is in > > > > cancer > > > > > and in > > > > > > > > dhanu navansha, it > > > > > > > > > has traversed 6 placed. > > > > > > > > <= > > > > > > > > Yes. But well I would calrify. Think that for Ta > > Lagna > > > > the > > > > > 5th lord > > > > > > > > Me is in Aq, and the Me Navamsa is in Cp. Since Aq is a > > > > sthira > > > > > sign Navamsa > > > > > > > > counting starts from 9th sign Li, which means that Me > is > > in > > > > the > > > > > 4th Navamsa. > > > > > > > > So the navamsa that should be considered are total 4 in > > > > number - > > > > > Li, Sc, Sg > > > > > > > > and Cp. Out of this Sc and Cp are owned by malifics and > > > > should > > > > > be > > > > > > > > discarded. The remaining are Li and Sg navamsas which > > > > indicates > > > > > 2 male > > > > > > > > children.(We need to see Li and Sg, if any malifics are > > > > placed > > > > > in those > > > > > > > > signs that also discarded) > > > > > > > > I think this method is pretty simple and clear. > This > > is > > > > the > > > > > normal > > > > > > > > using style of this method. (If you want to use this > > method > > > > > this much is the > > > > > > > > authentic portion. What is given below is part of some > > > > > traditional advice) > > > > > > > > ----------------------------- > > > > > > > > But there is some thing special as well. Which can > > make > > > > it > > > > > complex. > > > > > > > > Normally it is discarded. It is given below. > > > > > > > > The problem with this method is - The ancients > (don't > > > > know > > > > > the exact > > > > > > > > ref) give a single rule for counting of Navmsa. Apart > > from > > > > the > > > > > two ancient > > > > > > > > methods - > > > > > > > > 1) Normal number of Navamsa (If planet in 9th degree > it > > is > > > > in > > > > > 3rd > > > > > > > > Navamsa etc) - Well agreed and standard method > > > > > > > > 2) Always strarting from Aries > > > > > > > > They give the following possibilities also for > counting - > > > > > > > > They say - " Sweche va, swaketre va, swa skane va, swa > > neecha > > > > > > > > va " , meaning this counting of of Navasa can be - > > > > > > > > 1) From its sign of exaltation > > > > > > > > 2) From its own sign > > > > > > > > 3) From the sign in which the planet is placed. > > > > > > > > 4) From its sign of debilitation. > > > > > > > > If the standard method fails or seems to fail we are > > > > adviced > > > > > to follow > > > > > > > > this, as per the situation and intution. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > > > When you say if the graha is in own sign multiply the > > > > number > > > > > by 2 , if > > > > > > > > in exaltation multiply by 3. Do you mean multiply the > > number > > > > > contributed by > > > > > > > > itself by 2 or 3. That is any planet can at most give 3 > > > > issues > > > > > if in 5th > > > > > > > > house or aspecting the 5th house. > > > > > > > > <= > > > > > > > > Yes. An exalted planet aspecting 3 can give a maximum > > of 3 > > > > > issues - it > > > > > > > > is the normal meaning. But the other meaning is also > > present > > > > > there. In some > > > > > > > > situations, we may have to multiply the the total > number > > of > > > > > children we > > > > > > > > calculated with 2 or 3, depending on own house > placemnet > > or > > > > > exaltation of > > > > > > > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > => > > > > > > > > > If an exalted natural malefic is in 5th house he > does > > not > > > > > contribute > > > > > > > > to the total, is > > > > > > > > > this what you mean. > > > > > > > > <= > > > > > > > > Yes. But this benefic malific clasification is a > > problem. > > > > > Think of the > > > > > > > > situation when Su is in Leo (its own house) for Aries > > Lagna > > > > can > > > > > we say that > > > > > > > > no children would be born? But the exalted Ma in 5th > > sign Cp > > > > > for Virgoa > > > > > > > > Lagna it is true. The exalted Ma in 5th sign Cp for > > Virgoa > > > > > Lagna will cause > > > > > > > > untimely death of child (since it is 8th lord as well), > > but > > > > it > > > > > can give > > > > > > > > issues as well (Ma is consider karaka for son by some!). > > > > What > > > > > would be your > > > > > > > > openion about exalted Sa placed in 5th for Ge Lagna? > > That Sa > > > > > neither will > > > > > > > > contribute to the total nor will cause death of child > > even > > > > > though it is 8th > > > > > > > > lord. Thus it goes. Too many specila rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > > > > Sreenadh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Panditji <navagraha@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Sreenadhji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you say navansha of 5th lord, meaning the number of > > > > signs > > > > > traversed > > > > > > > > by 5th lord from the rashi position ? i.e. If 5th lord > > is in > > > > > cancer and > > > > > > > > in dhanu navansha, it has traversed 6 placed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you say if the graha is in own sign multiply the > > number > > > > by > > > > > 2 , if > > > > > > > > in exaltation multiply by 3. Do you mean multiply the > > number > > > > > contributed by > > > > > > > > itself by 2 or 3. That is any planet can at most give 3 > > > > issues > > > > > if in 5th > > > > > > > > house or aspecting the 5th house. If an exalted natural > > > > malefic > > > > > is in 5th > > > > > > > > house he does not contribute to the total, is this what > > you > > > > > mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Sreenadh <sreesog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Panditji, > > > > > > > > > There are many methods, but most of them does not > > seems to > > > > > give the > > > > > > > > > correct result, may be also due to the influence of > > will, > > > > > because we > > > > > > > > > can stop preganacy at any time. But still I will try > to > > > > state > > > > > some of > > > > > > > > > the popular methods that are in use. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Number of children > > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > > > > 1) Count the navamsa of the 5th lord. Avoid the signs > > > > owned by > > > > > > > > > malific planets, and the signs in which malifics are > > > > placed. > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > remaining number will give the number of children. > > > > > > > > > 2) The same method as told above taking the Ju > instead > > of > > > > 5th > > > > > lord. > > > > > > > > > 3) The total number of bebefic planets that aspects > > > > (Drishti) > > > > > the 5th > > > > > > > > > house + the total number of benefic planets that is > > placed > > > > in > > > > > the 5th > > > > > > > > > house can give the total number of children. But if > the > > > > > planet is in > > > > > > > > > own house you need to multiply the number by two and > > if it > > > > is > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > exaltation you need to multiply the number by three. > > [This > > > > > method is > > > > > > > > > very difficult to apply properly, due to many special > > > > rules > > > > > connected > > > > > > > > > with]. But as arjun ji pointed out, the planets > placed > > in > > > > 5th > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > aspecting 5th has much importance in determining the > > > > number of > > > > > > > > > children. > > > > > > > > > 4) The number of planets placed between 5th house > > (=sign) > > > > and > > > > > 5th > > > > > > > > > lord can indicate the number of children. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But in general, in total astrology, there does not > > seems > > > > to > > > > > be any > > > > > > > > > systematic and generally applied to calculate numbers, > > > > > amounts, > > > > > > > > > persentage etc, that gives correct results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Male/Female determination > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > > > > > > > We have to depend on Male/Female classification of > > signs > > > > and > > > > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > > > > > Sreenadh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > > > > > , " panditarjun2004 " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear pandit ji > > > > > > > > > > namaste > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my understanding (open to correction or addition) > is > > as > > > > > follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. all odd signs are male signs and all even signs > > are > > > > > female > > > > > > > > > > signs. so the 5th house is first seen whether it > > has a > > > > > male or > > > > > > > > > > female sign. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. sun, mars, jupiter are reckoned as male giving > > > > planets. > > > > > moon, > > > > > > > > > > venus, mercury and saturn are reckoned as female > > giving > > > > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. taurus, leo, virgo and scorpio signs in 5th > house > > are > > > > > considered > > > > > > > > > > giving less and delayed children. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. the number of children is obtained by finding out > > > > which > > > > > planet > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > in 5th house. for example sun in 5H gives one son. > > > > moon > > > > > in 5H > > > > > > > > > > gives one daughter. mars in 5H gives three sons. > > > > mercury > > > > > in 5H > > > > > > > > > > gives two daughters. jupiter in 5H can give up to 5 > > > > sons. > > > > > venus > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > 5H can give up to 7 daughters. saturn in 5H can > give > > > > > maximum > > > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > of 8 daughters. in rare cases, saturn in 5H also > > gives > > > > son > > > > > if the > > > > > > > > > > 5th lord is a male planet and is aspected by a male > > > > planet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. rahu can cause miscarriages while ketu can give > > > > premature > > > > > > > > > > (underdeveloped) babies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. to arrive at the total number of children the > > sign of > > > > > 5H, number > > > > > > > > > > of planets in 5H, number of planets aspecting 5H and > > > > lastly > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > of planets in conjunction with 5th lord are > reckoned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. first child is seen from 5H, second child from > 7H, > > > > third > > > > > child > > > > > > > > > > from 9H etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. some researchers have written books stating that > > 3rd > > > > > house also > > > > > > > > > > denotes children and have given how many children > > each > > > > > planet in > > > > > > > > > 3rd > > > > > > > > > > house gives. but i dont know the logic behind this > > and > > > > > hence not > > > > > > > > > > mentioning them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9. D-7 or saptamamsha is also seen for calculating > > the > > > > > number of > > > > > > > > > > children. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10. lastly, in my experience all the above are to be > > > > seen > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > > mother's chart for it is the mother who gives > > children > > > > and > > > > > not the > > > > > > > > > > father. this is based on various reasons. also in > > > > bigamy > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > polygamy a man begets children from several wives > > and in > > > > > those > > > > > > > > > cases > > > > > > > > > > also each mother's chart is seen for the number of > > > > children > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > their gender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > > > > > > > pandit arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > Panditji > > > > > > > > > > <navagraha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wanted start a new discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How can we judge from a kundali how many issues > > will > > > > be > > > > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have never gotten a good reading of this vexing > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are things like looking at influence on 5th > > > > house > > > > > and 5th > > > > > > > > > > lord. # male > > > > > > > > > > > graha influence = # male issues, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyoner done a comprehensive study of this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. It may be a moot point in this day and age > > when > > > > most > > > > > middel > > > > > > > > > > class > > > > > > > > > > > people have no more than two. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.