Navamsha -To Manish

[Guest guest]

Manish, The example cited by you is an astrological impossibility. Regarding your first query , I don't exactly understand the question. Please make it a bit more explicit. Best Wishes Madhu N Nair Manish Mahajan <manish1380 wrote: Hello Madhu Ji,I am a beginner in astrology and the explanation given by you in a simple but elaborate way is very helpful in understanding Navamsha.I still have a doubt regarding navamsha:Do we consider the house in Navamsha or is it only the sign the planet is placed in, has relevance ?For example ,If moon as seventh lord is neecha in rashi but uccha in navamsha andnavamsha has scorpio lagna then how do we interpret moon's impact onmarried

life.Thanks,Manish , VYASAJI<vyasatvm wrote:>> Dear Dhanapal,> I will try to answer to my best of my ability purely on the basisof experience rather than what is given in the Rule book(read Textbook) .In Kerala, especially, well known and highly respected genuinescholars in Astrology of the old generation like Paravoor SreedharanTantri , and the stalwarts of the modern era like Trikunna puzhaUdayakumar etc are seen evaluating the D-9 in the following way,especially in prasna (Obviously they might be interpreting in the samemanner in Horoscopes too)> Consider Aries as the Ascendant. Suppose a planet is in 7* inAries. Then, they say in Malayalam " Lagnathinthay munnilamshichirikunnu " That means, the planet begets an amsa in the 3rdfrom the Ascendant. I haven't seen them attaching

any specialimportance to Navamsa Lagna.Navamsa chart has no independentexistence and should be read along with Rasi chart. However, they useto treat the dispositor of a Rasi lord at par with the Bhava Lord asreckoned from the Ascendant.. I will elaborate. Usually they say likethis "Lagnathipano Lagnathipantay Amsakadhipano " That means "eitherthe Ascendant Lord or its Navamsa dispositor". Suppose Aries is theAscendant and Mars is in Aries with a longitude of 4* , that means,the navamsa dispositor of Mars is Venus. Whilst discussing theAscendant lord and its implication, they invariably takes into accountits navamsa dispositor, ie Venus. > Now regarding the question of Aspects in Divisional Charts > Let me tell you from experience that Aspects apply exclusively toRasi and definitely not to Divisional charts. Unfortunately acommentator of BPHS (SC Mishra)in one of his

articles says aspectsare equally true in divisions. This is not borne out of experience.Anyone repeat anyone who interprets the divisional charts with aspectsare just misguiding the gullible.A counter question should be posed toprotagonist of aspects in Divisional charts "What about aspects inHora chart" They will find their tongue tied.> Let me share my experience in Navamsa. I have seen planet in Fallin Navamsa or planet in Navamsa that forms 2/12 or 6/8 relationshipwith the major period in Navamsa adversely affecting married life.This scribe has got the good fortune to study hundreds of horoscopes of Gulf wives.(wives of poor workers hailing from kerala toiling inMiddle East and who are not in a position to take their wives withthem ) In many (not a Thumb rule) one could find the MD forming 2/12relation with the sub period(s)> operating.Regarding

Yogas in Navamsa , there is a concept "Rasithulya Navamsa " That is , Navamsa is equivalent to Rasi chart (Don'tmisunderstand, D-9 has no independent existence and should always beread along with Rasi). If my memory is correct in the chart ofMohammed Ali, the famous boxing champion of yester years , you couldfind a yoga for parkinsonism in D-9.The point is D-9 often excels ormodify the indications of Rasi chart though it cannot overrideit.Retrogression & Direction of planets applies only to Rasi chart andnot to divisions.> Virgo is the inimical sign of Jupiter.> Hope this helps> Madhu N Nair > > Dhanapal T <tdhanapal_logic wrote:> Dear Sreenadh, Madhu ji and other dear beloved learned members,> > Thanks to all of you for sharing the vital knowledge and givingthe

beginners like us great indepth into the indian ancient astrology.I had some doubts in Navamsha and thought of posting them. I thinkthis is the right time to post:-). > > 1) What is the importance of Navamsha lagna? Is it only used forto verifty that horoscope is correct? (For ex:- Navamsha lagana inmale rasi for males and viceversa makes it clear that the horoscopepossibly correct).> > 2) In rasi, we give importance to the placements of the lagnalord, the fifth lord and the ninth lord. Same thing should beconsidered for 1,5,9 lords in Navamsha chart too?> > 3) Do we have to consider the dhristhi for all the planets? (Ex:For jupitor 5, 7,9 drishti is there in rasi chart. Same thingapplicable in Navamsha chart too?> > 4) Does Navamsha creates yogas too? In rasi, we

consider neechapanga yoga, Guru-mangal yoga etc., Same thing applicable in Navamsha too?> > 5) The discussion of this thread is "Navamsha for spouse". Whatexactly we have to look into the navamsha chart to see whether onereally has blessed married life? Then what is the focus to be given onsapthamsa chart (7th) different than Navamsha?> > 6) Does retrograde to planets applicable in Navamsha chart too?> > 7) What is the relationship does Jupitor have in Kanya(virgo)? Isit a friendly sign or enemy sign? One of the astrologer I met arguedthat it is enemy sign even though some of the books I read consider itas friendly sign.> > Please forgive me if they are too basic:-). I thought this is thecorrect forum to clear my doubts. I feel this will be useful to manyother

members here.> > Thank you,> Dhanapal> > > > > Sreenadh <sreesog wrote:> Dear Arjunji,> Navamsa gets double importance than any other Varga(Amsa) and that > is the reason for its importance. They are-> 1) It is 1/9 th of a Sign. So it is importance as a 'Rasyamsa'.> 2) It is 1/4 th of a star. (This forms the base of Sign and > Nakshatra divisions) So it is important as a 'Nakshatramsa'.> So at the same time Navamsa is Rasyamsa (Division of Sign), and > Nakshatramsa (Division of Star). To add to it -> 3) The luck (or destiny) of a person is what we are trying to > decipher using the whole horoscope. In the horoscope the 9th house > indicates Luck (Bhagya). There for 9th house is specially

important > in any horoscope. As per Dwadesa Varga system, the Varga that > indicates 9th house related matters is Navamsa (R x 9). This also > gives special importance to Navamsa.> It is due to the cumulative effect of all these that the saints gave > special importance to Navamsa. > Love,> Sreenadh> > > , "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote:> >> > dear pradeep ji> > > > besides what you mentioned, which is correct, navamsha is the only > > divional chart reckoned by all astrologers invariably before > > attempting any prediction. it is widely believed that a planet's > > strength increases or decreases from lagna chart when compared to > > its strength in navamsha. for example, if the strength of a planet > > in lagna chart is

zero and in navamsha it is five, the net strenght > > would be 2.5 and similarly if the strenght in lagna chart of a > > planet is 5 and in navamsha it is -5 the net strength would be zero.> > > > as sreenadhji observed in one mail, the above quantification is > only > > for simple understanding and not application of maths or any rules > > as such.> > > > we can discuss more on this important divisional chart, sreenadh ji > > willing.> > > > with best wishes> > pandit arjun> > > , "vijayadas_pradeep" > > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Respected members> > > > > > I am posting my understanding on the subject.Kindly verify.> > > > > > Spouse is sometimes termed as

PraanaSakhi(beloved companion of> > > Prana).Also Spouse is known as one half of Prana.Shiva and > Shakthi > > and> > > Ardhanareeshwara - any connection?.> > > > > > Now Navamshas represent Navapranas as per Dashadhyayi.> > > > > > Combining own understanding(can be wrong) with authentic words of> > > Thalakkulathu Bhattathiri(Dashadhyayi author) - relationship > > between> > > Navamsha and Spouse can be linked.> > > > > > Thus studying the navamsha sambandha of a graha on relevant > bhavas > > or> > > Karaka planets,as mentioned in Classics seems to be correct and > > pretty> > > clear than the contemporary understanding of Navamsha analysis.It > > is my> > > personal opinion and other learned members can very well >

disagree.> > > > > > Thanks> > > Pradeep> > >> >> > > > > > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. > >