Pramod Mahajan Predictions on Vrishabha Lagna/Sarva Shri K.N.Rao & Madhu Nair

[Guest guest]

Dear Respected members

 

Shri K.N.Raoji had predicted the following on the 24th of April.He is

taking 1948,but Vrisha as Lagna.

Madhu Nair ji had also predicted death,again with Vrisha Lagna but year

as 1949.Chandrashekhar ji had raised concern regarding lagna and

Physical apperance -Taurus looks appropriate.

 

On 24th me too had ''clearly explained'' the event based on Mithuna

Lagna ,proving again that any past event can be ''explained clearly''

using any horoscope.If we use ''divisional horoscopes'' as well,one can

write essays.

 

Myself aadded that,if horoscope is correct ,3 planets in kendra & lagna

lord in exaltation, guarantees longevity.Thus i feel Mithuna Lagna is

not correct.

 

Most importantly - One gets a feeling - Whom to believe regarding

Celebrity horoscopes and their authenticities !!!!

 

Kind regds

Pradeep

>

>

>

> knrao [k_n_rao]

> Montag, 24. April 2006 13:44

> Vijayadas, Pradeep Kumar

> Re: Pramod Mahajan

>

> Pradeep,

> As usual five horoscopes are circulating but the one with the

> following details seem to be reliable:

> 30 Oct 948

> 19/51

> Mahboobnagar

> Lagna Vrisha 17/39

> Moon in Kanya 21/35

> It is the end of story for him. If he survives 27/28 April he drag on

for four months at most if this horoscope is correct.

> K.N.Rao

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep ji,

You said:

> Most importantly - One gets a feeling - Whom to believe regarding

> Celebrity horoscopes and their authenticities !!!!

I would suggest the learned astrologers who are/were doing special

research in that field. B V Raman, Madhu ji many such are there who

is especially interested in this - and we can count and improve on

their efforts and collected data.

If we consider transit forecast

1)I feel the methods empolyed by Madhu ji needs special attention.

2) In transit prediction of future related to countries, war,

natural calamities etc the efforts of " Janardana Kurup " of Kerala

(Editor of Ksheerapatham tri-monthly) specially impressed me.

3) Chandrahari provides a global frame work for predicting the

events related to any country - a result of much study and pondering.

4) There are other scholars like " Noname " who writes in other groups

who specialises in predicting natural calamities. (I don't have much

idea about the methods he uses, but he seems to mystify it too much)

All these demands attention. There are many more who are

concentrating in this field.

We can count/learn/improve based on their efforts - But yes, never

ever forget the path shown by the creators of this system of

astrology, the saints.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Respected members

>

> Shri K.N.Raoji had predicted the following on the 24th of April.He

is

> taking 1948,but Vrisha as Lagna.

> Madhu Nair ji had also predicted death,again with Vrisha Lagna but

year

> as 1949.Chandrashekhar ji had raised concern regarding lagna and

> Physical apperance -Taurus looks appropriate.

>

> On 24th me too had ''clearly explained'' the event based on Mithuna

> Lagna ,proving again that any past event can be ''explained

clearly''

> using any horoscope.If we use ''divisional horoscopes'' as well,one

can

> write essays.

>

> Myself aadded that,if horoscope is correct ,3 planets in kendra &

lagna

> lord in exaltation, guarantees longevity.Thus i feel Mithuna Lagna

is

> not correct.

>

> Most importantly - One gets a feeling - Whom to believe regarding

> Celebrity horoscopes and their authenticities !!!!

>

> Kind regds

> Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

> > knrao [k_n_rao]

> > Montag, 24. April 2006 13:44

> > Vijayadas, Pradeep Kumar

> > Re: Pramod Mahajan

> >

> > Pradeep,

> > As usual five horoscopes are circulating but the one with the

> > following details seem to be reliable:

> > 30 Oct 948

> > 19/51

> > Mahboobnagar

> > Lagna Vrisha 17/39

> > Moon in Kanya 21/35

> > It is the end of story for him. If he survives 27/28 April he

drag on

> for four months at most if this horoscope is correct.

> > K.N.Rao

> >

> >

> >

>