Case studies..??How To Test Softwares : Mundane Charts

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Jha - I trust I have generally been very respectful and earnest in

asking for the case studies( as the situation demnds generally)- and two times

you have agreed(BTW- I or any one is not demanding).

 

 

 

Just learn to take criticism than trying to kill the critic...NO one generally

has time to go against you or any one..

 

The case studies presented by you are fine, but a formatted presentation would

win you more people- they currently to me appear very diffused without the basic

ingredients like events, quantifying even in broad terms, and key the rules of

interpretation(now a request-kindly no philosophical dereliction on this..)

 

It should be a simple 1 hour effort for you...If you need my help I am there-

but I will ask you the same question about events,quantum(like heavy rainfall..)

and your rules of interpretation...

 

I am not sure- that despite positive encouragements- why do you get into

negative state.....

 

now if I am incapable..I don't know software...should not distract you from

doing the right things..From day one a basic doc is being asked for..with the

format discussed... & ..am not sure why do we get into bylanes....

 

You can deliver some value and I am for vedic technologies- that is the reason I

am still optimistic..You being a MONK, I expect even more optimism...as going

to GOD head should mean funeral of all sorrows ( I am not making fun of

you..so plz..)

 

 

I hope it explains..

 

This time you can e mail me the data/case studies at pankajdhar

 

 

Take care,

Punkajj

 

, " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan

wrote:

>

> Dear Vinay Ji,

>

> You have expressed a lot of doubts and misgivings in your message and other

postings too, earlier.

>

> Please do not waste your time in reaching out and placing your efforts on

Internet.

>

> As you have stated earlier, several times in different fora, you have

discovered nothing new, and also that promoting SS or proving its utility is not

your life's mission, which has many higher and different and higher spiritual

goals.

>

> Then why a detached, dispassionate individual like you is so passionate about

this software and method etc and cannot walk away from it all? All the abuse and

distraction that you get dragged into and all these people that you say are

trying to shut your voice down and so on.

>

> Why would one so knowledgeable and dedicated to higher causes as your postings

indicate that you are and someone who just 'knows' things at times and knows how

long he is going to live etc -- Why would one continue to return again and again

to the matter of this software and your hard work and valuable use of your time

and not be able to just walk away and focus on this book that you told us about

you were writing?

>

> Which writer or researcher in ANY faculty, science or non-science first polls

the future readers and gets their assurance before he starts doing or writing

down the research etc?

>

> The true pleasure and sense of accomplishment should arise from simply writing

what one believes in and must not be based on 'others' or how they perceive your

work or worth!

>

> Kuch jyaada bol gaya, Sir, to bhool chook leni deni!

>

> Modern human psyche is basically very paranoid, and full of disbelief because

it has survival value in our daily reality. Come morning most of us must return

to the concrete jungle and the harsh 'dog eat dog' reality and rat race! If

someone suddenly tries to switch the paradigm, they will meet with resistance!

>

> So, please do write but only if you can do so with happiness in your heart and

not worrying if someone will read every word you write, no matter how important

and personal to you, or even understand the words or say, " Thank you Jha Ji for

writing " or whatever.

>

> Please try it, it works ;-)

>

> RR

>

> , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > To All :

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Some members have demanded case studies. I am ready to present case

> > studies on internet provided they are read seriously and my time is not

> > wasted. But I need to clarify some points in this regard.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > I used to send annual rain forecasts to 615 weather scientists each

> > year, but this year I have not been able to do so although mesha

> > samkraanti elapsed one month ago. Case studies and biographical analyses

> > are secondary in my list of priorities than to a full English version of

> > Kundalee software. I made this software in Hindi, and translation into

> > Englisg was started recently. So far , only divisionals and varshaphala

> > have been translated. What is the use of case studies if the software is

> > incomplete in English ? Six months ago, I put 5 individual and some

> > mundane case studies in English my website in addition to nearly 70

> > mundane case studies in Hindi attached file, but nobody was interested

> > in mundane studies and individual case studies were neglected because I

> > followed the BPHS + Jaimini rules of death prediction which does not

> > work with physical astronomy. Many members want case studies which

> > could support their right or wrong belief in physical astronomy. When

> > they see Suryasiddhanta is working well with phalita rules of Rishis,

> > they either drop discussion or revert to tactics saying BPHS is not the

> > only method ! It is not honesty. BPHS is the only complete textbook of

> > phalita jyotisha propounded by a Rishi. When I saw some people wanted

> > case studies I presented such studies, 7 of them, but then they dropped

> > discussion without pointing at my errors or merits. I became convinced

> > they were not serious, hence I stopped making more case studies. I left

> > contributing to mysticboard, for which these case studies were

> > originally prepared and were later put at my website.

> >

> > In the meantime, due to a lapse of my technician, some wrong version of

> > DLL files were attached to my software which created installion

> > problems to nearly 15-20 persons. I had to completely reinstall my

> > Windows OS as well as software making platform Visual Studio and had to

> > recompile Kundalee afresh. I have rectified these version differences,

> > and the current version of Kundalee is fit for all versions of XP and

> > Win98.

> >

> > These problems were augmented by my mundane other problems and

> > assignments. I will present case studies when I get leisure, because I

> > am sure 7 case studies rotting at my website are not being studied by

> > those who want more case studies. The proposal of 10 case studies was

> > originally from Mr Pankaj Dhar whose language was a proof of his lack of

> > interest in my work : he said it is " my duty " to prove my point and

> > therefore I should present 10 case studies comparing results of my

> > software with those of other. Why should I try to prove other software

> > makers wrong ? Will it not make all of them hostile to me? I said I will

> > increase the number of case studies but I will not compare my results

> > with those from other softwares : after this Mr pankaj Dhar lost

> > interest in my work. At present you are the only person who is demanding

> > case studies. Why 7 case studies presently at my website since Dec 2008

> > cannot be regarded as " case studies " is not clear to me. I will need

> > only one day to add extra 3 case studies to complete 10 case studies

> > demanded by two members in JR (none of whom has installed Kundalee). But

> > I will never abuse other software makers, and unless I abuse them, my

> > case studies will not be read at all !! Why you do not see this point ?

> > Some people do not want case studies, they want me to stop my creative

> > works and fight with all software makers of the world by proving them

> > wrong !

> >

> > I sent individual case studies to many persons. None of them is ready to

> > discuss the good or bad points in my case studies, just because

> > planetary positions of Kundalee differ from physical astronomy. They are

> > under an oath never to discuss a chart with me ASTROLOGICALLY.

> >

> > Only real software developers like PVR and Shyam Kansal ji are

> > sympathetic and unbiased : they know the shortcomings of modern

> > softwares and are doing their best to find ways to remove these

> > shortcomings. Shyam Kansal ji is the pioneer in software on

> > Ashtakavargas, and when he found the team of Sreenadh falsely charging

> > me of making an " uninstallable " software based on an " outdated "

> > siddhaanta, he stepped in to report that he faced no difficulty in

> > installing Kundalee and found that no other software dealt with

> > Ashtakavargas more exhaustively than Kundalee. But such verdicts by a

> > pioneer vedic software developer made no impact on AIA managers.

> >

> > Over half of my time is wasted on useless theoretical discussions or

> > diversions. I wanted comparative discussion of charts, but I found no

> > one is interested in it. Only I am expected to make case studies and

> > comparative studies and only I will read my case studies. Why 7 case

> > studies rotting at my website for over 6 months cannot be regarded as

> > case studies ? I

> >

> > I started biographical study of Napoleon, but stopped the work when one

> > senior member in JR said that birthtime of celebrities are doubtful.

> > Why they want to waste my time with biographical studies when they will

> > not read those studies ? I know birthdata of most of Indian celebrities

> > are deliberate falsehoods, but same is not the casewith well researched

> > foerign celebrities.

> >

> >

> > Hence, the best method for comparing various schools is mundane case

> > studies : I have over two hundred case studies in this field, which has

> > no uncertainties like birthtime errors, because time of chart is

> > determined by solar transits into raashis or nakshatras. Moreover, I can

> > present comparative case studies in this field too, because there will

> > be no need to compare astrological softwares made by others. 136 years

> > of official annual rainfall data is availabe on a monthly basis. Change

> > the year beginning with January to year beginning with April, and

> > compare annual rainfall data with Mesha Samkraanti charts of India.

> > Analysis of only one raashi is enough in this case, becase we need to

> > analyse only that raashi in which India falls in the Prithvi Chakra.

> >

> > Repeat same exercize for 55 years of economic growth data presented in

> > Economic Survey of central finance ministers : these data are already

> > presented in year beginning from April and can be easily compared with

> > Varsha-pravesh charts of India on nirayana mesha Samkraanti. Analysis of

> > only 11th house is needed in this case.

> >

> > Internet astrologers are not interested in mundane astrology, hence I am

> > not translating my Hindi case studies into English. But whether internet

> > people read my case studies or not, I will certainly put them on my

> > websites gradually.

> >

> > I translated one year's forecasts made by a HOD on world and by me on

> > India and put it at following webpage : Click_Here

> > <http://jyotirvidya.wetpaint.com/page/World+Economy+%3A+Apr+2009-Mar+201\

> > 0> . I will have to translate my whole mundane software into English

> > for making English case studies. Before I joined forums, I did not

> > know Indian astrologers do not know rudimentary Hindi. If south Indian

> > astrologers can recognize Hindi alphabets (no mastery of language is

> > needed), I will not need to translate my whole mundane softwares, and

> > can present mundane case studies with commentaries in english.

> >

> > But then someone will come and say Parashari phalit is not universal and

> > should not be used ! After all, there must be some consensus on the

> > methods of case studies. So far, my experience is that only those people

> > want case studies from me who do not want to touch my software for one

> > reason or another.

> >

> > I have devoted my life in making scores of softwares and other research

> > projects along modern physical astronomy initially but along

> > Suryasiddhanta later when I found modern physical astronomy giving

> > unsatisfactory results. Those who have not worked along both lines and

> > merely stick to modern physical astronomy have a prejudiced feeling that

> > I have some personal agenda of imposing Suryasiddhanta. My background is

> > not astrological but scientific, and I became a supporter of

> > Suryasiddanta after decades of comparative researches. I have no benefit

> > in propagating this method, because I never sold either my softwares not

> > took any fees for my astrological services. Yet, some people have

> > expressed their unfounded views that I have a future plan to get

> > commercial benefits by making " hoax claims " . These same people refuse to

> > study 7 case studies at my website and say it is " my " duty to prove my

> > point. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything to those who

> > refuse to read the proofs.

> >

> > -VinayJha

> > ============== ====

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >