Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Arjun ji

 

a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

 

Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

 

for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

 

the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

 

Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the soil

is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

 

the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

 

we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

 

but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

of African breed

 

Prashant

 

 

________________________________

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

meru parvat - to vinayji

 

 

 

 

 

dear vinayji

 

from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

 

if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

 

the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu tradition

is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing the mount

meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical properties but

pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru parvat with

distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more. of course

all these names were medieval names but surely from these various chapters, i

understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history knowledge.

 

besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy .com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!////

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

 

RR

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ________________________________

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

RR Ji,

 

The simple article you pointed to says that humans separated from other primates

around ~6 million years ago (the article says 5-7m yrs), and earliest Homo

proofs are from SE Africa : Homo Habilis 2.4 m yrs.

 

The average of separation from primates and earlist known Homo fossils is ~4

million years ago, when last Deluge ended according to Suryasiddhanta and new

creation began around Mt Meru (Mt Kenya). Look at some good map or Google Earth

to see Meru town at its foothill.

 

-vj

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:15:33 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Krishnan Ji,

You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and there

are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as the

highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it North

Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator can

be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of

Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of

Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

-vj

 

 

 

 

________________________________

vattem krishnan <bursar_99

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vinay ji

 

if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea

 

which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and europe,

saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join the big

break ups as islands

 

then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely lifted

from the greek

 

which is beyond the truth

 

as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

 

Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our traditional

wisdom

 

Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

 

 

the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

 

but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with something

fresh

 

and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

 

transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

 

u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

 

Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

 

Prashant

 

 

________________________________

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Krishnan Ji,

You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and there

are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as the

highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it North

Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator can

be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of

Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of

Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

-vj

 

____________ _________ _________ __

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Prashant Ji,

 

MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana changes

from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's diameter

as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to

that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a

shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light)

moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed

of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

 

You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history. Geographical

India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was practised over

entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of countries in

Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas and MBh. On the

other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to merely India, India

is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text says Mt Meru was within

India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported from Greece or Egypt.

The contrary is true :

 

The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around ~400

BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose smoke

went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic Vedic

Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that the

ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the psalms

of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of

prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented

Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda and fail

to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their remote

ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and European

means " those who came from the East " !

 

The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

 

-VJ

 

================= ============

 

 

________________________________

Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Vinay ji

 

if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea

 

which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and europe,

saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join the big

break ups as islands

 

then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely lifted

from the greek

 

which is beyond the truth

 

as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

 

Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our traditional

wisdom

 

Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

 

the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

 

but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with something

fresh

 

and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

 

transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

 

u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

 

Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

 

Prashant

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Krishnan Ji,

You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and there

are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as the

highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it North

Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator can

be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of

Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of

Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

-vj

 

____________ _________ _________ __

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Vinay ji

 

I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

 

nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

 

pl re-read my post

 

I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from India

and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

 

I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure it is

so nothe otherway as u assume I said

 

also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st time

[in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i had

only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it though

understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while I was

in my 7th std in Bangalore

 

there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind even

Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

 

Thanks

 

prashant

 

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Prashant Ji,

 

MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana changes

from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's diameter

as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to

that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a

shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light)

moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed

of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

 

You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history. Geographical

India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was practised over

entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of countries in

Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas and MBh. On the

other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to merely India, India

is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text says Mt Meru was within

India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported from Greece or Egypt.

The contrary is true :

 

The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around ~400

BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose smoke

went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic Vedic

Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that the

ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the psalms

of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of

prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented

Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda and fail

to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their remote

ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and European

means " those who came from the East " !

 

The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

 

-VJ

 

============ ===== ============

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Vinay ji

 

if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea

 

which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and europe,

saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join the big

break ups as islands

 

then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely lifted

from the greek

 

which is beyond the truth

 

as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

 

Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our traditional

wisdom

 

Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

 

the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

 

but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with something

fresh

 

and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

 

transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

 

u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

 

Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

 

Prashant

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Krishnan Ji,

You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and there

are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as the

highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it North

Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator can

be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of

Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of

Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

-vj

 

____________ _________ _________ __

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Prashant ji,

 

I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is the

original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be impossible

to establish truth.

 

If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

 

Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of Vedic

origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

 

-VJ

 

 

________________________________

Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

 

Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Vinay ji

 

I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

 

nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

 

pl re-read my post

 

I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from India

and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

 

I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure it is

so nothe otherway as u assume I said

 

also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st time

[in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i had

only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it though

understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while I was

in my 7th std in Bangalore

 

there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind even

Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

 

Thanks

 

prashant

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Prashant Ji,

 

MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana changes

from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's diameter

as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to

that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a

shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light)

moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed

of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

 

You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history. Geographical

India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was practised over

entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of countries in

Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas and MBh. On the

other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to merely India, India

is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text says Mt Meru was within

India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported from Greece or Egypt.

The contrary is true :

 

The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around ~400

BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose smoke

went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic Vedic

Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that the

ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the psalms

of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of

prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented

Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda and fail

to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their remote

ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and European

means " those who came from the East " !

 

The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

 

-VJ

 

============ ===== ============

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Vinay ji

 

if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

 

which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and europe,

saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join the big

break ups as islands

 

then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely lifted

from the greek

 

which is beyond the truth

 

as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

 

Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our traditional

wisdom

 

Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

 

the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

 

but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with something

fresh

 

and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

 

transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

 

u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

 

Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

 

Prashant

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Krishnan Ji,

You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and there

are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as the

highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it North

Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator can

be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of

Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of

Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

-vj

 

____________ _________ _________ __

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Dear Sirs,

The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures identified

MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not contested or

changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of Inidian

origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second thought

about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and

can never be altered

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

 

For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Dear Arjun ji

>

> a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

>

> Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

>

> for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

>

> the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke away

from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the Himalays

formed etc...

>

> Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

>

> the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does suggest

the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists version

of history to suit their version

>

> we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

>

> but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> of African breed

>

> Prashant

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> meru parvat - to vinayji

>

>

>

>

>

> dear vinayji

>

> from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

>

> if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

>

> the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

>

> besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namsthe,

 

It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji has

written.

 

There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to cunduct

such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if the person

stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot afford to do the rites

and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough to please the ancestors.

 

A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village doing the

same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due to famine.

 

further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of the soul

during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have seen / read about

this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich / kings when dead , the body

used to be put on a boat sent into the river burning.

 

Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in Russia.

 

But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in India. In other

parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and it was never as

complicated & systematic as in India. More over these rituals are still

practiced in India while, there is practically nothing left in other parts of

the world to establish any authentic link.

 

recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it was found a

few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with those of african

people. But again, there is no evidence that of Brahmanical link to say that

higher knowledge came from Africa.

 

If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not evident now.

Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or it mere outsiders) &

never equated them to the locals.

 

Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be the

" Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

 

I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi Atri.

Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile. But could not

do more research on the subject.

 

Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete continuation. It

is matter of surprise that the african language in any form does not have any

semblence with Indian languages including Sanskrit. I may be wrong here,

Purhaps, it may because I have not done enough research on the subject.

 

Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look at ideas &

explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

 

With warm regards

A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

> Prashant ji,

>

> I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is the

original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be impossible

to establish truth.

>

> If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

>

> Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of Vedic

origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

>

> -VJ

>

>

> ________________________________

> Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar

>

> Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

>

>

>

>

> Vinay ji

>

> I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

>

> nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

>

> pl re-read my post

>

> I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from India

and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

>

> I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure it

is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

>

> also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st

time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i

had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it

though understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while

I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

>

> there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind even

Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

>

> Thanks

>

> prashant

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Prashant Ji,

>

> MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana changes

from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's diameter

as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to

that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a

shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light)

moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed

of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

>

> You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was

practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of

countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas

and MBh. On the other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to

merely India, India is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text

says Mt Meru was within India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported

from Greece or Egypt. The contrary is true :

>

> The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around ~400

BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose smoke

went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic Vedic

Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that the

ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the psalms

of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of

prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented

Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda and fail

to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their remote

ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and European

means " those who came from the East " !

>

> The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ===== ============

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Dear Vinay ji

>

> if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

>

> http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

>

> which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and

europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join

the big break ups as islands

>

> then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely

lifted from the greek

>

> which is beyond the truth

>

> as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

>

> Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

>

> Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

>

> the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

>

> but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with

something fresh

>

> and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

>

> transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

>

> u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

>

> Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

>

> Prashant

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Krishnan Ji,

> You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and

there are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as

the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it

North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator

can be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre

of Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge

of Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> -vj

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Dear Sirs,

> The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not

contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of

Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second

thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu

dweepe and can never be altered

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

>

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

>

> For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

>

> http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

>

> RR

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..>

wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Arjun ji

> >

> > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> >

> > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> >

> > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> >

> > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke

away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the

Himalays formed etc...

> >

> > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> >

> > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does

suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists

version of history to suit their version

> >

> > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> >

> > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> > of African breed

> >

> > Prashant

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > meru parvat - to vinayji

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > dear vinayji

> >

> > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> >

> > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

> >

> > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

> >

> > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Suresh Babu

 

well it is true on what u felt is similar and lost also pl see my next mail

actually had that in mind when a ttel call came and I forgot to finish it but

sent it

subject is MIKE DAVIS

 

prashant

 

 

 

 

________________________________

sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag

 

Monday, May 4, 2009 7:44:56 PM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Namsthe,

 

It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji has

written.

 

There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to cunduct

such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if the person

stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot afford to do the rites

and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough to please the ancestors.

 

A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village doing the

same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due to famine.

 

further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of the soul

during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have seen / read about

this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich / kings when dead , the body

used to be put on a boat sent into the river burning.

 

Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in Russia.

 

But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in India. In other

parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and it was never as

complicated & systematic as in India. More over these rituals are still

practiced in India while, there is practically nothing left in other parts of

the world to establish any authentic link.

 

recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it was found a

few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with those of african

people. But again, there is no evidence that of Brahmanical link to say that

higher knowledge came from Africa.

 

If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not evident now.

Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or it mere outsiders) &

never equated them to the locals.

 

Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be the

" Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

 

I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi Atri.

Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile. But could not

do more research on the subject.

 

Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete continuation. It

is matter of surprise that the african language in any form does not have any

semblence with Indian languages including Sanskrit. I may be wrong here,

Purhaps, it may because I have not done enough research on the subject.

 

Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look at ideas &

explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

 

With warm regards

A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

 

 

> Prashant ji,

>

> I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is the

original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be impossible

to establish truth.

>

> If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

>

> Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of Vedic

origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

>

> -VJ

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..>

>

> Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

>

>

>

>

> Vinay ji

>

> I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

>

> nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

>

> pl re-read my post

>

> I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from India

and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

>

> I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure it

is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

>

> also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st

time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i

had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it

though understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while

I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

>

> there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind even

Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

>

> Thanks

>

> prashant

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Prashant Ji,

>

> MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana changes

from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's diameter

as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to

that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a

shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light)

moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed

of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

>

> You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was

practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of

countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas

and MBh. On the other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to

merely India, India is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text

says Mt Meru was within India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported

from Greece or Egypt. The contrary is true :

>

> The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around ~400

BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose smoke

went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic Vedic

Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that the

ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the psalms

of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of

prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented

Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda and fail

to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their remote

ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and European

means " those who came from the East " !

>

> The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ===== ============

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Dear Vinay ji

>

> if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

>

> http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

>

> which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and

europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join

the big break ups as islands

>

> then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely

lifted from the greek

>

> which is beyond the truth

>

> as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

>

> Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

>

> Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

>

> the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

>

> but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with

something fresh

>

> and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

>

> transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just intermediate

sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his sishyas and

they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water on it daily

after prayers they decayed naturally

>

> u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was for

nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in public

after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

>

> Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

>

> Prashant

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Krishnan Ji,

> You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and

there are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as

the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it

North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator

can be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre

of Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge

of Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> -vj

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Dear Sirs,

> The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not

contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of

Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second

thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu

dweepe and can never be altered

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

>

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

> Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

>

> For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

>

> http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

>

> RR

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..>

wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Arjun ji

> >

> > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> >

> > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> >

> > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> >

> > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke

away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the

Himalays formed etc...

> >

> > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even the

soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> >

> > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does

suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists

version of history to suit their version

> >

> > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> >

> > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> > of African breed

> >

> > Prashant

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > meru parvat - to vinayji

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > dear vinayji

> >

> > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> >

> > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

> >

> > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

> >

> > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors like

vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this mount

meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste,

 

Shenoy Ji is wondering why " Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in

India " ! The answer is horrifying, almost unprintable. In Persia and

Afghanistan, Vedic gods were declared to be demons and Asura was

worshipped. Hakhamani (Achaemanid) kings hunted for Brahmins and killed

them. So did Alexander. He hanged his own gurubhai Callesthenes

(Kaala-shtaani) whi refused to accept his divinity. He ordered his

soldiers to capture an Indian monk Damdami (as per Megashenes, actual

name Daandaayana) , but his soldiers dared not touch this naagaa monk.

In Israel, cannibals of Canaan sacrificed best of humans by breaking

open his sacred-fissure on skull, there is replastered broken skull at

Jericho. Peking men were veteran cannibals. Vedic texts in hieroglyphs

were found in Israel but I have not been able to locate it : it is in UK

perhaps. Egyptian civilisation was asuri, read the poems on pyramids,

they are completely anti Vedic , but their source was in sudan where

traces of a Mruvian civilization have been found : Meru was a great city

in southern Sudan (known to Herodotus, different from Mt Meru in Kenya),

whose language is deliberately declared to be unknown, but I have read

an article on internet by a Western linguist who says Kushanas of

central Asia and India were linguistically an eastern branch of this

Meruvian language whose nation was known as Kush by Egyptians and was

believed to be their source. Harappans used Sanskrit but were dead

against Vedic culture : they worshipped a naked Pashupati-like figure

with erect phallus adorned with buffalo horns. Western historians call

it Pashupati, but Finnish and Russian experts said ruling clan belonged

to Buffalo clan. In other words , Mahisaasura !! Bovine bones have been

found in numerous public fire altars at Kalibangan ! They were asuras.

During 3000-700 BC, most of the dynasties from India to Meditarranean

were Asuric, barring a few Aryans, like King Dasharatha in Syria around

14th century BC with a daughter or daughter in law Set (Sita) married to

Egyptian Pharaoh. The first king of Egypt was Manu, whose name was given

as Menes by Greek author Manetho, but few persons know that last 's' in

Greek names was not pronounced, and vowels in Egyptian hieroglyphs were

originally not written but supplied by memory : hences Manu and Mene

will have same hieroglyph in Old Kingdom period. Egyptian religion was

almost a replica of Hinduism in its essential traits, but Egypt was

ruled by Asuras who claimed divine origins like early Ikshvaakus. It is

wrong to believe that we came from Egypt. All the moolaa, shaashanas,

graamas, etc of those Brahmins who have maintained their old records are

Indian, excepting Shakaldvipis who went from India and later returned

due to persecution bu Persians and Greeks. Remaining traces of Brahmanic

influences were obliterated by Islam. Prophet Muhammad removed adhimaasa

in his last year : this then Indian calendar was practised by asuras of

Arabia.

 

Ancient heritage was largely saved by Brahmins . Sanskrit and Brahmins

were systematically wiped out from those lands millenia ago. Whatever

proofs come out now are instantly destroyed or hid. It is merely the

initial part of Kaliyuga. With the " progress and development " of

Kaliyuga, speaking Sanskrit and practice of Vedic religion will become

non-bailable offences, or to be burnt on stake. How much blood was shed

for forcible of Europe to Christianity has been now accounted by many

authors. Pagan Europe had more affinities with Vedic customs. They

observed Ravivaar vrata. Their New Year was in Middlemarch (nirayanaa

Mesha Samkraanti), now Middle-April due to one raashi shift of zodiac.

Even Church observed another variety of Vedic New Year borrowed perhaps

from Egypt on nirayana Makara Samkraanti, which was Jan 1 till 1582, but

was shifted 13 days due to Gregorian reform and now nirayana Makara

Samkraanti occurs on 14 Jan. This aggressiveness towards Vedas and

Vedangas has me becme an unconscious urge in even those Indians who

believe in Westernism.

 

-VJ

 

=================================

, " sureshbabuag "

<sureshbabuag wrote:

>

> Namsthe,

>

> It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji

has written.

>

> There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to

cunduct such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if

the person stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot

afford to do the rites and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough

to please the ancestors.

>

> A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village

doing the same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due

to famine.

>

> further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of

the soul during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have

seen / read about this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich /

kings when dead , the body used to be put on a boat sent into the river

burning.

>

> Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in

Russia.

>

> But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in

India. In other parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and

it was never as complicated & systematic as in India. More over these

rituals are still practiced in India while, there is practically nothing

left in other parts of the world to establish any authentic link.

>

> recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it

was found a few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with

those of african people. But again, there is no evidence that of

Brahmanical link to say that higher knowledge came from Africa.

>

> If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not

evident now. Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or

it mere outsiders) & never equated them to the locals.

>

> Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be

the " Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

>

> I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi

Atri. Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile.

But could not do more research on the subject.

>

> Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete

continuation. It is matter of surprise that the african language in any

form does not have any semblence with Indian languages including

Sanskrit. I may be wrong here, Purhaps, it may because I have not done

enough research on the subject.

>

> Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look

at ideas & explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

>

> With warm regards

> A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashant ji,

> >

> > I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic

language is the original language, but as long as Western hegemony

remains it will be impossible to establish truth.

> >

> > If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken.

Vedic culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which

Bharata-varsha was only a small, although most important, part. Creation

was created from Mt Meru in Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples

was centred in India from the very beginning. It is a long history

everywhere forgotten, only some portions of Puranas mention it.

> >

> > Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof

of Vedic origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar@

> >

> > Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Vinay ji

> >

> > I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

> >

> > nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

> >

> > pl re-read my post

> >

> > I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars

from India and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and

from egypt it sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA

BY Charaka and his compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

> >

> > I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so

make sure it is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

> >

> > also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for

the 1st time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till

now earlier i had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a

chance to read it though understood it from the time i heard it in a

radio program in apr 74 while I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

> >

> > there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of

mankind even Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt

and other local strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can

be similarities as said in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all

cultures [except the Monoliths that came later, church, mosues]

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Prashant Ji,

> >

> > MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of

yojana changes from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient

India give Earth's diameter as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600

yojana for Jamboodvip cannot belong to that period in history when

yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana refers to a shruti in RV,i,50 that

Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of light) moves at a speed of

2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the speed of light,

then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to the

distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

> >

> > You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in

ancient texts. Names of countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India

can be found in many Puranas and MBh. On the other hand, there is no

ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to merely India, India is a small part

of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text says Mt Meru was within India.

But it does not mean Indian culture was imported from Greece or Egypt.

The contrary is true :

> >

> > The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds

around ~400 BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations

into fire whose smoke went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the

existence of ritualistic Vedic Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet,

Europeans falsely teach us that the ancestors of Aryans practised a

simple religion based on prayers like the psalms of Bible, and declared

Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a book of prayers, and

Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who invented Yajna.

Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their language is

also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false propaganda

and fail to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt their

remote ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and

European means " those who came from the East " !

> >

> > The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or

Kinyangiri in Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means

a single language and culture was practised in the whole the world. It

tallies with the descriptions of cultures in various parts of

Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> > ============ ===== ============

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Prashant Kumar G B gbp_kumar >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Vinay ji

> >

> > if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called

the Pangea here is the link

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

> >

> > which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south]

and europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could

not join the big break ups as islands

> >

> > then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is

purely lifted from the greek

> >

> > which is beyond the truth

> >

> > as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way

ahead

> >

> > Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

> >

> > Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost

represt whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

> >

> > the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

> >

> > but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up

with something fresh

> >

> > and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us

can claim possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never

believed in claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

> >

> > transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just

intermediate sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written

for his sishyas and they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by

sprinkling water on it daily after prayers they decayed naturally

> >

> > u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of

it was for nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of

dual use in public after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime

itself

> >

> > Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

> >

> > Prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Krishnan Ji,

> > You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than

Meru, and there are many ancient references which put it outside India.

It was regarded as the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence

Varah Mihira called it North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator.

Neither North Pole nor equator can be located in India.

Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre of Earth but is

not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge of Africa

which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> > -vj

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > vattem krishnan bursar_99 >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Sirs,

> > The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is

not contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for

the people of Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There

should not be a second thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it

continues to be related to Jambu dweepe and can never be altered

> > vrkrishnan

> >

> > --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

> >

> > For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or

superscientific evidence!/// /

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Arjun ji

> > >

> > > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> > >

> > > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> > >

> > > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> > >

> > > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian

sub-continent broke away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as

it moves northwards the Himalays formed etc...

> > >

> > > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau

even the soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> > >

> > > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but

does suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the

Imperialists version of history to suit their version

> > >

> > > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> > >

> > > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa

and moved upwards to Europe, asia...

> > > of African breed

> > >

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > > meru parvat - to vinayji

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > dear vinayji

> > >

> > > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess

you are suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of

mine is wrong, kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> > >

> > > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i

fail to understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures

described meru parvant or mount meru as different and not surely as in

africa.

> > >

> > > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in

hindu tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS

on describing the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not

on the mythical properties but pure mathematical and geographical

descriptions of the meru parvat with distances and names of all the

mountains far and near and much more. of course all these names were

medieval names but surely from these various chapters, i understand

mount meru is not from africa in my limited history knowledge.

> > >

> > > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request

professors like vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as

to where this mount meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe

and is in africa as presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are

committing an error in their daily sankalpam as to which direction from

meru they are. your answer helps us understand to which side of meru we

are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam correctly.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Suresh ji,

 

There is a belief or perhaps some anecdotal evidence that there are genetic

shifts in what we label as Human culture or cohort. Hence there are mentions of

Atlanteans, Mayans etc. Infact why go that far back, and just look at the Romans

or even the Greek or Chinese? The modern Roman is a very different 'being' than

the one in Julius Caesar's times. Perhaps there has been some subtle genetic

shift as well since Aristotle's times and Onassis Ji's times!

 

But certainly one can imagine that in prehistoric times such as when Atlantis

existed (and many speculations exist) the beings were perhaps not the same or

similar in their mental, psychological and perhaps genetic make up either. This

is all very speculative so please do not run with it! :-)

 

Why is it difficult to then imagine that the Indian in Satyuga, even though

living in the same India that exists today or in Treta, Dwapara could be

significantly different from the Indian that walks the street of Ayodhya or

Dwarka today. I do not mean just in the way he or she dresses or even thinks,

but in their genetic makeup or their species-related (special?) characteristics?

 

All this sounds fantastic, but what is new? To the average Joe out there, even

astrology sounds fantastic but to us who had been butting our heads at it for

years at the very least, don't the JOEs seem misinformed?

 

RR

 

, " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag

wrote:

>

> Namsthe,

>

> It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji has

written.

>

> There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to cunduct

such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if the person

stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot afford to do the rites

and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough to please the ancestors.

>

> A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village doing the

same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due to famine.

>

> further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of the

soul during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have seen / read

about this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich / kings when dead , the

body used to be put on a boat sent into the river burning.

>

> Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in Russia.

>

> But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in India. In

other parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and it was never as

complicated & systematic as in India. More over these rituals are still

practiced in India while, there is practically nothing left in other parts of

the world to establish any authentic link.

>

> recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it was found

a few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with those of african

people. But again, there is no evidence that of Brahmanical link to say that

higher knowledge came from Africa.

>

> If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not evident now.

Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or it mere outsiders) &

never equated them to the locals.

>

> Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be the

" Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

>

> I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi Atri.

Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile. But could not

do more research on the subject.

>

> Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete continuation.

It is matter of surprise that the african language in any form does not have any

semblence with Indian languages including Sanskrit. I may be wrong here,

Purhaps, it may because I have not done enough research on the subject.

>

> Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look at ideas

& explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

>

> With warm regards

> A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashant ji,

> >

> > I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is

the original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be

impossible to establish truth.

> >

> > If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

> >

> > Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of

Vedic origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

> >

> > Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Vinay ji

> >

> > I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

> >

> > nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

> >

> > pl re-read my post

> >

> > I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from

India and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

> >

> > I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure

it is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

> >

> > also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st

time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i

had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it

though understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while

I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

> >

> > there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind

even Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Prashant Ji,

> >

> > MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana

changes from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's

diameter as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot

belong to that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana

refers to a shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of

light) moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the

speed of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to

the distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

> >

> > You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was

practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of

countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas

and MBh. On the other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to

merely India, India is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text

says Mt Meru was within India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported

from Greece or Egypt. The contrary is true :

> >

> > The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around

~400 BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose

smoke went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic

Vedic Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that

the ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the

psalms of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a

book of prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who

invented Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their

language is also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false

propaganda and fail to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt

their remote ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and

European means " those who came from the East " !

> >

> > The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> > ============ ===== ============

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Vinay ji

> >

> > if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

> >

> > which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and

europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join

the big break ups as islands

> >

> > then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely

lifted from the greek

> >

> > which is beyond the truth

> >

> > as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

> >

> > Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

> >

> > Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

> >

> > the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

> >

> > but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with

something fresh

> >

> > and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

> >

> > transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just

intermediate sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his

sishyas and they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water

on it daily after prayers they decayed naturally

> >

> > u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was

for nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in

public after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

> >

> > Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

> >

> > Prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Krishnan Ji,

> > You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and

there are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as

the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it

North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator

can be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre

of Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge

of Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> > -vj

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Sirs,

> > The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not

contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of

Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second

thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu

dweepe and can never be altered

> > vrkrishnan

> >

> > --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

> >

> > For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@

...> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Arjun ji

> > >

> > > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> > >

> > > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> > >

> > > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> > >

> > > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke

away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the

Himalays formed etc...

> > >

> > > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even

the soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> > >

> > > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does

suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists

version of history to suit their version

> > >

> > > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> > >

> > > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> > > of African breed

> > >

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > > meru parvat - to vinayji

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > dear vinayji

> > >

> > > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> > >

> > > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

> > >

> > > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

> > >

> > > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors

like vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this

mount meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

RR Ji,

 

Your ideas have weight. I had read that there is no major genetic difference

between modern Europeans and prehistoric Europeans of 3000 BC, which is used as

a proof in favour of European Homeland of PIE (Proto Indo-Europeans). But I have

also read that same is the case with India, although much attempt has been made

to find some trace of European element. There are indeed some common traits

between europeans and Indians, but so is the case with other groups. It leads me

to conclude that no major migration took place either way after 3000 BC.

Whatever migration occurred must belong to 20000 - 40000 BC.

 

-VJ

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

 

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 4:57:57 AM

Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

 

 

 

 

 

Suresh ji,

 

There is a belief or perhaps some anecdotal evidence that there are genetic

shifts in what we label as Human culture or cohort. Hence there are mentions of

Atlanteans, Mayans etc. Infact why go that far back, and just look at the Romans

or even the Greek or Chinese? The modern Roman is a very different 'being' than

the one in Julius Caesar's times. Perhaps there has been some subtle genetic

shift as well since Aristotle's times and Onassis Ji's times!

 

But certainly one can imagine that in prehistoric times such as when Atlantis

existed (and many speculations exist) the beings were perhaps not the same or

similar in their mental, psychological and perhaps genetic make up either. This

is all very speculative so please do not run with it! :-)

 

Why is it difficult to then imagine that the Indian in Satyuga, even though

living in the same India that exists today or in Treta, Dwapara could be

significantly different from the Indian that walks the street of Ayodhya or

Dwarka today. I do not mean just in the way he or she dresses or even thinks,

but in their genetic makeup or their species-related (special?) characteristics?

 

All this sounds fantastic, but what is new? To the average Joe out there, even

astrology sounds fantastic but to us who had been butting our heads at it for

years at the very least, don't the JOEs seem misinformed?

 

RR

 

, " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...>

wrote:

>

> Namsthe,

>

> It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji has

written.

>

> There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to cunduct

such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if the person

stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot afford to do the rites

and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough to please the ancestors.

>

> A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village doing the

same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due to famine.

>

> further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of the

soul during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have seen / read

about this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich / kings when dead , the

body used to be put on a boat sent into the river burning.

>

> Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in Russia.

>

> But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in India. In

other parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and it was never as

complicated & systematic as in India. More over these rituals are still

practiced in India while, there is practically nothing left in other parts of

the world to establish any authentic link.

>

> recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it was found

a few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with those of african

people. But again, there is no evidence that of Brahmanical link to say that

higher knowledge came from Africa.

>

> If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not evident now.

Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or it mere outsiders) &

never equated them to the locals.

>

> Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be the

" Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

>

> I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi Atri.

Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile. But could not

do more research on the subject.

>

> Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete continuation.

It is matter of surprise that the african language in any form does not have any

semblence with Indian languages including Sanskrit. I may be wrong here,

Purhaps, it may because I have not done enough research on the subject.

>

> Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look at ideas

& explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

>

> With warm regards

> A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Prashant ji,

> >

> > I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is

the original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be

impossible to establish truth.

> >

> > If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

> >

> > Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of

Vedic origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

> >

> > Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Vinay ji

> >

> > I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

> >

> > nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

> >

> > pl re-read my post

> >

> > I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from

India and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

> >

> > I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure

it is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

> >

> > also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the 1st

time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier i

had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it

though understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while

I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

> >

> > there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind

even Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

> >

> > Thanks

> >

> > prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Prashant Ji,

> >

> > MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana

changes from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's

diameter as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot

belong to that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana

refers to a shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of

light) moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the

speed of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to

the distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

> >

> > You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was

practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of

countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas

and MBh. On the other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to

merely India, India is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text

says Mt Meru was within India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported

from Greece or Egypt. The contrary is true :

> >

> > The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around

~400 BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose

smoke went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic

Vedic Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that

the ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the

psalms of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a

book of prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who

invented Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their

language is also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false

propaganda and fail to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt

their remote ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and

European means " those who came from the East " !

> >

> > The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> > ============ ===== ============

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Vinay ji

> >

> > if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the Pangea

here is the link

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

> >

> > which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and

europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join

the big break ups as islands

> >

> > then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely

lifted from the greek

> >

> > which is beyond the truth

> >

> > as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

> >

> > Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

> >

> > Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

> >

> > the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

> >

> > but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with

something fresh

> >

> > and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can claim

possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

> >

> > transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just

intermediate sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his

sishyas and they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water

on it daily after prayers they decayed naturally

> >

> > u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was

for nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in

public after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

> >

> > Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

> >

> > Prashant

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Krishnan Ji,

> > You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and

there are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as

the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it

North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator

can be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre

of Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge

of Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> > -vj

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Dear Sirs,

> > The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not

contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of

Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second

thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu

dweepe and can never be altered

> > vrkrishnan

> >

> > --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> >

> > Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

> >

> > For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@

...> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Arjun ji

> > >

> > > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> > >

> > > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> > >

> > > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> > >

> > > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent broke

away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards the

Himalays formed etc...

> > >

> > > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even

the soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> > >

> > > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does

suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists

version of history to suit their version

> > >

> > > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> > >

> > > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and moved

upwards to Europe, asia...

> > > of African breed

> > >

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > > meru parvat - to vinayji

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > dear vinayji

> > >

> > > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you are

suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is wrong,

kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> > >

> > > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail to

understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru parvant

or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

> > >

> > > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

> > >

> > > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors

like vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this

mount meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Vinay Ji,

 

Perhaps a geneticist, if one exists in the forum (and willing to come out of the

closet ;-), alone can tell how these comparisons can be made over the millennia,

unless someone found ancient human DNA etc but perhaps there may be other

scientific techniques.

 

I had read long ago that there was a mass-migration from China-Mongolia up

Russia, across Behring strait and down into the Americas. These are believed to

be the first " Immigrants " from Asia into the Americas and the foreparents of the

wonderful people once known as Red-Indian (due to Chris Columbus and his

world-famous poor navigational skills [Just joking!] then became known as Native

Americans and related subgroups. This is believed to have taken place about

20-30000 years ago. Again, I have no clue how the 'dating' was done or how much

'off' it is from actual.

 

Perhaps a genetic comparison between modern native americans and modern chinese

from Mongolian regions may give some evidence of any genetic drift or shift. Of

course there has been tremendous amount of genetic mixing over the millennia at

least in the Native americans and maybe this migration does not explain

everything because the different type of Native Americans have very significant

differences in physical appearance, build etc.

 

RR

 

, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote:

>

> RR Ji,

>

> Your ideas have weight. I had read that there is no major genetic difference

between modern Europeans and prehistoric Europeans of 3000 BC, which is used as

a proof in favour of European Homeland of PIE (Proto Indo-Europeans). But I have

also read that same is the case with India, although much attempt has been made

to find some trace of European element. There are indeed some common traits

between europeans and Indians, but so is the case with other groups. It leads me

to conclude that no major migration took place either way after 3000 BC.

Whatever migration occurred must belong to 20000 - 40000 BC.

>

> -VJ

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

>

> Tuesday, May 5, 2009 4:57:57 AM

> Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

>

>

>

>

>

> Suresh ji,

>

> There is a belief or perhaps some anecdotal evidence that there are genetic

shifts in what we label as Human culture or cohort. Hence there are mentions of

Atlanteans, Mayans etc. Infact why go that far back, and just look at the Romans

or even the Greek or Chinese? The modern Roman is a very different 'being' than

the one in Julius Caesar's times. Perhaps there has been some subtle genetic

shift as well since Aristotle's times and Onassis Ji's times!

>

> But certainly one can imagine that in prehistoric times such as when Atlantis

existed (and many speculations exist) the beings were perhaps not the same or

similar in their mental, psychological and perhaps genetic make up either. This

is all very speculative so please do not run with it! :-)

>

> Why is it difficult to then imagine that the Indian in Satyuga, even though

living in the same India that exists today or in Treta, Dwapara could be

significantly different from the Indian that walks the street of Ayodhya or

Dwarka today. I do not mean just in the way he or she dresses or even thinks,

but in their genetic makeup or their species-related (special?) characteristics?

>

> All this sounds fantastic, but what is new? To the average Joe out there, even

astrology sounds fantastic but to us who had been butting our heads at it for

years at the very least, don't the JOEs seem misinformed?

>

> RR

>

> , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Namsthe,

> >

> > It seems that there is some substance but confusing in what Vinay ji has

written.

> >

> > There is a practice related with death rites. If one is very poor to cunduct

such rites, it is ordained that the ancestors will be pleased if the person

stands in a junction and proclaims loudly that he caanot afford to do the rites

and the offering of a handfull of sand is enough to please the ancestors.

> >

> > A few back, I saw on BBC channel, the people of an african village doing the

same thing outside their village when they had to leave it due to famine.

> >

> > further, there is a part of " Vitharini Nadi " regarding the crossing of the

soul during the last rite rituals as practiced by brahmins. I have seen / read

about this as practiced in some of spain etc. The rich / kings when dead , the

body used to be put on a boat sent into the river burning.

> >

> > Hence we can find many such similarities of even names as far as in Russia.

> >

> > But the confusing part, Sanskrit , rituals etc only exist now in India. In

other parts of the world, the rituals are forgone. Why?. and it was never as

complicated & systematic as in India. More over these rituals are still

practiced in India while, there is practically nothing left in other parts of

the world to establish any authentic link.

> >

> > recently I happened to another article on genetic research where it was

found a few sect in parts of tamilnadu has their genetic link with those of

african people. But again, there is no evidence that of Brahmanical link to say

that higher knowledge came from Africa.

> >

> > If Africans had such knowldege of advanced subjects why is it not evident

now. Even the egyptians believed that the pharos where gods (or it mere

outsiders) & never equated them to the locals.

> >

> > Mayan culture is total gone. Purhaps the only link we have could be the

" Mayamatham " , a Vastu sastra treatise still held in high respect.

> >

> > I have also heard that ituria in Africa gets its name from Maharshi Atri.

Similarly " Neela nadi " mentioned in puranas could be River Nile. But could not

do more research on the subject.

> >

> > Once can seen a lot of links but difficult to get any concrete continuation.

It is matter of surprise that the african language in any form does not have any

semblence with Indian languages including Sanskrit. I may be wrong here,

Purhaps, it may because I have not done enough research on the subject.

> >

> > Hence, I think It would be beneficial if we keep our minds open look at

ideas & explore every bit of knowledge without love / hate / passion.

> >

> > With warm regards

> > A.G.Suresh Babu shenoy.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > Prashant ji,

> > >

> > > I devoted 12 years on comparative linguistics and I know vedic language is

the original language, but as long as Western hegemony remains it will be

impossible to establish truth.

> > >

> > > If you think Africa's ancient past was pagan then you are mistaken. Vedic

culture was practised over entire Jamboodvipa, of which Bharata-varsha was only

a small, although most important, part. Creation was created from Mt Meru in

Kenya, but actual history of Vedic peoples was centred in India from the very

beginning. It is a long history everywhere forgotten, only some portions of

Puranas mention it.

> > >

> > > Read my article Yajna posted today, it provides an irrefutable proof of

Vedic origin of prehistoric Greeks. AKK is just opposite of facts.

> > >

> > > -VJ

> > >

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

> > >

> > > Monday, May 4, 2009 10:24:36 AM

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Vinay ji

> > >

> > > I DID NOT SAY I APPROVE OF AKK;s views

> > >

> > > nor did I say Vedic culture is imported from greece, egypy etc...

> > >

> > > pl re-read my post

> > >

> > > I am clear that egypt got the knowledge by hijacking many scholars from

India and killed them after their scholars learnt the subject and from egypt it

sprread to West-europe ZERO, CHEMISTRY OR RASAYANA SHASTRA BY Charaka and his

compatriot [i forget the name for the moment]

> > >

> > > I have said by ur ALLUDING Mt Meru to Kenya u r approving AKK so make sure

it is so nothe otherway as u assume I said

> > >

> > > also read the PANGEA link i sent u i am actually using the word for the

1st time [in the sarch as i heard the word never read about it till now earlier

i had only heard of the word may be 35 yrs ago never had a chance to read it

though understood it from the time i heard it in a radio program in apr 74 while

I was in my 7th std in Bangalore

> > >

> > > there is no way one language can be part of such a vast spread of mankind

even Bharatha varsha, bharata khande had the Prakruit, sanskirt and other local

strains, culture, rituals also do differ and there can be similarities as said

in the way fire, Sun was worshipped in all cultures [except the Monoliths that

came later, church, mosues]

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > >

> > > prashant

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:05:52 PM

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > > Prashant Ji,

> > >

> > > MBh gives Jamboodvip's dimensions as 18600 yojanas. Measure of yojana

changes from time to time. All astronomical texts of ancient India give Earth's

diameter as 1100-1600 yojanas only, hence 18600 yojana for Jamboodvip cannot

belong to that period in history when yojana's value was much larhe. Sayana

refers to a shruti in RV,i,50 that Surya (which Mr subhash Kak reads as spped of

light) moves at a speed of 2202 yojana per half nimisha. If this is actually the

speed of light, then this value of yojana makes 18600 yojana exactly equal to

the distance from Cape Town to Bering Starits in far east of Siberia.

> > >

> > > You are misled by forerunners of AKK who distorted Indian history.

Geographical India is a small country, but what we know as Indian culture was

practised over entire Jamboodvip, which is narrated in ancient texts. Names of

countries in Jamboodvip which were outside India can be found in many Puranas

and MBh. On the other hand, there is no ancient proof to limit Jamboodvip to

merely India, India is a small part of Jamboodvip. Secondly, no ancient text

says Mt Meru was within India. But it does not mean Indian culture was imported

from Greece or Egypt. The contrary is true :

> > >

> > > The greatest Greek comedian Aristophanes wrote a comedy The Birds around

~400 BC, which said the ancestors of Greeks offered oblations into fire whose

smoke went into Heavens to feed gods. It proves the existence of ritualistic

Vedic Yajna among the ancestors of greeks. Yet, Europeans falsely teach us that

the ancestors of Aryans practised a simple religion based on prayers like the

psalms of Bible, and declared Rgveda to be the original Veda because it was a

book of prayers, and Yajurveda was the invention of non Aryan brahmins who

invented Yajna. Rgveda and YV name each other innumerable times, and their

language is also contemporary. Yet, many Indians believe in this false

propaganda and fail to read Greek evidences which show Yajna was practised bt

their remote ancestors. The word Europa in Greek meant " easterlies (winds " and

European means " those who came from the East " !

> > >

> > > The existence of Sanskrit placenames like Meru in Kenya or Kinyangiri in

Tanzania does not mean India was a part of Kenya. It means a single language and

culture was practised in the whole the world. It tallies with the descriptions

of cultures in various parts of Jamboodvipa found in Puranas and MBh.

> > >

> > > -VJ

> > >

> > > ============ ===== ============

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar >

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:55:08 PM

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > > Dear Vinay ji

> > >

> > > if u r refering to to Jamboo dweepa as what the westerners called the

Pangea here is the link

> > >

> > > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Pangaea

> > >

> > > which shows the continetal drift theory where AMERICAS [north south] and

europe, saudi arabia, australia, India and smaller pieces that could not join

the big break ups as islands

> > >

> > > then u r close to AKK's call that all of Hindu/vedic knowledge is purely

lifted from the greek

> > >

> > > which is beyond the truth

> > >

> > > as the multiple discpplines in any subject Vedic heritage is way ahead

> > >

> > > Egyptians did steal/smuggle many vedic scholars and took most of our

traditional wisdom

> > >

> > > Mayan civilisation has many close similarities to Vedic and in all

civiilisations the fire, sun etc are supreme forces-gods and almost represt

whatever astrology attributes to ravi.

> > >

> > > the ;onk also suggests some period where it cud have happened also

> > >

> > > but superimpose this witht ye Yugas, the puranas etc and come up with

something fresh

> > >

> > > and till then pl treat every source of info as INFO and none of us can

claim possession to original source anyday as vedic heritage never believed in

claiming, bragging knowledge just lived by practice alone

> > >

> > > transfered knowledge by word of mouth only palm leaves were just

intermediate sources till it was memorised and each guru had it written for his

sishyas and they once memorised it were asked to destroy it by sprinkling water

on it daily after prayers they decayed naturally

> > >

> > > u won't find misuse of knowledge like Einstiens Nuke bomb -info of it was

for nuclear energy not bombs and he regreted sharing that info of dual use in

public after the dirty bombs were used in his lifetime itself

> > >

> > > Vidya vinaya sampanae is vedic rest is barbaric

> > >

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:30:45 PM

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > > Krishnan Ji,

> > > You are making wrong statements. Jamboodvip was much bigger than Meru, and

there are many ancient references which put it outside India. It was regarded as

the highest point, being the centre of Cosmos, hence Varah Mihira called it

North Pole. Suryasiddhanta says it is at equator. Neither North Pole nor equator

can be located in India. Narapatijayacharya says it is said to be at the centre

of Earth but is not found there , the reason was people had lost the knowledge

of Africa which was known to ancient sages who said Meru was at equator in

Jamboodvip. Jamboodvip is a sigle big contintnt which Euripeans have

artificially named as Africa, Europe and Asia. This new nomenclature is

misleading you.

> > > -vj

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 11:29:02 AM

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > > Dear Sirs,

> > > The evolutionary trends continue to be there.Our reverred scriptures

identified MERU as part of Bharat varshe,Bharat Khande.This position is not

contested or changed so far by any one.The importance of MERU for the people of

Inidian origin is Supreme and continues to be there.There should not be a second

thought about it.Till the end of kaliyug ,it continues to be related to Jambu

dweepe and can never be altered

> > > vrkrishnan

> > >

> > > --- On Sun, 5/3/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> wrote:

> > >

> > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com>

> > > Re: meru parvat - to vinayji 3/5

> > >

> > > Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:45 AM

> > >

> > > For the curious. ////CAVEAT: This is not scientific or superscientific

evidence!/// /

> > >

> > > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Human_evolution

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@

...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Arjun ji

> > > >

> > > > a very valied point the sankalpa part when we say

> > > >

> > > > Bharatha varasha, Bharatha Khande

> > > > Meru dakshina dik bhagae.

> > > >

> > > > for southern ppl Ganga -Kaveri madhyae...

> > > >

> > > > the continental drift theory propounder belive Indian sub-continent

broke away from E.AFRICA and joined the Asian plate and as it moves northwards

the Himalays formed etc...

> > > >

> > > > Erdy Australia similarly is belived to be part of S Indian plateau even

the soil is similar in chennaim perth it is said....

> > > >

> > > > the later part is non astrological or Hindu scriptures based but does

suggest the way some ppl see History, geography in the eyes of the Imperialists

version of history to suit their version

> > > >

> > > > we r partsuperior they r as they r from European blood

> > > >

> > > > but there is also a theory tha Mankind was born in South africa and

moved upwards to Europe, asia...

> > > > of African breed

> > > >

> > > > Prashant

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...>

> > > >

> > > > Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:19:44 AM

> > > > meru parvat - to vinayji

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > dear vinayji

> > > >

> > > > from few old posts of you and from a link provided by you, i guess you

are suggesting the holy meru parvat is in africa. if this surmise of mine is

wrong, kindly ignore this mail as a misunderstood query.

> > > >

> > > > if you are indeed suggesting mount meru as the one from africa, i fail

to understand why the puranas and other ancient scriptures described meru

parvant or mount meru as different and not surely as in africa.

> > > >

> > > > the significance of mount meru in hindu mythology as well as in hindu

tradition is so high that one purana narrates three full CHAPTERS on describing

the mount meru where THOUSANDS of lines were narrating not on the mythical

properties but pure mathematical and geographical descriptions of the meru

parvat with distances and names of all the mountains far and near and much more.

of course all these names were medieval names but surely from these various

chapters, i understand mount meru is not from africa in my limited history

knowledge.

> > > >

> > > > besides your version of mount meru in africa, i also request professors

like vattem krishnanji on their understanding from history as to where this

mount meru lies. if this mount meru is not what we believe and is in africa as

presented by vinayji, then crores of brahmins are committing an error in their

daily sankalpam as to which direction from meru they are. your answer helps us

understand to which side of meru we are so that we can pronounce the sankalpam

correctly.

> > > >

> > > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > > pandit arjun

> > > > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...