Guest guest Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. " <<<<<< Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in India nor the equator passes through India. I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are teaching me lessons in etiquette. Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. <http://jyotirvidya.wetpaint.com/page/Vinay_Jha> Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! < to hear someone else'swords). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. -VJ ===================== =============== , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag wrote: > > Namasthe > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in astrology. > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > Further, on the computation, > > I just tried todays date & and time > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > Time : 7:00 Am > Latitude : 09:58N > Longitude: 76:17E > > The longitude of Venus as given by > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > jHora : 06:25:44 > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > another local software: 06:26 > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very evident in the words you choose to express. > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two about astrology. > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaayate > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho.abhijaayate.. > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibhramaH > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNashyati.. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free not to test a software. > > > > -VJ > > ======================= ======================== > > > > > > ________________________________ > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in experimenting. > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of " yasaswii " . > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered before forming any opinion. > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other type of dasas. > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system for the sake of experimentation. > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it in lunar dates. > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably will effect the dasa also. > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very easy to commit blunders. > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be confused by this. > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living or bygone. > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is therefore universally applicable. > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain conditions are fulfilled. > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not universally accepted. > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need in actual practice. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of " Time " . > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new also. > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new in your claim. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the birth time also. > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders. Even I was surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you introduced it). > > > > > > with warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their respective fields. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this sentence in two parts, as > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect. > > > > warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not correct. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent to me : > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking about astrology, and I > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that astrological planets are > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he gives is > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical planets. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points. > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary accordingly. > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on solar year. > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more accurate. > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made on > > > the > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun. Such a great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 Dear Vinay ji pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. what may differ is the precession par Prashant ________________________________ vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16 Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. " <<<< << Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in India nor the equator passes through India. I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are teaching me lessons in etiquette. Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. -VJ ============ ========= ============ === , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > Namasthe > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in astrology. > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > Further, on the computation, > > I just tried todays date & and time > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > Time : 7:00 Am > Latitude : 09:58N > Longitude: 76:17E > > The longitude of Venus as given by > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > jHora : 06:25:44 > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > another local software: 06:26 > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very evident in the words you choose to express. > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two about astrology. > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free not to test a software. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in experimenting. > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of " yasaswii " . > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered before forming any opinion. > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other type of dasas. > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system for the sake of experimentation. > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it in lunar dates. > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably will effect the dasa also. > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very easy to commit blunders. > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be confused by this. > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living or bygone. > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is therefore universally applicable. > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain conditions are fulfilled. > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not universally accepted. > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need in actual practice. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of " Time " . > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new also. > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new in your claim. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the birth time also. > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders. Even I was surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you introduced it). > > > > > > with warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their respective fields. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this sentence in two parts, as > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect. > > > > warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not correct. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent to me : > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking about astrology, and I > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that astrological planets are > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he gives is > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical planets. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points. > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary accordingly. > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on solar year. > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more accurate. > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made on > > > the > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun. Such a great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Prashant ji, As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. -V J ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Dear Vinay ji pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. what may differ is the precession par Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. " <<<< << Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in India nor the equator passes through India. I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are teaching me lessons in etiquette. Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. -VJ ============ ========= ============ === , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > Namasthe > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in astrology. > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > Further, on the computation, > > I just tried todays date & and time > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > Time : 7:00 Am > Latitude : 09:58N > Longitude: 76:17E > > The longitude of Venus as given by > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > jHora : 06:25:44 > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > another local software: 06:26 > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very evident in the words you choose to express. > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two about astrology. > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free not to test a software. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in experimenting. > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of " yasaswii " . > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered before forming any opinion. > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other type of dasas. > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system for the sake of experimentation. > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it in lunar dates. > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably will effect the dasa also. > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very easy to commit blunders. > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be confused by this. > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living or bygone. > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ .....> wrote: > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is therefore universally applicable. > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain conditions are fulfilled. > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not universally accepted. > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need in actual practice. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of " Time " . > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new also. > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the birth time also. > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you introduced it). > > > > > > with warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their respective fields. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this sentence in two parts, as > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent to me : > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking about astrology, and I > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that astrological planets are > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he gives is > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical planets. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary accordingly. > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on solar year. > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more accurate. > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made on > > > the > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia ...wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Namasthe, Dear Sri Vinay Jha I am not against testing your softwares or theories. In fact, I tod you I had downloaded it as soon as you released it. What put me off was its user un-friendliness & language & differences in longitudes of planets as I had pointed out earlier. I have done considerable research in this subject & is very open to any knowledge for which I spend huge amount of money. I also travel when time permits just to get even a small amount of insighte into this vast & divine subject. I have one of the best collection of original texts in sanskrit one could possibly imagine to get,painstaikingly collected on astrology, vedas, smritis, samhitas, sastras etc. I have always held that Hora represents & hence its use has a far greater implications than for merely knowing about a few incidences in ones life and that it is multi-dimentional. Knowledge is the essence and I don't claim to be scholar. I won't hessitate to bow my head in front of a worthy person. I am from Kerala and here we have a tradition of hold Ashtamangalya prasna. There will a group of astrologers presided by one person. The are held systematicaly with logic. if one assertains something, it should be proved logicaly. There is no ucha - neecha bhava. No one tries to establish over the others. Questions & clarifications will be saught even by the public & we are used to answer even tantrums. I have participated in many such gatherings. I only wish you did not get irritated by comments most of which were asked sincerely. We also consider all the works of great rishis in our analysis. Even the text " Narapatijayacharya " stress the Keraliya knowledge, which was written 1000 years back. I have also seen planetory possition differ even by one sign as per methods used by Nadi Astrologers. I am trying to understand its implications & methods. But it is not easy. Many of the theories provided in classical works like samhitas contradict or are confusing due to inconsistancy as you have pointed out about the height of Meru. The meassurement of Yojana itself lacks consistancy among samhitas, pranas etc. Names of Saptha Rishis (you very well their importance in astrology / astronomy)are different in various texts. You have provided the information about Mt.Meru on the face of earth. Have you thought about the one inside you?. A layman is least interested in these matters & may not benefit from the knowledge. I hope you understood me & why asked for the reason for the difference in longitude. I use my own software which was developed by me way back in 1995 & now converted to windows. I do not intend to make money by selling it. It is purely reasearch centric. I know you are using Visual Basic for your programe. I dont mind helping you also if you like. With warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Prashant ji, > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > -V J > > > > ________________________________ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Dear Vinay ji > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > what may differ is the precession par > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > India?. " <<<< << > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > India nor the equator passes through India. > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > -VJ > ============ ========= ============ === > , " sureshbabuag " > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Namasthe > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > astrology. > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > Time : 7:00 Am > > Latitude : 09:58N > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > about astrology. > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > not to test a software. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > experimenting. > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > type of dasas. > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > in lunar dates. > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > confused by this. > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > or bygone. > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > therefore universally applicable. > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > " Time " . > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > also. > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > birth time also. > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > introduced it). > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > about astrology, and I > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > astrological planets are > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > gives is > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > accordingly. > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > solar year. > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more accurate. > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > on > > > > the > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Cunay ji do u imply that u r followiong Heliocentric model and also the Vakya -no retrogression for major Grahas? di u aoot beeja corrections, what is the method for this and u must also be patient even when a new drug is created it is tested in house and then some animals then some live patients-volunteers finally only after years it is realesed in to market after the report says it is safe enough similarlt once u publish the charets based on both models of casting and what difference it is making to a result then people may try else TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED Prashant ________________________________ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:43:44 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Prashant ji, As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. -V J ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Dear Vinay ji pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. what may differ is the precession par Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. " <<<< << Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in India nor the equator passes through India. I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are teaching me lessons in etiquette. Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. -VJ ============ ========= ============ === , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > Namasthe > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in astrology. > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > Further, on the computation, > > I just tried todays date & and time > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > Time : 7:00 Am > Latitude : 09:58N > Longitude: 76:17E > > The longitude of Venus as given by > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > jHora : 06:25:44 > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > another local software: 06:26 > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very evident in the words you choose to express. > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two about astrology. > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free not to test a software. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in experimenting. > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of " yasaswii " . > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered before forming any opinion. > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other type of dasas. > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system for the sake of experimentation. > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it in lunar dates. > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably will effect the dasa also. > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very easy to commit blunders. > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be confused by this. > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living or bygone. > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ .....> wrote: > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is therefore universally applicable. > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain conditions are fulfilled. > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not universally accepted. > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need in actual practice. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of " Time " . > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new also. > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the birth time also. > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you introduced it). > > > > > > with warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their respective fields. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this sentence in two parts, as > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent to me : > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking about astrology, and I > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that astrological planets are > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he gives is > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical planets. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary accordingly. > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on solar year. > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more accurate. > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made on > > > the > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia ...wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Shenoy ji, Thanks for your kind response ! I am inviting you to my town for at least one or two days (or for months if you like), whener you wish. If I could have a tete-for-tete talk with a research minded person like you, I will be able to show much more in short time than is possible on internet. This invitation is not for testing Kundalee software which you can test in your home, but for other more important astrological softwares which I never distributed due to concerns for national security. As for Kundalee, I had to translate most essential pages into English in short time, and I want to find time to make it more user friendly. But 6080 unanswered mails are lying in my mailbox, and I have other assignments too. I have no grievance against Sreenadh ji & c too. I am sure if he spends a couple of hours before my computer, I will be able to remove his doubts. If he agrees, you may bring him too. But I am a monk, and I gave my paternal properties to a Sanskrit college (keeping my late mother's house which sustains me). I do not beg. Nor do I charge any fee for chart readings or panchanga making. Hence, I will not be able to pay for tavelling expenses. I will arrange for free lodging for some persons here. At present you may not be motivated to travel so great a distance at the call of a stranger, but I hope you may want to, in near future. -VJ ________________________________ sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:44:22 PM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Namasthe, Dear Sri Vinay Jha I am not against testing your softwares or theories. In fact, I tod you I had downloaded it as soon as you released it. What put me off was its user un-friendliness & language & differences in longitudes of planets as I had pointed out earlier. I have done considerable research in this subject & is very open to any knowledge for which I spend huge amount of money. I also travel when time permits just to get even a small amount of insighte into this vast & divine subject. I have one of the best collection of original texts in sanskrit one could possibly imagine to get,painstaikingly collected on astrology, vedas, smritis, samhitas, sastras etc. I have always held that Hora represents & hence its use has a far greater implications than for merely knowing about a few incidences in ones life and that it is multi-dimentional. Knowledge is the essence and I don't claim to be scholar. I won't hessitate to bow my head in front of a worthy person. I am from Kerala and here we have a tradition of hold Ashtamangalya prasna. There will a group of astrologers presided by one person. The are held systematicaly with logic. if one assertains something, it should be proved logicaly. There is no ucha - neecha bhava. No one tries to establish over the others. Questions & clarifications will be saught even by the public & we are used to answer even tantrums. I have participated in many such gatherings. I only wish you did not get irritated by comments most of which were asked sincerely. We also consider all the works of great rishis in our analysis. Even the text " Narapatijayacharya " stress the Keraliya knowledge, which was written 1000 years back. I have also seen planetory possition differ even by one sign as per methods used by Nadi Astrologers. I am trying to understand its implications & methods. But it is not easy. Many of the theories provided in classical works like samhitas contradict or are confusing due to inconsistancy as you have pointed out about the height of Meru. The meassurement of Yojana itself lacks consistancy among samhitas, pranas etc. Names of Saptha Rishis (you very well their importance in astrology / astronomy)are different in various texts. You have provided the information about Mt.Meru on the face of earth. Have you thought about the one inside you?. A layman is least interested in these matters & may not benefit from the knowledge. I hope you understood me & why asked for the reason for the difference in longitude. I use my own software which was developed by me way back in 1995 & now converted to windows. I do not intend to make money by selling it. It is purely reasearch centric. I know you are using Visual Basic for your programe. I dont mind helping you also if you like. With warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > Prashant ji, > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > -V J > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Dear Vinay ji > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > what may differ is the precession par > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > India?. " <<<< << > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > India nor the equator passes through India. > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > -VJ > ============ ========= ============ === > , " sureshbabuag " > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Namasthe > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > astrology. > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > Time : 7:00 Am > > Latitude : 09:58N > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > about astrology. > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > not to test a software. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > experimenting. > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > type of dasas. > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > in lunar dates. > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > confused by this. > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > or bygone. > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > therefore universally applicable. > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > " Time " . > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > also. > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > birth time also. > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > introduced it). > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > about astrology, and I > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > astrological planets are > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > gives is > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > accordingly. > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > solar year. > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more accurate. > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > on > > > > the > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Prashant ji, Surely, TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED. My profile at ClickHere (http://jyotirvidya.wetpaint.com/page/Vinay_Jha) shows following : >>>>>SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi ( Hindi, presented in summarised form in the national conference at SampoornÄnand Sanskrit University in VÄrÄnasi on Oct 18-19,2005 ( It was unanimously accepted by all leading astrologers of Hindi speaking states participating in this conference that all panchangas / almanacs ought to be made solely from Surya-siddhÄnta). This article can be downloaded from this site (see link below the Home Page).<<<<< " SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi " means : method of making Suryasiddhantic Panchanga. The method of Suryasiddhantic panchanga or kundali is the most time tested one in the world, even Varah Mihir said so. I added nothing new to this method. I have no wish to impose Suryasiddhantic method upon those who dislike it for some purpose or other. I updated the beej-samskaara along ancient rules, because traditional Suryasiddhantic panchanga makers were using old tables updated in 1478 AD.. I never saw any heliocentric astrological software. I use geotopical model, as all astrologers ought to do : planetary positions for the birthplace of native (at the surface of Earth) is needed by astrologers, not for Earth's centre or Sun's centre. -VJ ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:46:26 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Cunay ji do u imply that u r followiong Heliocentric model and also the Vakya -no retrogression for major Grahas? di u aoot beeja corrections, what is the method for this and u must also be patient even when a new drug is created it is tested in house and then some animals then some live patients-volunteers finally only after years it is realesed in to market after the report says it is safe enough similarlt once u publish the charets based on both models of casting and what difference it is making to a result then people may try else TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:43:44 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Prashant ji, As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. -V J ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Dear Vinay ji pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. what may differ is the precession par Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. " <<<< << Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in India nor the equator passes through India. I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are teaching me lessons in etiquette. Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. -VJ ============ ========= ============ === , " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > Namasthe > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in astrology. > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > Further, on the computation, > > I just tried todays date & and time > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > Time : 7:00 Am > Latitude : 09:58N > Longitude: 76:17E > > The longitude of Venus as given by > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > jHora : 06:25:44 > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > another local software: 06:26 > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very evident in the words you choose to express. > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two about astrology. > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > With warm regards > A..G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free not to test a software. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, great many people have contributed their thoughts on this.. Sri Chandra Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in experimenting. > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of " yasaswii " . > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered before forming any opinion. > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other type of dasas. > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system for the sake of experimentation. > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it in lunar dates. > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably will effect the dasa also. > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very easy to commit blunders. > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be confused by this. > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living or bygone. > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages.. Rather that trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > With warm regards > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ .....> wrote: > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is therefore universally applicable. > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain conditions are fulfilled. > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not universally accepted. > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need in actual practice. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of " Time " . > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new also. > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau... " > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the birth time also. > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you introduced it). > > > > > > with warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ .....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their respective fields. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this sentence in two parts, as > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent to me : > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking about astrology, and I > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that astrological planets are > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he gives is > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical planets. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary accordingly. > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on solar year. > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as more accurate. > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either knowingly or unknowingly.. Many of them have made comparative studies of horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made on > > > the > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia ...wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Namasthe, Dear Sri Vinay Jha Thank you for your kind invitation from the bottom of my heart. I shall consider it to be an honour to have your company (sathsangh) and pray to lord as such. Meanwhile, as pointed out yesterday, Venus & saturn show retro motion in computation but displayed as margi. I am not sure if this is a minor overlook or willfully made. With warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Shenoy ji, > > Thanks for your kind response ! I am inviting you to my town for at least one or two days (or for months if you like), whener you wish. If I could have a tete-for-tete talk with a research minded person like you, I will be able to show much more in short time than is possible on internet. This invitation is not for testing Kundalee software which you can test in your home, but for other more important astrological softwares which I never distributed due to concerns for national security. > > As for Kundalee, I had to translate most essential pages into English in short time, and I want to find time to make it more user friendly. But 6080 unanswered mails are lying in my mailbox, and I have other assignments too. > > I have no grievance against Sreenadh ji & c too. I am sure if he spends a couple of hours before my computer, I will be able to remove his doubts. If he agrees, you may bring him too. > > > But I am a monk, and I gave my paternal properties to a Sanskrit college (keeping my late mother's house which sustains me). I do not beg. Nor do I charge any fee for chart readings or panchanga making. Hence, I will not be able to pay for tavelling expenses. I will arrange for free lodging for some persons here. > > At present you may not be motivated to travel so great a distance at the call of a stranger, but I hope you may want to, in near future. > > -VJ > > > ________________________________ > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:44:22 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Namasthe, > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > I am not against testing your softwares or theories. In fact, I tod you I had downloaded it as soon as you released it. What put me off was its user un-friendliness & language & differences in longitudes of planets as I had pointed out earlier. > > I have done considerable research in this subject & is very open to any knowledge for which I spend huge amount of money. I also travel when time permits just to get even a small amount of insighte into this vast & divine subject. I have one of the best collection of original texts in sanskrit one could possibly imagine to get,painstaikingly collected on astrology, vedas, smritis, samhitas, sastras etc. > > I have always held that Hora represents & hence its use has a far greater implications than for merely knowing about a few incidences in ones life and that it is multi-dimentional. Knowledge is the essence and I don't claim to be scholar. I won't hessitate to bow my head in front of a worthy person. > > I am from Kerala and here we have a tradition of hold Ashtamangalya prasna. There will a group of astrologers presided by one person. The are held systematicaly with logic. if one assertains something, it should be proved logicaly. There is no ucha - neecha bhava. No one tries to establish over the others. Questions & clarifications will be saught even by the public & we are used to answer even tantrums. I have participated in many such gatherings. I only wish you did not get irritated by comments most of which were asked sincerely. We also consider all the works of great rishis in our analysis. Even the text " Narapatijayacharya " stress the Keraliya knowledge, which was written 1000 years back. > > I have also seen planetory possition differ even by one sign as per methods used by Nadi Astrologers. I am trying to understand its implications & methods. But it is not easy. > > Many of the theories provided in classical works like samhitas contradict or are confusing due to inconsistancy as you have pointed out about the height of Meru. The meassurement of Yojana itself lacks consistancy among samhitas, pranas etc. Names of Saptha Rishis (you very well their importance in astrology / astronomy)are different in various texts. > > You have provided the information about Mt.Meru on the face of earth. Have you thought about the one inside you?. > > A layman is least interested in these matters & may not benefit from the knowledge. > > I hope you understood me & why asked for the reason for the difference in longitude. I use my own software which was developed by me way back in 1995 & now converted to windows. I do not intend to make money by selling it. It is purely reasearch centric. I know you are using Visual Basic for your programe. I dont mind helping you also if you like. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > Prashant ji, > > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > > > > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > > > -V J > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vinay ji > > > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > > > what may differ is the precession par > > > > Prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > > India?. " <<<< << > > > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > > India nor the equator passes through India. > > > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= ============ === > > , " sureshbabuag " > > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > > astrology. > > > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > > Time : 7:00 Am > > > Latitude : 09:58N > > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > > about astrology. > > > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > > not to test a software. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra > > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > > experimenting. > > > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > > type of dasas. > > > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > > in lunar dates. > > > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > > confused by this. > > > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > > or bygone. > > > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that > > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > > therefore universally applicable. > > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > > " Time " . > > > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > > also. > > > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > > birth time also. > > > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > > ÃÆ'¢â‚¬ " this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > > introduced it). > > > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more > > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > > about astrology, and I > > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > > astrological planets are > > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > > gives is > > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > > accordingly. > > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > > solar year. > > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more accurate. > > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > > knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of > > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Namasthe, I believe the old panchangas were used to be computed using Surasidhanta & beeja Ganitha. But over a period of time, I feel the system was changed. The present generation simply carry on what their predecesors were doing. Most of them do not know the calculations. Some uses a mixture - planetory positions as per standard system, but duration of nakshatra, thithy, yoga differs. No one gives a clear answer, if you try to enquire. I once met an astrologer who makes Sanskrit Panchanga, which actually is different from local panchangas. To my surprise, I found it to be similar and asked him the reason. Since I know him personaly, he admitted that it is actually made by another person & he do not really know the computations. That panchanga is followed by many of temples of our community(brahmin) Such is state of affairs now. Even if we may find logic to be true, it is not very easy to convince a huge number of astrologers who use the standard methods & gets fantastic results. Take for instance, The prediction made by Sri Vr.Krishna elsewere in this forum on a football match. I am sure he uses normal computation. I am sure you understand the difficulty. Many a times rasi chart may not show any difference. The issue arises when one requires more precise dates, numbers etc mostly deduced from vargas. The sad part is we rarely get enough time & energy. I have seen another funny side also. Though you can the computations in seconds using computers, some astrologers insist on manual computation from panchanga, not aware that these are computer generated. The best way will be asses the system in parallel. I can asure you, I shall spend some time on it. with warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Prashant ji, > > Surely, TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED. > > My profile at ClickHere (http://jyotirvidya.wetpaint.com/page/Vinay_Jha) shows following : > > >>>>>SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi ( Hindi, presented in summarised form in the national conference at SampoornÄnand Sanskrit University in VÄrÄnasi on Oct 18-19,2005 ( It > was unanimously accepted by all leading astrologers of Hindi speaking > states participating in this conference that all panchangas / almanacs > ought to be made solely from Surya-siddhÄnta). This article can be downloaded from this site (see link below the Home Page).<<<<< > > " SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi " means : method of making Suryasiddhantic Panchanga. The method of Suryasiddhantic panchanga or kundali is the most time tested one in the world, even Varah Mihir said so. I added nothing new to this method. I have no wish to impose Suryasiddhantic method upon those who dislike it for some purpose or other. > > I updated the beej-samskaara along ancient rules, because traditional Suryasiddhantic panchanga makers were using old tables updated in 1478 AD.. > > > I never saw any heliocentric astrological software. I use geotopical model, as all astrologers ought to do : planetary positions for the birthplace of native (at the surface of Earth) is needed by astrologers, not for Earth's centre or Sun's centre. > > -VJ > > > ________________________________ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:46:26 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Cunay ji > > do u imply that u r followiong Heliocentric model and also the Vakya -no retrogression for major Grahas? > > di u aoot beeja corrections, what is the method for this > and u must also be patient even when a new drug is created it is tested in house and then some animals then some live patients-volunteers finally only after years it is realesed in to market after the report says it is safe enough similarlt once u publish the charets based on both models of casting and what difference it is making to a result then people may try > > else TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:43:44 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > Prashant ji, > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > -V J > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > Dear Vinay ji > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > what may differ is the precession par > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > India?. " <<<< << > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > India nor the equator passes through India. > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > -VJ > ============ ========= ============ === > , " sureshbabuag " > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Namasthe > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > astrology. > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > Time : 7:00 Am > > Latitude : 09:58N > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > about astrology. > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > With warm regards > > A..G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > not to test a software. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this.. Sri Chandra > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > experimenting. > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > type of dasas. > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > in lunar dates. > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > confused by this. > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > or bygone. > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages.. Rather that > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > therefore universally applicable. > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > " Time " . > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > also. > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau... " > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > birth time also. > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > introduced it). > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > about astrology, and I > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > astrological planets are > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > gives is > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > accordingly. > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > solar year. > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more accurate. > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > knowingly or unknowingly.. Many of them have made comparative studies of > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > on > > > > the > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Namasthe Dear Vinay Jha A question on Time Zone. You have not provided for time zone in Kundalee. Is it not considered? or is the software only meant for India (5:30)?. With warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Shenoy ji, > > Thanks for your kind response ! I am inviting you to my town for at least one or two days (or for months if you like), whener you wish. If I could have a tete-for-tete talk with a research minded person like you, I will be able to show much more in short time than is possible on internet. This invitation is not for testing Kundalee software which you can test in your home, but for other more important astrological softwares which I never distributed due to concerns for national security. > > As for Kundalee, I had to translate most essential pages into English in short time, and I want to find time to make it more user friendly. But 6080 unanswered mails are lying in my mailbox, and I have other assignments too. > > I have no grievance against Sreenadh ji & c too. I am sure if he spends a couple of hours before my computer, I will be able to remove his doubts. If he agrees, you may bring him too. > > > But I am a monk, and I gave my paternal properties to a Sanskrit college (keeping my late mother's house which sustains me). I do not beg. Nor do I charge any fee for chart readings or panchanga making. Hence, I will not be able to pay for tavelling expenses. I will arrange for free lodging for some persons here. > > At present you may not be motivated to travel so great a distance at the call of a stranger, but I hope you may want to, in near future. > > -VJ > > > ________________________________ > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:44:22 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Namasthe, > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > I am not against testing your softwares or theories. In fact, I tod you I had downloaded it as soon as you released it. What put me off was its user un-friendliness & language & differences in longitudes of planets as I had pointed out earlier. > > I have done considerable research in this subject & is very open to any knowledge for which I spend huge amount of money. I also travel when time permits just to get even a small amount of insighte into this vast & divine subject. I have one of the best collection of original texts in sanskrit one could possibly imagine to get,painstaikingly collected on astrology, vedas, smritis, samhitas, sastras etc. > > I have always held that Hora represents & hence its use has a far greater implications than for merely knowing about a few incidences in ones life and that it is multi-dimentional. Knowledge is the essence and I don't claim to be scholar. I won't hessitate to bow my head in front of a worthy person. > > I am from Kerala and here we have a tradition of hold Ashtamangalya prasna. There will a group of astrologers presided by one person. The are held systematicaly with logic. if one assertains something, it should be proved logicaly. There is no ucha - neecha bhava. No one tries to establish over the others. Questions & clarifications will be saught even by the public & we are used to answer even tantrums. I have participated in many such gatherings. I only wish you did not get irritated by comments most of which were asked sincerely. We also consider all the works of great rishis in our analysis. Even the text " Narapatijayacharya " stress the Keraliya knowledge, which was written 1000 years back. > > I have also seen planetory possition differ even by one sign as per methods used by Nadi Astrologers. I am trying to understand its implications & methods. But it is not easy. > > Many of the theories provided in classical works like samhitas contradict or are confusing due to inconsistancy as you have pointed out about the height of Meru. The meassurement of Yojana itself lacks consistancy among samhitas, pranas etc. Names of Saptha Rishis (you very well their importance in astrology / astronomy)are different in various texts. > > You have provided the information about Mt.Meru on the face of earth. Have you thought about the one inside you?. > > A layman is least interested in these matters & may not benefit from the knowledge. > > I hope you understood me & why asked for the reason for the difference in longitude. I use my own software which was developed by me way back in 1995 & now converted to windows. I do not intend to make money by selling it. It is purely reasearch centric. I know you are using Visual Basic for your programe. I dont mind helping you also if you like. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > Prashant ji, > > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > > > > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > > > -V J > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vinay ji > > > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > > > what may differ is the precession par > > > > Prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > > India?. " <<<< << > > > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > > India nor the equator passes through India. > > > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= ============ === > > , " sureshbabuag " > > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > > astrology. > > > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > > Time : 7:00 Am > > > Latitude : 09:58N > > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > > about astrology. > > > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > > not to test a software. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra > > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > > experimenting. > > > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > > type of dasas. > > > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > > in lunar dates. > > > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > > confused by this. > > > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > > or bygone. > > > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that > > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > > therefore universally applicable. > > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > > " Time " . > > > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > > also. > > > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > > birth time also. > > > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > > ÃÆ'¢â‚¬ " this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > > introduced it). > > > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more > > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > > about astrology, and I > > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > > astrological planets are > > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > > gives is > > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > > accordingly. > > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > > solar year. > > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more accurate. > > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > > knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of > > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Shenoy ji, Thanks ! Your previous message said : >>>>>>>> Further, on the computation,I just tried todays date & and time Date : 10-Apr-2009 Time : 7:00 Am Latitude : 09:58N Longitude: 76:17E The longitude of Venus as given by Kundalee: 28:37:58 jHora : 06:25:44 Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 another local software: 06:26 Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. <<<<<<<<< Actually, the longitudes were : Kundalee: Kumbha 28:37:58 jHora : Meena 06:25:44 You forgot to mention the Rashi. The difference between Jhora and Kundalee on that day was not of 28:37:58 vs 06:25:44, but of 28:37:58 vs 36:25:44, and is equal to 7:47:46, which appeared to be 22:12:14 to you due to neglecting Rashi. This difference is not due to difference in sidereal mean planets which is small now-q-days, but mainly due to difference in mandaphala and more due to shighra-phala of traditional astronomy (Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, Brahmagupta, Bhaskar-I & II, etc). A lot of panchangas use modern data and call themselves " traditional " panchangas. As far as I know, no panchanga was being made along the ancient principles of Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, Brahmagupta, Bhaskar-I & II, etc , till 2005 AD, when seven new panchangas were started after a consensus was reached in Varanasi among scholars of four Sanskrit universities and astrologers of six states of India. BHU publishes a Suryasiddhantic panchanga without any beeja-samskaara, because Burgess said Suryasiddhanta has no verse for Beeja. But Chapter-1 verse-9 clearly says that changes are made from time to time. These changes cannot be made in basic principles but only in temporary tables (karana or tantra methods), because if the mahayuga-bhaganamaana is changed even by one bhagana, computations will not match with those of previous year's panchanga. Burgess committed the crime of disowning Makaranda Tables as being Suryasiddhantic , the first verse of Makaranda Tables says these tables were Suryasiddhantic. The problem with Burgessa and other modern commentators is that they fail to explain the values in Makaranda Tables, and therefore either deny the veracity of Makaranda Tables or keep quiet. The fact is that Makaranda Tables are made strictly according to principles of Suryasiddhanta which Burgess could not understand. I am unwilling to publish these techniques due a court case, but I can explain these things to you personally, on the computer, if we ever meet. Now-a-days, mean planets of Suryasiddhanta have negligible differences with those of physical astronomy. But in ancient times, even mean motions had a large difference, due to a 42000 year cycle between Suryasiddhantic and physical unuiverses. Suryasiddhantic world is non-physical, and can be proven only astrologuically. If you insist on Suryasiddhanta being a text of physical astronomy, you will end up abusing it as a wrong text. Compare planetary position given by Kundalee and JHora for 1 Apr 400 AD , wou will find far greater differences than at present : doeas it mean all stalwarts like Aryabhatta and Varah Mihir were idiots who failed to watch " errors " of over 10 degrees and declared Suryasiddhanta to be most perfect ! The fact is entirely different than what has been propagated by Europeans and Indian materialists : Suryasiddhantic planets showed greter difference from physical astronomy in ancient times, and therefore there was no taker of physical astronomy in astrology, while 2000 AD the period of minimum difference between Suryasiddhantic and physical planets, which is the reason behind some amount of accuracy in astrological softwares based on physical astronomy. After 2000 AD, this difference has started widening again, and after a few centuries, there will be no taker of physical astronomy in astrology. I am speaking at the worst possible time. The only proof of validity of Suryasiddhanta is comparison of astrological results. In the output form of True Planets (Kundalee), call to Vakri module was missing last year, which I had inserted around Feb 2009. I am surprised to know that this updating was undone by System Restore which I ran last month due to system hanging and forced shutdown ! I now fear my other improvements between Feb and March must have been undone by System Restore ! I thought System Restore restores the system only, but it tampers with user files as well ! I will be careful in future while using System Restore (backing up my files). -VJ ________________________________ sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag Sunday, April 12, 2009 1:06:03 AM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Namasthe, Dear Sri Vinay Jha Thank you for your kind invitation from the bottom of my heart. I shall consider it to be an honour to have your company (sathsangh) and pray to lord as such. Meanwhile, as pointed out yesterday, Venus & saturn show retro motion in computation but displayed as margi. I am not sure if this is a minor overlook or willfully made. With warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > Shenoy ji, > > Thanks for your kind response ! I am inviting you to my town for at least one or two days (or for months if you like), whener you wish. If I could have a tete-for-tete talk with a research minded person like you, I will be able to show much more in short time than is possible on internet. This invitation is not for testing Kundalee software which you can test in your home, but for other more important astrological softwares which I never distributed due to concerns for national security. > > As for Kundalee, I had to translate most essential pages into English in short time, and I want to find time to make it more user friendly. But 6080 unanswered mails are lying in my mailbox, and I have other assignments too. > > I have no grievance against Sreenadh ji & c too. I am sure if he spends a couple of hours before my computer, I will be able to remove his doubts. If he agrees, you may bring him too. > > > But I am a monk, and I gave my paternal properties to a Sanskrit college (keeping my late mother's house which sustains me). I do not beg. Nor do I charge any fee for chart readings or panchanga making. Hence, I will not be able to pay for tavelling expenses. I will arrange for free lodging for some persons here. > > At present you may not be motivated to travel so great a distance at the call of a stranger, but I hope you may want to, in near future.. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:44:22 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Namasthe, > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > I am not against testing your softwares or theories. In fact, I tod you I had downloaded it as soon as you released it. What put me off was its user un-friendliness & language & differences in longitudes of planets as I had pointed out earlier. > > I have done considerable research in this subject & is very open to any knowledge for which I spend huge amount of money. I also travel when time permits just to get even a small amount of insighte into this vast & divine subject. I have one of the best collection of original texts in sanskrit one could possibly imagine to get,painstaikingly collected on astrology, vedas, smritis, samhitas, sastras etc. > > I have always held that Hora represents & hence its use has a far greater implications than for merely knowing about a few incidences in ones life and that it is multi-dimentional. Knowledge is the essence and I don't claim to be scholar. I won't hessitate to bow my head in front of a worthy person. > > I am from Kerala and here we have a tradition of hold Ashtamangalya prasna.. There will a group of astrologers presided by one person. The are held systematicaly with logic. if one assertains something, it should be proved logicaly. There is no ucha - neecha bhava. No one tries to establish over the others. Questions & clarifications will be saught even by the public & we are used to answer even tantrums. I have participated in many such gatherings. I only wish you did not get irritated by comments most of which were asked sincerely. We also consider all the works of great rishis in our analysis. Even the text " Narapatijayacharya " stress the Keraliya knowledge, which was written 1000 years back. > > I have also seen planetory possition differ even by one sign as per methods used by Nadi Astrologers. I am trying to understand its implications & methods. But it is not easy. > > Many of the theories provided in classical works like samhitas contradict or are confusing due to inconsistancy as you have pointed out about the height of Meru. The meassurement of Yojana itself lacks consistancy among samhitas, pranas etc. Names of Saptha Rishis (you very well their importance in astrology / astronomy)are different in various texts. > > You have provided the information about Mt.Meru on the face of earth. Have you thought about the one inside you?. > > A layman is least interested in these matters & may not benefit from the knowledge. > > I hope you understood me & why asked for the reason for the difference in longitude. I use my own software which was developed by me way back in 1995 & now converted to windows. I do not intend to make money by selling it. It is purely reasearch centric. I know you are using Visual Basic for your programe. I dont mind helping you also if you like. > > > With warm regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > Prashant ji, > > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > > > > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis.. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > > > -V J > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vinay ji > > > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > > > what may differ is the precession par > > > > Prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > > India?. " <<<< << > > > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > > India nor the equator passes through India. > > > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > > beginning of Jan 2009.. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > > > -VJ > > ============ ========= ============ === > > , " sureshbabuag " > > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > > astrology. > > > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > > Time : 7:00 Am > > > Latitude : 09:58N > > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > > about astrology. > > > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > > not to test a software. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this. Sri Chandra > > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > > experimenting. > > > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > > type of dasas. > > > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > > in lunar dates. > > > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. .. > > > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > > confused by this. > > > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > > or bygone. > > > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages. Rather that > > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > > > With warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > > explained what are its unique features.. > > > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > > therefore universally applicable. > > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > > " Time " . > > > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > > also. > > > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau.. " > > > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > > birth time also. > > > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > > ÃÆ'¢â‚¬ " this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > > introduced it). > > > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A..G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more > > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > > about astrology, and I > > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > > astrological planets are > > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > > gives is > > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > > accordingly. > > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > > solar year. > > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > > more accurate. > > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it. They know > > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > > knowingly or unknowingly. Many of them have made comparative studies of > > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Shenoy Ji, You said : " I once met an astrologer who makes Sanskrit Panchanga, which actually is different from local panchangas. To my surprise, I found it to be similar. " Different from local panchangas but similar to what ? I could not understand. If one has an astrologer's yoga in his/her kundali, he/she can make fantastic predictions using bad panchangas.. And vice versa. In Bihar, UP, MP, etc, a large majority of traditional panchangas are hand made from ancient tables which are directly or indirectly based upon Suryasiddhanta. these panchangas are crude, but horoscopes made freom them are better than those made from physical astronomy as far as astrological accuracy is concerned. That is why " some astrologers insist on manual computation from panchanga " . I have little knowledge of south Indian panchangas. The knowledge of Siddhanta is in a pitiable condition, as you noted. I mastered it (not completely, but to a great extent), merely to generate envy and anger among those who neglect Siddhanta and call themselves Tri-skandha-jyotishi. -VJ ________________________________ sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag Sunday, April 12, 2009 1:37:07 AM Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! Namasthe, I believe the old panchangas were used to be computed using Surasidhanta & beeja Ganitha. But over a period of time, I feel the system was changed. The present generation simply carry on what their predecesors were doing. Most of them do not know the calculations. Some uses a mixture - planetory positions as per standard system, but duration of nakshatra, thithy, yoga differs. No one gives a clear answer, if you try to enquire. I once met an astrologer who makes Sanskrit Panchanga, which actually is different from local panchangas. To my surprise, I found it to be similar and asked him the reason. Since I know him personaly, he admitted that it is actually made by another person & he do not really know the computations. That panchanga is followed by many of temples of our community(brahmin) Such is state of affairs now. Even if we may find logic to be true, it is not very easy to convince a huge number of astrologers who use the standard methods & gets fantastic results. Take for instance, The prediction made by Sri Vr.Krishna elsewere in this forum on a football match. I am sure he uses normal computation. I am sure you understand the difficulty. Many a times rasi chart may not show any difference. The issue arises when one requires more precise dates, numbers etc mostly deduced from vargas. The sad part is we rarely get enough time & energy. I have seen another funny side also. Though you can the computations in seconds using computers, some astrologers insist on manual computation from panchanga, not aware that these are computer generated. The best way will be asses the system in parallel. I can asure you, I shall spend some time on it. with warm regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > Prashant ji, > > Surely, TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED. > > My profile at ClickHere (http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha) shows following : > > >>>>>SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi ( Hindi, presented in summarised form in the national conference at SampoornÄnand Sanskrit University in VÄrÄnasi on Oct 18-19,2005 ( It > was unanimously accepted by all leading astrologers of Hindi speaking > states participating in this conference that all panchangas / almanacs > ought to be made solely from Surya-siddhÄnta). This article can be downloaded from this site (see link below the Home Page).<<<<< > > " SuryasiddhÄntiya ParnchÄnga Ki NirmÄna Vidhi " means : method of making Suryasiddhantic Panchanga. The method of Suryasiddhantic panchanga or kundali is the most time tested one in the world, even Varah Mihir said so. I added nothing new to this method. I have no wish to impose Suryasiddhantic method upon those who dislike it for some purpose or other. > > I updated the beej-samskaara along ancient rules, because traditional Suryasiddhantic panchanga makers were using old tables updated in 1478 AD.. > > > I never saw any heliocentric astrological software. I use geotopical model, as all astrologers ought to do : planetary positions for the birthplace of native (at the surface of Earth) is needed by astrologers, not for Earth's centre or Sun's centre. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:46:26 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > > > > > Cunay ji > > do u imply that u r followiong Heliocentric model and also the Vakya -no retrogression for major Grahas? > > di u aoot beeja corrections, what is the method for this > and u must also be patient even when a new drug is created it is tested in house and then some animals then some live patients-volunteers finally only after years it is realesed in to market after the report says it is safe enough similarlt once u publish the charets based on both models of casting and what difference it is making to a result then people may try > > else TIME TESTED MODELS WILL BE USED > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:43:44 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > Prashant ji, > As seen from Earth, all planets must follow vakri (retrogression) and then margi paths, excepting Sun, Moon and nodes. But if we could see from the Sun (Heliocentric model), all planets will always be margi, and only Moon and its nodes will show margi & vakri variations. Suryasiddhantic and physical models are same in this respect, the only difference is a difference of few degrees in planetsry positions. > > I know Shenoy ji is not among those who were abusing or attacking me, but he does not want to test Kundalee software just because he follows a different school. I do not want to say anything against any school, but I rate Parashara and Jaimini among rishis. I think Shenoy ji's misgivings have been removed. I have no misgivings or complaint against him. > > -V J > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:25:19 PM > Re: Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > Dear Vinay ji > > pl be patient and polite in replies here as I have said earlier also no one here r from the other group members who have been targeting u so if u expect at least ppl here to try ur model u must be starting from scratch-so patience will help u > > and if as the earlier mail suggested to give examples of both modesl wok sure all will BENEFIT by it > > u have not clarified on the VAKRI/REtrogression is this part of ur model or is not part of it pl clarify > > as the Vakya panchanga karthas or traditional ones don't use them > > and for religious functions, yagnas, Upavas [vrat] etc they use Vakya for Phalit or horary Ganit is used so there is a inbuilt model for them and the ganit model follows retrogression. > > what may differ is the precession par > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 8:11:34 PM > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee- Test it ASTROLOGICALLY !! > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji : > > You said : >>>>>> " By equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, > you are vertually racking up the age old controversy - was astrology > brought to India from outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from > India?. " <<<< << > > Strange argument ! No ancient or modern writer, as far as I know, ever > said Mt Meru was in India (some tried to equate it with Mt Kailash). If > someone locates it in the Arctic Ocean (North Pole), Indocentricism is > not hurt, but if I say that Suryasiddhanta and Narapatijayacharya > clearly say it was at the middle of the Earth in the land of Jamboonada, > does it not prove it was outside India ? Neither Jamboonada flows in > India nor the equator passes through India. > > I do not want to show you posts to me by " reputed " astrologers abusing > my mother and sister in worst obscene language, because I forgave him. > Whom I ever called name ? I merely said some persons are scoundrels and > some are good-hearted. Everyone knows this truth, for which you are > teaching me lessons in etiquette. > > Your words are : " frustration of being rejected or rediculed by others " > is your misconception about me. It was me who rejected worldliness and > became an ascetic, and not the world rejecting me. I belonged to a > powerful political family and my relatives were dejected when I left my > brilliant academic career, having topped both in science and arts > (English literature) to become an ascetic and learn astrology. My works > are accepted by reputed institutions : Click Here. > <http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vinay_Jha> > > Earlier, I did not want to distribute Kundalee software to all and > sundry and gave it only to those who knew its worth. It was created in > 2005, but I started distributing it through the internet actually in the > beginning of Jan 2009. Only those persons are " rejecting and ridiculing " > it who are opposed either to Suryasiddhanta or to BPHS. Hence they are > not rejecting me, they are rejecting Lord Surya or Sage Parashara. To > date, I have not seen a single refutation of Kundalee software based on > any astrological ground. Planetary positions of Suryasiddhanta differ > from yhose of physical planets. Why make a fuss about planetary > positions, make a fuss if astrological results are wrong. Many > softwares are experimenting with ayanamsha and Vimshottari year length, > I widened this experiment to a third zone (planetary position). This > view is based on traditional astrological wisdom, according to which > astrological planets are different from physical planets not only in > character but in heavenly positions as well (CLICK HERE ! > <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o> to hear someone else's > words). I hope Shenoy ji will take my words in a good spirit. > > -VJ > ============ ========= ============ === > , " sureshbabuag " > <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Namasthe > > > > Its very good that you understand that there are various systems in > astrology. > > > > It is you posted here in the first place trying to prove your point. I > dont have to prove anything to you. It was you who refered the Mt Meru & > ujain also. It is not that I wanted Mt.Meru in Ujain. You totaly > misunderstood the concept. Kindly re-read what I had written on it. By > equating Mt.Meru with that of mountain in Kenya, you are vertually > racking up the age old controversy - was astrology brought to India from > outside (Kenya?) or did it go outside from India?. > > > > Not that it is important for normal seekers of astrological advice. > > > > Further, on the computation, > > > > I just tried todays date & and time > > Date : 10-Apr-2009 > > Time : 7:00 Am > > Latitude : 09:58N > > Longitude: 76:17E > > > > The longitude of Venus as given by > > Kundalee: 28:37:58 > > jHora : 06:25:44 > > Traditional Panchanga : 06:28 > > another local software: 06:26 > > > > Kundalee varies Hugely. Can you explain it?. > > > > All your theories make an interesting reading provided it is backed > with " accurate " data & not being sarcastic or bad mouthing > ( " scoundrals " ) that is totaly unbecomming of a monk. > > > > You have immense knowledge in the subject, but it seems frustration of > being rejected or rediculed by others is taking its toll which is very > evident in the words you choose to express. > > > > I do not intend nor consider myself competent to teach you anything, > But being an open forum, every one has to maintain its etiquette, > particularly since a lot of persons visit only to learn a thing or two > about astrology. > > > > dhyaayato viShayaanpuMsaH sa~NgasteShupajaaya te > > sa~Ngaatsa~njaayate kaamaH kaamaatkrodho. abhijaayate. . > > > > krodhaadbhavati sammohaH sammohaatsmritivibh ramaH > > smritibhraMshaad buddhinaasho buddhinaashaatpraNa shyati.. > > > > > > With warm regards > > A..G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > To sureshbabuag ji : > > > > > > There are systems not based on Vimshottari, but no ancient or > modern author has written AGAINST the efficacy of Vimshottari dasha. > If someone believes Vimshottari system is wrong, he/she should not use > Kundalee software. This software is based on BPHS and not on Brihad > Jataka. There are differences in BPHS and Brihad Jataka and I do not > want to say anything against Brihad Jataka or against any system. > Kundalee software is not an encyclopaedia of all systems. > > > > > > I repeat that Kundalee software is world's most accurate software if > one wants to test timing of events based on Vimshottari system and wants > to test all divisionals according to principles of BPHS and Laghu > Parashari. But for those who do not follow BPHS and do not use > Vimshottari, Kundalee software is of no use. > > > > > > I gave reference of verses in ancient texts (eg, Suryasiddhanta, > Narapatijayacharya) about the location of Mt Meru, but Mr Shenoy now > wants Mt Meru in Ujjain without giving any reference. > > > > > > What is the use of arguing with people who want to prove, without > testing a software, that a software should not be used ?? They are free > not to test a software. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ ========= == ============ ========= === > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sureshbabuag sureshbabuag@ > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 3:31:15 PM > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > Now it your turn to look again at what I had written. A never used > the word Lunar Time for computing the " time " for birth time or " Hora " . > > > > > > The computation / reference of " Time " has changed over centuries due > to various developments & adoptations. In old days " time " was found > using the " sankuchaya " , which is practicaly useless at night. > Mechanical clocks were developed only a few centuries back and how many > could have afforded it? even if they could have obtained one. > > > > > > Hence it is only logical & prudent to adopt a suitable method of > computation when time changes. There is nothing illogical in it. > > > > > > Here the only controvercy is over Ayanamsa. Over the centuries, > great many people have contributed their thoughts on this.. Sri Chandra > Hari who holds an M.sc in physics & M.Tech from BHU, Varnasi has given a > new formula based on his findings & information & studies in vedas & > upanishads. But he being not an astrologer and not having true > predictive experience we cannot easily accept it. But there is harm in > experimenting. > > > > > > Late Sri B.V.Raman had given his own formula and many say it is very > accurate. We have to believe it, simply due to the greatness of that > person. I am sure he would not have risked his reputation as well as > that of his ancestors simply on the question of a degree or two. > > > > > > Sri M.C.Lahiri's is the most widely used method and thousands of > great astrologers are staking their reputation & welfare of the people > who seek their advice on a grossily wrong principle. > > > > > > Further, I am sure you are wrongly informed when you wrote about the > efficacy of Vimsottari Dasa for that matter any particular dasa system. > > > > > > Kindly refer to the 7th chapter 1st sloka of brihad jataka > > > > > > mayayavanamaNinthas haktipuurvaiH > > > divasakaraadiShu vatsaraaH pradiShTaaH > > > navatithiviShayaash wibhuutarudraa > > > dashasahitaa dashabhisswatungabh eShu > > > > > > Where the no's for calculation of Ucha/neecha dasa is given & > further says that when raja yoga is present as in the case of > " yasaswii " . > > > > > > He again states the importance of amsaka dasa. > > > swamatena kilaaha jiivasharmmaa > > > grihadaayaM paramaayuShasswaraa MshaM > > > grihabhuuktanavaaMs haraashitulyaM > > > bahuusaamyaM samupaiti satyavaakyam. . > > > > > > again in chapter 8 of the same book verse 22 > > > > > > shubhaphaladadashaa yaam taadrigevaandaraatm aa > > > bahu janayati puMsaaM saukhyamarthaagaman jha > > > kathitaphalavipaaka istarkayedwartta maanaaM > > > pariNamati phaloktiH swapnachindaaswavii raiH.. > > > > > > He is very clear in statement that the dasa which proves most > efficient & corresponds to most of the events should be adopted. > > > > > > What is specifically written, what is not written, what is assumed, > what is commented about others opinion etc all should be considered > before forming any opinion. > > > > > > If Vimshottari alone shows the whole life cycle & events in ones > life Varaha Mihira & others would not wasted their valuable time on > other type of dasa. We do not possess even 1/1000 of the knowledge they > possessed. Still it would not be without reason they searched for other > type of dasas. > > > > > > Similarly, No astrology classical works state that the computation > of period should only be done on the basis Lunar year. Representation of > day / month / year are periodical & subjective to the nation. Even In > India, though English dates are considered for day-today activities & > universal consistency, Some communities only consider Lunar dates for > religious purpose. The only real difference is in the concept & mean. An > English date only a date while a lunar thithy has a wider meaning as far > as we are concerned. Hence, Lunar Year may be considered for dasa system > for the sake of experimentation. > > > > > > Then again, there are many methods. (a) Consider lunar year (b) > consider Lunar converted year 116.5 years instead of 12 year © compute > normally & instead of presenting the output in English dates present it > in lunar dates. > > > > > > Many authors have stressed the need to look at factors like once > lineage etc when stating the effects of planets / yogas which invariably > will effect the dasa also. > > > > > > Saravali : on Raja yogas > > > > > > svocchatrikoNagR^ ihagairbalasaMyu taishcha tryaadyairnR^ ipo > bhavati bhuupativaMshajaata H > > > pa~nchaadibhirjanap adaprabhavo. api siddho hiinaiH > kshitiishvarasamo na tu bhuumipaalaH. . > > > > > > If three planets are exalted or in moolatrikona or with strength, a > person born in royal family shall become the king. The next part also > states similar conditions. The most important point here is " born in > royal family " . Hence it should be understood that the same yoga may not > produce a king if the person is born in much lower family status. This > raises another question, What is use of most accurate dasa system if the > astrologer is not aware of the financial / family background of the > person in such a situation. If we go blindly by data alone it is very > easy to commit blunders. > > > > > > Finaly Mt Meru mentioned by you in another post is very simple. The > " Meru " mean spine in Sanskrit & hence refers to Tropic of cancer which > passes through Ujain. The Mount is added to indicate its greatness & > firmness †" that never changes, the base characteristic of a > mountain. There is nothing mystical about it & and it does not refer to > Meru partvatha used for " palazhi mathana " . The readers should not be > confused by this. > > > > > > While, your thoughts, concepts & software are most welcome, claiming > that it is " worlds most accurate one " is taking it too far. By doing > that you are degrading every other great proponents of astrology living > or bygone. > > > > > > Astronomy & particularly astrology is highly adaptive, and has > undergone various " Samskars " refinement over the ages.. Rather that > trying to exert an already established theory, it would be better if you > concentrate on taking the views of its users & refining the software. > > > > > > With this I rest my case. > > > > > > With warm regards > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > The verses you quoted from Prasna Marg were based upon an earlier > work : Panchsiddhantika of Varah Mihir. > > > > > > > > Why you guessed I have anything new about " Time " ? I used > standard methods of computing birthtime.. Did you guess I used lunar > time everywhere ? There is no hidden thing in Kundalee, and I've already > explained what are its unique features. > > > > > > > > Varah Mihir used different method of dasha, but neither he nor > anyone else has ever said that " Vimshottari dasa need not reveal / > correspond to all the events in ones life " . BPHS clearly gives a long > list of three typres of dashas : > > > > > > > > (1) Vimshottari, which has no condition and no opponent, and is > therefore universally applicable. > > > > (2) Nine other nakshatra based dasha which work when certain > conditions are fulfilled. > > > > (3) Other dashas, about which BPHS says that they are not > universally accepted. > > > > > > > > All your suspicions will be removed when you start using the > English pages of English version of Kundalee ; you need not touch Hindi > pages which are less important and are seldom needed. Complete > translation into English will take a long time : why you do not believe > me that only those pages are in Hindi alone which you will hardly need > in actual practice. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > Friday, April 10, 2009 12:38:54 AM > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > Fine, I understood. But you did not comment on the calculation of > " Time " . > > > > > > > > More over there are many factors to astrology other than mere > calculations alone & the importance of suryasindhanta is nothing new > also. > > > > > > > > " braahmaH saurashcha vaasiShTo raumashaH paulishastathaa > > > > siddhaantaa iti pa~ncha syuuH kathyante khalu tad{}bhidaaH. . " > > > > > > > > The five sidhantas as Brahma, Surya, Vashishta & Poulasa > > > > > > > > " spaShTo braahmastu siddhaantastasyaasa nnastu raumashaH > > > > sauraH spaShTataro. aspaShTau vaasiShTaH paulishashcha tau... " > > > > > > > > Brahama sidhanta is accurate, Romasa is more accurate. Surya is > the most accurate. Vashista & Poulisa is not accurate. > > > > > > > > " kadaachid{} brahmasiddhaanta H saavitrastu kadaachana > > > > kadaachidraumashaH spaShTo na kadaachittathetarau .. " > > > > > > > > Sometime brahma sidhanta is accurate, Surya is always clear, > Sometimes Romasa is clear. But the other are never accurate. > > > > > > > > The above is from Prasna Marga, a book that was written atleast > 1100 years back, a the book we value highly. Hence, there is nothing new > in your claim.. Further, Every classical text urges us to compute " time " > according to " kaladeshapramanena " , simply put using those equipments > awailable at the place / period / century etc. > > > > > > > > There are astrological tools like " kunda kriya " etc to rectify the > birth time also. > > > > > > > > It is also said that the dasa which corresponds to major events in > the past should be considered to predict future events also. This view > is held by almost all the classical writers. Hence, Vimshottari dasa > need not reveal / correspond to all the events in ones life. > > > > > > > > Is astrology solely depended only on computations alone?. > > > > > > > > anekahoraatatvaGYaH paM~nchasiddhaandak ovidaH > > > > uuhaapohapaTuH siddhamantro jaanaati jaatakaM iti.. > > > > > > > > One should have core knowledge of many horas, 5 sidhantas > †" this could very well be Panchasidhanta of Varaha Mihira, > expert in surmising / correlating / intuitive , Mantra siddhi. Such a > person only will know jathaka. > > > > > > > > Though computation is the basis of Astronomy , which becomes the > basis of astrology also , it is not enough. > > > > > > > > Just to drive the point, recently myself & a few homeopathic > doctors were discussing on medical astrology & a chronic nervous > disorder case. I explained, the relationship between the type of > medicine, its relationship with signs, & planets etc. Just then one of > the doctor asked about the rahu & what could be inffered from it / how > it is related to this case?. I must admit, I was taken back, but > remembered that Rahu is called (Paryaya) " Chatram " and could be equated > to Mushroom (toadstool fungi). He said it is called " Agaricus Muscarius " > in Homeopathy and is a medicine for Nervous disorders.. Even I was > surprised at the relationship & what amount of information we can get > from Rasi chart itself if we only we care to spend time & effort. > > > > > > > > Finaly we have to resolve the matter of Lunar year for Vimshottari > as you say. We shall discuss this further, if you like. > > > > > > > > Kindly understand that I am not blindly against your software or > the concepts. Primarily I sincerly wish, It was more user friendly & > fully awailable in english. (I had downloaded it way back when you > introduced it). > > > > > > > > with warm regards > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > ....> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > I said : " remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > You read it as " remove all after " hence " " , and deduced > whatever suited your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > If you want accuracy in positions of physical planets, you need > physical astronomy. > > > > > > > > > > If you need accurate ASTROLOGICAL results, there is no > alternative to Suryasiddhanta. > > > > > > > > > > Both modern astronomy and Suryasiddhanta are accurate in their > respective fields. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:32:59 PM > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe, > > > > > > > > > > Ok, Let me understand more clearly. > > > > > > > > > > You wrote, remove all after " hence " - I had written this > sentence in two parts, as > > > > > A) only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > instead of modern methods of computation > > > > > b) Modern methods are more accurate(than Suryasidhantha) . > > > > > > > > > > Do you refute both the arguments or only the (a) part. Which > brings up another argument. > > > > > > > > > > A) Surya sidhantha is more accurate than modern computations > > > > > b) Modern computation could be accurate for finding planetory > positions, but does not correspond with Phala vibhaga. > > > > > > > > > > When we talk about accuracy, while we are using atomic clocks to > know time, In old days , it was something called " Sankuchaya " that was > used to know time. " Time " as it is measured / known then could be > different from today atomic clocks. Hence, we may have to go back & > start using the old " Sankuchaya " for knowing the Time of birth etc. > > > > > > > > > > Without " if " , " hence " , " but " one cannot understand / learn > anything or convey any thoughts. This is the very essence of what we > call as " Sanskrit " - that which has been refined. No doubt, Astrology is > divine science, But equally there should not be any doubt its deep > scientific roots and without " if " & " but " , one cannot write a software. > > > > > > > > > > Kindly reflect.. > > > > > warm regards > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > All your points are correct, but the reason given is not > correct.. You say : " All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be considered > > > > > > instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more > > > > > > accurate. " > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half is correct ( " " All the phala (results) used for > predictions where originaly based on position of planets computed as per > Suryasidhanta. " ). But remove the word " Hence " in next sentence. I had > same misgivings about Suryasiddhanta as most of the modern astrologers > have, and would never have touched Suryasiddhanta on my own.. But I was > fortunate to be a disciple of a paramhamsa baala-brahmachaari sadhu Dr > Lakshamana Jha who was a great scholar also (he was Ph.D from School of > Oriental and African Studies in London University, and served as a Vice > Chancellor without taking any salary). His 60 books are rotting > unpublished in the hands of unworthy persons, but I was lucky to have > learnt many things from him. I did not arrive at Suryasiddhanta due to > any " hence " , " if " or " but " , due to blessings of my deperted Guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > You may like to see the following which a member recently sent > to me : > > > > > > > > > > > > " This is a video of Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda talking > about astrology, and I > > > > > > think what he says is somewhat similar. He says that > astrological planets are > > > > > > different from the astronomical ones (although the reason he > gives is > > > > > > different), and that they are deities, not just physical > planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=wtRqUFi6l4o " > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 8:56:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. It is not a matter of disliking > hindi, rather it is understanding it. Unfortunately, I don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind waiting. As far as accuracy us concerned, well, > we shall see. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mean while may I surmise your view points.. > > > > > > 1) Calculations for finding the longitude of planets should be > based on Suryasidhanta methods. > > > > > > 2) Hence, Nakshtra, karana, yoga etc shall also vary > accordingly. > > > > > > 3) Vimshottari Dasa should be computed on Lunar year & not on > solar year. > > > > > > 4) All the phala (results) used for predictions where > originaly based on position of planets computed as per Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > 5) Hence only positions as per Suryasidhantha should be > considered instead of modern methods of computation, though regarded as > more accurate. > > > > > > 6) Ayanamsa calculation also should be purely on > Suryasidhanta. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just trying to understand your views. Correct me if am I > erred in any of the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Kundalee software was made in Hindi only and was > distributed freely in the Hindi belt through CDs. Lately, I converted > most important pages into English and uploaded it on the internet. If > you dislike Hindi in the remaing pages of English version, I will have > to delete those pages. But many astrologers said they can read Hindi but > want English input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, please bear for some time. The accuracy of > astrological results will more than compensate for your trouble. I want > to hear about your experiences about the astrological results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:25:39 PM > > > > > > > Re: Main Problems of Vedic Astrology - > Kundalee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namasthe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had downloaded the software. I am sorry to say that, it > lacks user friendliness. Though it could be viewed in Hindi or English, > if we choose english, the form that is displayed when button " Planets " > is pressed switches to hindi from english WHEN ZOOMED. Most of the forms > displays only Hindi & they are highly crowded with data making it less > readable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt that you have created a valuable tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindly look into the problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards > > > > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " > <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I gather from remarks made by users of various internet > forums and experiments made by astrological software makers, the most > important problem faced by Vedic astrologers is that of Ayanamsha. All > other problems of mathematical portion of astrology seems to have been > finally resolved by modern physical scientists. Since the basic rules of > phalita (predictive) astrology have not been questioned by almost all > Vedic astrologers, does it mean barring ayanamsha there is no real > problem in vedic astrology today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But is it really so ? There are softwares in the market > today which give the user an opportunity to chose or put in any value of > ayanamsha. Currently, various values of ayanamsha range from over 22 to > 24 degrees approximately. With all possible values of ayanamsha already > having been experimented with, has the problem of a foolproof software > been solved ? If any astrologer feels he/she already has perfect > softwares and barring a slight readjustment of ayanamsha there is > nothing to be experimented with, he/she need not read my messages, > because it will lead to useless fuss. But if anyone feels even with all > types of ayanamshas and all types of softwares, accurate prediction is > never guaranteed and much remains to be done, they must read this > thread.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrologers are human beings, and to err is human. I have > also erred on many occassions. It is difficult to take into account all > charts together with their due weightage. There were numerous occassions > when with all sorts of interpretations I could not get satisfactory > explanations of real life events. After decades of research, I found out > that most of our current problems are rooted in our departure from > ancient principles, which can be summed up in following points : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha gives accurate results. BV > Raman adopted Suryasiddhantic ayanamsha, but for the present era he > added modern rate of annual precession. Hence his ayanamsha is a hybrid > one, very near to Suryasiddhantic one. Yukteshwar ayanamsha is also > Suryasiddhantic, with negligible difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Vimshottari year of 360 days ought to be lunar, based > 360 lunar days (tithis). Vimshottari is made from Moon. Chhaandogya > Upanishada says full life is of 116 years. 120 lunar years are equal to > 116..4 solar years. leave aside these arguments, perfect timing of > events has found to be achieved with lunar year used for Vimshottari. > Many other software developers had also experimented with this option ; > I am not the first. But they did not carry out the third reform given > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Suryasiddhantic true planets have slight difference > from the true planets of modern physical astronomy, ranging from half to > over a degree. This difference was minimum in 2000 AD and has again > started rising, at the rate of one degree in nearly 117 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If these three adjustments are made into modern > astrological softwares, perfect Vimshottari will be achieved. Some other > softwares have options for lunar year for Vimshottari, and they also > have optons for adding or substracting offset to ayanamsha. Had it > contained similar offsets for true planets and lagna, it would have > saved me years which I wasted in developing Kundalee software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only third of the above three points needs some > clarification, because the first two points have already been adopted in > many famous vedic softwares. Some people say Suryasiddhanta is an > outdated text and there is no need to experiment with it.. They know > majority of Indian panchangas are still made from tables based on > Suryasiddhanta either directly or indirectly. Hence, majority of > traditional vedic astrologers make horoscopes from Suryasiddhanta either > knowingly or unknowingly. . Many of them have made comparative studies of > horoscopes made from traditional system with horoscopes made from > softwares, and a large number of these traditional astrologers declare > that Suryasiddhantic horoscopes are far nearer to real life events that > horoscopes based on modern astronomy. That is why astrologers of many > states of India , led by four Sanskrit universities, unanimously decided > in 2005 at a conference in Varanasi that all panchangas ought to be made > on > > > > the > > > > > > > basis of Suryasiddhanta. Unfortunately, voice of this > traditional India is not duly represented on the internet because most > Sanskrit pandits have little or no experience of computers and internet. > That is why some computerized astrologers think the voice of traditional > Indian astrology must be forcibly suppressed because this > " anachronistic " voice is against modernization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole problem is of just half to little over one > degree of offset in positions of true planets, which will make all > divisional charts absolutely accurate for all natives whose birthtime is > accurate. Moreover, traditional predictive rules work in perfect harmony > with Suryasiddhantic computations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One method of test is analysis of horoscopes for seeing > the operation of rules of death prediction ( http://jyotirvidya. > wetpaint.. com/page/ Prediction+ of+Death ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another method is analysis of horoscopes for examining > Vimshottari timings of events. One example is displayed at > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ Vimshottari+ Dasha under title > Vimshottari Timings for Planets of Mixed Attributes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method is mundane astrology. One example is > forecasting world economy ( http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ > World+Economy+ %3A+Apr+2009- Mar+2010 ) ; another example is > > > > > > > > Economic Future of India : mid-Apr 2009 to mid-Apr 2010 in > the same page ; third example is rain forecast (http://weatherindia > ..wetpaint. com/page/ 2007%3AAnnual+ Rain+Forecast+ (from+Apr) +for+ > South+Asia) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Third method, ie, of mundane astrology, is easiest for > ascertaing whether Suryasiddhantic or physical-astronomic al planets > ought to be used for making horoscopes, because horoscopes made at > Samkraantis has a difference of 6-7 raashis due to over half a degree > difference in Suryasiddhantic Surya and modern asteronomical Sun.. Such a > great difference in horoscopes will make it easier to see which conforms > more to real events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is useless to solve this problem merely by word duel > which will lead us to nowhere. Historical or logical debates will not > help. Practical testing is the only proper way. It is foolish to crush > the voice of a great body of traditional India just because it has no > presence on internet. All these pandits of Sanskrit universities are not > fools or thugs. They have mastered the ancient methods more than > socalled experts of indology in the West. Vedic Astrology is a > traditional discipline and voice of traditional pandits must be > listened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am calling for free and fair comparison of both methods, > without personal attacks. Those who are not interested in examining the > validity of traditional scholarship may keep away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > ============ == =========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.