Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Namasthe recently a lot of messages are appearing about webdunia.com. I have also noticed that whenever I post a message, I get a " Mail failure notice " persumably generated from webdunia due to exceeding their limit. I am posting the exact content for other to comapare and find a solution. ===========Message Content============================ ----- The mail you sent to <mysmact could not be delivered as the mailbox quota for the user has exceeded the limit of 1GB. ----- --- Below this line is a copy of the header of the message .. Received: (qmail 7810 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 Received: from n37d.bullet.mail.sp1. (66.163.168.191) by webdunia.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; s=lima; t=1238921536; bh=MRW7hp+Xnu+3+pJjyb1Y/xoWMy7Qkwyut1LCX6U/GW8=; h=Received:Received:X--Newman-Id:Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:\ Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Re\ ceived:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP\ :X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X--Post-IP:X--Profile:X-eGroups-Approved-By:S\ ender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Un\ :Date:Subject:X--Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=OpXX5JkZJfVcLqQqooB5WFKCZILkUhZma/mngieQg4CaVo52054GpnEQHpLLQ5R4sjseOeL3LihtdI\ ciokWdpdzXOm0u7dEE4rw8TcMdFoJ/DSBrx237aTO4q2M/k+tT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=; b=KvL4REB5cd91yyTFbE/4PM96dKFAoYz/CtGm4n8wO1Zr2hevFJEY7DjSf5d3rCLpnA5LzSL2i4YR/o\ liowCfqdLqrDXD9G/uS99GIJTBv5cs/GlEYlnXq8W2pE0sVPvK; Received: from [69.147.65.174] by n37.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from [98.137.34.37] by t12.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 X--Newman-Id: 9699862-m58437 Received: (qmail 88556 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (98.137.34.44) by 98.137.34.37 with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n61d.bullet.mail.sp1.) (98.136.45.86) by mta1.grp.sp2. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; s=lima; t=1238921531; bh=/ZAj9N0DoEV2vs3JcdtpntGXsEJC2I+oLU7ehVycR+4=; h=Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-\ Received:X-Received:Date:To:Message-ID:In-User-Agent:MIME-Version:Conte\ nt-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X--Newman-Property:X-Originating\ -IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X--Post-IP:Subject:X--Group-Post:X--P\ rofile:Sender:X-eGroups-Approved-By:X-eGroups-Auth; b=hmYg664ZHEk1Ny42zbmlcEeYzvBGciiwgeNnEM3/HeGEUmokSX3TMDak4wAMQprDzSfFuJU++5gAWu\ QIcDCBoOlZ2lLcZS/B/AvE646Mvs2wZyX9Z2hEjobWfylT9vv1 Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n61.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 Received: from [98.137.34.32] by t15.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 X-Sender: sureshbabuag X-Apparently- X-Received: (qmail 31953 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108.201) by m7.grp.re1. with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO n16c.bullet.sp1.) (69.147.64.123) by mta2.grp.re1. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n16.bullet.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 X-Received: from [98.137.34.35] by t15.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 Message-ID: <gr9j4e+forn (AT) eGroups (DOT) com> In-<14317.84385.qm User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 69.147.64.123 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:6:0:0:0 X--Post-IP: 61.17.32.2 " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag X--Profile: sureshbabuag X-eGroups-Approved-By: gbp_kumar <gbp_kumar via web; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:10 -0000 Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list ; contact -owner Delivered-mailing list List-Id: <.> Precedence: bulk List-Un: <- > Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:29:34 -0000 Re: pls analyse how this accident happened. - Re-post X--Newman-Property: groups-email-ff-m Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary= " -ZqAHuR8myTf6F86MGySLQuWlXgIfeDu8Ty4t4w " =================Content over====================================== It seems that a copy of the message is send to webdunia also. It might be that this particular site might be an associate of & there could be something in the terms & conditions of this group policy by that it can use the content / email for its own associates. After all why should it provide this free service?. The only issue is that this started only recently. When I post this message, I am sure I shall get another of such messages. regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Dear Suresh Ji, Regards.The contents are same even in the failure notices I get through webdunia.com.I t was also opned by one of our member today it is due to spyware on server. in fact about 3-4 weeks I brought to the notice in our group why this kind of failure notices have been posted. with such kind of notices,our replies messages migh be going into spam and not received in the In box of JR group. let'c how other members too react and express their views namskarams vrkrishnan --- On Sun, 4/5/09, sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag wrote: sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag Mail Failure Messages from webdunia.com Sunday, April 5, 2009, 8:21 AM Namasthe recently a lot of messages are appearing about webdunia.com. I have also noticed that whenever I post a message, I get a " Mail failure notice " persumably generated from webdunia due to exceeding their limit. I am posting the exact content for other to comapare and find a solution. ===========Message Content===== ========= ========= ===== ----- The mail you sent to <mysmact (AT) webdunia (DOT) com> could not be delivered as the mailbox quota for the user has exceeded the limit of 1GB. ----- --- Below this line is a copy of the header of the message .. Received: (qmail 7810 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 Received: from n37d.bullet. mail.sp1. (66.163.168. 191) by webdunia.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=. com; s=lima; t=1238921536; bh=MRW7hp+Xnu+ 3+pJjyb1Y/ xoWMy7Qkwyut1LCX 6U/GW8=; h=Received:Received :X-- Newman-Id: Received: Received: Received: DKIM-Signature: Received: Received: X-Sender: X-Apparently- To:X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: To:Message- ID:In-Reply- To:User-Agent: X-Mailer: X-Originating- IP:X-eGroups- Msg-Info: X--Post- IP:X- -Profile: X-eGroups- Approved- By:Sender: MIME-Version: Mailing-List: Delivered- To:List-Id: Precedence: List-Un :Date:Subject: X--Newman- Property: Content-Type; b=OpXX5JkZJfVcLqQqo oB5WFKCZILkUhZma /mngieQg4CaVo520 54GpnEQHpLLQ5R4s jseOeL3LihtdIcio kWdpdzXOm0u7dEE4 rw8TcMdFoJ/ DSBrx237aTO4q2M/ k+tT DomainKey-Signature : a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=. com; b=KvL4REB5cd91yyTFb E/4PM96dKFAoYz/ CtGm4n8wO1Zr2hev FJEY7DjSf5d3rCLp nA5LzSL2i4YR/ oliowCfqdLqrDXD9 G/uS99GIJTBv5cs/ GlEYlnXq8W2pE0sV PvK; Received: from [69.147.65.174] by n37.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from [98.137.34.37] by t12.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 X--Newman- Id: 9699862-m58437 Received: (qmail 88556 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (98.137.34.44) by 98.137.34.37 with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n61d.bullet. mail.sp1. ) (98.136.45.86) by mta1.grp.sp2. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=. com; s=lima; t=1238921531; bh=/ZAj9N0DoEV2vs3J cdtpntGXsEJC2I+ oLU7ehVycR+ 4=; h=Received:Received :X-Sender: X-Apparently- To:X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: Date:To:Message- ID:In-Reply- To:User-Agent: MIME-Version: Content-Type: Content-Transfer -Encoding: X-Mailer: X--Newman- Property: X-Originating- IP:X-eGroups- Msg-Info: X--Post- IP:X--Group- Post:X-- Profile:Sender: X-eGroups- Approved- By:X-eGroups- Auth; b=hmYg664ZHEk1Ny42z bmlcEeYzvBGciiwg eNnEM3/HeGEUmokS X3TMDak4wAMQprDz SfFuJU++5gAWuQIc DCBoOlZ2lLcZS/ B/AvE646Mvs2wZyX 9Z2hEjobWfylT9vv 1 Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n61.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 Received: from [98.137.34.32] by t15.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 X-Sender: sureshbabuag@ X-Apparently- X-Received: (qmail 31953 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108. 201) by m7.grp.re1.. com with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO n16c.bullet. sp1.. com) (69.147.64.123) by mta2.grp.re1. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 X-Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n16.bullet.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 X-Received: from [98.137.34.35] by t15.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 Message-ID: <gr9j4e+forn@ eGroups.com> In-<14317.84385. qm (AT) web7904 (DOT) mail.in.. com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0. 82 X-Mailer: Message Poster X-Originating- IP: 69.147.64.123 X-eGroups-Msg- Info: 1:6:0:0:0 X--Post- IP: 61.17.32.2 " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ > X--Profile: sureshbabuag X-eGroups-Approved- By: gbp_kumar <gbp_kumar > via web; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:10 -0000 Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list ; contact - owner@ s.com Delivered-mailing list List-Id: <. . com> Precedence: bulk List-Un: <- > Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:29:34 -0000 Re: pls analyse how this accident happened. - Re-post X--Newman- Property: groups-email- ff-m Content-Type: multipart/alternati ve; boundary= " -ZqAHuR8m yTf6F86MGySLQuWl XgIfeDu8Ty4t4w " ============ =====Content over======== ========= ========= ========= === It seems that a copy of the message is send to webdunia also. It might be that this particular site might be an associate of & there could be something in the terms & conditions of this group policy by that it can use the content / email for its own associates. After all why should it provide this free service?. The only issue is that this started only recently. When I post this message, I am sure I shall get another of such messages. regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Namasthe In order to confirm, I posted two messages one each at Vedicastrology group & srijaganath astrology group. so far, I did not get mail failure notice. If server is infected, why is it not sending messages from other groups also?. If it is being sent from other groups also, since the previous message indicate exeeding their limit, I should have got similar failure notices. Hence we can assume at present, only this group is affected. I am not sure how far the administrator can help in this matter. I am trying to find out more. Meanwhile software proffesional who are working on server technologies, if on this group might be able dig on more information. regards A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , vattem krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear Suresh Ji, > Regards.The contents are same even in the failure notices I get through webdunia.com.I t was also opned by one of our member today it is due to spyware on server. > in fact about 3-4 weeks I brought to the notice in our group why this kind of failure notices have been posted. > with such kind of notices,our replies messages migh be going into spam and not received in the In box of JR group. > let'c how other members too react and express their views > namskarams > vrkrishnan > > --- On Sun, 4/5/09, sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag wrote: > > sureshbabuag <sureshbabuag > Mail Failure Messages from webdunia.com > > Sunday, April 5, 2009, 8:21 AM Namasthe > > recently a lot of messages are appearing about webdunia.com. I have also noticed that whenever I post a message, I get a " Mail failure notice " persumably generated from webdunia due to exceeding their limit. > > I am posting the exact content for other to comapare and find a solution. > > ===========Message Content===== ========= ========= ===== > ----- The mail you sent to <mysmact (AT) webdunia (DOT) com> could not be delivered as the mailbox quota for the user has exceeded the limit of 1GB. ----- > > --- Below this line is a copy of the header of the message > > . > > Received: (qmail 7810 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 > Received: from n37d.bullet. mail.sp1. (66.163.168. 191) > by webdunia.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:28:24 -0000 > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=. com; s=lima; t=1238921536; bh=MRW7hp+Xnu+ 3+pJjyb1Y/ xoWMy7Qkwyut1LCX 6U/GW8=; h=Received:Received :X-- Newman-Id: Received: Received: Received: DKIM-Signature: Received: Received: X-Sender: X-Apparently- To:X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: To:Message- ID:In-Reply- To:User-Agent: X-Mailer: X-Originating- IP:X-eGroups- Msg-Info: X--Post- IP:X- -Profile: X-eGroups- Approved- By:Sender: MIME-Version: Mailing-List: Delivered- To:List-Id: Precedence: List-Un :Date:Subject: X--Newman- Property: Content-Type; b=OpXX5JkZJfVcLqQqo oB5WFKCZILkUhZma /mngieQg4CaVo520 54GpnEQHpLLQ5R4s jseOeL3LihtdIcio kWdpdzXOm0u7dEE4 rw8TcMdFoJ/ DSBrx237aTO4q2M/ k+tT > DomainKey-Signature : a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=. com; > b=KvL4REB5cd91yyTFb E/4PM96dKFAoYz/ CtGm4n8wO1Zr2hev FJEY7DjSf5d3rCLp nA5LzSL2i4YR/ oliowCfqdLqrDXD9 G/uS99GIJTBv5cs/ GlEYlnXq8W2pE0sV PvK; > Received: from [69.147.65.174] by n37.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 > Received: from [98.137.34.37] by t12.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 > X--Newman- Id: 9699862-m58437 > Received: (qmail 88556 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 > Received: from unknown (98.137.34.44) > by 98.137.34.37 with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO n61d.bullet. mail.sp1. ) (98.136.45.86) > by mta1.grp.sp2. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 08:52:16 -0000 > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=. com; s=lima; t=1238921531; bh=/ZAj9N0DoEV2vs3J cdtpntGXsEJC2I+ oLU7ehVycR+ 4=; h=Received:Received :X-Sender: X-Apparently- To:X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: X-Received: Date:To:Message- ID:In-Reply- To:User-Agent: MIME-Version: Content-Type: Content-Transfer -Encoding: X-Mailer: X--Newman- Property: X-Originating- IP:X-eGroups- Msg-Info: X--Post- IP:X--Group- Post:X-- Profile:Sender: X-eGroups- Approved- By:X-eGroups- Auth; b=hmYg664ZHEk1Ny42z bmlcEeYzvBGciiwg eNnEM3/HeGEUmokS X3TMDak4wAMQprDz SfFuJU++5gAWuQIc DCBoOlZ2lLcZS/ B/AvE646Mvs2wZyX 9Z2hEjobWfylT9vv 1 > Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n61.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 > Received: from [98.137.34.32] by t15.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:11 -0000 > X-Sender: sureshbabuag@ > X-Apparently- > X-Received: (qmail 31953 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 > X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108. 201) > by m7.grp.re1.. com with QMQP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 > X-Received: from unknown (HELO n16c.bullet. sp1.. com) (69.147.64.123) > by mta2.grp.re1. with SMTP; 5 Apr 2009 06:30:31 -0000 > X-Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n16.bullet.sp1. with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 > X-Received: from [98.137.34.35] by t15.bullet.mail. sp1.. com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2009 06:29:35 -0000 > > Message-ID: <gr9j4e+forn@ eGroups.com> > In-<14317.84385. qm (AT) web7904 (DOT) mail.in.. com> > User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0. 82 > X-Mailer: Message Poster > X-Originating- IP: 69.147.64.123 > X-eGroups-Msg- Info: 1:6:0:0:0 > X--Post- IP: 61.17.32.2 > " sureshbabuag " <sureshbabuag@ > > X--Profile: sureshbabuag > X-eGroups-Approved- By: gbp_kumar <gbp_kumar > via web; 05 Apr 2009 08:52:10 -0000 > Sender: > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Mailing-List: list ; contact - owner@ s.com > Delivered-mailing list > List-Id: <. . com> > Precedence: bulk > List-Un: <- > > Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:29:34 -0000 > Re: pls analyse how this accident happened. - Re-post > > X--Newman- Property: groups-email- ff-m > Content-Type: multipart/alternati ve; > boundary= " -ZqAHuR8m yTf6F86MGySLQuWl XgIfeDu8Ty4t4w " > > ============ =====Content over======== ========= ========= ========= === > > It seems that a copy of the message is send to webdunia also. It might be that this particular site might be an associate of & there could be something in the terms & conditions of this group policy by that it can use the content / email for its own associates. After all why should it provide this free service?. The only issue is that this started only recently. > > When I post this message, I am sure I shall get another of such messages. > > regards > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.