Lagna Rasi Question-nothing controversial or provocative

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

 

There is no problem in taking lagna covering two houses. That is what

essentially the concept of bhava and aspects in Sripati Paddhati followed.

 

But please note that the final outcome should be decided on the basis of the

ruler of the sign where the exact lagna falls in.

 

In one of the issues of Astrological Magazine Mrs Gayatri Devi Vasudev through

her illuminating editorial

 

'Rasi and Bhava not Rasi or Bhava' has solved major part of the issue. Please go

through her editorial. You will surely benefit a lot.

 

 

Additionally in the book 'catechisms of astrology' late illustrious Dr. BV Raman

clearly tells :

 

Planets in good bhava, friendly/own/exaltation rasi = good results

Plaents in bad bhava, friendly/own/exaltation rasi = minimal bad results and so

on.

 

 

Just a simple example;

 

My son born in the boarder of aries/taurus lagna.

 

As per the doctor's recorded time in birth certificate lagna is taurus. But when

he started growing on...learned to talk and walk...it was became quite clear

that he is of aries lagna...from his dominating and leadership qualities...the

way he walks in a brisk manner like a military personnel and also talks out his

thoughts very very crisply and objectively. He still stammers while beginning a

sentence. This is probably due to weak mercury as the 3rd lord of expression in

the second house of speech. Venus is quite strong as far away from sun providing

the protection from major speech related problems.

 

 

 

Natal Chart

 

May 27, 2005

Time: 4:22:00( unrectified time was 4:25AM)

Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

Place: 85 E 58' 00 " , 21 N 47' 00 "

Karanjia, India

 

Body Longitude Nakshatra Pada Rasi Navamsa

 

Lagna 29 Ar 47' 40.62 " Krit 1 Ar Sg

Sun - PiK 11 Ta 50' 31.30 " Rohi 1 Ta Ar

Moon - BK 24 Sg 16' 48.10 " PSha 4 Sg Sc

Mars - AmK 24 Aq 40' 37.51 " PBha 2 Aq Ta

Mercury - GK 2 Ta 56' 46.92 " Krit 2 Ta Cp

Jupiter ® - MK 15 Vi 07' 52.05 " Hast 2 Vi Ta

Venus - AK 26 Ta 40' 30.35 " Mrig 2 Ta Vi

Saturn - DK 0 Cn 05' 33.92 " Puna 4 Cn Cn

Rahu - PK 26 Pi 39' 47.31 " Reva 3 Pi Aq

Ketu 26 Vi 39' 47.31 " Chit 1 Vi Le

 

 

Please not that in this case sun as the 5th lord of intelligence comes in 1st

bhava or lagna in bhava kundli.

 

But it is in the house of enemy.

 

So the result should be read as...sun as the 5th lord placed in 2nd rasi an

enemy sign in lagna bhava. Please note that in the astrology software if you are

not using the circular chart format ( which is used only in part of Vanaras and

West Bengal only) sun will be wrongly shown in the sign Aries. Please note that

showing sun is sign aries is quite wrong.

 

So there is no harm in showing houses or lagna in two rasi. But it must be shown

in circular chart only for visual accuracy.

 

Other charts such as north indian diamond chart format or the south indian suqre

format or even the east indian solar format are not able to show bhava kundli /

chart properly owing to their inherent deficiency.

 

I have seen illustrious astrologer Shri MC Jain casting circular chart in all

his writings and books. Dr Raman and Mrs Gayatri Devi Vasudev using them in

proper perspective even without casting the circular charts.

 

With regards and best wishes,

 

Pt. Mrutyunjay Tripathy

09811971190

 

, " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan

wrote:

>

> Dear Satybhama!

>

> Actually this is not a unique question or even 'provocative' as some

infrequent posters bring it up, hoping to stirr the pond, with baited breath!

>

> Tripathyji has addressed it recently, proactively one may say (!), right here

on this forum in the last few days :-)

>

> Please read the messages carefully posted here over the last oh say 7 days!

>

> RR

>

> , " Satyabhama Gupta "

<satyabhama_gupta_1980@> wrote:

> >

> > Pranam

> > I had a very rudimentary question on astrology. Please do excuse me for

asking such a basic question.

> > If someone has Lagna/Asc in 10 Degrees Leo, we consider that first house as

Leo

> > If someone has the Lagna in 20 Degrees Leo, then too we consider the first

house as Leo

> > If someone has the Lagna in 29 Degrees Leo, then too we consider the first

house as Leo

> > Shouldn't we consider the Lagna to be the center of the horoscope and in

that case is their a possibility that two different rasis can form the houses of

the horoscope?

> > Satyabhama

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Pranam

This is really a very informative mail.

Thank you

Satyabhama

, " Mrutyunjay Tripathy "

<astrologer_mrutyunjay wrote:

>

> Dear friends,

>

> There is no problem in taking lagna covering two houses. That is what

essentially the concept of bhava and aspects in Sripati Paddhati followed.

>

> But please note that the final outcome should be decided on the basis of the

ruler of the sign where the exact lagna falls in.

>

> In one of the issues of Astrological Magazine Mrs Gayatri Devi Vasudev through

her illuminating editorial

>

> 'Rasi and Bhava not Rasi or Bhava' has solved major part of the issue. Please

go through her editorial. You will surely benefit a lot.

>

>

> Additionally in the book 'catechisms of astrology' late illustrious Dr. BV

Raman clearly tells :

>

> Planets in good bhava, friendly/own/exaltation rasi = good results

> Plaents in bad bhava, friendly/own/exaltation rasi = minimal bad results and

so on.

>

>

> Just a simple example;

>

> My son born in the boarder of aries/taurus lagna.

>

> As per the doctor's recorded time in birth certificate lagna is taurus. But

when he started growing on...learned to talk and walk...it was became quite

clear that he is of aries lagna...from his dominating and leadership

qualities...the way he walks in a brisk manner like a military personnel and

also talks out his thoughts very very crisply and objectively. He still stammers

while beginning a sentence. This is probably due to weak mercury as the 3rd lord

of expression in the second house of speech. Venus is quite strong as far away

from sun providing the protection from major speech related problems.

>

>

>

> Natal Chart

>

> May 27, 2005

> Time: 4:22:00( unrectified time was 4:25AM)

> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

> Place: 85 E 58' 00 " , 21 N 47' 00 "

> Karanjia, India

>

> Body Longitude Nakshatra Pada Rasi Navamsa

>

> Lagna 29 Ar 47' 40.62 " Krit 1 Ar Sg

> Sun - PiK 11 Ta 50' 31.30 " Rohi 1 Ta Ar

> Moon - BK 24 Sg 16' 48.10 " PSha 4 Sg Sc

> Mars - AmK 24 Aq 40' 37.51 " PBha 2 Aq Ta

> Mercury - GK 2 Ta 56' 46.92 " Krit 2 Ta Cp

> Jupiter ® - MK 15 Vi 07' 52.05 " Hast 2 Vi Ta

> Venus - AK 26 Ta 40' 30.35 " Mrig 2 Ta Vi

> Saturn - DK 0 Cn 05' 33.92 " Puna 4 Cn Cn

> Rahu - PK 26 Pi 39' 47.31 " Reva 3 Pi Aq

> Ketu 26 Vi 39' 47.31 " Chit 1 Vi Le

>

>

> Please not that in this case sun as the 5th lord of intelligence comes in 1st

bhava or lagna in bhava kundli.

>

> But it is in the house of enemy.

>

> So the result should be read as...sun as the 5th lord placed in 2nd rasi an

enemy sign in lagna bhava. Please note that in the astrology software if you are

not using the circular chart format ( which is used only in part of Vanaras and

West Bengal only) sun will be wrongly shown in the sign Aries. Please note that

showing sun is sign aries is quite wrong.

>

> So there is no harm in showing houses or lagna in two rasi. But it must be

shown in circular chart only for visual accuracy.

>

> Other charts such as north indian diamond chart format or the south indian

suqre format or even the east indian solar format are not able to show bhava

kundli / chart properly owing to their inherent deficiency.

>

> I have seen illustrious astrologer Shri MC Jain casting circular chart in all

his writings and books. Dr Raman and Mrs Gayatri Devi Vasudev using them in

proper perspective even without casting the circular charts.

>

> With regards and best wishes,

>

> Pt. Mrutyunjay Tripathy

> 09811971190

>

> , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan@>

wrote:

> >

> > Dear Satybhama!

> >

> > Actually this is not a unique question or even 'provocative' as some

infrequent posters bring it up, hoping to stirr the pond, with baited breath!

> >

> > Tripathyji has addressed it recently, proactively one may say (!), right

here on this forum in the last few days :-)

> >

> > Please read the messages carefully posted here over the last oh say 7 days!

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , " Satyabhama Gupta "

<satyabhama_gupta_1980@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Pranam

> > > I had a very rudimentary question on astrology. Please do excuse me for

asking such a basic question.

> > > If someone has Lagna/Asc in 10 Degrees Leo, we consider that first house

as Leo

> > > If someone has the Lagna in 20 Degrees Leo, then too we consider the first

house as Leo

> > > If someone has the Lagna in 29 Degrees Leo, then too we consider the first

house as Leo

> > > Shouldn't we consider the Lagna to be the center of the horoscope and in

that case is their a possibility that two different rasis can form the houses of

the horoscope?

> > > Satyabhama

> > >

> >

>