Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear RRji,

 

except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest of it is not

stand alone.

so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its significance, may be u

can give it some more lines

 

and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching ridicilous

proportions. if JSY  can alone do so much harm then we dont need astrolgoers at

all these half baled ppl come around and smear one or tow factors all the time

be it Mangalik, KSY or some spl stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha,

Swati, Anuradha etc as Maha nakshatras so no matching required

Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to bee seen as

TAMILS do.

ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar bashing when so many

applicable factors make the reading.

 

this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their clients to seek

better people after a glance like a general medical practioner does refer to a

Senior in that subject

 

 

prashantr

--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan wrote:

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

 

Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar ji as a personal

 

sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me to

 

write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like it,

 

choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other flavours,

 

perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so on ...

 

 

 

It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and politics

 

and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other line of

 

work or discipline or profession etc.

 

 

 

I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

 

inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!) say that

 

over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the *island*

 

of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely remained

 

aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For this I

 

must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

 

 

 

This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but simply 'detached'

 

in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything claimed

 

too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

 

received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

 

 

 

Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

 

anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them trying to

 

understand and even empathize with their despondancy that arises from

 

the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their current

 

life-plan.

 

 

 

Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that dreaded

 

moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or her

 

first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not pleasant

 

it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

 

 

 

The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must remain

 

watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

 

disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about all 'healers' is

 

that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

 

 

 

But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and get

 

impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an Ashram of

 

Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty hospital

 

everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one thing

 

is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

 

 

 

Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in God,

 

the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once lost --

 

will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

 

questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and their

 

advice.

 

 

 

Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking from

 

the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands but

 

does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like a

 

parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and crying

 

like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the PARENT,

 

though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the experience!

 

 

 

God Bless you all!

 

 

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand alone? " .

 

The " not " is creating confusion!

 

And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the earlier

is a stand alone!

 

As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some of

us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

 

Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something that

cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well those

would have to appear on private sites, right?

 

Does that make sense to the forum?

 

RR

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear RRji,

>

> except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest of

it is not stand alone.

> so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

significance, may be u can give it some more lines

>

> and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

ridicilous proportions. if JSY  can alone do so much harm then we

dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around and

smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or some spl

stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha etc as

Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to bee

seen as TAMILS do.

> ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar bashing

when so many applicable factors make the reading.

>

> this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

> I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their

clients to seek better people after a glance like a general medical

practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

>

>

> prashantr

> --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan wrote:

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

> JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

>

> Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

>

>

>

>

>

Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar ji

as a personal

>

> sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me to

>

> write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like it,

>

> choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other flavours,

>

> perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so on ...

>

>

>

> It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

politics

>

> and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other line of

>

> work or discipline or profession etc.

>

>

>

> I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

>

> inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!) say

that

>

> over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

*island*

>

> of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

remained

>

> aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For this I

>

> must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

>

>

>

> This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

simply 'detached'

>

> in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

claimed

>

> too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

>

> received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

>

>

>

> Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

>

> anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them trying

to

>

> understand and even empathize with their despondancy that arises

from

>

> the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

current

>

> life-plan.

>

>

>

> Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that dreaded

>

> moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or her

>

> first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

pleasant

>

> it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

>

>

>

> The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must remain

>

> watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

>

> disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about all 'healers' is

>

> that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

>

>

>

> But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and get

>

> impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an Ashram of

>

> Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty hospital

>

> everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one

thing

>

> is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

>

>

>

> Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in God,

>

> the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once lost --

>

> will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

>

> questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and

their

>

> advice.

>

>

>

> Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking

from

>

> the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands but

>

> does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like a

>

> parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and crying

>

> like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the PARENT,

>

> though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

experience!

>

>

>

> God Bless you all!

>

>

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear RRji

for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get the link sure many

more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why u put those lines to avoid

any chain reaction IF ANY.

 

so far so good.

 

and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation, else groups will

lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can be public

 

prashant

 

 

________________________________

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

 

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

 

 

Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand alone? " .

 

The " not " is creating confusion!

 

And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the earlier

is a stand alone!

 

As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some of

us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

 

Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something that

cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well those

would have to appear on private sites, right?

 

Does that make sense to the forum?

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote:

>

> Dear RRji,

>

> except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest of

it is not stand alone.

> so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

significance, may be u can give it some more lines

>

> and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm then we

dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around and

smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or some spl

stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha etc as

Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to bee

seen as TAMILS do.

> ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar bashing

when so many applicable factors make the reading.

>

> this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

> I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their

clients to seek better people after a glance like a general medical

practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

>

>

> prashantr

> --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

>

> Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

>

>

>

>

>

Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar ji

as a personal

>

> sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me to

>

> write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like it,

>

> choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other flavours,

>

> perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so on ...

>

>

>

> It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

politics

>

> and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other line of

>

> work or discipline or profession etc.

>

>

>

> I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

>

> inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!) say

that

>

> over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

*island*

>

> of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

remained

>

> aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For this I

>

> must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

>

>

>

> This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

simply 'detached'

>

> in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

claimed

>

> too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

>

> received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

>

>

>

> Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

>

> anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them trying

to

>

> understand and even empathize with their despondancy that arises

from

>

> the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

current

>

> life-plan.

>

>

>

> Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that dreaded

>

> moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or her

>

> first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

pleasant

>

> it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

>

>

>

> The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must remain

>

> watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

>

> disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about all 'healers' is

>

> that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

>

>

>

> But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and get

>

> impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an Ashram of

>

> Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty hospital

>

> everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one

thing

>

> is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

>

>

>

> Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in God,

>

> the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once lost --

>

> will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

>

> questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and

their

>

> advice.

>

>

>

> Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking

from

>

> the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands but

>

> does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like a

>

> parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and crying

>

> like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the PARENT,

>

> though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

experience!

>

>

>

> God Bless you all!

>

>

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

 

I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek readings

to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae model.

You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a stomach upset,

take the green pill, if this or that system does not work, take the

yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If all

fails surgery is there.

 

The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing jyotish

writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate and

reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the system of

remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model, then

there would not be so many coming back again and again reporting that

this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this or

something else and they are not getting any better. And each

astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

 

As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is correct

diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or possible or

deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not applied

mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they believe in

it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain therapeutic

modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of the

psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as placebo

effect etc.

 

There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers. In many

cases it seems that the intent and other important details (spiritual

state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which to

practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a higher

Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can recite one

lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep on

fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones and make

the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter, but the

disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why me? "

and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head or in

one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the wheels

of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-confusion!

 

That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense to some,

regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of thinking,

and whether they like me or what I write or not...

 

Namastay!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear RRji

> for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get the link

sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why u put

those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

>

> so far so good.

>

> and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation, else

groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can be

public

>

> prashant

>

>

> ________________________________

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

>

> Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

> Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

>

>

> Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand

alone? " .

>

> The " not " is creating confusion!

>

> And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the

earlier

> is a stand alone!

>

> As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some of

> us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

> manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

>

> Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something

that

> cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well those

> would have to appear on private sites, right?

>

> Does that make sense to the forum?

>

> RR

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

> <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > Dear RRji,

> >

> > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest

of

> it is not stand alone.

> > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

> significance, may be u can give it some more lines

> >

> > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

> ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm then we

> dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around and

> smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or some

spl

> stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha etc

as

> Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to

bee

> seen as TAMILS do.

> > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar bashing

> when so many applicable factors make the reading.

> >

> > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

> > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their

> clients to seek better people after a glance like a general medical

> practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

> >

> >

> > prashantr

> > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

> >

> > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar ji

> as a personal

> >

> > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me to

> >

> > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like it,

> >

> > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

flavours,

> >

> > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so

on ...

> >

> >

> >

> > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

> politics

> >

> > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other line

of

> >

> > work or discipline or profession etc.

> >

> >

> >

> > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

> >

> > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!) say

> that

> >

> > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

> *island*

> >

> > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

> remained

> >

> > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For this

I

> >

> > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

> >

> >

> >

> > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

> simply 'detached'

> >

> > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

> claimed

> >

> > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

> >

> > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

> >

> >

> >

> > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

> >

> > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them

trying

> to

> >

> > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that arises

> from

> >

> > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

> current

> >

> > life-plan.

> >

> >

> >

> > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that dreaded

> >

> > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or her

> >

> > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

> pleasant

> >

> > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

> >

> >

> >

> > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must remain

> >

> > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

> >

> > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about all 'healers'

is

> >

> > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

> >

> >

> >

> > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and get

> >

> > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an Ashram

of

> >

> > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty hospital

> >

> > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one

> thing

> >

> > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

> >

> >

> >

> > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in

God,

> >

> > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once lost --

 

> >

> > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

> >

> > questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and

> their

> >

> > advice.

> >

> >

> >

> > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking

> from

> >

> > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands

but

> >

> > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like a

> >

> > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and

crying

> >

> > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the

PARENT,

> >

> > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

> experience!

> >

> >

> >

> > God Bless you all!

> >

> >

> >

> > Rohiniranjan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shri Rohini dada,

Mechanically application of basics come out after knowing the basic objectives

jyotish and practices come up after thorough aunderstanding of the subject.

otherwise people look for medical applications model.Pwerhaps Internet media

made many things to put for wrong approaches and wrong prescriptions too

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Wed, 1/28/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan wrote:

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

 

Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 8:36 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

 

 

 

I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek readings

 

to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae model.

 

You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a stomach upset,

 

take the green pill, if this or that system does not work, take the

 

yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If all

 

fails surgery is there.

 

 

 

The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing jyotish

 

writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate and

 

reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the system of

 

remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model, then

 

there would not be so many coming back again and again reporting that

 

this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this or

 

something else and they are not getting any better. And each

 

astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

 

 

 

As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is correct

 

diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

 

prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or possible or

 

deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not applied

 

mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

 

chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they believe in

 

it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain therapeutic

 

modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of the

 

psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as placebo

 

effect etc.

 

 

 

There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers. In many

 

cases it seems that the intent and other important details (spiritual

 

state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which to

 

practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

 

explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

 

revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a higher

 

Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can recite one

 

lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep on

 

fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones and make

 

the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter, but the

 

disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why me? "

 

and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head or in

 

one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the wheels

 

of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-confusion!

 

 

 

That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense to some,

 

regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of thinking,

 

and whether they like me or what I write or not...

 

 

 

Namastay!

 

 

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

 

<gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote:

 

>

 

> Dear RRji

 

> for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get the link

 

sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why u put

 

those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

 

>

 

> so far so good.

 

>

 

> and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation, else

 

groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can be

 

public

 

>

 

> prashant

 

>

 

>

 

> ____________ _________ _________ __

 

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

 

>

 

> Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

 

> Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

 

>

 

>

 

> Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand

 

alone? " .

 

>

 

> The " not " is creating confusion!

 

>

 

> And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the

 

earlier

 

> is a stand alone!

 

>

 

> As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some of

 

> us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

 

> manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

 

>

 

> Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something

 

that

 

> cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well those

 

> would have to appear on private sites, right?

 

>

 

> Does that make sense to the forum?

 

>

 

> RR

 

>

 

> , Prashant Kumar G B

 

> <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

 

> >

 

> > Dear RRji,

 

> >

 

> > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest

 

of

 

> it is not stand alone.

 

> > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

 

> significance, may be u can give it some more lines

 

> >

 

> > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

 

> ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm then we

 

> dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around and

 

> smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or some

 

spl

 

> stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha etc

 

as

 

> Maha nakshatras so no matching required

 

> > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to

 

bee

 

> seen as TAMILS do.

 

> > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar bashing

 

> when so many applicable factors make the reading.

 

> >

 

> > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

 

> > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their

 

> clients to seek better people after a glance like a general medical

 

> practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > prashantr

 

> > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

 

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

 

> > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

 

> >

 

> > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar ji

 

> as a personal

 

> >

 

> > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me to

 

> >

 

> > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like it,

 

> >

 

> > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

 

flavours,

 

> >

 

> > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so

 

on ...

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

 

> politics

 

> >

 

> > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other line

 

of

 

> >

 

> > work or discipline or profession etc.

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

 

> >

 

> > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!) say

 

> that

 

> >

 

> > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

 

> *island*

 

> >

 

> > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

 

> remained

 

> >

 

> > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For this

 

I

 

> >

 

> > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

 

> simply 'detached'

 

> >

 

> > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

 

> claimed

 

> >

 

> > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

 

> >

 

> > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

 

> >

 

> > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them

 

trying

 

> to

 

> >

 

> > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that arises

 

> from

 

> >

 

> > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

 

> current

 

> >

 

> > life-plan.

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that dreaded

 

> >

 

> > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or her

 

> >

 

> > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

 

> pleasant

 

> >

 

> > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must remain

 

> >

 

> > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

 

> >

 

> > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about all 'healers'

 

is

 

> >

 

> > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and get

 

> >

 

> > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an Ashram

 

of

 

> >

 

> > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty hospital

 

> >

 

> > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one

 

> thing

 

> >

 

> > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in

 

God,

 

> >

 

> > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once lost --

 

 

 

> >

 

> > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

 

> >

 

> > questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and

 

> their

 

> >

 

> > advice.

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking

 

> from

 

> >

 

> > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands

 

but

 

> >

 

> > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like a

 

> >

 

> > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and

 

crying

 

> >

 

> > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the

 

PARENT,

 

> >

 

> > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

 

> experience!

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > God Bless you all!

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > Rohiniranjan

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Krishnan ji,

 

It is sad but true that internet due to its speed and space has been

responsible for the good, bad and the ugly in Jyotish, just as in

many other areas and disciplines.

 

Serious astrology simply cannot be done effectively on internet. It

is too impersonal in contrast with a traditional human to human

reading, which though slower is sustained. I am sure there will be

practitioners who would disagree...

 

RR

 

, vattem krishnan

<bursar_99 wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Rohini dada,

> Mechanically application of basics come out after knowing the basic

objectives jyotish and practices come up after thorough

aunderstanding of the subject.

> otherwise people look for medical applications model.Pwerhaps

Internet media made many things to put for wrong approaches and wrong

prescriptions too

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan wrote:

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

> Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

>

> Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 8:36 AM

>

>

>

>

>

I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

>

>

>

> I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek

readings

>

> to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae model.

>

> You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a stomach

upset,

>

> take the green pill, if this or that system does not work, take the

>

> yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If all

>

> fails surgery is there.

>

>

>

> The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing jyotish

>

> writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate and

>

> reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the system of

>

> remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model, then

>

> there would not be so many coming back again and again reporting

that

>

> this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this or

>

> something else and they are not getting any better. And each

>

> astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

>

>

>

> As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is correct

>

> diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

>

> prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or possible or

>

> deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not applied

>

> mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

>

> chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they believe

in

>

> it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain therapeutic

>

> modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of the

>

> psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as placebo

>

> effect etc.

>

>

>

> There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers. In many

>

> cases it seems that the intent and other important details

(spiritual

>

> state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which to

>

> practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

>

> explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

>

> revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a

higher

>

> Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can recite one

>

> lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep on

>

> fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones and make

>

> the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter, but

the

>

> disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why me? "

>

> and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head or in

>

> one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the wheels

>

> of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-confusion!

>

>

>

> That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense to

some,

>

> regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of

thinking,

>

> and whether they like me or what I write or not...

>

>

>

> Namastay!

>

>

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

>

> <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Dear RRji

>

> > for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get the

link

>

> sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why u

put

>

> those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

>

> >

>

> > so far so good.

>

> >

>

> > and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation,

else

>

> groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can be

>

> public

>

> >

>

> > prashant

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

>

> >

>

> > Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

>

> > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand

>

> alone? " .

>

> >

>

> > The " not " is creating confusion!

>

> >

>

> > And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the

>

> earlier

>

> > is a stand alone!

>

> >

>

> > As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some

of

>

> > us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

>

> > manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

>

> >

>

> > Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something

>

> that

>

> > cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well those

>

> > would have to appear on private sites, right?

>

> >

>

> > Does that make sense to the forum?

>

> >

>

> > RR

>

> >

>

> > , Prashant Kumar G B

>

> > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear RRji,

>

> > >

>

> > > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg, rest

>

> of

>

> > it is not stand alone.

>

> > > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

>

> > significance, may be u can give it some more lines

>

> > >

>

> > > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

>

> > ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm then we

>

> > dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around and

>

> > smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or some

>

> spl

>

> > stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha

etc

>

> as

>

> > Maha nakshatras so no matching required

>

> > > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs to

>

> bee

>

> > seen as TAMILS do.

>

> > > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar

bashing

>

> > when so many applicable factors make the reading.

>

> > >

>

> > > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

>

> > > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask their

>

> > clients to seek better people after a glance like a general

medical

>

> > practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > prashantr

>

> > > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

>

> > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

>

> > > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

>

> > >

>

> > > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called Kumar

ji

>

> > as a personal

>

> > >

>

> > > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led me

to

>

> > >

>

> > > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like

it,

>

> > >

>

> > > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

>

> flavours,

>

> > >

>

> > > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so

>

> on ...

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

>

> > politics

>

> > >

>

> > > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other

line

>

> of

>

> > >

>

> > > work or discipline or profession etc.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

>

> > >

>

> > > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!)

say

>

> > that

>

> > >

>

> > > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

>

> > *island*

>

> > >

>

> > > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

>

> > remained

>

> > >

>

> > > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For

this

>

> I

>

> > >

>

> > > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

>

> > simply 'detached'

>

> > >

>

> > > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

>

> > claimed

>

> > >

>

> > > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

>

> > >

>

> > > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt their

>

> > >

>

> > > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them

>

> trying

>

> > to

>

> > >

>

> > > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that

arises

>

> > from

>

> > >

>

> > > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

>

> > current

>

> > >

>

> > > life-plan.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that

dreaded

>

> > >

>

> > > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or

her

>

> > >

>

> > > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

>

> > pleasant

>

> > >

>

> > > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must

remain

>

> > >

>

> > > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

>

> > >

>

> > > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about

all 'healers'

>

> is

>

> > >

>

> > > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and

get

>

> > >

>

> > > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an

Ashram

>

> of

>

> > >

>

> > > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty

hospital

>

> > >

>

> > > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering one

>

> > thing

>

> > >

>

> > > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in

>

> God,

>

> > >

>

> > > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once

lost --

>

>

>

> > >

>

> > > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

>

> > >

>

> > > questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers and

>

> > their

>

> > >

>

> > > advice.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is lacking

>

> > from

>

> > >

>

> > > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD understands

>

> but

>

> > >

>

> > > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt! Like

a

>

> > >

>

> > > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and

>

> crying

>

> > >

>

> > > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the

>

> PARENT,

>

> > >

>

> > > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

>

> > experience!

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > God Bless you all!

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Rohiniranjan

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear friends

 

yes, internet has done more good to the receptive free for all and

bad to those who resist change.

 

thanks to internet, the entire world is living in an advanced

developed technologically benefited situation and so are old

traditional services that too turned net savvy.

 

internet truly has created a global village sans boundaries and

astrologers as well as natives all can reach one another easily.

 

some members may be vocal in highlighting the futility of internet

while there are outnumbering members who find the utility of

internet. more than ninety percent of my satisfied customers have

never seen or met me and have contacted only through phone or net and

they all got what they wanted. for those who could meet one to one,

it is better but if they could not, no regret either.

 

regarding serious astrology learning or teaching or reading, these

days many astro classics are available online freely and so are

various astro school students having their own groups and blogs.

internet truly has contributed greatly in spreading the light of

jyotish.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

, " Rohiniranjan "

<rohini_ranjan wrote:

>

> Krishnan ji,

>

> It is sad but true that internet due to its speed and space has

been

> responsible for the good, bad and the ugly in Jyotish, just as in

> many other areas and disciplines.

>

> Serious astrology simply cannot be done effectively on internet. It

> is too impersonal in contrast with a traditional human to human

> reading, which though slower is sustained. I am sure there will be

> practitioners who would disagree...

>

> RR

>

> , vattem krishnan

> <bursar_99@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri Rohini dada,

> > Mechanically application of basics come out after knowing the

basic

> objectives jyotish and practices come up after thorough

> aunderstanding of the subject.

> > otherwise people look for medical applications model.Pwerhaps

> Internet media made many things to put for wrong approaches and

wrong

> prescriptions too

> > vrkrishnan

> >

> > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@>

> > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> >

> > Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 8:36 AM

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

> >

> >

> >

> > I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek

> readings

> >

> > to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae

model.

> >

> > You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a stomach

> upset,

> >

> > take the green pill, if this or that system does not work, take

the

> >

> > yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If all

> >

> > fails surgery is there.

> >

> >

> >

> > The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing jyotish

> >

> > writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate and

> >

> > reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the system

of

> >

> > remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model,

then

> >

> > there would not be so many coming back again and again reporting

> that

> >

> > this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this or

> >

> > something else and they are not getting any better. And each

> >

> > astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

> >

> >

> >

> > As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is correct

> >

> > diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

> >

> > prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or possible

or

> >

> > deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not applied

> >

> > mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

> >

> > chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they believe

> in

> >

> > it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain

therapeutic

> >

> > modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of the

> >

> > psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as

placebo

> >

> > effect etc.

> >

> >

> >

> > There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers. In

many

> >

> > cases it seems that the intent and other important details

> (spiritual

> >

> > state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which to

> >

> > practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

> >

> > explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

> >

> > revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a

> higher

> >

> > Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can recite

one

> >

> > lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep on

> >

> > fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones and

make

> >

> > the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter, but

> the

> >

> > disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why

me? "

> >

> > and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head or in

> >

> > one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the

wheels

> >

> > of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-confusion!

> >

> >

> >

> > That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense to

> some,

> >

> > regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of

> thinking,

> >

> > and whether they like me or what I write or not...

> >

> >

> >

> > Namastay!

> >

> >

> >

> > Rohiniranjan

> >

> >

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B

> >

> > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Dear RRji

> >

> > > for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get the

> link

> >

> > sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why u

> put

> >

> > those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > so far so good.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation,

> else

> >

> > groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can

be

> >

> > public

> >

> > >

> >

> > > prashant

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> >

> > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

> >

> > > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand

> >

> > alone? " .

> >

> > >

> >

> > > The " not " is creating confusion!

> >

> > >

> >

> > > And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the

> >

> > earlier

> >

> > > is a stand alone!

> >

> > >

> >

> > > As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck some

> of

> >

> > > us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that you

> >

> > > manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like something

> >

> > that

> >

> > > cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well

those

> >

> > > would have to appear on private sites, right?

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Does that make sense to the forum?

> >

> > >

> >

> > > RR

> >

> > >

> >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B

> >

> > > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Dear RRji,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg,

rest

> >

> > of

> >

> > > it is not stand alone.

> >

> > > > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

> >

> > > significance, may be u can give it some more lines

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

> >

> > > ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm then

we

> >

> > > dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around

and

> >

> > > smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or

some

> >

> > spl

> >

> > > stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati, Anuradha

> etc

> >

> > as

> >

> > > Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> >

> > > > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs

to

> >

> > bee

> >

> > > seen as TAMILS do.

> >

> > > > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar

> bashing

> >

> > > when so many applicable factors make the reading.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken hearted

> >

> > > > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask

their

> >

> > > clients to seek better people after a glance like a general

> medical

> >

> > > practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > prashantr

> >

> > > > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> >

> > > > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called

Kumar

> ji

> >

> > > as a personal

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led

me

> to

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not like

> it,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

> >

> > flavours,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and so

> >

> > on ...

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups and

> >

> > > politics

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other

> line

> >

> > of

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > work or discipline or profession etc.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my true

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever lie!)

> say

> >

> > > that

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored the

> >

> > > *island*

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

> >

> > > remained

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For

> this

> >

> > I

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

> >

> > > simply 'detached'

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking anything

> >

> > > claimed

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt

their

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them

> >

> > trying

> >

> > > to

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that

> arises

> >

> > > from

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of their

> >

> > > current

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > life-plan.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that

> dreaded

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his or

> her

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While not

> >

> > > pleasant

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must

> remain

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about

> all 'healers'

> >

> > is

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that and

> get

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an

> Ashram

> >

> > of

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty

> hospital

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering

one

> >

> > > thing

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith in

> >

> > God,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once

> lost --

> >

> >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we see

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers

and

> >

> > > their

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > advice.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is

lacking

> >

> > > from

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD

understands

> >

> > but

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt!

Like

> a

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle and

> >

> > crying

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the

> >

> > PARENT,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

> >

> > > experience!

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > God Bless you all!

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Rohiniranjan

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Arjun ji,

 

You may have misunderstood me. :-)

If you are giving a one on one, reading you are following the

traditional approach with 'electronic' enhancement. This would

include chat or video or telephone conversation etc. The important

thing is the 'real time' interaction. This is somewhat difficult to

achieve through emails or forum exchanges.

 

Unfortunately, and you may choose to disagree with me -- while

information exists in huge amounts on the internet, errors,

omissions, insertions, modifications are easier to occur. In the

slower medium there was some amount of review, editorial control etc.

I suppose CAVEAT EMPTOR applies perhaps more stringently on internet

information.

 

Rohiniranjan

 

, " panditarjun2004 "

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear friends

>

> yes, internet has done more good to the receptive free for all and

> bad to those who resist change.

>

> thanks to internet, the entire world is living in an advanced

> developed technologically benefited situation and so are old

> traditional services that too turned net savvy.

>

> internet truly has created a global village sans boundaries and

> astrologers as well as natives all can reach one another easily.

>

> some members may be vocal in highlighting the futility of internet

> while there are outnumbering members who find the utility of

> internet. more than ninety percent of my satisfied customers have

> never seen or met me and have contacted only through phone or net

and

> they all got what they wanted. for those who could meet one to

one,

> it is better but if they could not, no regret either.

>

> regarding serious astrology learning or teaching or reading, these

> days many astro classics are available online freely and so are

> various astro school students having their own groups and blogs.

> internet truly has contributed greatly in spreading the light of

> jyotish.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> , " Rohiniranjan "

> <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> >

> > Krishnan ji,

> >

> > It is sad but true that internet due to its speed and space has

> been

> > responsible for the good, bad and the ugly in Jyotish, just as in

> > many other areas and disciplines.

> >

> > Serious astrology simply cannot be done effectively on internet.

It

> > is too impersonal in contrast with a traditional human to human

> > reading, which though slower is sustained. I am sure there will

be

> > practitioners who would disagree...

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , vattem krishnan

> > <bursar_99@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Shri Rohini dada,

> > > Mechanically application of basics come out after knowing the

> basic

> > objectives jyotish and practices come up after thorough

> > aunderstanding of the subject.

> > > otherwise people look for medical applications model.Pwerhaps

> > Internet media made many things to put for wrong approaches and

> wrong

> > prescriptions too

> > > vrkrishnan

> > >

> > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@>

> > > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> > >

> > > Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 8:36 AM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek

> > readings

> > >

> > > to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae

> model.

> > >

> > > You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a stomach

> > upset,

> > >

> > > take the green pill, if this or that system does not work, take

> the

> > >

> > > yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If

all

> > >

> > > fails surgery is there.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing jyotish

> > >

> > > writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate

and

> > >

> > > reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the system

> of

> > >

> > > remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model,

> then

> > >

> > > there would not be so many coming back again and again

reporting

> > that

> > >

> > > this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this

or

> > >

> > > something else and they are not getting any better. And each

> > >

> > > astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is correct

> > >

> > > diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

> > >

> > > prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or

possible

> or

> > >

> > > deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not applied

> > >

> > > mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

> > >

> > > chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they

believe

> > in

> > >

> > > it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain

> therapeutic

> > >

> > > modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of the

> > >

> > > psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as

> placebo

> > >

> > > effect etc.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers. In

> many

> > >

> > > cases it seems that the intent and other important details

> > (spiritual

> > >

> > > state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which to

> > >

> > > practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

> > >

> > > explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

> > >

> > > revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a

> > higher

> > >

> > > Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can recite

> one

> > >

> > > lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep

on

> > >

> > > fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones and

> make

> > >

> > > the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter,

but

> > the

> > >

> > > disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why

> me? "

> > >

> > > and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head or

in

> > >

> > > one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the

> wheels

> > >

> > > of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-confusion!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense to

> > some,

> > >

> > > regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of

> > thinking,

> > >

> > > and whether they like me or what I write or not...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Namastay!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Rohiniranjan

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > >

> > > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Dear RRji

> > >

> > > > for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get

the

> > link

> > >

> > > sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add why

u

> > put

> > >

> > > those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > so far so good.

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > and YES all public messages can't be for private circulation,

> > else

> > >

> > > groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest can

> be

> > >

> > > public

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > prashant

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > >

> > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

> > >

> > > > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?> stand

> > >

> > > alone? " .

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > The " not " is creating confusion!

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to the

> > >

> > > earlier

> > >

> > > > is a stand alone!

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck

some

> > of

> > >

> > > > us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that

you

> > >

> > > > manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like

something

> > >

> > > that

> > >

> > > > cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well

> those

> > >

> > > > would have to appear on private sites, right?

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Does that make sense to the forum?

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > RR

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > >

> > > > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Dear RRji,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous mesg,

> rest

> > >

> > > of

> > >

> > > > it is not stand alone.

> > >

> > > > > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

> > >

> > > > significance, may be u can give it some more lines

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

> > >

> > > > ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm

then

> we

> > >

> > > > dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come around

> and

> > >

> > > > smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY or

> some

> > >

> > > spl

> > >

> > > > stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati,

Anuradha

> > etc

> > >

> > > as

> > >

> > > > Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> > >

> > > > > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything needs

> to

> > >

> > > bee

> > >

> > > > seen as TAMILS do.

> > >

> > > > > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar

> > bashing

> > >

> > > > when so many applicable factors make the reading.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken

hearted

> > >

> > > > > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask

> their

> > >

> > > > clients to seek better people after a glance like a general

> > medical

> > >

> > > > practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > prashantr

> > >

> > > > > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

wrote:

> > >

> > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > >

> > > > > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called

> Kumar

> > ji

> > >

> > > > as a personal

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which led

> me

> > to

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not

like

> > it,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

> > >

> > > flavours,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality and

so

> > >

> > > on ...

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups

and

> > >

> > > > politics

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any other

> > line

> > >

> > > of

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > work or discipline or profession etc.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my

true

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever

lie!)

> > say

> > >

> > > > that

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored

the

> > >

> > > > *island*

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly completely

> > >

> > > > remained

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing. For

> > this

> > >

> > > I

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

> > >

> > > > simply 'detached'

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking

anything

> > >

> > > > claimed

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt

> their

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with them

> > >

> > > trying

> > >

> > > > to

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that

> > arises

> > >

> > > > from

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of

their

> > >

> > > > current

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > life-plan.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that

> > dreaded

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his

or

> > her

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While

not

> > >

> > > > pleasant

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must

> > remain

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about

> > all 'healers'

> > >

> > > is

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that

and

> > get

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an

> > Ashram

> > >

> > > of

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty

> > hospital

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and suffering

> one

> > >

> > > > thing

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can faith

in

> > >

> > > God,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen, once

> > lost --

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we

see

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > questions all over the place, questioning other astrologers

> and

> > >

> > > > their

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > advice.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is

> lacking

> > >

> > > > from

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD

> understands

> > >

> > > but

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt!

> Like

> > a

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle

and

> > >

> > > crying

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to the

> > >

> > > PARENT,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for the

> > >

> > > > experience!

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > God Bless you all!

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Rohiniranjan

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear RRji

 

your views are correct and my take is about the positive side of

internet or the convenience, privacy and freedom it gives the users.

 

internet has its own disadvantages like we dont know the gender of

the person as sometimes men fake as women and women fake as men.

sometimes astrologers pose as querents and there are spammers too.

 

but imagine before the western invented electricity bulb, the priests

usd to batti and oil to let the god in the dark sanctum sanctorum

visible. now you visit any famous shrine in india and you find

electric bulbs and even airconditioning systems in place. so,

technology has its own advantages.

 

writing a letter with a personal touch used to move the receipient

with all emotions but these days people stopped writing letters and

using the western invented telephone, mobile phone or using webcam to

see and chat. surely technology made two people in two countries see

each other and talk each other live as if it is a miracle or maya.

 

same is the case with banking where deposit, transfer or withdrawal

used to take several days. now instantly it gets done online and lo,

you even get an sms in your phone too. surely, technology has done

its best part to help the world have a better living.

 

specific to astrology, several astro classics with easy to search

particular chapter or verse are avaialble FREELY online.

 

research works or analytical papers by expert astrologers on special

yogas and issues are also available freely on the net.

 

another advantage of internet based astrology is that if an

astrologer says something, he knows beforehand that there are 1001

other astrologers out there to agree, disagree or criticise in

healthy discussions.

 

sometimes we find some irritations too in internet like the lalits

who spit vitriol or those virus generated slang messages.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

 

, " Rohiniranjan "

<rohini_ranjan wrote:

>

> Dear Arjun ji,

>

> You may have misunderstood me. :-)

> If you are giving a one on one, reading you are following the

> traditional approach with 'electronic' enhancement. This would

> include chat or video or telephone conversation etc. The important

> thing is the 'real time' interaction. This is somewhat difficult to

> achieve through emails or forum exchanges.

>

> Unfortunately, and you may choose to disagree with me -- while

> information exists in huge amounts on the internet, errors,

> omissions, insertions, modifications are easier to occur. In the

> slower medium there was some amount of review, editorial control

etc.

> I suppose CAVEAT EMPTOR applies perhaps more stringently on

internet

> information.

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

> , " panditarjun2004 "

> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> >

> > dear friends

> >

> > yes, internet has done more good to the receptive free for all

and

> > bad to those who resist change.

> >

> > thanks to internet, the entire world is living in an advanced

> > developed technologically benefited situation and so are old

> > traditional services that too turned net savvy.

> >

> > internet truly has created a global village sans boundaries and

> > astrologers as well as natives all can reach one another easily.

> >

> > some members may be vocal in highlighting the futility of

internet

> > while there are outnumbering members who find the utility of

> > internet. more than ninety percent of my satisfied customers

have

> > never seen or met me and have contacted only through phone or net

> and

> > they all got what they wanted. for those who could meet one to

> one,

> > it is better but if they could not, no regret either.

> >

> > regarding serious astrology learning or teaching or reading,

these

> > days many astro classics are available online freely and so are

> > various astro school students having their own groups and blogs.

> > internet truly has contributed greatly in spreading the light of

> > jyotish.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> >

> > , " Rohiniranjan "

> > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Krishnan ji,

> > >

> > > It is sad but true that internet due to its speed and space has

> > been

> > > responsible for the good, bad and the ugly in Jyotish, just as

in

> > > many other areas and disciplines.

> > >

> > > Serious astrology simply cannot be done effectively on

internet.

> It

> > > is too impersonal in contrast with a traditional human to human

> > > reading, which though slower is sustained. I am sure there will

> be

> > > practitioners who would disagree...

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > > , vattem krishnan

> > > <bursar_99@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Shri Rohini dada,

> > > > Mechanically application of basics come out after knowing the

> > basic

> > > objectives jyotish and practices come up after thorough

> > > aunderstanding of the subject.

> > > > otherwise people look for medical applications model.Pwerhaps

> > > Internet media made many things to put for wrong approaches and

> > wrong

> > > prescriptions too

> > > > vrkrishnan

> > > >

> > > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@>

> > > > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> > > >

> > > > Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 8:36 AM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I thought it was pretty obvious, but here goes:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I am noticing an increasing tendency amongst those who seek

> > > readings

> > > >

> > > > to treat jyotish solutions and remedies as a medical/diseae

> > model.

> > > >

> > > > You have a headache, take the blue pill, if you have a

stomach

> > > upset,

> > > >

> > > > take the green pill, if this or that system does not work,

take

> > the

> > > >

> > > > yellow pill and if that does not work there is injection. If

> all

> > > >

> > > > fails surgery is there.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The reading seekers alone are not at fault. Prevailing

jyotish

> > > >

> > > > writings and advice from many practitioners seems to indicate

> and

> > > >

> > > > reinforce that belief. There is just one problem. If the

system

> > of

> > > >

> > > > remedies were effective as expected for the healthcare model,

> > then

> > > >

> > > > there would not be so many coming back again and again

> reporting

> > > that

> > > >

> > > > this or that or x number of astrologers prescribed to do this

> or

> > > >

> > > > something else and they are not getting any better. And each

> > > >

> > > > astrologer prescribed a different remedy.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As I see it, jyotish has two basic functions. First is

correct

> > > >

> > > > diagnosis (just like in the medical model). The next is the

> > > >

> > > > prescription of appropriate remedies where indicated or

> possible

> > or

> > > >

> > > > deemed to be beneficial. This consideration must be not

applied

> > > >

> > > > mechanically. In a physical disease model, there are powerful

> > > >

> > > > chemicals which will effect a change in most whether they

> believe

> > > in

> > > >

> > > > it or not. There are some subtle medicines and certain

> > therapeutic

> > > >

> > > > modalities where a willingness and faith helps. In some of

the

> > > >

> > > > psychotherapeutic measures for instance or what is known as

> > placebo

> > > >

> > > > effect etc.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > There are many remedies that are prescribed by astrologers.

In

> > many

> > > >

> > > > cases it seems that the intent and other important details

> > > (spiritual

> > > >

> > > > state, the mental ambience, the appropriate setting in which

to

> > > >

> > > > practice the spiritual remedies...etc, I think are not fully

> > > >

> > > > explained. One needs to have a deep faith in this not being a

> > > >

> > > > revengeful Creation or Universe and one that is governed by a

> > > higher

> > > >

> > > > Law and Order (as opposed to anarchy and chaos). One can

recite

> > one

> > > >

> > > > lakh and 25 thousand times some mantra like a parrot, or keep

> on

> > > >

> > > > fasting till cows come home or wear all kinds of gemstones

and

> > make

> > > >

> > > > the jeweller's happy and welcoming smile wider and brighter,

> but

> > > the

> > > >

> > > > disease remains untouched. Unless this victim mentality, " Why

> > me? "

> > > >

> > > > and 'God is cruel' mantra goes on being chanted in the head

or

> in

> > > >

> > > > one's heart while all the remedials are being practiced, the

> > wheels

> > > >

> > > > of karma will remain stuck in the quigmire of induced-

confusion!

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > That is kind of what I was saying. Hopefully, it makes sense

to

> > > some,

> > > >

> > > > regardless of their affiliation to a group, school, line of

> > > thinking,

> > > >

> > > > and whether they like me or what I write or not...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Namastay!

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Rohiniranjan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > > >

> > > > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Dear RRji

> > > >

> > > > > for me it was ok even if not stand alone in nature can get

> the

> > > link

> > > >

> > > > sure many more who r newer here WILL not so felt u can add

why

> u

> > > put

> > > >

> > > > those lines to avoid any chain reaction IF ANY.

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > so far so good.

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > and YES all public messages can't be for private

circulation,

> > > else

> > > >

> > > > groups will lose its purpouse. except the charged ones rest

can

> > be

> > > >

> > > > public

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > prashant

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > >

> > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:58:33 AM

> > > >

> > > > > Re: JUST SHARING OPENLY ... 28/1

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Did you mean by any chance that " the rest of it is <?>

stand

> > > >

> > > > alone? " .

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > The " not " is creating confusion!

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > And ... yes, each posting and message even when linked to

the

> > > >

> > > > earlier

> > > >

> > > > > is a stand alone!

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > As I recently posted/shared just before the eclipse struck

> some

> > > of

> > > >

> > > > > us -- messages posted on public fora such as this one that

> you

> > > >

> > > > > manage -- would have to be about sharing and chaining!

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Any exclusive and special messages that are felt like

> something

> > > >

> > > > that

> > > >

> > > > > cannot be responded to or added to or improved upon -- well

> > those

> > > >

> > > > > would have to appear on private sites, right?

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Does that make sense to the forum?

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > RR

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > , Prashant Kumar G

B

> > > >

> > > > > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Dear RRji,

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > except the first 2 lines which talk abt the previous

mesg,

> > rest

> > > >

> > > > of

> > > >

> > > > > it is not stand alone.

> > > >

> > > > > > so I am sure members will be wondering what cud be its

> > > >

> > > > > significance, may be u can give it some more lines

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > and abot KSY as a sole culprit for any factor is reaching

> > > >

> > > > > ridicilous proportions. if JSY can alone do so much harm

> then

> > we

> > > >

> > > > > dont need astrolgoers at all these half baled ppl come

around

> > and

> > > >

> > > > > smear one or tow factors all the time be it Mangalik, KSY

or

> > some

> > > >

> > > > spl

> > > >

> > > > > stars as superior and no aflictions say Makha, Swati,

> Anuradha

> > > etc

> > > >

> > > > as

> > > >

> > > > > Maha nakshatras so no matching required

> > > >

> > > > > > Amavasya is the best Muhirtha so no lagna or anything

needs

> > to

> > > >

> > > > bee

> > > >

> > > > > seen as TAMILS do.

> > > >

> > > > > > ocassionally the Guru chandala yoga comes in for similar

> > > bashing

> > > >

> > > > > when so many applicable factors make the reading.

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > this is not a subject for the fly by night or chicken

> hearted

> > > >

> > > > > > I hope they leave it to better equiped ones and just ask

> > their

> > > >

> > > > > clients to seek better people after a glance like a general

> > > medical

> > > >

> > > > > practioner does refer to a Senior in that subject

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > prashantr

> > > >

> > > > > > --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > > >

> > > > > > JUST SHARING OPENLY ...

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:27 PM

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Prashant Kumar ji (whom I have always called

> > Kumar

> > > ji

> > > >

> > > > > as a personal

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > sambodhan) has written a beautiful message #55794 which

led

> > me

> > > to

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > write what I share below. Some or perhaps many would not

> like

> > > it,

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > choose to read it unapprovingly and perhaps in many other

> > > >

> > > > flavours,

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > perspectives and levels of experience of human reality

and

> so

> > > >

> > > > on ...

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > It is unavoidable that there would be cliques and groups

> and

> > > >

> > > > > politics

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > and so on in Jyotish, as would be elsewhere or in any

other

> > > line

> > > >

> > > > of

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > work or discipline or profession etc.

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > I can truthfully (My dear and departed Mother who was my

> true

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > inspiration into occultism would KNOW, if I would ever

> lie!)

> > > say

> > > >

> > > > > that

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > over the many decades that I have travelled and explored

> the

> > > >

> > > > > *island*

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > of occultism (including astrology) I have nearly

completely

> > > >

> > > > > remained

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > aloof and devoid of any political grouping or cliquing.

For

> > > this

> > > >

> > > > I

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > must thank the MA that made it exactly so!

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > This does not make me more pious or spiritual, but

> > > >

> > > > > simply 'detached'

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > in a sense. Perhaps a bit less biased -- not taking

> anything

> > > >

> > > > > claimed

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > too seriously or each cyber-punch heading this way

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > received 'LIGHTly', if you catch my drift :-)

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Over the years I have seen many nativities and even felt

> > their

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > anguish and urgency and shared a few dark moments with

them

> > > >

> > > > trying

> > > >

> > > > > to

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > understand and even empathize with their despondancy that

> > > arises

> > > >

> > > > > from

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > the depth of their spirit and from the darker parts of

> their

> > > >

> > > > > current

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > life-plan.

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Those who are parents would perhaps have experienced that

> > > dreaded

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > moment when their sweet little bundle of joy received his

> or

> > > her

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > first needle (vaccination) every early on in life. While

> not

> > > >

> > > > > pleasant

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > it gave me a big moment of 'AHA!'. The DOCTOR knows best!

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > The DOCTOR does not know what is best, always, so we must

> > > remain

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > watchful and not blasé about what the doctor (any and all

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > disciplines) tells us for one thing constant about

> > > all 'healers'

> > > >

> > > > is

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > that their opinions and prescriptions VARY!

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > But GOD surely knows what is best? And yet we forget that

> and

> > > get

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > impatient and all this urgency arises. The moment that an

> > > Ashram

> > > >

> > > > of

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Jyotish such as this turns into an Emergency or Casualty

> > > hospital

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > everyone becomes anxious and despite the pain and

suffering

> > one

> > > >

> > > > > thing

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > is certain. The faith in God and Infinite Wisdom is gone.

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Will healing ever take place in such a mind-set? Can

faith

> in

> > > >

> > > > God,

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > the God within us and in the lifeplan we have chosen,

once

> > > lost --

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > will even astrological advice help us? Perhaps not as we

> see

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > questions all over the place, questioning other

astrologers

> > and

> > > >

> > > > > their

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > advice.

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Sometimes it is not the knowledge or experience that is

> > lacking

> > > >

> > > > > from

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > the astrological session, but the FAITH. Maybe GOD

> > understands

> > > >

> > > > but

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > does not react right away despite the internal pain felt!

> > Like

> > > a

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > parent who is watching his baby getting his first needle

> and

> > > >

> > > > crying

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > like this is the end of the world. My heart goes out to

the

> > > >

> > > > PARENT,

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > though I know that the baby will come out stronger for

the

> > > >

> > > > > experience!

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > God Bless you all!

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > Rohiniranjan

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...