Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Thanks for the links ANji -- I wish you had included darchini/dalchini/cinnamon! But no problem ji! RR , " astroiniket " <nakshtraniket wrote: > > RR ji , just for your reading and proving that i never give any > comments which does not have logics pls go through following links. > > http://www.benefits-of-honey.com/honey-properties.html > > http://books.google.co.in/books? > id=CMJKgfhCKzIC & pg=PA525 & lpg=PA525 & dq=is+saffron+antioxidant & source=we b & > ots=PIVOgq5q- > d & sig=yHjDrkoEbPqfGXsUH7Qbzvx0qEg & hl=en & sa=X & oi=book_result & resnum=10 & ct > =result > > > whenever free pls read and if have any doubt you can contact to owner > of above link holders. > > rgds > niket > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Niketji, Aap to bura maan gaye jee! I have often seen this reaction and not just in you! But think: WE all are just stating what ancients have said to our best belief. If someone criicizes or does not agree they are not questioning the 'reporter' but the original author! In most cases not known really. Why must we bear he burden on our frail shoulders that cannot even explain simple axioms such as why must the most advanced planet in a chart be assumed to be the Atmakaraka and the least advanced the darakaraka? Leaving aside the retrograde rahu ketu conundrum for the time being! Why must the dara in jyotish be behind the atma when in the saptapheri she is allowed to lead and not just follow? Or is that just a courtesy meant just for the ritual and not the life to follow? Please Explain <sounds challenging but I really loved that column named Please Explain!> Rohiniranjan , " astroiniket " <nakshtraniket wrote: > > RR ji , just for your reading and proving that i never give any > comments which does not have logics pls go through following links. > > http://www.benefits-of-honey.com/honey-properties.html > > http://books.google.co.in/books? > id=CMJKgfhCKzIC & pg=PA525 & lpg=PA525 & dq=is+saffron+antioxidant & source=we b & > ots=PIVOgq5q- > d & sig=yHjDrkoEbPqfGXsUH7Qbzvx0qEg & hl=en & sa=X & oi=book_result & resnum=10 & ct > =result > > > whenever free pls read and if have any doubt you can contact to owner > of above link holders. > > rgds > niket > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 RR ji - i never felt bad - but as you wrote i should not post this so wildly - your words were not correct - people like you should not comment on half knowledge. some time you forgot to choose - what to write or might be some time you feel that other one is dwarf in front of you. in my first mail when i offer this to you it was a symbol of my prayers for you. leave it sir - on earth all are not same - some may be from diff bread. i like you not becoz of your gyana - just becoz your writing skill in english which i do not have. :-) :-) and as scientist says there is no alternative of saffron and honey on earth. rgds Niket , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Niketji, > > Aap to bura maan gaye jee! > I have often seen this reaction and not just in you! > > But think: > > WE all are just stating what ancients have said to our best belief. > If someone criicizes or does not agree they are not questioning > the 'reporter' but the original author! In most cases not known > really. > > Why must we bear he burden on our frail shoulders that cannot even > explain simple axioms such as why must the most advanced planet in a > chart be assumed to be the Atmakaraka and the least advanced the > darakaraka? > > Leaving aside the retrograde rahu ketu conundrum for the time being! > > Why must the dara in jyotish be behind the atma when in the > saptapheri she is allowed to lead and not just follow? Or is that > just a courtesy meant just for the ritual and not the life to follow? > > Please Explain > > <sounds challenging but I really loved that column named Please > Explain!> > > Rohiniranjan > > > , " astroiniket " > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > RR ji , just for your reading and proving that i never give any > > comments which does not have logics pls go through following links. > > > > http://www.benefits-of-honey.com/honey-properties.html > > > > http://books.google.co.in/books? > > > id=CMJKgfhCKzIC & pg=PA525 & lpg=PA525 & dq=is+saffron+antioxidant & source=we > b & > > ots=PIVOgq5q- > > > d & sig=yHjDrkoEbPqfGXsUH7Qbzvx0qEg & hl=en & sa=X & oi=book_result & resnum=10 & > ct > > =result > > > > > > whenever free pls read and if have any doubt you can contact to > owner > > of above link holders. > > > > rgds > > niket > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Niketji, I consider " gyana' a dangerous word and given the spelling slippages we all make on internet a very very dicey term! For instance GYANA GaYANA GaYANAa I rest my case! Nice to chat with people who really know the subtle nuances of my mother tongue: HINDI! RR , " astroiniket " <nakshtraniket wrote: > > RR ji - i never felt bad - but as you wrote i should not post this so > wildly - your words were not correct - people like you should not > comment on half knowledge. > > some time you forgot to choose - what to write or might be some time > you feel that other one is dwarf in front of you. > > in my first mail when i offer this to you it was a symbol of my > prayers for you. > > leave it sir - on earth all are not same - some may be from diff > bread. > > > i like you not becoz of your gyana - just becoz your writing skill in > english which i do not have. > > :-) :-) > > and as scientist says there is no alternative of saffron and honey on > earth. > > > rgds > Niket > > , " Rohiniranjan " > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > Niketji, > > > > Aap to bura maan gaye jee! > > I have often seen this reaction and not just in you! > > > > But think: > > > > WE all are just stating what ancients have said to our best belief. > > If someone criicizes or does not agree they are not questioning > > the 'reporter' but the original author! In most cases not known > > really. > > > > Why must we bear he burden on our frail shoulders that cannot even > > explain simple axioms such as why must the most advanced planet in > a > > chart be assumed to be the Atmakaraka and the least advanced the > > darakaraka? > > > > Leaving aside the retrograde rahu ketu conundrum for the time being! > > > > Why must the dara in jyotish be behind the atma when in the > > saptapheri she is allowed to lead and not just follow? Or is that > > just a courtesy meant just for the ritual and not the life to > follow? > > > > Please Explain > > > > <sounds challenging but I really loved that column named Please > > Explain!> > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , " astroiniket " > > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > > > RR ji , just for your reading and proving that i never give any > > > comments which does not have logics pls go through following > links. > > > > > > http://www.benefits-of-honey.com/honey-properties.html > > > > > > http://books.google.co.in/books? > > > > > > id=CMJKgfhCKzIC & pg=PA525 & lpg=PA525 & dq=is+saffron+antioxidant & source=we > > b & > > > ots=PIVOgq5q- > > > > > > d & sig=yHjDrkoEbPqfGXsUH7Qbzvx0qEg & hl=en & sa=X & oi=book_result & resnum=10 & > > ct > > > =result > > > > > > > > > whenever free pls read and if have any doubt you can contact to > > owner > > > of above link holders. > > > > > > rgds > > > niket > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Please note: The " wild " part was only about the claim regarding antioxidant ( " antioxident " ) It has specific conntotation (rightly or worngly) and many individuals with life-threatening cancers have been convinced that these are good for them and more! Sadly, when one is at the end of the rope (strangely rhymes with " HOPE " ) one would grab at " anything " but some would be better off holding on to the root that they are holding on to as they slip down the slippery slope. There is a reason why certain treatment modalities are called 'alternatives'. To my mind these imply that there is an option greater than one! HOPE is not an alternative, but an ADDITIONAL root to hold on to and climb out of the morass that many terminal care patients find themselves in. If the imagery does not make sense to you, then both of us are wasting one another's time and perhaps of others, as well! Namastay (on this futile topic) RR , " astroiniket " <nakshtraniket wrote: > > RR ji - i never felt bad - but as you wrote i should not post this so > wildly - your words were not correct - people like you should not > comment on half knowledge. > > some time you forgot to choose - what to write or might be some time > you feel that other one is dwarf in front of you. > > in my first mail when i offer this to you it was a symbol of my > prayers for you. > > leave it sir - on earth all are not same - some may be from diff > bread. > > > i like you not becoz of your gyana - just becoz your writing skill in > english which i do not have. > > :-) :-) > > and as scientist says there is no alternative of saffron and honey on > earth. > > > rgds > Niket > > , " Rohiniranjan " > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > Niketji, > > > > Aap to bura maan gaye jee! > > I have often seen this reaction and not just in you! > > > > But think: > > > > WE all are just stating what ancients have said to our best belief. > > If someone criicizes or does not agree they are not questioning > > the 'reporter' but the original author! In most cases not known > > really. > > > > Why must we bear he burden on our frail shoulders that cannot even > > explain simple axioms such as why must the most advanced planet in > a > > chart be assumed to be the Atmakaraka and the least advanced the > > darakaraka? > > > > Leaving aside the retrograde rahu ketu conundrum for the time being! > > > > Why must the dara in jyotish be behind the atma when in the > > saptapheri she is allowed to lead and not just follow? Or is that > > just a courtesy meant just for the ritual and not the life to > follow? > > > > Please Explain > > > > <sounds challenging but I really loved that column named Please > > Explain!> > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , " astroiniket " > > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > > > RR ji , just for your reading and proving that i never give any > > > comments which does not have logics pls go through following > links. > > > > > > http://www.benefits-of-honey.com/honey-properties.html > > > > > > http://books.google.co.in/books? > > > > > > id=CMJKgfhCKzIC & pg=PA525 & lpg=PA525 & dq=is+saffron+antioxidant & source=we > > b & > > > ots=PIVOgq5q- > > > > > > d & sig=yHjDrkoEbPqfGXsUH7Qbzvx0qEg & hl=en & sa=X & oi=book_result & resnum=10 & > > ct > > > =result > > > > > > > > > whenever free pls read and if have any doubt you can contact to > > owner > > > of above link holders. > > > > > > rgds > > > niket > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Oh Niketji! Please do not let mere language get in your way! I will be more than happy (as perhaps many others here) to try and translate your messages from hindi to english to the best of our capability, meagre as these might be. Mana ki bahut saal ho gaye Ma kay paon chuay parantu yadi aap awasar dayngay is sewa ka, to kewal aap ki sahaytaa to nahin, meraa bhi kuch swartha hai naa? Shubh-kamnayen ya Shubhasheesh (aap jaisa upayukta samjhay, Niketji) Rohiniranjan , " astroiniket " <nakshtraniket wrote: > > i like you not becoz of your gyana - just becoz your writing skill in > english which i do not have. > > :-) :-) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 oh RRji aur bhee baatain hai jamane mai , nokjhonk ke sevay. :-)) KIND REGARDS niket , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Oh Niketji! > > Please do not let mere language get in your way! I will be more than > happy (as perhaps many others here) to try and translate your messages > from hindi to english to the best of our capability, meagre as these > might be. > > Mana ki bahut saal ho gaye Ma kay paon chuay parantu yadi aap awasar > dayngay is sewa ka, to kewal aap ki sahaytaa to nahin, meraa bhi kuch > swartha hai naa? > > Shubh-kamnayen ya Shubhasheesh > (aap jaisa upayukta samjhay, Niketji) > > Rohiniranjan > > , " astroiniket " > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > i like you not becoz of your gyana - just becoz your writing skill in > > english which i do not have. > > > > :-) :-) > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.