Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 vedic astrology , " rajanbhc " <rajanbhc wrote: > > hai friend how are you > i am rajasekaran > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 i am mannu from punjab how r u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 i'm fine..hw about u..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 Iam fine my friend and what are you --- On Fri, 12/5/08, neetu.kahlon143 <neetu.kahlon143 wrote: neetu.kahlon143 <neetu.kahlon143 [vedic astrology] Re: " " " " " " " " " " friends " " " " " " " " " " vedic astrology Friday, December 5, 2008, 4:52 AM i am mannu from punjab how r u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 vedic astrology , " neetu.kahlon143 " <neetu.kahlon143 wrote: > > i am mannu from punjab > how r u >tera baap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 vedic astrology , " neetu.kahlon143 " <neetu.kahlon143 wrote: > > i am mannu from punjab > how r u >i am your new friend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read my post/s, Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will agree with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences of happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type which I did not go through, same vice versa. Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do argument for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have interest in questioning then it give all answers. Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can be define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all depends individual to individual. Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa can't cross Maya. Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or Brahma Says so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand on that level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have limitations, and the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not needed on all these things. I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested your time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. Kind Regards Niket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 Dear Niket, It is not a question of agreement or disagreement. It is an healthy exchange of individual thoughts. I personally more than fully agree on yr statement " Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can be define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all depends individual to individual. " Regards Jk On Behalf Of astroiniket Friday, January 02, 2009 12:11 PM Friends Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read my post/s, Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will agree with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences of happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type which I did not go through, same vice versa. Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do argument for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have interest in questioning then it give all answers. Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can be define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all depends individual to individual. Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa can't cross Maya. Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or Brahma Says so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand on that level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have limitations, and the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not needed on all these things. I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested your time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. Kind Regards Niket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 i completely second this thoughts RRji. , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Dear Niket ji, > > Please allow me to express what I have always believed in. If we all > believed in what others had to say, conversation would end and so > would questions and then what would be the reason-for-being as the > French say a bit differently and with flourishes and accent-marks -- > for this discussion forum? > > So, each time we disagree does not mean that we deny your perspective > or viewpoint or your position and belief! We are just making sure > that you are on a firm platform and before we come up there and shake > your hand we may want to make sure that we all do not come down > crashing! > > But seriously -- we are not ants! We are human beings and that means > we are created with differences and the direct output and outcome of > that is that wonderful factor named: Individuality! > > On the one hand it means we are separate and divided -- > > but if you look around a bit more the 'in' may actually be a term of > negation and may actually mean that we are ONE. > > In-coherent means one who is NOT coherent (a madman! ;-) > In-consistent means one who is NOT consistent > In-capable means one who is NOT capable > In-corrigible means one who canNOT be corrected > In-dividual means ...? > > > Warm regards, > > Rohiniranjan > > > - , " astroiniket " > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read my > > post/s, > > > > Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will agree > > with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different > > opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences of > > happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type which I > > did not go through, same vice versa. > > > > > > Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do > argument > > for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have interest > in > > questioning then it give all answers. > > > > Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can be > > define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all > depends > > individual to individual. > > > > Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa can't > cross > > Maya. > > > > Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or Brahma Says > > so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand on > that > > level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have limitations, > and > > the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not needed on > all > > these things. > > > > I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested your > > time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. > > > > > > Kind Regards > > Niket > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 Careful Raja! Don't agree with me so readily or at least publicly here!! It is amazing that Ursa Major that may point to the Pole-Star today is decreed to mean nothing tomorrow (figuratively speaking), when the wishy-washy but constant " wobble " of the earth shall point to another constellation and the only real question that shall remain then is this conundrum about Ayanamsha! Until the two zodiacs meet once again!! RR , " Raja " <desi.raja wrote: > > i completely second this thoughts RRji. > > , " Rohiniranjan " > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > Dear Niket ji, > > > > Please allow me to express what I have always believed in. If we > all > > believed in what others had to say, conversation would end and so > > would questions and then what would be the reason-for-being as the > > French say a bit differently and with flourishes and accent- marks -- > > > for this discussion forum? > > > > So, each time we disagree does not mean that we deny your > perspective > > or viewpoint or your position and belief! We are just making sure > > that you are on a firm platform and before we come up there and > shake > > your hand we may want to make sure that we all do not come down > > crashing! > > > > But seriously -- we are not ants! We are human beings and that > means > > we are created with differences and the direct output and outcome > of > > that is that wonderful factor named: Individuality! > > > > On the one hand it means we are separate and divided -- > > > > but if you look around a bit more the 'in' may actually be a term > of > > negation and may actually mean that we are ONE. > > > > In-coherent means one who is NOT coherent (a madman! ;-) > > In-consistent means one who is NOT consistent > > In-capable means one who is NOT capable > > In-corrigible means one who canNOT be corrected > > In-dividual means ...? > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > - , " astroiniket " > > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read my > > > post/s, > > > > > > Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will > agree > > > with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different > > > opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences of > > > happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type which > I > > > did not go through, same vice versa. > > > > > > > > > Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do > > argument > > > for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have > interest > > in > > > questioning then it give all answers. > > > > > > Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can be > > > define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all > > depends > > > individual to individual. > > > > > > Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa can't > > cross > > > Maya. > > > > > > Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or Brahma > Says > > > so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand on > > that > > > level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have limitations, > > and > > > the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not needed on > > all > > > these things. > > > > > > I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested your > > > time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > Niket > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 these are exact my thoughts. Besides, whats at risk - being called a madman!!! hehe.. let them say it. , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Careful Raja! Don't agree with me so readily or at least publicly > here!! > > It is amazing that Ursa Major that may point to the Pole-Star today > is decreed to mean nothing tomorrow (figuratively speaking), when the > wishy-washy but constant " wobble " of the earth shall point to another > constellation and the only real question that shall remain then is > this conundrum about Ayanamsha! Until the two zodiacs meet once > again!! > > RR > > > , " Raja " <desi.raja@> > wrote: > > > > i completely second this thoughts RRji. > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Niket ji, > > > > > > Please allow me to express what I have always believed in. If we > > all > > > believed in what others had to say, conversation would end and so > > > would questions and then what would be the reason-for-being as > the > > > French say a bit differently and with flourishes and accent- > marks -- > > > > > for this discussion forum? > > > > > > So, each time we disagree does not mean that we deny your > > perspective > > > or viewpoint or your position and belief! We are just making sure > > > that you are on a firm platform and before we come up there and > > shake > > > your hand we may want to make sure that we all do not come down > > > crashing! > > > > > > But seriously -- we are not ants! We are human beings and that > > means > > > we are created with differences and the direct output and outcome > > of > > > that is that wonderful factor named: Individuality! > > > > > > On the one hand it means we are separate and divided -- > > > > > > but if you look around a bit more the 'in' may actually be a term > > of > > > negation and may actually mean that we are ONE. > > > > > > In-coherent means one who is NOT coherent (a madman! ;-) > > > In-consistent means one who is NOT consistent > > > In-capable means one who is NOT capable > > > In-corrigible means one who canNOT be corrected > > > In-dividual means ...? > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > - , " astroiniket " > > > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read > my > > > > post/s, > > > > > > > > Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will > > agree > > > > with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different > > > > opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences of > > > > happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type > which > > I > > > > did not go through, same vice versa. > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do > > > argument > > > > for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have > > interest > > > in > > > > questioning then it give all answers. > > > > > > > > Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can > be > > > > define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all > > > depends > > > > individual to individual. > > > > > > > > Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa can't > > > cross > > > > Maya. > > > > > > > > Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or Brahma > > Says > > > > so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand > on > > > that > > > > level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have > limitations, > > > and > > > > the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not needed > on > > > all > > > > these things. > > > > > > > > I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested > your > > > > time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Niket > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 Now that you mention, dear Raja -- duty calls! I must go and certify a few more as I am on duty tonight ... ;-) RR , " Raja " <desi.raja wrote: > > these are exact my thoughts. Besides, whats at risk - being called a > madman!!! hehe.. let them say it. > > > , " Rohiniranjan " > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > Careful Raja! Don't agree with me so readily or at least publicly > > here!! > > > > It is amazing that Ursa Major that may point to the Pole-Star today > > is decreed to mean nothing tomorrow (figuratively speaking), when > the > > wishy-washy but constant " wobble " of the earth shall point to > another > > constellation and the only real question that shall remain then is > > this conundrum about Ayanamsha! Until the two zodiacs meet once > > again!! > > > > RR > > > > > > , " Raja " <desi.raja@> > > wrote: > > > > > > i completely second this thoughts RRji. > > > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " > > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Niket ji, > > > > > > > > Please allow me to express what I have always believed in. If > we > > > all > > > > believed in what others had to say, conversation would end and > so > > > > would questions and then what would be the reason-for-being as > > the > > > > French say a bit differently and with flourishes and accent- > > marks -- > > > > > > > for this discussion forum? > > > > > > > > So, each time we disagree does not mean that we deny your > > > perspective > > > > or viewpoint or your position and belief! We are just making > sure > > > > that you are on a firm platform and before we come up there and > > > shake > > > > your hand we may want to make sure that we all do not come down > > > > crashing! > > > > > > > > But seriously -- we are not ants! We are human beings and that > > > means > > > > we are created with differences and the direct output and > outcome > > > of > > > > that is that wonderful factor named: Individuality! > > > > > > > > On the one hand it means we are separate and divided -- > > > > > > > > but if you look around a bit more the 'in' may actually be a > term > > > of > > > > negation and may actually mean that we are ONE. > > > > > > > > In-coherent means one who is NOT coherent (a madman! ;-) > > > > In-consistent means one who is NOT consistent > > > > In-capable means one who is NOT capable > > > > In-corrigible means one who canNOT be corrected > > > > In-dividual means ...? > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > - , " astroiniket " > > > > <nakshtraniket@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear friends RRji, JK ji and all other my friend/s those read > > my > > > > > post/s, > > > > > > > > > > Friends it is not necessary that you agree with me or I will > > > agree > > > > > with you, all we have different mind sets, we have different > > > > > opinions, we have different type of experiences, experiences > of > > > > > happenings or feelings or seeing you may have another type > > which > > > I > > > > > did not go through, same vice versa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding of any thing is always differ, some time we do > > > > argument > > > > > for sake of argument, Time is biggest teacher if one have > > > interest > > > > in > > > > > questioning then it give all answers. > > > > > > > > > > Here what is right or what is wrong no one can define. It can > > be > > > > > define by self, what is needed or what is not needed, it all > > > > depends > > > > > individual to individual. > > > > > > > > > > Ishwar Anant – Ishwar ki Maya Ananta – without Hari Kripa > can't > > > > cross > > > > > Maya. > > > > > > > > > > Knowledge have no end, Lord Krishna or Rama or Shiva or > Brahma > > > Says > > > > > so many things, the IQ level which we have, we can understand > > on > > > > that > > > > > level only, beyond that we can't. Our thoughts have > > limitations, > > > > and > > > > > the meaning of the Almighty is unlimited. Debate is not > needed > > on > > > > all > > > > > these things. > > > > > > > > > > I am very much thankful to all of you that you have invested > > your > > > > > time to read and making your direct or indirect comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > > Niket > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.