Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 dEAR nEELAM JI iF i AM NOT MISTAKEN THERE R MANY MODERATORS IN AIA and take time in seeing them so it may appear it is spontanous approvals in a chat with one of the moderators [he had said he had banned u and later reinstated u too] he said there r 12 moderators in all and i feel all of them have been doning well for the subject a good model I must say I had seen jotish vidya of Wendy ji's model as a v good model too as it is v stroct and more Parashari centric than mixed systems when it difficult for many to get a understanding leave alone depth of one rishi's work expecting them to use multiple rishies works is too much most members with a few English works behind them to guide them have been around and do fade away works from classical depth better if one can learn Sanskrit read the original slokas and adapt it to our times as B V RAMANji, PS Sastry, PS Iyer, VAK iyer, KN RAO ji, D V N SUBBA RAO ji, K S MENON, NS NATTU etc have done English translations do help and we must use it as a starter pack the clasics r the key to it and they have the essence for all times to come all we have to do is read assimilate it and apply them to our times Best wishes prashant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 prashant ji, my personal opinion is one should use one id in one forum, becoz it make easy in identification. and no need to use diffrent id. you can see most of members use one id only in one forum. this is my personal opinion, need not that every one will agree to this. rgds niket , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > dEAR nEELAM JI > > iF i AM NOT MISTAKEN THERE R MANY MODERATORS IN AIA and take time in seeing them so it may appear it is spontanous approvals > > in a chat with one of the moderators [he had said he had banned u and later reinstated u too] he said there r 12 moderators in all > > and i feel all of them have been doning well for the subject a good model I must say > > I had seen jotish vidya of Wendy ji's model as a v good model too as it is v stroct and more Parashari centric than mixed systems when it difficult for many to get a understanding leave alone depth of one rishi's work expecting them to use multiple rishies works is too much most members with a few English works behind them to guide them have been around and do fade away > > works from classical depth better if one can learn Sanskrit read the original slokas and adapt it to our times as B V RAMANji, PS Sastry, PS Iyer, VAK iyer, KN RAO ji, D V N SUBBA RAO ji, K S MENON, NS NATTU etc have done > > > English translations do help and we must use it as a starter pack the clasics r the key to it and they have the essence for all times to come all we have to do is read assimilate it and apply them to our times > > Best wishes > > prashant > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: >... > English translations do help and we must use it as a starter pack the clasics r the key to it and they have the essence for all times to come all we have to do is read assimilate it and apply them to our times > > Best wishes > > prashant > > > Dear Kumar ji, Just focusing on the essential here, if you will permit so! Not being a sanskrit-vid (just the basic stuff any indian kid got in 50s 60s encouraged by a father who was well-versed in sanskrit and science -- after losing my Hindi translation of BPHS and a trunkful of books on jyotish in early 80s other than a few, GC Sharmaji's BPHS was a godsend and perhaps more complete than Santhanam's version. In fact I found that the slokas in GC Sharma's version reasonably easy to follow even if not completely. It did take some time but was well worth it! Did this additional 'enlightenment' help me astrologically? NO! It did help me write the article at boloji com about astrotreasures that survived time! And all the other myths etc! RR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Dear Prashant ji and group, //in a chat with one of the moderators [he had said he had banned u and later reinstated u too] he said there r 12 moderators in all// Most of us seem to be working on presumptions and remain away from reality. There is no truth, whatsoever, in your statement, Prashant ji. Please check your facts with one of the 'real' moderators of the forum and there aren't many as you seem to believe. The point is that people are not just labels, easy to read at a glance, or be read through some other eyes! There is always more to them than their tags. Our formed opinions, piggy riding on other's statements may be far from the truth. I completely agree with Niket ji's personal opinion that one should use one id in one forum. However, while entering a new forum or place, sometimes we need to assess the environment before deciding to stay on, by being there for a while, and one might not be comfortable walking with an identity card. Moreover, our true worth is realised only when what is said becomes important, and not who is saying? War should be waged against the ignorance that still veils this beautiful and divine subject and not against our own comrades. Regards Neelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Dear Neelam ji If this info I said was wrong I stand corrected I thank you for that if it is a mistake we must make up for it fortunately I don't use names and has been useful as it may lead to a different issue later the context and time was when we had our first exchange again not a pleasant one I guess that was when u said i was probably scaring a member in a prediction in VA a female member [and also questioned my knowledge in the subject] which I clarified to u and guess was resolved I didn't carry any baggage I know the members can decide what we r and this must help u as I have ssked u to be here as well. about using one or more ID'S I MYSELF HAVE ADMITTED I USE 3 ID's but sign my name same way in all apart from language style is same too as u may be new here i give u them gbp_kumar in JR, JG, JS, AIA, V_J, K_P_SYSTEMS, LALKITAB_REMEDIES pkgoteti in vedic astrology jyotidh-vidya vedichora astro.prashantkumar only reason is to filter the inbox content into these ID's and reply too many to handle from a single ID and may lead to cluttering and if anyone closes down will loose a lot of selected topics that i store in sub-folders and have to go back to the groups and pick them again laborously but my name will remain same everywhere I have been accused of many more ID's but certainly no time or interest for them, just don't want to see what happend to u, one mistake will take our image to a different place it may not be intentional but the ones who want to create trouble will. again no HARD FEELINGS on the content I SAID STAND CORRECTED TILL TODAY I THOT I WAS A MEMBER IN 7-8 but am in 10 groups but not been active in any I had d from one KP group and another group too. just JR, VA, AIA THANKS PRASHANT ________________________________ neelamgupta106 <neelamgupta07 Tuesday, December 23, 2008 3:58:46 PM Re: Neelam gupta on AIA APPROVALS Dear Prashant ji and group, //in a chat with one of the moderators [he had said he had banned u and later reinstated u too] he said there r 12 moderators in all// Most of us seem to be working on presumptions and remain away from reality. There is no truth, whatsoever, in your statement, Prashant ji. Please check your facts with one of the 'real' moderators of the forum and there aren't many as you seem to believe. The point is that people are not just labels, easy to read at a glance, or be read through some other eyes! There is always more to them than their tags. Our formed opinions, piggy riding on other's statements may be far from the truth. I completely agree with Niket ji's personal opinion that one should use one id in one forum. However, while entering a new forum or place, sometimes we need to assess the environment before deciding to stay on, by being there for a while, and one might not be comfortable walking with an identity card. Moreover, our true worth is realised only when what is said becomes important, and not who is saying? War should be waged against the ignorance that still veils this beautiful and divine subject and not against our own comrades. Regards Neelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dear Mr. Prashant ji, Ancient_Indian_Astrology {AIA}= do not that NUMBER of moderators you mentioned in your original mail. The only key moderator of that AIA group is the group owner Mr. Sreenadh himself. There are many worthy members who have subject core interest and knowledge, come up with new topics in the group. Dr. Neelam ji was NEVER banned in that group as mentioned in your mail.... she has been active contributor to the group. To my knowledge NO person has been banned till date - unless someone is talking totally tangent or abusing others.... Sorry, for this non_astro mail, posting to keep the records straight. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dear sreeram this ok, but after I closed the issue rightly with neelam ji herself this post is strange but what i quoted /said is untrue by herself till then I had to believe what was told to me by one of them I gave the context, timeshare too I also said I stand corrected as only 2 ppl can say it one who told me and one who claimed to have done it. HER WORD IS GOOD ENUF for me. and everywhere I mentioned abt AIA it has not -vely and happy to see the group that way. and wish the same future for all existing groups in which we may or may not be present many groups had happy starts, a good run and later became weaker. I wish the group susttained strenght and as u know I am also there when time permits. prashant ________________________________ sreeram srinivas <sreeram64 Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:51:16 AM Re: Neelam gupta on AIA APPROVALS Dear Mr. Prashant ji, Ancient_Indian_ Astrology {AIA}= do not that NUMBER of moderators you mentioned in your original mail. The only key moderator of that AIA group is the group owner Mr. Sreenadh himself. There are many worthy members who have subject core interest and knowledge, come up with new topics in the group. Dr. Neelam ji was NEVER banned in that group as mentioned in your mail.... she has been active contributor to the group. To my knowledge NO person has been banned till date - unless someone is talking totally tangent or abusing others.... Sorry, for this non_astro mail, posting to keep the records straight. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Please define abuse! Often taken for granted and assumed to have a Crystal Clear meaning and context -- a travesty remaining to be defined! RR , " sreeram srinivas " <sreeram64 wrote: > > > Dear Mr. Prashant ji, > > Ancient_Indian_Astrology {AIA}= do not that NUMBER of moderators you > mentioned in your original mail. The only key moderator of that AIA > group is the group owner Mr. Sreenadh himself. There are many worthy > members who have subject core interest and knowledge, come up with new > topics in the group. Dr. Neelam ji was NEVER banned in that group as > mentioned in your mail.... she has been active contributor to the group. > To my knowledge NO person has been banned till date - unless someone is > talking totally tangent or abusing others.... > > Sorry, for this non_astro mail, posting to keep the records straight. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dear Kumar ji, Please let Sreeram ji/Sreenadh jee express their sentiments/resentments! There must be a good reason why we folks attract their attention and of certain others who are so frustrated as to spam private emails of members of this Group! Enough said! Rohiniranjan , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear sreeram > > this ok, but after I closed the issue rightly with neelam ji herself this post is strange > > but what i quoted /said is untrue by herself till then I had to believe what was told to me by one of them I gave the context, timeshare too I also said I stand corrected as only 2 ppl can say it one who told me and one who claimed to have done it. HER WORD IS GOOD ENUF for me. > > and everywhere I mentioned abt AIA it has not -vely and happy to see the group that way. and wish the same future for all existing groups in which we may or may not be present many groups had happy starts, a good run and later became weaker. I wish the group susttained strenght and as u know I am also there when time permits. > > prashant > > > ________________________________ > sreeram srinivas <sreeram64 > > Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:51:16 AM > Re: Neelam gupta on AIA APPROVALS > > > > Dear Mr. Prashant ji, > > Ancient_Indian_ Astrology {AIA}= do not that NUMBER of moderators you > mentioned in your original mail. The only key moderator of that AIA > group is the group owner Mr. Sreenadh himself. There are many worthy > members who have subject core interest and knowledge, come up with new > topics in the group. Dr. Neelam ji was NEVER banned in that group as > mentioned in your mail.... she has been active contributor to the group. > To my knowledge NO person has been banned till date - unless someone is > talking totally tangent or abusing others.... > > Sorry, for this non_astro mail, posting to keep the records straight. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dear RRji I agree on the spam part but I had always respected and admired sreenadh ji for his research orient approach right from his JR days and never missed a chance to say so but Sreeram ji has been more a mouth piece of the rest of the noise makes sreenadh has also been a victim for sometime from them but has shown a lot of maturity and material to withstand and still give them room and grow too the spam part just sreram is there as many times he has refered there r good astrologers over AIA all of them were part of many groups even JR but we have enough good members left like u , Vattem krishna ji, rafel g, k gopeu, nikit, harry, anup m., and many more un named ones and if there is peace sure many more will come back and new members may also be here. we have not shut the door on anyone. it is up to them to be here and treat this forum as they have AIA, the subject is supreme not individuals is my approach we must act, preach and live to keep it alive collectively.. Best wishes prashant ________________________________ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:33:29 AM Re: Neelam gupta on AIA APPROVALS Dear Kumar ji, Please let Sreeram ji/Sreenadh jee express their sentiments/resentme nts! There must be a good reason why we folks attract their attention and of certain others who are so frustrated as to spam private emails of members of this Group! Enough said! Rohiniranjan , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote: > > Dear sreeram > > this ok, but after I closed the issue rightly with neelam ji herself this post is strange > > but what i quoted /said is untrue by herself till then I had to believe what was told to me by one of them I gave the context, timeshare too I also said I stand corrected as only 2 ppl can say it one who told me and one who claimed to have done it. HER WORD IS GOOD ENUF for me. > > and everywhere I mentioned abt AIA it has not -vely and happy to see the group that way. and wish the same future for all existing groups in which we may or may not be present many groups had happy starts, a good run and later became weaker. I wish the group susttained strenght and as u know I am also there when time permits. > > prashant > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > sreeram srinivas <sreeram64@. ..> > > Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:51:16 AM > Re: Neelam gupta on AIA APPROVALS > > > > Dear Mr. Prashant ji, > > Ancient_Indian_ Astrology {AIA}= do not that NUMBER of moderators you > mentioned in your original mail. The only key moderator of that AIA > group is the group owner Mr. Sreenadh himself. There are many worthy > members who have subject core interest and knowledge, come up with new > topics in the group. Dr. Neelam ji was NEVER banned in that group as > mentioned in your mail.... she has been active contributor to the group. > To my knowledge NO person has been banned till date - unless someone is > talking totally tangent or abusing others.... > > Sorry, for this non_astro mail, posting to keep the records straight. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.