Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

msg nos - 54368-74 aapproved at 17.43

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Members, Bhaskar

 

pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42 hrs approx

 

in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is of harry when

3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny so too anshuls

 

btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

 

sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be happening when a

single member posts a few messages a BUG in mostly

 

I also get a msg like

 

 

 

PythonError: <exceptions.AttributeError instance at 1954210>

 

if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

 

and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that apporva alias neelam

gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but for the name/identity being

mixed up in the cat's mode

 

alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the welfare of the

subject I had conveyed this to her in public, private and ur msg is helpful too

 

I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in batches when I am at my

desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER DOUBTING MEMBER/S. i have tried

many ways to explain it -this is also one with msg nos itself anyone seeking the

truth with a open mind and heart will find it not just on this day on any past

day in the past 8 months it has been similar

v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was online I did so,

else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can do it in faster and

smaller lots

 

 

 

prashant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear prashant garu

 

firstly, you must be appreciated for doing the tough task of a

moderator job of this large group and one remarkable improvement

brought out by your moderatorship is that you are not allowing slang,

dirty, vulgar abusive language mails. similarly do take pains to

read all mails and delete spams and virus generated mails etc. though

it is time consuming.

 

as regards our fraternal friend bhaskarji, all must realise that he

has great knowledge and command in astrology and he had demonstrated

earlier that he can give greatest contribution to the subject and

also to reading charts. if one goes through all his posts in this

group, 99 percent of his posts are subject related and only one

percent critical. it is unfortunate that you both had some

misunderstanding and as a fraternal brother, i request upon you to

show brotherly affection and forget what all happened in the past and

start a fresh beginning coincing with the fresh new year 2009.

 

thinking as a moderator, please give him an opportunity by making him

unmoderated for all his contributions in this group. yes, as a

moderator you are at liberty to put a rider that he would again be

placed under moderation if he errs. this way, you would be giving a

signal as a fair treating moderator that all those astrologers who

have contributed heavily in this group in the past are unmoderated

including bhaskarji.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear Members, Bhaskar

>

> pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42 hrs

approx

>

> in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is of

harry when 3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny so

too anshuls

>

> btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

>

> sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be

happening when a single member posts a few messages a BUG in

groups mostly

>

> I also get a msg like

>

>

>

> PythonError: <exceptions.AttributeError instance at 1954210>

>

> if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

>

> and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that apporva

alias neelam gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but for

the name/identity being mixed up in the cat's mode

>

> alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the

welfare of the subject I had conveyed this to her in public, private

and ur msg is helpful too

>

> I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in batches

when I am at my desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER DOUBTING

MEMBER/S. i have tried many ways to explain it -this is also one

with msg nos itself anyone seeking the truth with a open mind and

heart will find it not just on this day on any past day in the past

8 months it has been similar

> v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was online

I did so, else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can do it

in faster and smaller lots

>

>

>

> prashant

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am Strongly Agree with Shree Arjunji's Post.

 

rgds

Niket

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " panditarjun2004 "

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear prashant garu

>

> firstly, you must be appreciated for doing the tough task of a

> moderator job of this large group and one remarkable improvement

> brought out by your moderatorship is that you are not allowing

slang,

> dirty, vulgar abusive language mails. similarly do take pains to

> read all mails and delete spams and virus generated mails etc.

though

> it is time consuming.

>

> as regards our fraternal friend bhaskarji, all must realise that he

> has great knowledge and command in astrology and he had

demonstrated

> earlier that he can give greatest contribution to the subject and

> also to reading charts. if one goes through all his posts in this

> group, 99 percent of his posts are subject related and only one

> percent critical. it is unfortunate that you both had some

> misunderstanding and as a fraternal brother, i request upon you to

> show brotherly affection and forget what all happened in the past

and

> start a fresh beginning coincing with the fresh new year 2009.

>

> thinking as a moderator, please give him an opportunity by making

him

> unmoderated for all his contributions in this group. yes, as a

> moderator you are at liberty to put a rider that he would again be

> placed under moderation if he errs. this way, you would be giving

a

> signal as a fair treating moderator that all those astrologers who

> have contributed heavily in this group in the past are unmoderated

> including bhaskarji.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

> <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Members, Bhaskar

> >

> > pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42

hrs

> approx

> >

> > in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is

of

> harry when 3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny so

> too anshuls

> >

> > btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

> >

> > sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be

> happening when a single member posts a few messages a BUG in

> groups mostly

> >

> > I also get a msg like

> >

> >

> >

> > PythonError: <exceptions.AttributeError instance at 1954210>

> >

> > if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

> >

> > and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that apporva

> alias neelam gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but

for

> the name/identity being mixed up in the cat's mode

> >

> > alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the

> welfare of the subject I had conveyed this to her in public,

private

> and ur msg is helpful too

> >

> > I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in batches

> when I am at my desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER

DOUBTING

> MEMBER/S. i have tried many ways to explain it -this is also one

> with msg nos itself anyone seeking the truth with a open mind and

> heart will find it not just on this day on any past day in the

past

> 8 months it has been similar

> > v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was

online

> I did so, else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can do

it

> in faster and smaller lots

> >

> >

> >

> > prashant

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Arjuni,

 

thanks for the mail as such, I am doing my bit with as much care as it demands

and trying to improve my short comings by the day it is a learning curve that

has to be steady, than allow ups and downs

 

I must say a few things that stand apart here

 

that the numbers part is not fair at all is it so small u must see that and get

back on this if it has some material even if its from anyone no issue. u must

see have posted many such even from av pathi y'day or Raj also to quote just a

couple.

 

as regards Bhaskars criticism of me I still have posted a few even under

moderation and will do so

 

he himself has said several times he is helpless when he is agitated can say

anything to anyone so if it is just me can take it as I have in my stride so

far

 

but what happened in the forum for the past few years

NOT JUST IN THIS FORUM OTHER FORUMS AS WELL there were frequent squabbles both

ways by him and towards him which did see the change in the moderation in many

groups else most were free and ended in chaos.

 

we know not always he was guilty ppl did anger him too it is up to us to protect

our image as an astrologer more than a individual. I have erred too for sometime

but did take steps to correct myself, I erred v few occasions to the number of

times I was targeted still it doesn't befit me to be so.

 

+++

 

I was accused of trying to corner and throw out one by one astrologer and

monopolize JR for many yrs did it happen? even after seeing my posts

appreciating many new astrologers in the past 2-3 yrs

 

I had gone a step forward and announced in JR i will do only free readings EARLY

THIS YR.

 

2 months later only i became a moderator till date do u see any monopoly by me?

 

on the contrary i get critisised for allowing all non astros to post

 

who r we to judge someones capabilities let the members at large decide that is

my approach.

 

if the climate is peaceful it is due to the efforts by most mode raters, owners

in many groups who had to wield their hand on it.

 

+++

 

I AM OPEN TO ALLOW BHASKAR'S MAILS unmoderated if he posts for 100 DAYS WITHOUT

OFFENDING ANYONE

 

THIS OFFER I CAN GIVE TO ALL SAME WAY

 

HAVE I NOT GIVEN HIM the platform to post here many-times I have and also

thanked him when he points out some members who have abused our generosity, time

and post in many groups and still abuse us today can be him ANOTHER DAY CAN BE

ANYONE OF US. as I am not a member in many groups so i won;t know of such people

and may have replied

 

there is no problem if one member in a group gets more than one astrologer to

read but not the same if he posts in many groups unchecked.

 

pl remember he is free to post any reading on any chart or topic anytime i had

asked him manytimes to do so

 

if he can give up the complex that i am withholding his mails deliberately which

is untrue with so many examples i am giving

he will not be disappointed all new members will be so and old members cud come

in between the approved msgs time stamps that too can be verified. by anyone

seeking the truth.in the past 8 month period and see if such a trend is there

 

let him start a fresh and see it for himself

 

i have maintained the subject is supreme not we individuals

 

 

but what we do with ourselves must not LOWER the astrologers image in the eyes

of the queriests and gen public

has been my concern

 

best wishes

 

prashant

 

 

________________________________

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

 

Tuesday, December 23, 2008 9:04:19 AM

Re: msg nos - 54368-74 aapproved at 17.43

 

 

dear prashant garu

 

firstly, you must be appreciated for doing the tough task of a

moderator job of this large group and one remarkable improvement

brought out by your moderatorship is that you are not allowing slang,

dirty, vulgar abusive language mails. similarly do take pains to

read all mails and delete spams and virus generated mails etc. though

it is time consuming.

 

as regards our fraternal friend bhaskarji, all must realise that he

has great knowledge and command in astrology and he had demonstrated

earlier that he can give greatest contribution to the subject and

also to reading charts. if one goes through all his posts in this

group, 99 percent of his posts are subject related and only one

percent critical. it is unfortunate that you both had some

misunderstanding and as a fraternal brother, i request upon you to

show brotherly affection and forget what all happened in the past and

start a fresh beginning coincing with the fresh new year 2009.

 

thinking as a moderator, please give him an opportunity by making him

unmoderated for all his contributions in this group. yes, as a

moderator you are at liberty to put a rider that he would again be

placed under moderation if he errs. this way, you would be giving a

signal as a fair treating moderator that all those astrologers who

have contributed heavily in this group in the past are unmoderated

including bhaskarji.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy .com

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote:

>

> Dear Members, Bhaskar

>

> pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42 hrs

approx

>

> in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is of

harry when 3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny so

too anshuls

>

> btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

>

> sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be

happening when a single member posts a few messages a BUG in

groups mostly

>

> I also get a msg like

>

>

>

> PythonError: <exceptions. AttributeError instance at 1954210>

>

> if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

>

> and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that apporva

alias neelam gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but for

the name/identity being mixed up in the cat's mode

>

> alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the

welfare of the subject I had conveyed this to her in public, private

and ur msg is helpful too

>

> I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in batches

when I am at my desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER DOUBTING

MEMBER/S. i have tried many ways to explain it -this is also one

with msg nos itself anyone seeking the truth with a open mind and

heart will find it not just on this day on any past day in the past

8 months it has been similar

> v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was online

I did so, else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can do it

in faster and smaller lots

>

>

>

> prashant

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear prashantji

 

your observations are true that earlier you were attacked with untrue

fears of monopolising and removing other astrologers from this

group. over the time, we have seen growing number of new and young

astrologers contributing more readings.

 

however, when a politician is in power, he will be hurled abuses

which he shall simply listen and forget. similarly moderators carry

that criticism which you shall ignore and carry on. in reality, the

moderator job is filled with tension and sometimes spoils your own

personal life schedules and you will be doing lot of ungrateful job

which are not visible in the group like reading all the shit which is

not worth readable by others. this means what is bad or unreadable

for all is read by you and your mind gets hot before you trash that

message.

 

your offer to make bhaskarji unmoderated after three months is a

positive encouragement.

 

though each person has his own style and way of responding, i always

preach and practice that while writing in public groups, we must only

convey in positive language and one shall never use unparliamentary

language.

 

anyway, the year 2008 is going and let us all look forward to a

happy, peaceful and more knowledgeable year 2009 ahead in all aspects.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear Arjuni,

>

> thanks for the mail as such, I am doing my bit with as much care as

it demands and trying to improve my short comings by the day it is a

learning curve that has to be steady, than allow ups and downs

>

> I must say a few things that stand apart here

>

> that the numbers part is not fair at all is it so small u must see

that and get back on this if it has some material even if its from

anyone no issue. u must see have posted many such even from av

pathi y'day or Raj also to quote just a couple.

>

> as regards Bhaskars criticism of me I still have posted a few even

under moderation and will do so

>

> he himself has said several times he is helpless when he is

agitated can say anything to anyone so if it is just me can take it

as I have in my stride so far

>

> but what happened in the forum for the past few years

> NOT JUST IN THIS FORUM OTHER FORUMS AS WELL there were frequent

squabbles both ways by him and towards him which did see the change

in the moderation in many groups else most were free and ended in

chaos.

>

> we know not always he was guilty ppl did anger him too it is up to

us to protect our image as an astrologer more than a individual. I

have erred too for sometime but did take steps to correct myself, I

erred v few occasions to the number of times I was targeted still it

doesn't befit me to be so.

>

> +++

>

> I was accused of trying to corner and throw out one by one

astrologer and monopolize JR for many yrs did it happen? even after

seeing my posts appreciating many new astrologers in the past 2-3 yrs

>

> I had gone a step forward and announced in JR i will do only free

readings EARLY THIS YR.

>

> 2 months later only i became a moderator till date do u see any

monopoly by me?

>

> on the contrary i get critisised for allowing all non astros to post

>

> who r we to judge someones capabilities let the members at large

decide that is my approach.

>

> if the climate is peaceful it is due to the efforts by most mode

raters, owners in many groups who had to wield their hand on it.

>

> +++

>

> I AM OPEN TO ALLOW BHASKAR'S MAILS unmoderated if he posts for 100

DAYS WITHOUT OFFENDING ANYONE

>

> THIS OFFER I CAN GIVE TO ALL SAME WAY

>

> HAVE I NOT GIVEN HIM the platform to post here many-times I have

and also thanked him when he points out some members who have abused

our generosity, time and post in many groups and still abuse us today

can be him ANOTHER DAY CAN BE ANYONE OF US. as I am not a member in

many groups so i won;t know of such people and may have replied

>

> there is no problem if one member in a group gets more than one

astrologer to read but not the same if he posts in many groups

unchecked.

>

> pl remember he is free to post any reading on any chart or topic

anytime i had asked him manytimes to do so

>

> if he can give up the complex that i am withholding his mails

deliberately which is untrue with so many examples i am giving

> he will not be disappointed all new members will be so and old

members cud come in between the approved msgs time stamps that too

can be verified. by anyone seeking the truth.in the past 8 month

period and see if such a trend is there

>

> let him start a fresh and see it for himself

>

> i have maintained the subject is supreme not we individuals

>

>

> but what we do with ourselves must not LOWER the astrologers

image in the eyes of the queriests and gen public

> has been my concern

>

> best wishes

>

> prashant

>

>

> ________________________________

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

>

> Tuesday, December 23, 2008 9:04:19 AM

> Re: msg nos - 54368-74 aapproved at 17.43

>

>

> dear prashant garu

>

> firstly, you must be appreciated for doing the tough task of a

> moderator job of this large group and one remarkable improvement

> brought out by your moderatorship is that you are not allowing

slang,

> dirty, vulgar abusive language mails. similarly do take pains to

> read all mails and delete spams and virus generated mails etc.

though

> it is time consuming.

>

> as regards our fraternal friend bhaskarji, all must realise that he

> has great knowledge and command in astrology and he had

demonstrated

> earlier that he can give greatest contribution to the subject and

> also to reading charts. if one goes through all his posts in this

> group, 99 percent of his posts are subject related and only one

> percent critical. it is unfortunate that you both had some

> misunderstanding and as a fraternal brother, i request upon you to

> show brotherly affection and forget what all happened in the past

and

> start a fresh beginning coincing with the fresh new year 2009.

>

> thinking as a moderator, please give him an opportunity by making

him

> unmoderated for all his contributions in this group. yes, as a

> moderator you are at liberty to put a rider that he would again be

> placed under moderation if he errs. this way, you would be giving

a

> signal as a fair treating moderator that all those astrologers who

> have contributed heavily in this group in the past are unmoderated

> including bhaskarji.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy .com

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

> <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Members, Bhaskar

> >

> > pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42

hrs

> approx

> >

> > in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is

of

> harry when 3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny so

> too anshuls

> >

> > btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

> >

> > sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be

> happening when a single member posts a few messages a BUG in

> groups mostly

> >

> > I also get a msg like

> >

> >

> >

> > PythonError: <exceptions. AttributeError instance at 1954210>

> >

> > if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

> >

> > and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that apporva

> alias neelam gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but

for

> the name/identity being mixed up in the cat's mode

> >

> > alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the

> welfare of the subject I had conveyed this to her in public,

private

> and ur msg is helpful too

> >

> > I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in batches

> when I am at my desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER

DOUBTING

> MEMBER/S. i have tried many ways to explain it -this is also one

> with msg nos itself anyone seeking the truth with a open mind and

> heart will find it not just on this day on any past day in the

past

> 8 months it has been similar

> > v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was online

> I did so, else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can do

it

> in faster and smaller lots

> >

> >

> >

> > prashant

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said, Arjunji! And jupiter in its neecha sign should pose

interesting situations...

 

, " panditarjun2004 "

<panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> dear prashantji

>

> your observations are true that earlier you were attacked with

untrue

> fears of monopolising and removing other astrologers from this

> group. over the time, we have seen growing number of new and young

> astrologers contributing more readings.

>

> however, when a politician is in power, he will be hurled abuses

> which he shall simply listen and forget. similarly moderators

carry

> that criticism which you shall ignore and carry on. in reality,

the

> moderator job is filled with tension and sometimes spoils your own

> personal life schedules and you will be doing lot of ungrateful job

> which are not visible in the group like reading all the shit which

is

> not worth readable by others. this means what is bad or unreadable

> for all is read by you and your mind gets hot before you trash that

> message.

>

> your offer to make bhaskarji unmoderated after three months is a

> positive encouragement.

>

> though each person has his own style and way of responding, i

always

> preach and practice that while writing in public groups, we must

only

> convey in positive language and one shall never use unparliamentary

> language.

>

> anyway, the year 2008 is going and let us all look forward to a

> happy, peaceful and more knowledgeable year 2009 ahead in all

aspects.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> , Prashant Kumar G B

> <gbp_kumar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Arjuni,

> >

> > thanks for the mail as such, I am doing my bit with as much care

as

> it demands and trying to improve my short comings by the day it is

a

> learning curve that has to be steady, than allow ups and downs

> >

> > I must say a few things that stand apart here

> >

> > that the numbers part is not fair at all is it so small u must

see

> that and get back on this if it has some material even if its from

> anyone no issue. u must see have posted many such even from av

> pathi y'day or Raj also to quote just a couple.

> >

> > as regards Bhaskars criticism of me I still have posted a few

even

> under moderation and will do so

> >

> > he himself has said several times he is helpless when he is

> agitated can say anything to anyone so if it is just me can take

it

> as I have in my stride so far

> >

> > but what happened in the forum for the past few years

> > NOT JUST IN THIS FORUM OTHER FORUMS AS WELL there were frequent

> squabbles both ways by him and towards him which did see the

change

> in the moderation in many groups else most were free and ended in

> chaos.

> >

> > we know not always he was guilty ppl did anger him too it is up

to

> us to protect our image as an astrologer more than a individual. I

> have erred too for sometime but did take steps to correct myself, I

> erred v few occasions to the number of times I was targeted still

it

> doesn't befit me to be so.

> >

> > +++

> >

> > I was accused of trying to corner and throw out one by one

> astrologer and monopolize JR for many yrs did it happen? even after

> seeing my posts appreciating many new astrologers in the past 2-3

yrs

> >

> > I had gone a step forward and announced in JR i will do only free

> readings EARLY THIS YR.

> >

> > 2 months later only i became a moderator till date do u see any

> monopoly by me?

> >

> > on the contrary i get critisised for allowing all non astros to

post

> >

> > who r we to judge someones capabilities let the members at large

> decide that is my approach.

> >

> > if the climate is peaceful it is due to the efforts by most mode

> raters, owners in many groups who had to wield their hand on it.

> >

> > +++

> >

> > I AM OPEN TO ALLOW BHASKAR'S MAILS unmoderated if he posts for

100

> DAYS WITHOUT OFFENDING ANYONE

> >

> > THIS OFFER I CAN GIVE TO ALL SAME WAY

> >

> > HAVE I NOT GIVEN HIM the platform to post here many-times I have

> and also thanked him when he points out some members who have

abused

> our generosity, time and post in many groups and still abuse us

today

> can be him ANOTHER DAY CAN BE ANYONE OF US. as I am not a member in

> many groups so i won;t know of such people and may have replied

> >

> > there is no problem if one member in a group gets more than one

> astrologer to read but not the same if he posts in many groups

> unchecked.

> >

> > pl remember he is free to post any reading on any chart or topic

> anytime i had asked him manytimes to do so

> >

> > if he can give up the complex that i am withholding his mails

> deliberately which is untrue with so many examples i am giving

> > he will not be disappointed all new members will be so and old

> members cud come in between the approved msgs time stamps that too

> can be verified. by anyone seeking the truth.in the past 8 month

> period and see if such a trend is there

> >

> > let him start a fresh and see it for himself

> >

> > i have maintained the subject is supreme not we individuals

> >

> >

> > but what we do with ourselves must not LOWER the astrologers

> image in the eyes of the queriests and gen public

> > has been my concern

> >

> > best wishes

> >

> > prashant

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@>

> >

> > Tuesday, December 23, 2008 9:04:19 AM

> > Re: msg nos - 54368-74 aapproved at 17.43

> >

> >

> > dear prashant garu

> >

> > firstly, you must be appreciated for doing the tough task of a

> > moderator job of this large group and one remarkable improvement

> > brought out by your moderatorship is that you are not allowing

> slang,

> > dirty, vulgar abusive language mails. similarly do take pains to

> > read all mails and delete spams and virus generated mails etc.

> though

> > it is time consuming.

> >

> > as regards our fraternal friend bhaskarji, all must realise that

he

> > has great knowledge and command in astrology and he had

> demonstrated

> > earlier that he can give greatest contribution to the subject and

> > also to reading charts. if one goes through all his posts in

this

> > group, 99 percent of his posts are subject related and only one

> > percent critical. it is unfortunate that you both had some

> > misunderstanding and as a fraternal brother, i request upon you

to

> > show brotherly affection and forget what all happened in the past

> and

> > start a fresh beginning coincing with the fresh new year 2009.

> >

> > thinking as a moderator, please give him an opportunity by making

> him

> > unmoderated for all his contributions in this group. yes, as a

> > moderator you are at liberty to put a rider that he would again

be

> > placed under moderation if he errs. this way, you would be

giving

> a

> > signal as a fair treating moderator that all those astrologers

who

> > have contributed heavily in this group in the past are

unmoderated

> > including bhaskarji.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy .com

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B

> > <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Members, Bhaskar

> > >

> > > pl see this again in this session I approved 6+2 msgs at 17.42

> hrs

> > approx

> > >

> > > in the 2 i separated they seem to go to the spam folder one is

> of

> > harry when 3/4 of his came in inbox one going to spam was funny

so

> > too anshuls

> > >

> > > btw some well known old members too is going into spam box

> > >

> > > sumit Bajaj , Anup M are 2 names i can recall this seems to be

> > happening when a single member posts a few messages a BUG in

 

> > groups mostly

> > >

> > > I also get a msg like

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > PythonError: <exceptions. AttributeError instance at 1954210>

> > >

> > > if anyone has a clue pl post a reply

> > >

> > > and members like Bhora u have done well to point out that

apporva

> > alias neelam gupta is a good astrologer which I too have said but

> for

> > the name/identity being mixed up in the cat's mode

> > >

> > > alll is well that ends well and forgiven in good spirit for the

> > welfare of the subject I had conveyed this to her in public,

> private

> > and ur msg is helpful too

> > >

> > > I hope u see my role in quoting the message approval in

batches

> > when I am at my desk is also seen and clarified to the EVER

> DOUBTING

> > MEMBER/S. i have tried many ways to explain it -this is also one

> > with msg nos itself anyone seeking the truth with a open mind and

> > heart will find it not just on this day on any past day in the

> past

> > 8 months it has been similar

> > > v few days I got time to pass them within minutes if i was

online

> > I did so, else in batches every 2 hrs I hope by March end i can

do

> it

> > in faster and smaller lots

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > prashant

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...