attn sunil, nair, AV Pathi. Bhaskar 17/9- SPELT wrongly

[Guest guest]

SwE Rafel

 

sorry about the wrong spelt name by oversieght

 

 

prashant

 

 

Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme

 

Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:00:00 AM

Re: attn sunil, nair, AV Pathi. Bhaskar 17/9

 

 

*kleem namah narasimhaaya*

Dear Prashant , Namaskar

 

I appreciate your endevour and respect but I cant go with this politics.

Normally I ignore these kind of mails and thats also my advice for you.

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz / SJC Teacher

www: http://rohinaa. com / email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

 

Prashant Kumar G B pisze:

>

> Dear Sunil Nair, A V Pathi, Bhaskar. tanveerji

>

> I am sending this mail specifically to the 3 of u and tanvir ji as

> owner of the group

>

> I approved only one message with much hesitation by lalit today

>

> , there r many which I have with held can forward them to all who want

> to read it the groups peace and discussion alone r central to me. I

> have sent sunil a coppy of 7 mails of lalit, I wrote to Lalit i will

> do it as well so no betrayal here I said to them to limit their wars

> privately

>

> and why did i approve one msg of Lalit today

>

> why inspite of asking manytimes sunil to say something on Nadis he

> spent time only on attacking girish

>

> it doesnt matter what girish says is sense or rubbish, let sunil say

> what is right at least- is all i mean.

>

> now on Nadi dosha Girish had given a reply

>

> to which sunil asked what was Nadi dosh

> then girish had replied in what little he know

>

> I have also said and he in a later mail that was not the only factor

> in deciding a alliance

>

> he has given the sloka from whatsoever be the source

>

> WHICH CAN BE SEEN AS outdated and needs some adaptation to our times

> today I tried a simple way as varnas were more profession based

>

> so i extended it to all religious people with different means of

> work/livelihood pl see and comment on it add or say wht u feel is

> right or wrong in such approaches

>

> we need to do some rethinking on what classics said after all it has

> the inbuilt Desha, kala paristhithi to guide us we need not throw the

> classis as unwanted they r our pillars for all times to come

>

> the post of lalit i allowed was least sensitive and all it asked was

> for some material

> it is strange AV Pathi too has gone into same stream and I wish he had

> some views on Nadi dosha instead

>

> the simplest way to prove your presence is by what u speak, write and

> if it is Jyotish it will shine if it is fire u will get fire instead

>

> I HAVE NOT PASSED SEVERAL MAILS is a fact that i take my job seroiusly

> there is one mail by mistake i had passed some one abusing rafel ji

>

> I have writen in group and to rafel ji too it was a mistake-due to mu

> low vision after this even if it takes longer time i wait read and approve

>

> so BHASKAR why keep bringing it all the while as though I don't want

> anyone here and what will the group be witout them?

>

> even before i became moderator for last 2 yrs i have acknowledged good

> contributions from several members

>

> Anup M, Asto Nikit, gaurav ghosh.

>

> VATTEM KRISHNA ji had long break and missed him but whnever he posted

> from the blue have said we miss him and I am happy but for his

> presence the light in the group wont be this good rafel ji too is back

> all these r the pillars of several groups

> TATVAM-ASI too i have missed from time to time he said he will need

> more time to be back, RRji is on and off, we need all of them here too

>

> and their contribution can never be lost, this is one reason why I do

> acknowledge their work

>

> apart from me and sreenadh ji in AIA i hardly see moderators,

> acknowledging member contrubutions. as said I've done this well before

> I was anywhere near a moderator

>

> it is a joy tosee the subject shine its glory from anyone.THE MORE

> MEMBERS ADD T O IT , BETTER IT BECOMES.

>

> all I do is avoid friction and u must see it is sunil who has provoked

> Lalit and I have stopped lalits response is this fair NO i need to be

> fair to both to air the taunts, YET I AM PARTIAL TO SUNIL TO LLOW HIS

> TAUNTS AND NOT LALIT yet u blame me.

>

> but u can see that I have not allowed it to become a play ground but

> did pass on the replies to sunil

>

> i spke to sunil on this to avoid them but he said he loves taunting Lalit

>

> if sunil or av pathi did add something to the nadi thread will be good

>

> we all learn by sharing not by abusing one another

>

> and remember one time girish was called my fake ID too, which is not

> true and I can't read sanskrit or quote it as he has

> this must lay to rest the fact girish exists in Harayana, me in chennai

>

> whatever I have to say I will say with my own ID and it will have my

> signature below it

>

> Bhakar

>

> I hope i carried the essence of ur mail, i can't pass urs it surely

> not that it is abusive on me, but it has no facts

> the Rafel ji episode is behind me and rafel ji u can ask him openly if

> u wish or private

>

> on LALIT he too feels I am biased towards sunil and is leaving the

> forum if this helps u all

>

> all i did was see if he can present himself as a jyotish student here

>

> he was peaceful till sunil started provoking him but i never allowed

> lalits replies to sunil for peace of group sake

>

> even if cut and paste I allowed lalits mails as long as it was jyotish

> rest not approved

>

> sunil I want ur work here to be as good as it is in AIA

>

> if u see ur reply on Dayakar and mine and

> my reply and urs on the sucide case r on similar lines in AIA so if

> the subject is the basis we r close to it, i hope it comes in the

> chemsitry too I have no issus with u, and want all members to feel

> free and write more of jyotish

>

> remember if u don't like a person address just materially to the

> group, need not take a dig at them

>

> best wishes

>

> prashant

>

>