naadi dosh-wrong thread 18/9

September 17, 2008

Sunil

don't u think u r wasting precious time? u said u had posted on such topics so

the material is there with u all u can do is in the same time wasted on taunting

members u can cut and paste them here or upload them into file section

this is best reply u can give anyone whom u feel is below ur standard

but by abusing them nothing is achieved.

use ur time constructively please

I KNOW U HAVE GOOD DEPTH, but then how can i say without anything from ur side

to support it?

btw one job reduced for u I HOPE U READ MY EARLIER post Lalit felt I am biased

towards u and is leaving

but bhaskar, prashant pandey, srinivas, u all feel I am biased towards him,,,!

which must say i was neutral I approached my job with a fresh, open mind and

allowed all Jyotish mails FROM ANYONE even if cut and paste for new members to

see them, it is up to seniors here to raise the discussion level rather than

indulge in mud slinging

REMEMBER WE R ALL VICTIMS OF HIS attacks in the past, yet i was giving everyone

a fresh chance, nothing prejudicial or judgemental. tried my best to plead for

moderated messaging, edited some, disallowed many abusive mails.

rest is up to u all, I have done and will do my best for keeping the form free

of personal clashes, what is visible is ur taunts on lalit and u have seen his

replies but not the group so this will affect ur image not his.

PRASHANT

sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala

Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:29:21 AM

Re: naadi dosh

girish raheja

learn more ,read more ,astrologer shud know more sastras and puranas .

varna is not cast ,it is based on guna and karma mean no one born with

it ,so it is wat prashnath ji or any one said ,it is appliable in 4 ages

..or any ages to come .

regrds sunil nair

, " girish_raheja "

<girish_raheja@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

>

> Can we condemn our classics simply because they talk of Varna which

> may not be palatable today because of our political compulsions.

>

> Classics have classified even the zodiac signs according to Varna

>

> Aires > Kshatriya

> Taurus > Vaishya

> Gemini > Shoodra

> Cancer > Vipra

>

> The sequence follows in the same order.

>

> At least I can not dump the classics. I would rather redefine the

> Varna as respected Prashant Kumar ji has done in his earlier message

> then deny the existence of Varna altogether.

>

> Regards,

>

> Girish Raheja

>

, " sunil nair "

> astro_tellerkerala@ wrote:

> >

> > Hare rama krishna

> >

> > dear pathi ji ,

> >

> > i am answering u but it is not for u .

> >

> > the problem here is too much depending on sankrit shlokas ,any one

> with

> > some bent of sanskrit can make a shloka and then future generation

> can

> > suffer on it by dog fights which happened here ,the problem is

> lack of

> > real scientific bent of mind .even if based on varna do u think is

> they

> > r aliens and with no life science appliable but the secret is they

> shud

> > wait or i cant disclose .

> >

> > but a person well devlped in basics cn know what is it and what to

> adopt

> > .

> >

> > even the shola quoted is very against the essence of religion

> which is

> > very basis of astrology .even very much agaisnt of astrology ,but

> fools

> > prefer to be fools and some fools want me to quote my studies ,if

> they

> > dont understand basic ,who am i to illuminate this fools who in the

> > pretext of harassing wanted to know technics .

> >

> > as religion dont support some one can born as a caste as there is

> not

> > caste in vedas .

> >

> > if some one coming for street dog fight with me refer geetha .All

> street

> > dogs can refer geetha on it .search wat is varna then wat is

> caste .

> >

> > all street dogs who fvr their pet theories shud think tht

> astrology then

> > become a limited subjuct to only india( that also caste india )

> and no

> > use in other countries or even in india generaly where we hav even

> > adivasi states .

> >

> > also think then u can classify almost all rishi munis also as some

> > sheduled castes .

> >

> > still i proove right without proving myself

> >

> > sorry for i hav to b blunt

> >

> > regrds sunil nair

> >

> > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .

> >

> > ps --there is some ppl who wnted to learn by shouting or

> squessing or

> > guerilla methods ,that is why i holding back real essence as it is

> very

> > much against this astrology and guru paramapara

> >

> > till then show real color of breeding .

> >

> > , venkatachala pathi

> > <pathiav@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sirs,

> > > Sri Vettem Krishnan is a very knowledgeable person in

> Astrology. Lot

> > of interesting, as well as educative, inputs are from him in this

> Forum.

> > > Modern concepts in any field is grown out of old theories and

> old data

> > and analysis are still valid. Of course, they are tested doctrines,

> > while 'improvements' brought by many learned Pundits in the field

> in

> > modern times are still in the process of testing and analysis.

> > >

> > > A.V.Pathi,

> > > Astrologer

> > > 103, Black Tie Lane, Chapel Hill,

> > > North Carolina, 27514, USA

>

September 18, 2008

dear prashant ji

yes i am waisting my precious time but not my precious hard earned

knowledge to others ,u shud think abt it .first create an atmosphere

..then ask any one to contribute .it is not here .do u think i will giv a

big feast to howling dogs party ?? ( also 2 minit taunt is better than 3

hrs hard work )

u hav to go back to this tread or any tread which i am writing ,i always

find some one will come real id or fake id and charging with book

knowldge .

even when u asked in chat ,i said that time also i know most worst

technics so pls tel ur ppl to stop taunting me if they want to get

anything or i will play and lov to play in tune with them than spilling

gems in frnt of swines .It is not my duty nor even gr8 rishis done it

..If some one wanted to part wat he know ,he shud get respect peace a

glorious atmosphere .then even other shud ask questions with decent way

..Not i know every thing but u show with exmples and proofs ( means i

work and they play and later plagiarise ). To make one post may b i hav

to work 4 to 5 hrs with illustrassions ,then any points to explain can

go on unending as even match making concepts if i write a book it will

1000 page in print .so tell me which is better to Mr NAIR U R WRONG PPL

,or ask counter questions and save my precious time and efforts and also

protect the knowledge to reaching asuras??,again i never cross limit

unless they cross .

This tread u go back and see how strted ,i was saying my long observed

and reserched knowledge to one poster and i never try to answer even

his query for marriage -2 reasons ,one is i dont hav time ( if i open

one chart i will reply very sincerely ) 2nd i am allowing other to do it

,and then some one came with i dont know anything ,and opened this can

of worms .then i asked wat is nadi,because thought i can learn frm him

..so pls continue tread and make me illuminated on it

b4 also same things happened .also happened in many grps ,

so this grp of this kind ppl cannot get anything frm me unless u close

their mouth and i dont need any business frm this grp nor any grp

..U know atleast i am saying truth

.so u can pass all abusing mails which i will answer in 2 or 3 minits

,but not the work which needs 3 or 4 hrs and then again i can hear i

dont know any thing posts ,so i am using my protection measures

the mailer ( the post u said u approved ) who said this profeser dont

post any charts and explained was learning frm me and now saying i dont

know anything.so what u expect ?? frm me ?? i shud let other s abuse me

wat ever will happen rite ??

so i wanted to say none of this tactics will or cannot open me up .I

told u i hav students to teach and i am doing it and i am going to strt

a net grp where ppl can pay and learn .

till then let us continue this play .

regrds sunil nair

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Sunil

>

> don't u think u r wasting precious time? u said u had posted on such

topics so the material is there with u all u can do is in the same time

wasted on taunting members u can cut and paste them here or upload them

into file section

>

> this is best reply u can give anyone whom u feel is below ur standard

>

> but by abusing them nothing is achieved.

>

> use ur time constructively please

>

> I KNOW U HAVE GOOD DEPTH, but then how can i say without anything from

ur side to support it?

>

> btw one job reduced for u I HOPE U READ MY EARLIER post Lalit felt I

am biased towards u and is leaving

>

> but bhaskar, prashant pandey, srinivas, u all feel I am biased towards

him,,,!

>

> which must say i was neutral I approached my job with a fresh, open

mind and allowed all Jyotish mails FROM ANYONE even if cut and paste for

new members to see them, it is up to seniors here to raise the

discussion level rather than indulge in mud slinging

>

> REMEMBER WE R ALL VICTIMS OF HIS attacks in the past, yet i was giving

everyone a fresh chance, nothing prejudicial or judgemental. tried my

best to plead for moderated messaging, edited some, disallowed many

abusive mails.

>

> rest is up to u all, I have done and will do my best for keeping the

form free of personal clashes, what is visible is ur taunts on lalit and

u have seen his replies but not the group so this will affect ur image

not his.

>

> PRASHANT

>

> sunil nair astro_tellerkerala

>

> Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:29:21 AM

> Re: naadi dosh

>

> girish raheja

>

> learn more ,read more ,astrologer shud know more sastras and puranas .

>

> varna is not cast ,it is based on guna and karma mean no one born with

> it ,so it is wat prashnath ji or any one said ,it is appliable in 4

ages

> .or any ages to come .

>

> regrds sunil nair

>

> , " girish_raheja "

> <girish_raheja@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Members,

> >

> > Can we condemn our classics simply because they talk of Varna which

> > may not be palatable today because of our political compulsions.

> >

> > Classics have classified even the zodiac signs according to Varna

> >

> > Aires > Kshatriya

> > Taurus > Vaishya

> > Gemini > Shoodra

> > Cancer > Vipra

> >

> > The sequence follows in the same order.

> >

> > At least I can not dump the classics. I would rather redefine the

> > Varna as respected Prashant Kumar ji has done in his earlier message

> > then deny the existence of Varna altogether.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Girish Raheja

September 18, 2008

Sunil

u r mixing threads, issues

like u said it was Girish whom u asked what isNadi

and he replied

so instead of adding somehting to it either way

all u did was see a ghost in him and started abusing him at several stages i

asked u to say something onthe topic as u did not esp with one mail giving 2

reasons why u won't

this one attracted the attn of ur former student [LALIT] MIND U I MEAN what i

said i posted a sober mail of his

if u want I can allow the stronger ones of the same

in this one that is approved it u have quoted it rightly so need not repeat it

but for heavens sake

the group is not of just one or two members so feel free and post to the group

not to ones whom u don't like and why this bandwagon of members behind

questioning my approach

i have already sent u many mails of lalit if I did want to enjoy the rubbish I

would have passed it isnt it?

I respect good knowledge u need not worry on one or two members

do what u have to do i can protect anyone contributing

but when u reply like the way y did it doesn;t help so the choice is up to u to

share the info,

prashant

sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala

Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:56:56 AM

Re: naadi dosh-wrong thread 18/9