Naadi dosh- wrong thread

[Guest guest]

DEAR SRINIVAS

 

PL change the topic, thread as members who want to read the subject ones will be

misled by these kind of personal assaults

 

 

as those who r criticising without adding anything of their own is not good for

members is a waste of time, space

 

i have nothing for or against the message u quoted

 

but this thread bears a name NADI dosha if u can add something on it membership

will be enlightened

 

on the other thread u said u can say what is said here by u

 

in whatever little astrology u can pl write on some subjects than be subjective

on members I am not worried on who it is. we all learn by sharing not by

abusing.

 

it is not though i have not abused anyone, it is when discussions were hijacked

or decried or used to abuse me in some i have with a great sense of defeat in me

as it is not our strenght but weakness if we get into this unwanted exchanges

 

, if there was moderation then it would have not arisen

 

 

thanks

 

prashant

 

 

 

 

 

sreeram srinivas <sreeram64

 

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:39:11 PM

Re: Naadi dosh

 

 

 

Dear Mr. Prashant ji,

 

I trust you would agree that these principle is also applicable to all

those who plagarize others without their own home work. We recently

heard someone getting two increments plus two promotions within

2-months, is it possible in any company, if true, such person(s) should

provide proof of the same. Again, gone are the days when one could

say it was a real windfall- {chappar phadke deyta hai - goes the hindi

phrase}.... some one walking to you and giving you Rs.50,000 out of blue

can only be case of someone being chased by Police, wanting to hide the

money or mislead the Police { illegal money}... ... valid particularly

when 8H is not involved in the dasha ...etc..

 

I strongly support that every member who posts his messages in this

group should go through a grilling process to answer all queries.....

only the successful ones to be applauded, rest akin to fakes should be

restricted.. ...

 

With regards,

 

Sreeram_Srinivas