Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Hi, My views - Places are not badhak, however, badhak lord is placed in such places should be considered in order to ascertain the results. For eg: for Aries ascendant badhak would be the lord of 9th house which is jupiter for Taurus ascendant badhak would be the lord of 10th house which is saturn and so on. We also need to ascertain there placements and awastha. Please other members share there views as well. Regards, Anshul ________________________________ on behalf of Ratnaakar Fri 4/11/2008 12:43 PM ; Re: Baadhak Sthan Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] </> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Dear Anshul, For Aries (movable) ascendant, Saturn being lord of the 11th would be the badhak. Similarly for Taurus (immovable), lord of the 9th Saturn would be the badhak. Best wishes, Amitabh " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor Friday, 11 April, 2008 12:53:41 PM RE: Re: Baadhak Sthan Hi, My views - Places are not badhak, however, badhak lord is placed in such places should be considered in order to ascertain the results. For eg: for Aries ascendant badhak would be the lord of 9th house which is jupiter for Taurus ascendant badhak would be the lord of 10th house which is saturn and so on. We also need to ascertain there placements and awastha. Please other members share there views as well. Regards, Anshul ____________ _________ _________ __ on behalf of Ratnaakar Fri 4/11/2008 12:43 PM ; Re: Baadhak Sthan Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ http://mail. <http://mail. /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Correct amitabh ji, I just referred to my notes. Thanks for correcting me. 1,4,7,10 lagna is movable, thus badhak would be lord of 11, 2, 5, 8 [sat, Ven, Sun, Mars] 2,5,8,11 lagna is fixed, thus badhak would be lord of 9,12,3,6 [Jup, Merc] 3,6,9,12 lagna is dual or dwishbhava, thus the badhak would be lord of 180 deg opp. i.e 9,10,11,12 [Jup, Sat] Regards, Anshul ________________________________ on behalf of Amitabh Shastri Fri 4/11/2008 3:08 PM Re: Re: Baadhak Sthan Dear Anshul, For Aries (movable) ascendant, Saturn being lord of the 11th would be the badhak. Similarly for Taurus (immovable), lord of the 9th Saturn would be the badhak. Best wishes, Amitabh " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor <anshul.kapoor%40safenet-inc.com> > <%40> Friday, 11 April, 2008 12:53:41 PM RE: Re: Baadhak Sthan Hi, My views - Places are not badhak, however, badhak lord is placed in such places should be considered in order to ascertain the results. For eg: for Aries ascendant badhak would be the lord of 9th house which is jupiter for Taurus ascendant badhak would be the lord of 10th house which is saturn and so on. We also need to ascertain there placements and awastha. Please other members share there views as well. Regards, Anshul ____________ _________ _________ __ on behalf of Ratnaakar Fri 4/11/2008 12:43 PM ; Re: Baadhak Sthan Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ http://mail. <http://mail./> <http://mail. <http://mail./> /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Dear Amitabh, Anshul, and Ratnaakar, For Taurus Ace, Saturn is 9th and 10 Lord it is ALSO termed as Yogakaraka. THEN how it becomes BOTH Badhaka & Yogakaraka simultaneously?? Can anybody explain in detail? Regards Chan2Chill , Amitabh Shastri <amitabh_shastri wrote: Dear Anshul, For Aries (movable) ascendant, Saturn being lord of the 11th would be the badhak. Similarly for Taurus (immovable), lord of the 9th Saturn would be the badhak. Best wishes, Amitabh Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Dear Chan2Chill, i am oberving your queries and dicussions since last few months, and am reaaly admiring how fast you are picking up. Great Query. Also would like to know how Mars can become Yogkaraka as well as badhaksthadhipati at same time for Leo Lagna ? rgrds, Bhaskar. , " Chandu2chill " <nanna_id2006 wrote: > > > Dear Amitabh, Anshul, and Ratnaakar, > > For Taurus Ace, Saturn is 9th and 10 Lord it is ALSO termed as > Yogakaraka. THEN how it becomes BOTH Badhaka & Yogakaraka > simultaneously?? > > Can anybody explain in detail? > > Regards > > Chan2Chill > > > , Amitabh Shastri > <amitabh_shastri@> wrote: > > Dear Anshul, > > For Aries (movable) ascendant, Saturn being lord of the 11th would > be the badhak. Similarly for Taurus (immovable), lord of the 9th > Saturn would be the badhak. > > Best wishes, > Amitabh > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar > [Vedic Astrologer] > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Dear All, Namaskara, Sri Sarajit Poddar has written a very nice article on this topic. http://varahamihira.blogspot.com/2004/10/badhakasthana-badhakesh.html Since Taurus is a fixed sign, the 9th house from there (Capricorn) would become the badhakasthana. Hence Shani would become badhakasthanadhipati. At the same, Shani owns a Kona and a Kendra (9th and 10th) and hence a Yogakaraka. Similarly, Mars becomes both badhakasthanadhipati and Yogakaraka for Leo sign. Regards, Hari On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Chandu2chill <nanna_id2006 wrote: > > Dear Amitabh, Anshul, and Ratnaakar, > > For Taurus Ace, Saturn is 9th and 10 Lord it is ALSO termed as > Yogakaraka. THEN how it becomes BOTH Badhaka & Yogakaraka > simultaneously?? > > Can anybody explain in detail? > > Regards > > Chan2Chill > > <%40>, > Amitabh Shastri > <amitabh_shastri wrote: > > Dear Anshul, > > For Aries (movable) ascendant, Saturn being lord of the 11th would > be the badhak. Similarly for Taurus (immovable), lord of the 9th > Saturn would be the badhak. > > Best wishes, > Amitabh > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar > [Vedic Astrologer] > > > -- Nellitheertha - A Natural Wonder http://www.nellitheertha.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Namaste, To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. Best regards, Narasimha Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Kya Prithvi veero se khaali hai? Kahan gaye bade bade daave karne waale Gadaadhaari? Answer nahi mil raha kya? but i do appriciate to all those who tried to give answer. Ratnaakar Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: Dear friends, As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions are about the same as. [1] What are the significance of such places? [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? [3] Will the other planets placed in such places give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or Anterdasa? I do request to all,plz place your views. Regards Ratnaakar Ratnaakar [Vedic Astrologer] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Namaste, To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. Best regards, Narasimha Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Sh.Narsimha ji, Saadar Pranaam I am highly grateful to you for your detailed and accurate explanation.Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer in the present time.Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as Baadhkesh Maahadasa? Thanks again Regards Ratnaakar " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: Namaste, To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. Best regards, Narasimha Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , Ratnaakar wrote: > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Sh.Narsimha ji, Saadar Pranaam I am highly grateful to you for your detailed and accurate explanation.Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer in the present time.Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as Baadhkesh Maahadasa? Thanks again Regards Ratnaakar " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: Namaste, To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. Best regards, Narasimha Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , Ratnaakar wrote: > > Dear friends, > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > are about the same as. > [1] What are the significance of such places? > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > Anterdasa? > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > Regards > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Dear Bhaskar Ji, Thank you for your complements!:-) It is only (my picking up in astrology study) because of so many learned people like you, Wendy Madam, Sri Sunil Nair ji, Sri Ravindramani Ji, just to name few whom i am learning (Directly or and Indirectly) on this maya called Internet!! i am indebitated for all for my Astro growth in whatever stage i am today! So in all i have lot of Gurus!! rather i would call it i found lot of Gurus on the Net for my study!!:-) Regards Chandu2Chill , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: Dear Chan2Chill, i am oberving your queries and dicussions since last few months, and am reaaly admiring how fast you are picking up. Great Query. Also would like to know how Mars can become Yogkaraka as well as badhaksthadhipati at same time for Leo Lagna ? rgrds, Bhaskar. , " Chandu2chill " > <nanna_id2006@> wrote: Dear Amitabh, Anshul, and Ratnaakar, For Taurus Ace, Saturn is 9th and 10 Lord it is ALSO termed as Yogakaraka. THEN how it becomes BOTH Badhaka & Yogakaraka simultaneously?? Can anybody explain in detail? Regards Chan2Chill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Dear Chan2chill, Keeping your interest in mind, I take liberty to advise you as under- 1) Join some good astrology course in your town wherever you are staying. 2) Buy all books written by Bhasin. They are cheap price wise, but the best I have read among all, in my personal library. 3) Buy one copy of Saravali too, translation by Santhanam. 3) And of course books by BV raman. I can email you some books in ebook form if you require. But dont use these to study your own chart. Try to learn and help people around you, That is the ultimate purpose of all learnings. Who knows You may be a STAR astrologer of tomorrow, considering your zeal and interest in this subject. And I may use your services to predict for my family members. Also try to make simple predictions on these Forums, where anyway most of them (Not all) are bogus astrologers, and you will do no harm to anybody by making simple predictions. That way you will learn, even at the cost of failures. Remember that every failure is a stepping stone towards Success. One must accept failures too in stride, just as one feel happiness in making succesful predictions. All the best, BHASKAR. www.shrikrishnajyotish.com , " Chandu2chill " <nanna_id2006 wrote: > > > Dear Bhaskar Ji, > > Thank you for your complements!:-) > > It is only (my picking up in astrology study) because of so many > learned people like you, Wendy Madam, Sri Sunil Nair ji, Sri > Ravindramani Ji, just to name few whom i am learning (Directly or and > Indirectly) on this maya called Internet!! i am indebitated for all > for my Astro growth in whatever stage i am today! > > So in all i have lot of Gurus!! rather i would call it i found lot of > Gurus on the Net for my study!!:-) > > Regards > > Chandu2Chill > > , " Bhaskar " > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > Dear Chan2Chill, > > i am oberving your queries and dicussions > since last few months, and am reaaly > admiring how fast you are picking up. > Great Query. > > Also would like to know how Mars can > become Yogkaraka as well > as badhaksthadhipati at same > time for Leo Lagna ? > > rgrds, > Bhaskar. > > , " Chandu2chill " > > <nanna_id2006@> wrote: > > Dear Amitabh, Anshul, and Ratnaakar, > > For Taurus Ace, Saturn is 9th and 10 Lord it is ALSO termed as > Yogakaraka. THEN how it becomes BOTH Badhaka & Yogakaraka > simultaneously?? > > Can anybody explain in detail? > > Regards > > Chan2Chill > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 vedic astrology , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: >Dear Ratnakar It is good that atleast some like you have asked a theoretical question regarding Badhaka theory I have some views as learnt from my Guru and later solved by self about this Badhaka Basically it is derived from a single word called " Sula " which is often used in Jaimini school Katapaya equivalent to Sula is 11 and grammatical meaning is " Death, any acute or sharp pain, trident of Siva or a sharp pointed weapon, pike, dart, spear or lance " We will derive the specific places as mentioned in Parasara School about Badhaka Sthanas for rasis (it is only rasis but not bhavas which act as Badhakas - this is evident in the following) It is said that 11th for movable, 9th for fixed and 7th for dual signs as Badhaka Sthanas, which are odd numbers starting from 7th and ending at 11th So if we take katapaya number 11 as Sula, and start from Bha-chakra i.e., Mesha the 11th Aquarius will be a Sula sign after Mesha, we move to Vrishaba i.e., fixed, and again counting 11th from Aquarius (where we have left for Mesh Sula place) we will have Sagittarius which is 9th zodiac sign, hence 9th will be Sula place Again after completing Vrishaba, we move to Gemini which is a dual sign, and counting 11th from Sagittarius we will settle at Tula which is 7th sign from Bha-chakra, hence 7th will be a Sula sign for Dual signs As it is said in Parasara for chara, sthira and dwiswabhava only but not to odd and even we have to restrict to such condition and in this way we can have reason behind the allotment of specific places for specific signs as Badhaka sthanas, and if we agree to such logic, we have to call Sula Rasis but not Badhaka Sthanas If we accept such view, we have to again question that if we have Sula rasis which are meant for giving pain or sorrow then what are pain relievers or ananda signs? For this we have understand the concept of Arudha as taught by Jaimini but not by others If we apply straight away the Sutra 1-1-29 " Yavadeeshasrayam Padamrukshanam " , we will have only 6(six) Arudha Rasis (as Ruksha is used but not bhavas) for all twelve placements of lord of a sign from it, that is, Arudha is half of Rasis, and these Arudhas will be only odd signs i.e., 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 from it. Just like for every materialistic desire (Kama) there will be a Badha (sorrow), " Kama " is the right word which is functionally opposite to " Sula " , which is why Maharshi Jaimini uses " Kama " as the virodha-argala for Sula in his Sutras If so, the katapaya equivalent for Kama is 3 Hence, for Mesha it is Mithuna(3rd zodiac sign), for Vrishaba it is Simha(5th zodia sign) and for Mithuna it is Tula(7th zodiac sign) i.e., for movabable signs 3rd sign is Kama or desire sign, for fixed signs it is 5th sign and for dual signs it is 7th sign This whole concept can be understood from " Kumarasambhava " where Lord Siva (the bearer of Sula - Sula dhari) representing Yogeshwar (Aquarius - there is a star Poorvabhadra representing Ajaikapada or Rudramasa)being disturbed by Kama (cupid)with 5 arrows in the form of Sagittarius (there is a star called moola - representing pointed arrow) aiming Mithuna (being 7th sign)to unite Yogeshwar to Parvati to procreate Kumaraswamy to kill Tarakasura, Mesha being a sign for goat the sacrifice for Daksha yagna etc. This is a brief description to only give the context of Sula or Badha Siddhanta as popularly studied in Parasara school, but has only root or basic explanation from Jaimini Please meditate more on these lines to get deeper answers to many theoretical problems of astrology Hope got the point Jairadhe > Namaste, > > To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? > > Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. > > Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. > > Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. > > While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. > > Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. > > If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. > > Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. > > [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. > > [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. > > [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@> wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > > are about the same as. > > [1] What are the significance of such places? > > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > > Anterdasa? > > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > > > Regards > > Ratnaakar > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Namaste, > Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > in the present time. To make progress in *astrology*, we should stop focussing on *astrologers*. Discussion of personalities is useless, though it happens a lot on the lists unfortunately. The best astrologers can make the worst comments sometimes and the worst can make the best. Whether someone is one of the best or one of the worst is irrelevant here (and difficult to judge too). We should stick to topical points and leave out personalities. > Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? The 7th lord's mahadasa will give the full results of badhaka sthana. Lagna lord's mahadasa will give the results only to a limited extent. Badhakesha is more important than planets placed in badhaka sthana. * * * When lagna lord is in 7th or 7th lord is in lagna, a conditional naksahtra dasa called " Dwisaptati sama dasa " is applicable. It will show life events better than Vimsottari dasa in such a case. Use that dasa in such a chart. There is no reason not to. Some people will tell you to learn one dasa - Vimsottari - first and master it first. What they don't realize that replacing Vimsottari with a conditional nakshatra dasa does NOT require *new learning*. Calculations are the only thing that changes and JHora does it for you. As for interpretation, you interpret all nakshatra dasa *in the same way* you interpret Vimsottari. It is as simple as that. The only additional rule is this: In dwisaptati sama dasa, there is no Ketu dasa. Ketu's dispositor and Rahu will give Ketu's results. If you use the correct nakshatra dasa as prescribed by Parasara, things will make sense easier. If you use a less effective dasa in a chart, you may have to stretch principles a little. For example, Indira Gandhi lost power in the antardasa of Ketu as per Vimsottari dasa and in the antardasa of Mercury as per Dwisaptati sama dasa. Ketu is the 5th lord in rasi and lagna lord in 11th in D-10, while Mercury is the 8th lord in lagna in D-10. Mercury clearly shows a fall in career, without must arm twisting. In fact, Dwisaptati sama dasa shows many events in Indira Gandhi's life clearer than Vimsottari dasa does. Many people are afraid of using new tools, but they don't realize that it is not really a new tool. Just open Dwisaptati sama dasa in the software, forget that it is Dwisaptati sama dasa, think that it is still Vimsottari dasa and analyze. It is so simple and it works better at the end. * * * BTW, badhaka sthana principle applies in divisional charts as well. Indira Gandhi's chart is an example. In D-10 (chart showing career), Scorpio is lagna and shows self from the point of view of profession. For a fixed sign, the 9th house of dharma shows the danger of becoming too rigid and dogmatic regarding one's duties and getting in trouble. Her Moon mahadasa as per Dwisaptati sama dasa (applicable in her chart and hence works better than Vimsottari) started in late 1974. Badhakesha's dasa did indeed make her too rigid and dogmatic. She forced certain policies down the throats of people and curbed opposition with an iron fist. For example, many forced family planning operations were done. She believed she was doing India a favor. She imposed emergency and eventually lost power because of the outcry. This is a classical example of how badhakesha gets one in trouble in the case of a fixed sign rising. Best regards, Narasimha Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: > > Sh.Narsimha ji, > Saadar Pranaam > I am highly grateful to you for your detailed and accurate > explanation.Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > in the present time.Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? > Thanks again > > Regards > Ratnaakar > > " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > Namaste, > > To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? > > Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. > > Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. > > Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. > > While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. > > Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. > > If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. > > Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. > > [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. > > [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. > > [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > , Ratnaakar wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > > are about the same as. > > [1] What are the significance of such places? > > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > > Anterdasa? > > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > > > Regards > > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 JAI SRIRAM Dear Narasimha, Rahu and Ketu also considered as Lagna lord for Aquaris and Scorpio lagan respectively is both of them are stronger than Saturn and Mars.Please clarify. Thanks, Venkatesh " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: Namaste, > Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > in the present time. To make progress in *astrology*, we should stop focussing on *astrologers*. Discussion of personalities is useless, though it happens a lot on the lists unfortunately. The best astrologers can make the worst comments sometimes and the worst can make the best. Whether someone is one of the best or one of the worst is irrelevant here (and difficult to judge too). We should stick to topical points and leave out personalities. > Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? The 7th lord's mahadasa will give the full results of badhaka sthana. Lagna lord's mahadasa will give the results only to a limited extent. Badhakesha is more important than planets placed in badhaka sthana. * * * When lagna lord is in 7th or 7th lord is in lagna, a conditional naksahtra dasa called " Dwisaptati sama dasa " is applicable. It will show life events better than Vimsottari dasa in such a case. Use that dasa in such a chart. There is no reason not to. Some people will tell you to learn one dasa - Vimsottari - first and master it first. What they don't realize that replacing Vimsottari with a conditional nakshatra dasa does NOT require *new learning*. Calculations are the only thing that changes and JHora does it for you. As for interpretation, you interpret all nakshatra dasa *in the same way* you interpret Vimsottari. It is as simple as that. The only additional rule is this: In dwisaptati sama dasa, there is no Ketu dasa. Ketu's dispositor and Rahu will give Ketu's results. If you use the correct nakshatra dasa as prescribed by Parasara, things will make sense easier. If you use a less effective dasa in a chart, you may have to stretch principles a little. For example, Indira Gandhi lost power in the antardasa of Ketu as per Vimsottari dasa and in the antardasa of Mercury as per Dwisaptati sama dasa. Ketu is the 5th lord in rasi and lagna lord in 11th in D-10, while Mercury is the 8th lord in lagna in D-10. Mercury clearly shows a fall in career, without must arm twisting. In fact, Dwisaptati sama dasa shows many events in Indira Gandhi's life clearer than Vimsottari dasa does. Many people are afraid of using new tools, but they don't realize that it is not really a new tool. Just open Dwisaptati sama dasa in the software, forget that it is Dwisaptati sama dasa, think that it is still Vimsottari dasa and analyze. It is so simple and it works better at the end. * * * BTW, badhaka sthana principle applies in divisional charts as well. Indira Gandhi's chart is an example. In D-10 (chart showing career), Scorpio is lagna and shows self from the point of view of profession. For a fixed sign, the 9th house of dharma shows the danger of becoming too rigid and dogmatic regarding one's duties and getting in trouble. Her Moon mahadasa as per Dwisaptati sama dasa (applicable in her chart and hence works better than Vimsottari) started in late 1974. Badhakesha's dasa did indeed make her too rigid and dogmatic. She forced certain policies down the throats of people and curbed opposition with an iron fist. For example, many forced family planning operations were done. She believed she was doing India a favor. She imposed emergency and eventually lost power because of the outcry. This is a classical example of how badhakesha gets one in trouble in the case of a fixed sign rising. Best regards, Narasimha ------------------------- Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------- , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: > > Sh.Narsimha ji, > Saadar Pranaam > I am highly grateful to you for your detailed and accurate > explanation.Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > in the present time.Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? > Thanks again > > Regards > Ratnaakar > > " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > Namaste, > > To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? > > Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. > > Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. > > Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. > > While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. > > Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. > > If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. > > Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. > > [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. > > [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. > > [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > , Ratnaakar wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > > are about the same as. > > [1] What are the significance of such places? > > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > > Anterdasa? > > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > > > Regards > > Ratnaakar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 sorry venkatesh,not to interrupt,but i think it depends on state of planet(mars,saturn,rahu and ketu) in chart. my aqarius antardasa was very very bad financially.lorded by rahu,it was terrible!!this was told by rafal guru,so i feel predicament. Please tell me what is out put of conversation on my email id: vedicastro_mind,as i dont check emails and jyotish frequently these days. regards, jim vedic astrology , Venkatesh S <ksvssvk wrote: > > JAI SRIRAM > > Dear Narasimha, > > Rahu and Ketu also considered as Lagna lord for Aquaris and Scorpio lagan respectively is both of them are stronger than Saturn and Mars.Please clarify. > > Thanks, > Venkatesh > > " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > Namaste, > > > Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > > in the present time. > > To make progress in *astrology*, we should stop focussing on *astrologers*. Discussion of personalities is useless, though it happens a lot on the lists unfortunately. > > The best astrologers can make the worst comments sometimes and the worst can make the best. Whether someone is one of the best or one of the worst is irrelevant here (and difficult to judge too). We should stick to topical points and leave out personalities. > > > Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? > > The 7th lord's mahadasa will give the full results of badhaka sthana. Lagna lord's mahadasa will give the results only to a limited extent. Badhakesha is more important than planets placed in badhaka sthana. > > * * * > > When lagna lord is in 7th or 7th lord is in lagna, a conditional naksahtra dasa called " Dwisaptati sama dasa " is applicable. It will show life events better than Vimsottari dasa in such a case. Use that dasa in such a chart. There is no reason not to. > > Some people will tell you to learn one dasa - Vimsottari - first and master it first. What they don't realize that replacing Vimsottari with a conditional nakshatra dasa does NOT require *new learning*. Calculations are the only thing that changes and JHora does it for you. As for interpretation, you interpret all nakshatra dasa *in the same way* you interpret Vimsottari. It is as simple as that. > > The only additional rule is this: In dwisaptati sama dasa, there is no Ketu dasa. Ketu's dispositor and Rahu will give Ketu's results. > > If you use the correct nakshatra dasa as prescribed by Parasara, things will make sense easier. If you use a less effective dasa in a chart, you may have to stretch principles a little. > > For example, Indira Gandhi lost power in the antardasa of Ketu as per Vimsottari dasa and in the antardasa of Mercury as per Dwisaptati sama dasa. Ketu is the 5th lord in rasi and lagna lord in 11th in D- 10, while Mercury is the 8th lord in lagna in D-10. Mercury clearly shows a fall in career, without must arm twisting. In fact, Dwisaptati sama dasa shows many events in Indira Gandhi's life clearer than Vimsottari dasa does. > > Many people are afraid of using new tools, but they don't realize that it is not really a new tool. Just open Dwisaptati sama dasa in the software, forget that it is Dwisaptati sama dasa, think that it is still Vimsottari dasa and analyze. It is so simple and it works better at the end. > > * * * > > BTW, badhaka sthana principle applies in divisional charts as well. Indira Gandhi's chart is an example. In D-10 (chart showing career), Scorpio is lagna and shows self from the point of view of profession. For a fixed sign, the 9th house of dharma shows the danger of becoming too rigid and dogmatic regarding one's duties and getting in trouble. Her Moon mahadasa as per Dwisaptati sama dasa (applicable in her chart and hence works better than Vimsottari) started in late 1974. Badhakesha's dasa did indeed make her too rigid and dogmatic. She forced certain policies down the throats of people and curbed opposition with an iron fist. For example, many forced family planning operations were done. She believed she was doing India a favor. She imposed emergency and eventually lost power because of the outcry. This is a classical example of how badhakesha gets one in trouble in the case of a fixed sign rising. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > ------------------------- > Do Ganapathi Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------- > > , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@> wrote: > > > > Sh.Narsimha ji, > > Saadar Pranaam > > I am highly grateful to you for your detailed and accurate > > explanation.Undoubtedly you are one of the best astrologer > > in the present time.Sir i have one more query,if ascedant lord is > > placed in 7th house in dual ascendant and its Mahadasa is running, > > in such case what will be the result? Will it give the result same as > > Baadhkesh Maahadasa? > > Thanks again > > > > Regards > > Ratnaakar > > > > " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> wrote: > > Namaste, > > > > To understand badhaka sthana, one has to look at the definition closely. Why 11th, 9th and 7th houses for movable, fixed and dual signs? > > > > Badhaka sthana is like an inherent weakness that troubles one and can destabilize the personality. > > > > Movable signs have a lot of rajas (energy). The 11th house is the house of gains and fulfilment of desires and it has the potential to drive a person of active and dynamic disposal to an extreme and test. Such a dynamic person should watch out against the tendency to become fickle-minded while pursuing multiple gains. > > > > Fixed signs have more tamas and are fixed in nature. The 9th house is the house of dharma (duty) and it has the potenital to put a person of rigid and strong temperament to test. Such a rigid person should watch out against the tendency to become dogmatic about one's dharma. > > > > While movable signs are dynamic and fixed signs are rigid, dual signs are flexible and able to adopt. The 7th house is of relationships and it can push those flexible people to test. Such people should watch out against the tendency to be ambivalent in relationships. > > > > Thus, badhaka sthana shows the forces that can make a dynamic person fickle-minded, a rigid person dogmatic and a flexible person ambivalent. > > > > If you understand the basic reasoning, you will realize that badhaka concept is sometimes overrated and wrongly used for every problem under Sun. If you understand the concept and the logic, you will be able to judge all the factors at play in an individual chart intelligently and judge appropriately. > > > > Anyway, having explained my take on the philosophy behind this concept in detail, I will briefly answer your specific questions. > > > > [1] These are the houses that present particular challenges to the person and tend to destabilize the personlity in extreme cases. These houses stand for disturbances in life that come from within and without any apparent reason. One should guard against these challenges. > > > > [2] Lord is more important. The ownerships of a planet decide its agenda. The placement of a planet decides the resources at its disposal as it finds a way to push its agenda. > > > > [3] Results of badhaka sthana can be given in mahadasa or antardasa. > > > > Best regards, > > Narasimha > > > > , Ratnaakar wrote: > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > As you know,in Movable ascendant 11th house, > > > in Dual ascendant 7th house & in fix ascendant > > > 9th house become Baadhak places.Now the questions > > > are about the same as. > > > [1] What are the significance of such places? > > > [2] Place is more Baadhak or Lord of such places? > > > [3] Will the other planets placed in such places > > > give same results as Baadhak in Mahadasa or > > > Anterdasa? > > > I do request to all,plz place your views. > > > > > > Regards > > > Ratnaakar > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.