Aspects in divisional charts- Sh.Prashant ji only

[Guest guest]

Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this person

Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started criticism.Ok,ignore

him.Let him do his Karma.

Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya(Banaras),Saahityachharya

and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar Sharma,

M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the editors

of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch with

them.

These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of Planets

in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant or to give

prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to them

vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama.So plz

explain further.

Thanks!

 

Regard

Ratnaakar

 

 

 

YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER <gbp_kumar wrote:

Dear Ratnakar,

 

Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school

writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in

September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

 

I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

 

if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit

has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I

am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many

systems may not be needed

 

I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed

in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

 

Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa]

works so using many others may not be needed.

 

Best wishes

 

, Ratnaakar

wrote:

>

> Dear Ansul ji,

> There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

all.To check

> the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

are the

> only use of divisional charts.

>

> Ratnaakar

>

> " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> Thank you Anup Ji

>

> ________________________________

>

>

> On Behalf Of Anup. M

> Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

>

> Re: Aspects in divisional charts

>

>

>

> Dear Anshul,

>

> The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> importance like Other divisional charts.

>

> The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result.

>

> For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of

> each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the

> div.

> chart.

>

> So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

>

>

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

" Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> Dear learned members,

>

> Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as

> well?

>

> Regards,

> Anshul

>

> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> or disclosing it.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this person

Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started criticism.Ok,ignore

him.Let him do his bad Karma.

Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya(Banaras),Saahityachharya

and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar Sharma,

M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the editors

of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch with

them.

These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of Planets

in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant chart or to give

prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to them

vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama etc.So plz

explain further.

Thanks!

 

Regard

Ratnaakar

 

 

 

YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER <gbp_kumar wrote:

Dear Ratnakar,

 

Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school

writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in

September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

 

I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

 

if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit

has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I

am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many

systems may not be needed

 

I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed

in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

 

Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa]

works so using many others may not be needed.

 

Best wishes

 

, Ratnaakar

wrote:

>

> Dear Ansul ji,

> There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

all.To check

> the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

are the

> only use of divisional charts.

>

> Ratnaakar

>

> " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> Thank you Anup Ji

>

> ________________________________

>

>

> On Behalf Of Anup. M

> Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

>

> Re: Aspects in divisional charts

>

>

>

> Dear Anshul,

>

> The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> importance like Other divisional charts.

>

> The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result.

>

> For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of

> each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the

> div.

> chart.

>

> So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

>

>

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

" Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> Dear learned members,

>

> Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as

> well?

>

> Regards,

> Anshul

>

> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> or disclosing it.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Bhaskar has given all explanations to the right

learned and knowledgable people and proved his

arguments with the relevant shlokas, present

in the classics, IN THE jYOTISH GROUP,that there

is no scope for futher discussion left

in this issue.

 

BHASKAR.

 

 

 

 

, Ratnaakar

<namra_nivedan wrote:

>

> Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

> I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

> astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this

person

> Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started

criticism.Ok,ignore

> him.Let him do his bad Karma.

> Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya

(Banaras),Saahityachharya

> and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar

Sharma,

> M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

> Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the

editors

> of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

> Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

> of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch

with

> them.

> These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of

Planets

> in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant

chart or to give

> prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to

them

> vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama

etc.So plz

> explain further.

> Thanks!

>

> Regard

> Ratnaakar

>

>

>

> YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER <gbp_kumar wrote:

> Dear Ratnakar,

>

> Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

school

> writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc

in

> September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

>

> I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

>

> if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

Lalit

> has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which

I

> am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many

> systems may not be needed

>

> I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

versed

> in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

>

> Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

Dasa]

> works so using many others may not be needed.

>

> Best wishes

>

> , Ratnaakar

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ansul ji,

> > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> all.To check

> > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> are the

> > only use of divisional charts.

> >

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> > Thank you Anup Ji

> >

> > ________________________________

> >

> >

> > On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> >

> > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Anshul,

> >

> > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > importance like Other divisional charts.

> >

> > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

result.

> >

> > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength

of

> > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by

the

> > div.

> > chart.

> >

> > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> >

> >

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > Dear learned members,

> >

> > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

charts as

> > well?

> >

> > Regards,

> > Anshul

> >

> > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > or disclosing it.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

By the way i am addressed this e-mail to

Sh.Prashant ji.Why did you jump? and it

is not the CUT & PASTE matter.It is very

sincere topic,beyond your reach.So plz

keep quiet.

 

Ratnaakar

 

Bhaskar <rajiventerprises wrote:

Bhaskar has given all explanations to the right

learned and knowledgable people and proved his

arguments with the relevant shlokas, present

in the classics, IN THE jYOTISH GROUP,that there

is no scope for futher discussion left

in this issue.

 

BHASKAR.

 

 

 

 

, Ratnaakar

wrote:

>

> Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

> I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

> astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this

person

> Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started

criticism.Ok,ignore

> him.Let him do his bad Karma.

> Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya

(Banaras),Saahityachharya

> and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar

Sharma,

> M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

> Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the

editors

> of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

> Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

> of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch

with

> them.

> These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of

Planets

> in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant

chart or to give

> prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to

them

> vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama

etc.So plz

> explain further.

> Thanks!

>

> Regard

> Ratnaakar

>

>

>

> YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER wrote:

> Dear Ratnakar,

>

> Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

school

> writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc

in

> September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

>

> I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

>

> if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

Lalit

> has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which

I

> am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many

> systems may not be needed

>

> I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

versed

> in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

>

> Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

Dasa]

> works so using many others may not be needed.

>

> Best wishes

>

> , Ratnaakar

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ansul ji,

> > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> all.To check

> > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> are the

> > only use of divisional charts.

> >

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> > Thank you Anup Ji

> >

> > ________________________________

> >

> >

> > On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> >

> > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Anshul,

> >

> > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > importance like Other divisional charts.

> >

> > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

result.

> >

> > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength

of

> > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by

the

> > div.

> > chart.

> >

> > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> >

> >

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > Dear learned members,

> >

> > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

charts as

> > well?

> >

> > Regards,

> > Anshul

> >

> > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > or disclosing it.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

// you explained very well but this

> person > > Bhaskar did not try to give

any explanation //

 

YOU HAVE GONE BONKERS IT SEEMS.

YOU USED MY NAME IN YOUR EMAIL

ADDRESSED TO PRASHANT, IS THE

REASON I JUMPED INTO THIS.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Ratnaakar

<namra_nivedan wrote:

>

> By the way i am addressed this e-mail to

> Sh.Prashant ji.Why did you jump? and it

> is not the CUT & PASTE matter.It is very

> sincere topic,beyond your reach.So plz

> keep quiet.

>

> Ratnaakar

>

> Bhaskar <rajiventerprises wrote:

> Bhaskar has given all explanations to the right

> learned and knowledgable people and proved his

> arguments with the relevant shlokas, present

> in the classics, IN THE jYOTISH GROUP,that there

> is no scope for futher discussion left

> in this issue.

>

> BHASKAR.

>

>

>

>

> , Ratnaakar

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

> > I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

> > astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this

> person

> > Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started

> criticism.Ok,ignore

> > him.Let him do his bad Karma.

> > Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya

> (Banaras),Saahityachharya

> > and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar

> Sharma,

> > M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

> > Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the

> editors

> > of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

> > Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

> > of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch

> with

> > them.

> > These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of

> Planets

> > in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant

> chart or to give

> > prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to

> them

> > vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama

> etc.So plz

> > explain further.

> > Thanks!

> >

> > Regard

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> >

> >

> > YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER wrote:

> > Dear Ratnakar,

> >

> > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

> school

> > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects

etc

> in

> > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

> >

> > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

> >

> > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

> Lalit

> > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc

which

> I

> > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> > modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too

many

> > systems may not be needed

> >

> > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

> versed

> > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

> >

> > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

> Dasa]

> > works so using many others may not be needed.

> >

> > Best wishes

> >

> > , Ratnaakar

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ansul ji,

> > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> > all.To check

> > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> > are the

> > > only use of divisional charts.

> > >

> > > Ratnaakar

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> > > Thank you Anup Ji

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > >

> > >

> > > On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> > >

> > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Anshul,

> > >

> > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > > importance like Other divisional charts.

> > >

> > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

> result.

> > >

> > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use

ful.Strength

> of

> > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated

by

> the

> > > div.

> > > chart.

> > >

> > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> > >

> > >

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > > Dear learned members,

> > >

> > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

> charts as

> > > well?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anshul

> > >

> > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > > or disclosing it.

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

" You know nothing about astrology.,

then why are you advising ?

You have already been the main cause for

commotion and fights in the

Jyotish group,and now come here

to spoil the peace of this forum ?

You have used much abuse there, and also

created rifts between all members,

but contribution has been nil

from you towards,astology,then on what base

are you advising here ? "

 

This is the reason,why i had to write so?

Did you explation something?Started criticism.

Aadmi banne ki koshish kar,haivaan nahin.

 

Ratnaakar

 

 

 

Bhaskar <rajiventerprises wrote:

// you explained very well but this

> person > > Bhaskar did not try to give

any explanation //

 

YOU HAVE GONE BONKERS IT SEEMS.

YOU USED MY NAME IN YOUR EMAIL

ADDRESSED TO PRASHANT, IS THE

REASON I JUMPED INTO THIS.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Ratnaakar

wrote:

>

> By the way i am addressed this e-mail to

> Sh.Prashant ji.Why did you jump? and it

> is not the CUT & PASTE matter.It is very

> sincere topic,beyond your reach.So plz

> keep quiet.

>

> Ratnaakar

>

> Bhaskar wrote:

> Bhaskar has given all explanations to the right

> learned and knowledgable people and proved his

> arguments with the relevant shlokas, present

> in the classics, IN THE jYOTISH GROUP,that there

> is no scope for futher discussion left

> in this issue.

>

> BHASKAR.

>

>

>

>

> , Ratnaakar

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

> > I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

> > astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this

> person

> > Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started

> criticism.Ok,ignore

> > him.Let him do his bad Karma.

> > Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya

> (Banaras),Saahityachharya

> > and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar

> Sharma,

> > M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

> > Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the

> editors

> > of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

> > Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

> > of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch

> with

> > them.

> > These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of

> Planets

> > in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant

> chart or to give

> > prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to

> them

> > vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama

> etc.So plz

> > explain further.

> > Thanks!

> >

> > Regard

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> >

> >

> > YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER wrote:

> > Dear Ratnakar,

> >

> > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

> school

> > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects

etc

> in

> > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

> >

> > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

> >

> > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

> Lalit

> > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc

which

> I

> > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> > modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too

many

> > systems may not be needed

> >

> > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

> versed

> > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

> >

> > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

> Dasa]

> > works so using many others may not be needed.

> >

> > Best wishes

> >

> > , Ratnaakar

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ansul ji,

> > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> > all.To check

> > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> > are the

> > > only use of divisional charts.

> > >

> > > Ratnaakar

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> > > Thank you Anup Ji

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > >

> > >

> > > On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> > >

> > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Anshul,

> > >

> > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > > importance like Other divisional charts.

> > >

> > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

> result.

> > >

> > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use

ful.Strength

> of

> > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated

by

> the

> > > div.

> > > chart.

> > >

> > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> > >

> > >

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > > Dear learned members,

> > >

> > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

> charts as

> > > well?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anshul

> > >

> > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > > or disclosing it.

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

Please change the subject of this mail trail, as the intent of my

question was not to create a rift. I asked the question just to get the

view on this as I have learnt to prepare shodashvarga chart manually,

thus was getting inquisitive.

 

With this mail trail war nobody will gain only the group reputation is

getting lost.

 

Think about the innocent ppl who wish to join Jyotish group in order to

gain some thing and gets really amazed when one looks at the messages

and finally decides not to join.

 

Aap sab bade log ho, sab log yahi sochte hain usne mujhe aise kaise

bola, uski itni himmat, things start going worse.

 

If someone does not like anybody, why there is a need to exchange the

mails then?.

 

I hope this would be finished from now on. I request every body to

refrain and focus on ASTROLOGY.

 

Regards,

Anshul

 

________________________________

 

 

On Behalf Of Ratnaakar

Friday, April 11, 2008 12:36 AM

 

Re: Aspects in divisional charts- Sh.Prashant ji only

 

 

 

" You know nothing about astrology.,

then why are you advising ?

You have already been the main cause for

commotion and fights in the

Jyotish group,and now come here

to spoil the peace of this forum ?

You have used much abuse there, and also

created rifts between all members,

but contribution has been nil

from you towards,astology,then on what base

are you advising here ? "

 

This is the reason,why i had to write so?

Did you explation something?Started criticism.

Aadmi banne ki koshish kar,haivaan nahin.

 

Ratnaakar

 

Bhaskar <rajiventerprises

<rajiventerprises%40hathway.com> > wrote:

// you explained very well but this

> person > > Bhaskar did not try to give

any explanation //

 

YOU HAVE GONE BONKERS IT SEEMS.

YOU USED MY NAME IN YOUR EMAIL

ADDRESSED TO PRASHANT, IS THE

REASON I JUMPED INTO THIS.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

<%40> , Ratnaakar

wrote:

>

> By the way i am addressed this e-mail to

> Sh.Prashant ji.Why did you jump? and it

> is not the CUT & PASTE matter.It is very

> sincere topic,beyond your reach.So plz

> keep quiet.

>

> Ratnaakar

>

> Bhaskar wrote:

> Bhaskar has given all explanations to the right

> learned and knowledgable people and proved his

> arguments with the relevant shlokas, present

> in the classics, IN THE jYOTISH GROUP,that there

> is no scope for futher discussion left

> in this issue.

>

> BHASKAR.

>

>

>

>

>

<%40> , Ratnaakar

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sh.Prashant ji,

> > I do respect your words and undoubtedly you are one of the best

> > astrologers in the present time.you explained very well but this

> person

> > Bhaskar did not try to give any explanation,started

> criticism.Ok,ignore

> > him.Let him do his bad Karma.

> > Sir,Pro.Priyavrat Sharma,M.A,Siddhantacharya

> (Banaras),Saahityachharya

> > and Gold medal winner and his younger brother Dr.Shaktidhar

> Sharma,

> > M.Sc,Ph.D (Nuclear Physics) from USA,F.R.A.S (London),M.A

> > Siddhantacharya (Banaras) and three Gold medal winner are the

> editors

> > of MARTAND Panchang one of the best in India published from

> > Panchkula (Haryana).Both two learned fellows are above 70 years

> > of age and Sh.K N Rao ji do respect them a lot & keep in touch

> with

> > them.

> > These learned persons are strongly against the aspecting of

> Planets

> > in any varga even Drekhna too or to treat them as ascendant

> chart or to give

> > prediction as per placemants of planets in vargas.According to

> them

> > vargas are only to check the strength of plants as Vargottama

> etc.So plz

> > explain further.

> > Thanks!

> >

> > Regard

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> >

> >

> > YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER wrote:

> > Dear Ratnakar,

> >

> > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

> school

> > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects

etc

> in

> > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

> >

> > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

> >

> > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

> Lalit

> > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc

which

> I

> > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> > modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too

many

> > systems may not be needed

> >

> > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

> versed

> > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

> >

> > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

> Dasa]

> > works so using many others may not be needed.

> >

> > Best wishes

> >

> >

<%40> , Ratnaakar

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ansul ji,

> > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> > all.To check

> > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> > are the

> > > only use of divisional charts.

> > >

> > > Ratnaakar

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " wrote:

> > > Thank you Anup Ji

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > >

> > >

<%40>

> > > [

<%40> ] On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> > >

<%40>

> > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Anshul,

> > >

> > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > > importance like Other divisional charts.

> > >

> > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

> result.

> > >

> > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use

ful.Strength

> of

> > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated

by

> the

> > > div.

> > > chart.

> > >

> > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> > >

> > >

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > > Dear learned members,

> > >

> > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

> charts as

> > > well?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anshul

> > >

> > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > > or disclosing it.

> > >

> > >