Aspects in divisional charts- 9/4- RUBBISH

[Guest guest]

SUNIL

 

IF U R WORTH UR SALT PROVE IT,

i have better things to do than this, when I have time and again said in the

past 19 months my time is tight and am not able to see most mails so I DON'T

KNOW MOST of the history and trail of ur wars so I have no choce but keep away

from it and anyway Jyotish is not abt wars it is about light the knowledge we

share, give that is all

 

I am sure Bhaskar knows u r here to spoil the atmosphere again I don't care on

what u have2say on this a I know there is nothing u can prove I was any of the

ID's other than what I have and is well published when such insulations r raised

 

I have jsut 3 ID's and I always sign as Prashant

the name given by my parents I have no history behind me to hide in anyother

name, if at allI change/add a NEW ID it will still have my name in it

 

.....ALL I CAN SAY IT ISA PITY SUCH CREATURES LIKE U R part of this earth.

 

 

sunil.jandon <sunil.jandon

 

Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:01:19 AM

Re: Aspects in divisional charts- 9/4

 

Bhaskar,

All those fraud ids are of Prashant Kumar GB.

 

Yesterday on vedic astrology group he came in the id of luvbug.

And day before yesterday he also came with one fraud id of Gmail.

 

And by mistake replied by his id in name of his own.

 

Recognise real person dont go for wrong ones(PVR or Lalit)

 

Closely read this mail.What he wants from you and want to make his

road on your shoulder even PVR was not able to find real culprit.

 

Bhaskar still you can not see the real person then i can not help

you.

 

, " YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER "

<gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote:

>

> Dear Ratnakar,

>

> Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

school

> writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc

in

> September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

>

> I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

>

> if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

Lalit

> has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which

I

> am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> modifications/ adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many

> systems may not be needed

>

> I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

versed

> in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

>

> Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

Dasa]

> works so using many others may not be needed.

>

> Best wishes

>

> , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@ >

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ansul ji,

> > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at

> all.To check

> > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant

> are the

> > only use of divisional charts.

> >

> > Ratnaakar

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor@ > wrote:

> > Thank you Anup Ji

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> >

> >

> > [] On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> >

> > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Anshul,

> >

> > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > importance like Other divisional charts.

> >

> > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

result.

> >

> > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength

of

> > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by

the

> > div.

> > chart.

> >

> > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> >

> >

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > Dear learned members,

> >

> > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

charts as

> > well?

> >

> > Regards,

> > Anshul

> >

> > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > or disclosing it.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Prashant,

 

I have no other reason to believe this man,

than the one you gave me, by your reply to

me. You have showed your feelings towards me

even after I have always extended my hand

and forgiven you, like Prithviraj Chauhan,

but you have always acted like Muhammed Ghori.

Its a real defeat of the astrologers ,

humanity and this Divince science with you

continued measures in all

available ways, to malign me, cause trouble

and thow me out from every where.

 

I am ashamed and sad, and pained very much by

your behaviour.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> SUNIL

>

> IF U R WORTH UR SALT PROVE IT,

> i have better things to do than this, when I have time and again

said in the past 19 months my time is tight and am not able to see

most mails so I DON'T KNOW MOST of the history and trail of ur wars

so I have no choce but keep away from it and anyway Jyotish is not

abt wars it is about light the knowledge we share, give that is all

>

> I am sure Bhaskar knows u r here to spoil the atmosphere again I

don't care on what u have2say on this a I know there is nothing u can

prove I was any of the ID's other than what I have and is well

published when such insulations r raised

>

> I have jsut 3 ID's and I always sign as Prashant

> the name given by my parents I have no history behind me to hide in

anyother name, if at allI change/add a NEW ID it will still have my

name in it

>

> ....ALL I CAN SAY IT ISA PITY SUCH CREATURES LIKE U R part of this

earth.

>

>

> sunil.jandon <sunil.jandon

>

> Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:01:19 AM

> Re: Aspects in divisional charts- 9/4

>

> Bhaskar,

> All those fraud ids are of Prashant Kumar GB.

>

> Yesterday on vedic astrology group he came in the id of luvbug.

> And day before yesterday he also came with one fraud id of Gmail.

>

> And by mistake replied by his id in name of his own.

>

> Recognise real person dont go for wrong ones(PVR or Lalit)

>

> Closely read this mail.What he wants from you and want to make his

> road on your shoulder even PVR was not able to find real culprit.

>

> Bhaskar still you can not see the real person then i can not help

> you.

>

> , " YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER "

> <gbp_kumar@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ratnakar,

> >

> > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional

> school

> > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in

> > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least

> > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects

etc

> in

> > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look

> >

> > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them

> >

> > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of

> Lalit

> > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc

which

> I

> > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with

> > modifications/ adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too

many

> > systems may not be needed

> >

> > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well

> versed

> > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits]

> >

> > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari

> Dasa]

> > works so using many others may not be needed.

> >

> > Best wishes

> >

> > , Ratnaakar

<namra_nivedan@ >

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ansul ji,

> > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts

at

> > all.To check

> > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the

ascendant

> > are the

> > > only use of divisional charts.

> > >

> > > Ratnaakar

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor@ > wrote:

> > > Thank you Anup Ji

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > >

> > >

> > > [] On Behalf Of Anup. M

> > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM

> > >

> > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Anshul,

> > >

> > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example,

> > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own

> > > importance like Other divisional charts.

> > >

> > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be

> > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better

> result.

> > >

> > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very

> > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use

ful.Strength

> of

> > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated

by

> the

> > > div.

> > > chart.

> > >

> > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself.

> > >

> > >

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote:

> > > Dear learned members,

> > >

> > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional

> charts as

> > > well?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Anshul

> > >

> > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission

> > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected

> > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in

> > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this

> > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying

> > > or disclosing it.

> > >

> > >