Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Bhaskar, u have covered the point I had while replying already that I had replied only yo tho the point he raised and in JG when we had pradeep discuss this last yr tooI had replied same, my content will be consistant with whatever I have heard raman live and writen. about fake ID unless u identify and mail us who r all fake we can avoid them I rarely have time to see all mails this is not a division of ranks but I don't know if this is real or a fake ID untill u said so now and these r being created so fast how can I know at least, i reply to a few posts that I can read for some more weeks may be later will see thru all of them and decide no offense meant prashant Bhaskar <rajiventerprises Wednesday, April 9, 2008 11:55:06 PM Re: Aspects in divisional charts- 9/4 Dear Prashantji, If people like you discuss astrology with false ids like Ratnakaar, it is a sure signal for the members to know how much unity we astrologers have here. Now regards the use of aspects in D Charts,whether it is proper or not, can of course be discussed with so many other learned members here, if one wishes to put his point across. I am dissapointed. I have already proved in Jyotish group, that aspects have been used extensively by Shri BV Raman, and Shri KN Rao. Anyway, the point is that we must not support false ids and people out to create disturbance in these forums, by our discussing with such people. ( I am not talking about supporting astrological principles or not used by astrologers, which may have our consent or not, is a seperate matter. Iam talking of , supporting such is by having a conversation or exchange of ideas with them. It is not that you are not aware of his misdoings in the Jyotish group ). If ulitmately if it has to be, to each his own, then so be it. rgrds, Bhaskar. , " YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER " <gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Ratnakar, > > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look > > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them > > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with > modifications/ adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many > systems may not be needed > > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits] > > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa] > works so using many others may not be needed. > > Best wishes > > , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@ > > wrote: > > > > Dear Ansul ji, > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at > all.To check > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant > are the > > only use of divisional charts. > > > > Ratnaakar > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor@ > wrote: > > Thank you Anup Ji > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > [] On Behalf Of Anup. M > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM > > > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts > > > > > > > > Dear Anshul, > > > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example, > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own > > importance like Other divisional charts. > > > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result. > > > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the > > div. > > chart. > > > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself. > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote: > > Dear learned members, > > > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as > > well? > > > > Regards, > > Anshul > > > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying > > or disclosing it. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.