Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Dear Ratnakar, Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many systems may not be needed I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits] Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa] works so using many others may not be needed. Best wishes , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan wrote: > > Dear Ansul ji, > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at all.To check > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant are the > only use of divisional charts. > > Ratnaakar > > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor wrote: > Thank you Anup Ji > > ________________________________ > > > On Behalf Of Anup. M > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts > > > > Dear Anshul, > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example, > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own > importance like Other divisional charts. > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result. > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the > div. > chart. > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself. > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote: > Dear learned members, > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as > well? > > Regards, > Anshul > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this > message and deleting it from your computer without copying > or disclosing it. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Dear Prashantji, If people like you discuss astrology with false ids like Ratnakaar, it is a sure signal for the members to know how much unity we astrologers have here. Now regards the use of aspects in D Charts,whether it is proper or not, can of course be discussed with so many other learned members here, if one wishes to put his point across. I am dissapointed. I have already proved in Jyotish group, that aspects have been used extensively by Shri BV Raman, and Shri KN Rao. Anyway, the point is that we must not support false ids and people out to create disturbance in these forums, by our discussing with such people. ( I am not talking about supporting astrological principles or not used by astrologers, which may have our consent or not, is a seperate matter. Iam talking of , supporting such is by having a conversation or exchange of ideas with them. It is not that you are not aware of his misdoings in the Jyotish group ). If ulitmately if it has to be, to each his own, then so be it. rgrds, Bhaskar. , " YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER " <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear Ratnakar, > > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look > > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them > > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with > modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many > systems may not be needed > > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits] > > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa] > works so using many others may not be needed. > > Best wishes > > , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Ansul ji, > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at > all.To check > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant > are the > > only use of divisional charts. > > > > Ratnaakar > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor@> wrote: > > Thank you Anup Ji > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > On Behalf Of Anup. M > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM > > > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts > > > > > > > > Dear Anshul, > > > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example, > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own > > importance like Other divisional charts. > > > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result. > > > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the > > div. > > chart. > > > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself. > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote: > > Dear learned members, > > > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as > > well? > > > > Regards, > > Anshul > > > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying > > or disclosing it. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Bhaskar, All those fraud ids are of Prashant Kumar GB. Yesterday on vedic astrology group he came in the id of luvbug. And day before yesterday he also came with one fraud id of Gmail. And by mistake replied by his id in name of his own. Recognise real person dont go for wrong ones(PVR or Lalit) Closely read this mail.What he wants from you and want to make his road on your shoulder even PVR was not able to find real culprit. Bhaskar still you can not see the real person then i can not help you. , " YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER " <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear Ratnakar, > > Well this part of ur statement is in line with the traditional school > writers like B V RAMAN, PS Sastry and Memon etc who wrote in > Astrological magazine in period from 1950;s to 80's at least > and a special issue is dedicated to the use of vargas, aspects etc in > September issues in 1972 or 73 take a look > > I am not sure why some of the modern mixes in astrology use them > > if PVNji has sued it also, I am surprised, but as his reading of Lalit > has come with other loaded info from other areas like SA etc which I > am not good at and I still believe the traditional model with > modifications/adaptations to ur times is enough and mixing too many > systems may not be needed > > I won't judge PVNji on Lalits case alone, he is definetly well versed > in many areas I am not versed. ]I use of BPH tree and its fruits] > > Maharishi Parasara also said in Kaliyuga only UDU [Vimshottari Dasa] > works so using many others may not be needed. > > Best wishes > > , Ratnaakar <namra_nivedan@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Ansul ji, > > There are no place of aspecting or yoga in divisional charts at > all.To check > > the actual strength of planets or yogas placed in the ascendant > are the > > only use of divisional charts. > > > > Ratnaakar > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " <anshul.kapoor@> wrote: > > Thank you Anup Ji > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > On Behalf Of Anup. M > > Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:53 PM > > > > Re: Aspects in divisional charts > > > > > > > > Dear Anshul, > > > > The divisional charts are equally important.For example, > > Navamansha, Dreshkona, Trishansa charts are having their own > > importance like Other divisional charts. > > > > The strength of the planets in div charts should be > > taken for consideration. The more the strength,more better result. > > > > For twin birth, the difference of time is very > > less. In such cases, divisional charts are very use ful.Strength of > > each div. chart can give the strength for the event indicated by the > > div. > > chart. > > > > So,now you can find the answer of your query yourself. > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Kapoor, Anshul " > wrote: > > Dear learned members, > > > > Q Should one see the aspects and yoga formation in divisional charts as > > well? > > > > Regards, > > Anshul > > > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission > > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected > > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in > > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this > > message and deleting it from your computer without copying > > or disclosing it. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.