Guest guest Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Dear friends, I received a gift on Holi. - Let me share my Gift with you. I am a person who at times purposely passes strong and hard remarks on certain persons to teach them a lesson. But in this case when a person was asking about his 1 day old new born child, I had made a harmless statement in general about the natives( And not about Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who put such queries, including this native, but not in any way detrimental about anyone. These lines written were general lines of concern and I put them below here again for the readers - // I do not understand that unless if the > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > a new born child's chart > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > ill health, then this person would > > > create a tension in his own > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > be lying on the bed now.// What wrong have I written in the above lines, which solicit such mails as been given to me by the father of this child ? He has once again written to me on my personal id, saying that he does not wish to insult me in public. But he does not know that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well as insults in public and on same scale. I am allowing him here the pleasure of insulting me in public, by reproducing his mail as sent to me. And also request the members who put their enquiries on Forums, and expect a positive reply, and do not get the same, due to many reasons, they must not torture any astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone just because he has chosen not to answer. And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no got the pleasure of insulting me in public, now kindly excuse me and forgive me for my unintentional, absolutely harmless, and unreferred to you, mail, which caused you griveance. You have been a good man to write me personally, and not on the Forum, but I cannot allow you to be more good than me, which is why I have send this to the Forum Yes, I know you are basically a normal good human being, so lets keep it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. regards, Bhaskar. ===================================================================== His Holi Gift to me. ===================================================================== Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya Dear Bhaskarji, as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human being who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me?as you are trying to tell " And remove from your system, this > demanding business.And also remove > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > And also remove to show displeasure > eventually " or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not answered me? i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about me. just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was not answered. I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read your post also. I only read certain group members posts. and what about you? read your words once again. " This is not a anatha ashram or a seva sadan, where every childs cry would be met with milk " what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words like the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for Orphans? that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through post. ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult you before group. ok bye for now. sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i became bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that from my childs chart) regards Rama Rao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya Dear Bhaskarji absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my mail in the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and the context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting if i have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my problem you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) who already answered me. right and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered me. what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. is it fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail /message/48231 i already told you that i never revealed about my panic situation to my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you used the word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize the ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls the other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and infact you remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this world and in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara told Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank you once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and holi was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday of sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi gift and i am sorry if you took it in that way. by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who has the right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are called mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. Cool :-) Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the disturbance.I am closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for further mails on this subject. I cleared my case. regards Rama Rao , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > Dear friends, > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > Let me share my Gift with you. > I am a person who at times purposely > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > persons to teach them a lesson. > But in this case when a person > was asking about his 1 day old new born > child, I had made a harmless statement > in general about the natives( And not about > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > put such queries, including this native, but > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > These lines written were general lines of > concern and I put them below here > again for the readers - > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > which solicit such mails as been given to me > by the father of this child ? > > He has once again written to me on my > personal id, saying that he does not wish > to insult me in public. But he does not know > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > as insults in public and on same scale. I > am allowing him here the pleasure of > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > mail as sent to me. > > And also request the members who put > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > to many reasons, they must not torture any > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > got the pleasure of insulting me in > public, now kindly excuse me > and forgive me for my unintentional, > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > You have been a good man to write me > personally, and not on the Forum, > but I cannot allow you to be more good > than me, which is why > I have send this to the Forum > Yes, I know you are basically > a normal good human being, so lets keep > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > ===================================================================== > His Holi Gift to me. > ===================================================================== > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human being > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me?as you > are trying to tell > > " And remove from your system, this > > demanding business.And also remove > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > And also remove to show displeasure > > eventually " > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not answered me? > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about me. > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was not > answered. > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read your > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > and what about you? read your words once again. > " This is not a > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > where every childs cry would be met > with milk " > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words like > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for Orphans? > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through post. > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult you > before group. > > ok bye for now. > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i became > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that from my > childs chart) > > > regards > Rama Rao > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Dear Ved Ramji, Extra smartness is not tolerated. The public is not " bevakoof " . You unnecessary shot mails with " bakwaas " not ethically right, and now trying to save face ? You pass sarcastic remarks in response to general statements mentioned by me to Shri Sumitji, and think public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect to people who help others and spend their time on others problems and now showing yourself as a " Mahagyaani " ? or " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one is born today morning to accept this illogiocal bakwaas. Now please just remain silent and no further talks of nonsense. And do not try to show any spiritualsim. Bhaskar. , " ved_ram " <ved_ram wrote: > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > Dear Bhaskarji > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my mail in > the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and the > context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. > > may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting if i > have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my problem > you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) who > already answered me. right > > and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail > initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered me. > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. is it > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail > > /message/48231 > > i already told you that i never revealed about my panic situation to > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you used the > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize the > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls the > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and infact you > remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this world and > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara told > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. > > so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank you > once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and holi > was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday of > sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi gift and > i am sorry if you took it in that way. > > by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who has the > right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are called > mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. > Cool :-) > > Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the disturbance.I am > closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for further > mails on this subject. I cleared my case. > > regards > > Rama Rao > > , " Bhaskar " > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > > > Let me share my Gift with you. > > I am a person who at times purposely > > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > > persons to teach them a lesson. > > But in this case when a person > > was asking about his 1 day old new born > > child, I had made a harmless statement > > in general about the natives( And not about > > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > > put such queries, including this native, but > > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > > These lines written were general lines of > > concern and I put them below here > > again for the readers - > > > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > > which solicit such mails as been given to me > > by the father of this child ? > > > > He has once again written to me on my > > personal id, saying that he does not wish > > to insult me in public. But he does not know > > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > > as insults in public and on same scale. I > > am allowing him here the pleasure of > > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > > mail as sent to me. > > > > And also request the members who put > > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > > to many reasons, they must not torture any > > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > > got the pleasure of insulting me in > > public, now kindly excuse me > > and forgive me for my unintentional, > > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > > You have been a good man to write me > > personally, and not on the Forum, > > but I cannot allow you to be more good > > than me, which is why > > I have send this to the Forum > > Yes, I know you are basically > > a normal good human being, so lets keep > > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > ===================================================================== > > His Holi Gift to me. > > > ===================================================================== > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human > being > > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me?as you > > are trying to tell > > > > " And remove from your system, this > > > demanding business.And also remove > > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > > And also remove to show displeasure > > > eventually " > > > > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not answered me? > > > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about me. > > > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was not > > answered. > > > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read your > > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > > > and what about you? read your words once again. > > " This is not a > > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > > where every childs cry would be met > > with milk " > > > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words > like > > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for Orphans? > > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through post. > > > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult you > > before group. > > > > ok bye for now. > > > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i > became > > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that from > my > > childs chart) > > > > > > regards > > Rama Rao > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Dear ved Ramji, You have done a " paap " by talking rubbish with a astrolger who mentioned a harmless statement not directed specially at You. And now wasting your time and others time with your bakwaas insinuating dialouges which are just face saving rubbish statements. You should think before writing. You are incurring sin by this type of talking, to a person who has been helping people without any hope of financial returns and who has been spending his family's time on people suffering, and there is no base or weight in your dialouges. Just keep remaining a silent member is the right Line of decesion for you, and also doing japa and Pooja for your new born child should be your first aim, which you kindly follow instead of cheaply indulging in road side talks with a person like me, who has to take care of another 40 enquiries like you within the next 48 hours. Okay ??? Bye Bye. Bhaskar. , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > The public is not " bevakoof " . > You unnecessary shot mails with > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > and now trying to save face ? > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > to general statements mentioned by me > to Shri Sumitji, and think > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > to people who help others and spend their time > on others problems > and now showing yourself > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > is born today morning > to accept this illogiocal > bakwaas. > > Now please just remain silent and no > further talks of nonsense. > > And do not try to show any > spiritualsim. > > Bhaskar. , " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > wrote: > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my mail > in > > the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and the > > context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. > > > > may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting if > i > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my problem > > you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) who > > already answered me. right > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail > > initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered me. > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. is > it > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail > > > > /message/48231 > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about my panic situation > to > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you used > the > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize the > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls the > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and infact > you > > remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this world > and > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara told > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. > > > > so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank you > > once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and holi > > was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday of > > sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi gift > and > > i am sorry if you took it in that way. > > > > by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who has > the > > right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are called > > mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. > > Cool :-) > > > > Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the disturbance.I > am > > closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for > further > > mails on this subject. I cleared my case. > > > > regards > > > > Rama Rao > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > > > > > Let me share my Gift with you. > > > I am a person who at times purposely > > > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > > > persons to teach them a lesson. > > > But in this case when a person > > > was asking about his 1 day old new born > > > child, I had made a harmless statement > > > in general about the natives( And not about > > > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > > > put such queries, including this native, but > > > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > > > These lines written were general lines of > > > concern and I put them below here > > > again for the readers - > > > > > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > > > > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > > > which solicit such mails as been given to me > > > by the father of this child ? > > > > > > He has once again written to me on my > > > personal id, saying that he does not wish > > > to insult me in public. But he does not know > > > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > > > as insults in public and on same scale. I > > > am allowing him here the pleasure of > > > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > > > mail as sent to me. > > > > > > And also request the members who put > > > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > > > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > > > to many reasons, they must not torture any > > > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > > > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > > > > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > > > got the pleasure of insulting me in > > > public, now kindly excuse me > > > and forgive me for my unintentional, > > > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > > > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > > > You have been a good man to write me > > > personally, and not on the Forum, > > > but I cannot allow you to be more good > > > than me, which is why > > > I have send this to the Forum > > > Yes, I know you are basically > > > a normal good human being, so lets keep > > > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > His Holi Gift to me. > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > > > > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human > > being > > > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > > > > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me?as > you > > > are trying to tell > > > > > > " And remove from your system, this > > > > demanding business.And also remove > > > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > > > And also remove to show displeasure > > > > eventually " > > > > > > > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not answered > me? > > > > > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about me. > > > > > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was not > > > answered. > > > > > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read your > > > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > > > > > and what about you? read your words once again. > > > " This is not a > > > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > > > where every childs cry would be met > > > with milk " > > > > > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words > > like > > > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for > Orphans? > > > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through post. > > > > > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > > > > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult > you > > > before group. > > > > > > ok bye for now. > > > > > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i > > became > > > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that from > > my > > > childs chart) > > > > > > > > > regards > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya Dear Bhaskar Ji you compelled me to write again. i accept i am not spiritual nor i tried to be spiritual by quoting verse of shri Adhi sankaracharya. I just repeated what is told by him. tell me is it not true? but one thing is true i am trying to be spiritual. I am a neophyte. are you trying to threaten me. do you want me to be removed from this group. by the way people who charge for jyotish and say they dont run Anath ashrams ( this is your statement) and who give examples of their success stories, what are they called? Professionals practice their profession by some times doing case studies free of cost to sharpen their skills and they colour it as service. Of course there are some excpetions, about whom i know well like shri K.N.Rao, Shri Sanjay rath, Shri P.V.R.Narasimharao, etc but certainly you cannot be in that exceptions list boss. i will never submit myself to people like you by remaining silent. if you once again write in a manner as you wrote below i will answer again. the best way for you to stop writing to me or getting replies from me is getting me removed from his group, which you can easily do because you can use your gomukha to achieve that. carry on dear. regards Rama Rao -- In , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > The public is not " bevakoof " . > You unnecessary shot mails with > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > and now trying to save face ? > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > to general statements mentioned by me > to Shri Sumitji, and think > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > to people who help others and spend their time > on others problems > and now showing yourself > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > is born today morning > to accept this illogiocal > bakwaas. > > Now please just remain silent and no > further talks of nonsense. > > And do not try to show any > spiritualsim. > > Bhaskar. , " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > wrote: > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my mail > in > > the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and the > > context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. > > > > may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting if > i > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my problem > > you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) who > > already answered me. right > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail > > initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered me. > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. is > it > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail > > > > /message/48231 > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about my panic situation > to > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you used > the > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize the > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls the > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and infact > you > > remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this world > and > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara told > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. > > > > so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank you > > once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and holi > > was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday of > > sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi gift > and > > i am sorry if you took it in that way. > > > > by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who has > the > > right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are called > > mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. > > Cool :-) > > > > Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the disturbance.I > am > > closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for > further > > mails on this subject. I cleared my case. > > > > regards > > > > Rama Rao > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > > > > > Let me share my Gift with you. > > > I am a person who at times purposely > > > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > > > persons to teach them a lesson. > > > But in this case when a person > > > was asking about his 1 day old new born > > > child, I had made a harmless statement > > > in general about the natives( And not about > > > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > > > put such queries, including this native, but > > > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > > > These lines written were general lines of > > > concern and I put them below here > > > again for the readers - > > > > > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > > > > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > > > which solicit such mails as been given to me > > > by the father of this child ? > > > > > > He has once again written to me on my > > > personal id, saying that he does not wish > > > to insult me in public. But he does not know > > > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > > > as insults in public and on same scale. I > > > am allowing him here the pleasure of > > > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > > > mail as sent to me. > > > > > > And also request the members who put > > > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > > > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > > > to many reasons, they must not torture any > > > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > > > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > > > > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > > > got the pleasure of insulting me in > > > public, now kindly excuse me > > > and forgive me for my unintentional, > > > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > > > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > > > You have been a good man to write me > > > personally, and not on the Forum, > > > but I cannot allow you to be more good > > > than me, which is why > > > I have send this to the Forum > > > Yes, I know you are basically > > > a normal good human being, so lets keep > > > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > His Holi Gift to me. > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > > > > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human > > being > > > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > > > > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me?as > you > > > are trying to tell > > > > > > " And remove from your system, this > > > > demanding business.And also remove > > > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > > > And also remove to show displeasure > > > > eventually " > > > > > > > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not answered > me? > > > > > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about me. > > > > > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was not > > > answered. > > > > > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read your > > > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > > > > > and what about you? read your words once again. > > > " This is not a > > > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > > > where every childs cry would be met > > > with milk " > > > > > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words > > like > > > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for > Orphans? > > > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through post. > > > > > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > > > > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult > you > > > before group. > > > > > > ok bye for now. > > > > > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i > > became > > > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that from > > my > > > childs chart) > > > > > > > > > regards > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Dear Shri Shri Ved Ramji , Pranaams, Koti koti shastan naman aapko. Bhai I am a most ordinary astrologer sharpening my skills by giving free services. Please leave this ordinary man like me alone to his gloom and his little efforts at trying to sharpen his skills. I am no math for a great person like you. Pranams once again to You. A most ordinary person and astrologer, Bhaskar. , " ved_ram " <ved_ram wrote: > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > Dear Bhaskar Ji > > you compelled me to write again. > > i accept i am not spiritual nor i tried to be spiritual by quoting > verse of shri Adhi sankaracharya. I just repeated what is told by > him. tell me is it not true? but one thing is true i am trying to be > spiritual. I am a neophyte. > > > > are you trying to threaten me. do you want me to be removed from > this group. > > > by the way people who charge for jyotish and say they dont run > Anath ashrams ( this is your statement) and who give examples of > their success stories, what are they called? > > > Professionals practice their profession by some times doing case > studies free of cost to sharpen their skills and they colour it as > service. Of course there are some excpetions, about whom i know well > like shri K.N.Rao, Shri Sanjay rath, Shri P.V.R.Narasimharao, etc > but certainly you cannot be in that exceptions list boss. > > i will never submit myself to people like you by remaining silent. > if you once again write in a manner as you wrote below i will answer > again. > > the best way for you to stop writing to me or getting replies from > me is getting me removed from his group, which you can easily do > because you can use your gomukha to achieve that. > > carry on dear. > > regards > Rama Rao > > > > > > -- In , " Bhaskar " > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > > The public is not " bevakoof " . > > You unnecessary shot mails with > > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > > and now trying to save face ? > > > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > > to general statements mentioned by me > > to Shri Sumitji, and think > > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > > to people who help others and spend their time > > on others problems > > and now showing yourself > > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > > is born today morning > > to accept this illogiocal > > bakwaas. > > > > Now please just remain silent and no > > further talks of nonsense. > > > > And do not try to show any > > spiritualsim. > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my mail > > in > > > the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and the > > > context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. > > > > > > may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting > if > > i > > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my problem > > > you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) who > > > already answered me. right > > > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail > > > initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered me. > > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. is > > it > > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail > > > > > > /message/48231 > > > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about my panic > situation > > to > > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you used > > the > > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize > the > > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls > the > > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and infact > > you > > > remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this world > > and > > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara told > > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. > > > > > > so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank you > > > once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and > holi > > > was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday > of > > > sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi gift > > and > > > i am sorry if you took it in that way. > > > > > > by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who has > > the > > > right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are called > > > mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. > > > Cool :-) > > > > > > Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the disturbance.I > > am > > > closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for > > further > > > mails on this subject. I cleared my case. > > > > > > regards > > > > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > > > > > > > Let me share my Gift with you. > > > > I am a person who at times purposely > > > > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > > > > persons to teach them a lesson. > > > > But in this case when a person > > > > was asking about his 1 day old new born > > > > child, I had made a harmless statement > > > > in general about the natives( And not about > > > > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > > > > put such queries, including this native, but > > > > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > > > > These lines written were general lines of > > > > concern and I put them below here > > > > again for the readers - > > > > > > > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > > > > > > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > > > > which solicit such mails as been given to me > > > > by the father of this child ? > > > > > > > > He has once again written to me on my > > > > personal id, saying that he does not wish > > > > to insult me in public. But he does not know > > > > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > > > > as insults in public and on same scale. I > > > > am allowing him here the pleasure of > > > > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > > > > mail as sent to me. > > > > > > > > And also request the members who put > > > > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > > > > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > > > > to many reasons, they must not torture any > > > > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > > > > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > > > > > > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > > > > got the pleasure of insulting me in > > > > public, now kindly excuse me > > > > and forgive me for my unintentional, > > > > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > > > > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > > > > You have been a good man to write me > > > > personally, and not on the Forum, > > > > but I cannot allow you to be more good > > > > than me, which is why > > > > I have send this to the Forum > > > > Yes, I know you are basically > > > > a normal good human being, so lets keep > > > > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > His Holi Gift to me. > > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > > > > > > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am human > > > being > > > > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > > > > > > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me? as > > you > > > > are trying to tell > > > > > > > > " And remove from your system, this > > > > > demanding business.And also remove > > > > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > > > > And also remove to show displeasure > > > > > eventually " > > > > > > > > > > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not > answered > > me? > > > > > > > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about > me. > > > > > > > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was > not > > > > answered. > > > > > > > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read > your > > > > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > > > > > > > and what about you? read your words once again. > > > > " This is not a > > > > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > > > > where every childs cry would be met > > > > with milk " > > > > > > > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using words > > > like > > > > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for > > Orphans? > > > > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through > post. > > > > > > > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > > > > > > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to insult > > you > > > > before group. > > > > > > > > ok bye for now. > > > > > > > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly i > > > became > > > > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that > from > > > my > > > > childs chart) > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 dont send me email --- Bhaskar <rajiventerprises wrote: > Dear Shri Shri Ved Ramji , > Pranaams, > Koti koti shastan naman aapko. > > Bhai I am a most ordinary astrologer > sharpening my skills by giving free > services. > > Please leave this ordinary man like > me alone to his gloom and his > little efforts at trying to sharpen > his skills. > > I am no math for a great person > like you. > > Pranams once again to You. > > A most ordinary person and astrologer, > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , " ved_ram " > <ved_ram > wrote: > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > Dear Bhaskar Ji > > > > you compelled me to write again. > > > > i accept i am not spiritual nor i tried to be > spiritual by quoting > > verse of shri Adhi sankaracharya. I just repeated > what is told by > > him. tell me is it not true? but one thing is true > i am trying to > be > > spiritual. I am a neophyte. > > > > > > > > are you trying to threaten me. do you want me to > be removed from > > this group. > > > > > > by the way people who charge for jyotish and say > they dont run > > Anath ashrams ( this is your statement) and who > give examples of > > their success stories, what are they called? > > > > > > Professionals practice their profession by some > times doing case > > studies free of cost to sharpen their skills and > they colour it as > > service. Of course there are some excpetions, > about whom i know > well > > like shri K.N.Rao, Shri Sanjay rath, Shri > P.V.R.Narasimharao, etc > > but certainly you cannot be in that exceptions > list boss. > > > > i will never submit myself to people like you by > remaining silent. > > if you once again write in a manner as you wrote > below i will > answer > > again. > > > > the best way for you to stop writing to me or > getting replies from > > me is getting me removed from his group, which you > can easily do > > because you can use your gomukha to achieve that. > > > > carry on dear. > > > > regards > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " Bhaskar " > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > > > > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > > > The public is not " bevakoof " . > > > You unnecessary shot mails with > > > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > > > and now trying to save face ? > > > > > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > > > to general statements mentioned by me > > > to Shri Sumitji, and think > > > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > > > to people who help others and spend their time > > > on others problems > > > and now showing yourself > > > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > > > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > > > is born today morning > > > to accept this illogiocal > > > bakwaas. > > > > > > Now please just remain silent and no > > > further talks of nonsense. > > > > > > And do not try to show any > > > spiritualsim. > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid > that you put my > mail > > > in > > > > the forum. but you have not put the entire > mail of yours and > the > > > > context in which you used the words to explain > Mr Sumit. > > > > > > > > may be you are really good person . But again > i am reinsisting > > if > > > i > > > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to > you about my > problem > > > > you but still you tried to answer some one > else ( Mr sumit) > who > > > > already answered me. right > > > > > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as > if i wrote mail > > > > initially to you and tortured you when you > have not answered > me. > > > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site > and do readings. > is > > > it > > > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public > read my mail > > > > > > > > > /message/48231 > > > > > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about > my panic > > situation > > > to > > > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and > enquired. you > used > > > the > > > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as > we dont realize > > the > > > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one > bevakoof calls > > the > > > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your > remark and > infact > > > you > > > > remarks once again remind me for what i have > come to this > world > > > and > > > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri > Adhi sankara > told > > > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) > mathe. > === message truncated === Save all your chat conversations. Find them online at http://in.messenger./webmessengerpromo.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Nobody is sending you any mails, We have better work to do. Kindly go to " Edit membership " on top of this page, and click on it, and then change your settings for " Mail delivery " ,to " Web only " . , kumudini wagh <kumudini_w wrote: > > dont send me email > --- Bhaskar <rajiventerprises wrote: > > > Dear Shri Shri Ved Ramji , > > Pranaams, > > Koti koti shastan naman aapko. > > > > Bhai I am a most ordinary astrologer > > sharpening my skills by giving free > > services. > > > > Please leave this ordinary man like > > me alone to his gloom and his > > little efforts at trying to sharpen > > his skills. > > > > I am no math for a great person > > like you. > > > > Pranams once again to You. > > > > A most ordinary person and astrologer, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ved_ram " > > <ved_ram@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar Ji > > > > > > you compelled me to write again. > > > > > > i accept i am not spiritual nor i tried to be > > spiritual by quoting > > > verse of shri Adhi sankaracharya. I just repeated > > what is told by > > > him. tell me is it not true? but one thing is true > > i am trying to > > be > > > spiritual. I am a neophyte. > > > > > > > > > > > > are you trying to threaten me. do you want me to > > be removed from > > > this group. > > > > > > > > > by the way people who charge for jyotish and say > > they dont run > > > Anath ashrams ( this is your statement) and who > > give examples of > > > their success stories, what are they called? > > > > > > > > > Professionals practice their profession by some > > times doing case > > > studies free of cost to sharpen their skills and > > they colour it as > > > service. Of course there are some excpetions, > > about whom i know > > well > > > like shri K.N.Rao, Shri Sanjay rath, Shri > > P.V.R.Narasimharao, etc > > > but certainly you cannot be in that exceptions > > list boss. > > > > > > i will never submit myself to people like you by > > remaining silent. > > > if you once again write in a manner as you wrote > > below i will > > answer > > > again. > > > > > > the best way for you to stop writing to me or > > getting replies from > > > me is getting me removed from his group, which you > > can easily do > > > because you can use your gomukha to achieve that. > > > > > > carry on dear. > > > > > > regards > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " Bhaskar " > > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > > > > > > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > > > > The public is not " bevakoof " . > > > > You unnecessary shot mails with > > > > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > > > > and now trying to save face ? > > > > > > > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > > > > to general statements mentioned by me > > > > to Shri Sumitji, and think > > > > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > > > > to people who help others and spend their time > > > > on others problems > > > > and now showing yourself > > > > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > > > > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > > > > is born today morning > > > > to accept this illogiocal > > > > bakwaas. > > > > > > > > Now please just remain silent and no > > > > further talks of nonsense. > > > > > > > > And do not try to show any > > > > spiritualsim. > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid > > that you put my > > mail > > > > in > > > > > the forum. but you have not put the entire > > mail of yours and > > the > > > > > context in which you used the words to explain > > Mr Sumit. > > > > > > > > > > may be you are really good person . But again > > i am reinsisting > > > if > > > > i > > > > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to > > you about my > > problem > > > > > you but still you tried to answer some one > > else ( Mr sumit) > > who > > > > > already answered me. right > > > > > > > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as > > if i wrote mail > > > > > initially to you and tortured you when you > > have not answered > > me. > > > > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site > > and do readings. > > is > > > > it > > > > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public > > read my mail > > > > > > > > > > > > > /message/48231 > > > > > > > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about > > my panic > > > situation > > > > to > > > > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and > > enquired. you > > used > > > > the > > > > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as > > we dont realize > > > the > > > > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one > > bevakoof calls > > > the > > > > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your > > remark and > > infact > > > > you > > > > > remarks once again remind me for what i have > > come to this > > world > > > > and > > > > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri > > Adhi sankara > > told > > > > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) > > mathe. > > > === message truncated === > > > > Save all your chat conversations. Find them online at http://in.messenger./webmessengerpromo.php > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya Dear Shri Bhaskarji Aap ko bhi koti koti sashtang namaskar and kshma. hum ko bhi humare hal mein chod dijiye. no more replies please. regards rama rao , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > Dear Shri Shri Ved Ramji , > Pranaams, > Koti koti shastan naman aapko. > > Bhai I am a most ordinary astrologer > sharpening my skills by giving free > services. > > Please leave this ordinary man like > me alone to his gloom and his > little efforts at trying to sharpen > his skills. > > I am no math for a great person > like you. > > Pranams once again to You. > > A most ordinary person and astrologer, > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > wrote: > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > Dear Bhaskar Ji > > > > you compelled me to write again. > > > > i accept i am not spiritual nor i tried to be spiritual by quoting > > verse of shri Adhi sankaracharya. I just repeated what is told by > > him. tell me is it not true? but one thing is true i am trying to > be > > spiritual. I am a neophyte. > > > > > > > > are you trying to threaten me. do you want me to be removed from > > this group. > > > > > > by the way people who charge for jyotish and say they dont run > > Anath ashrams ( this is your statement) and who give examples of > > their success stories, what are they called? > > > > > > Professionals practice their profession by some times doing case > > studies free of cost to sharpen their skills and they colour it as > > service. Of course there are some excpetions, about whom i know > well > > like shri K.N.Rao, Shri Sanjay rath, Shri P.V.R.Narasimharao, etc > > but certainly you cannot be in that exceptions list boss. > > > > i will never submit myself to people like you by remaining silent. > > if you once again write in a manner as you wrote below i will > answer > > again. > > > > the best way for you to stop writing to me or getting replies from > > me is getting me removed from his group, which you can easily do > > because you can use your gomukha to achieve that. > > > > carry on dear. > > > > regards > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " Bhaskar " > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ved Ramji, > > > > > > Extra smartness is not tolerated. > > > The public is not " bevakoof " . > > > You unnecessary shot mails with > > > " bakwaas " not ethically right, > > > and now trying to save face ? > > > > > > You pass sarcastic remarks in response > > > to general statements mentioned by me > > > to Shri Sumitji, and think > > > public is " bevakoof " ? You show disrespect > > > to people who help others and spend their time > > > on others problems > > > and now showing yourself > > > as a " Mahagyaani " ? or > > > " Sahukaar Seth " ? Boos no one > > > is born today morning > > > to accept this illogiocal > > > bakwaas. > > > > > > Now please just remain silent and no > > > further talks of nonsense. > > > > > > And do not try to show any > > > spiritualsim. > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ved_ram " <ved_ram@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Aum namo bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > > > absolutely no hard feelings nor i am afraid that you put my > mail > > > in > > > > the forum. but you have not put the entire mail of yours and > the > > > > context in which you used the words to explain Mr Sumit. > > > > > > > > may be you are really good person . But again i am reinsisting > > if > > > i > > > > have not asked you or wrote specifically to you about my > problem > > > > you but still you tried to answer some one else ( Mr sumit) > who > > > > already answered me. right > > > > > > > > and you are trying to tell the public that as if i wrote mail > > > > initially to you and tortured you when you have not answered > me. > > > > what is this guruji? you maintain a web site and do readings. > is > > > it > > > > fair to put such remarks on me. let the public read my mail > > > > > > > > /message/48231 > > > > > > > > i already told you that i never revealed about my panic > > situation > > > to > > > > my wife or anybody but took it to myself and enquired. you > used > > > the > > > > word bevakoof for me? in this world as long as we dont realize > > the > > > > ultimate we all are bevakoofs only what if one bevakoof calls > > the > > > > other a bevakoof. that is why i accepted your remark and > infact > > > you > > > > remarks once again remind me for what i have come to this > world > > > and > > > > in what i am indulging- so thanks. As Sri Sri Adhi sankara > told > > > > Bhajagovindam Bhajagovindam Bhaje muda( fool) mathe. > > > > > > > > so i have no hard feelings for being called bevakoof. Thank > you > > > > once again for reminding me what am i? today is not holi and > > holi > > > > was yesterday as per vaishnava calendar which is also birthday > > of > > > > sri chaitanya mahaprabhu. So, my mail to you was not a holi > gift > > > and > > > > i am sorry if you took it in that way. > > > > > > > > by the way you purposefully teach lessons right! tell me who > has > > > the > > > > right to teach lessons to other souls? you know they are > called > > > > mahgyanis right? then what is wrong if i called you mahagyani. > > > > Cool :-) > > > > > > > > Group thank you for listening me and sorry for the > disturbance.I > > > am > > > > closing this matter from my side and i will not respond for > > > further > > > > mails on this subject. I cleared my case. > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > > > <rajiventerprises@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > > > > > I received a gift on Holi. - > > > > > > > > > > Let me share my Gift with you. > > > > > I am a person who at times purposely > > > > > passes strong and hard remarks on certain > > > > > persons to teach them a lesson. > > > > > But in this case when a person > > > > > was asking about his 1 day old new born > > > > > child, I had made a harmless statement > > > > > in general about the natives( And not about > > > > > Mr. so n so or anyone particularly) who > > > > > put such queries, including this native, but > > > > > not in any way detrimental about anyone. > > > > > These lines written were general lines of > > > > > concern and I put them below here > > > > > again for the readers - > > > > > > > > > > // I do not understand that unless if the > > > > > > > > Doctor at the maternity home suggests > > > > > > > > and medical emergency, then until > > > > > > > > then, why must a parent come with > > > > > > > > a new born child's chart > > > > > > > > and ask for such queries. because > > > > > > > > if some astrologer replies in the negative, > > > > > > > > while the Doctor has said nothing about > > > > > > > > ill health, then this person would > > > > > > > > create a tension in his own > > > > > > > > mind, as well as his poor wifes, who must > > > > > > > > be lying on the bed now.// > > > > > > > > > > What wrong have I written in the above lines, > > > > > which solicit such mails as been given to me > > > > > by the father of this child ? > > > > > > > > > > He has once again written to me on my > > > > > personal id, saying that he does not wish > > > > > to insult me in public. But he does not know > > > > > that Bhaskar takes both accolades as well > > > > > as insults in public and on same scale. I > > > > > am allowing him here the pleasure of > > > > > insulting me in public, by reproducing his > > > > > mail as sent to me. > > > > > > > > > > And also request the members who put > > > > > their enquiries on Forums, and expect a > > > > > positive reply, and do not get the same, due > > > > > to many reasons, they must not torture any > > > > > astrologer, by such mails and hurt anyone > > > > > just because he has chosen not to answer. > > > > > > > > > > And Shri Ved Ramaji, You have no > > > > > got the pleasure of insulting me in > > > > > public, now kindly excuse me > > > > > and forgive me for my unintentional, > > > > > absolutely harmless, and unreferred > > > > > to you, mail, which caused you griveance. > > > > > You have been a good man to write me > > > > > personally, and not on the Forum, > > > > > but I cannot allow you to be more good > > > > > than me, which is why > > > > > I have send this to the Forum > > > > > Yes, I know you are basically > > > > > a normal good human being, so lets keep > > > > > it that way. No hard feelings on both sides. > > > > > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > > His Holi Gift to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===================================================================== > > > > > > > > > > Aum Namo Bhagavate vasudevaya > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji, > > > > > > > > > > as you stated i am not humble atleast in your case. I am > human > > > > being > > > > > who has emotions and surrounded by material dirt. > > > > > > > > > > Did i demand you to tell me or i asked Mr sumit to reply me? > as > > > you > > > > > are trying to tell > > > > > > > > > > " And remove from your system, this > > > > > > demanding business.And also remove > > > > > > dis-satisfaction,if your request is not met. > > > > > > And also remove to show displeasure > > > > > > eventually " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or did i express dissatisfaction when some one has not > > answered > > > me? > > > > > > > > > > i only protested the way you were telling to Mr Sumith about > > me. > > > > > > > > > > just show me where i expressed my dissatisfaction when i was > > not > > > > > answered. > > > > > > > > > > I am silent observer of the group doesnt mean i should read > > your > > > > > post also. I only read certain group members posts. > > > > > > > > > > and what about you? read your words once again. > > > > > " This is not a > > > > > anatha ashram or a seva sadan, > > > > > where every childs cry would be met > > > > > with milk " > > > > > > > > > > what human nature you have? are you not ashamed of using > words > > > > like > > > > > the one you wrote above. Do you have so cheap feeling for > > > Orphans? > > > > > that you used above words just to teach me a lesson through > > post. > > > > > > > > > > ok i am ignoring you from today. you also ignore me. > > > > > > > > > > this i am posting to you personally and i dont want to > insult > > > you > > > > > before group. > > > > > > > > > > ok bye for now. > > > > > > > > > > sorry if i wasted your time.may be knowingly or unknowingly > i > > > > became > > > > > bevakoof( fool) but i am not a cheat(hope you can read that > > from > > > > my > > > > > childs chart) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > Rama Rao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.