Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 Hi Friends, New member here.I would be grateful if learned members of the group enlighten me on the following issue: It is a well known rule that if a planet's own interperiod in its mahadasha is good then the rest of the mahadasha will not be good;and if the own interperiod is not good then the rest of the mahadasha will be good.However i have not been able to find any rules in astrology books as to how to determine by looking at a horoscope itself as to whether the mahadasha of a particular planet will give good results in its own bhukti or otherwise.This is something which has remained a mystery to me inspite of having been a student of the subject for about 25 years now. All opinions in the matter are highly welcome.It would be even better if the opinions are supported by examples. R.K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Dear Rupkishen, // It is a well known rule that if a planet's own interperiod in its > mahadasha is good then the rest of the mahadasha will not be good // There is no such rule, either well known or remotely known. Please let me know where is this written. // However i have not been able to find any rules in astrology > books as to how to determine by looking at a horoscope itself as to > whether the mahadasha of a particular planet will give good results in > its own bhukti or otherwise. This is something which has remained a > mystery to me inspite of having been a student of the subject for about 25 years now.// What type of studies you have been doing for quarter of a century, I cannot understand. One should be able to check how a planet would behave, as a mahadasha or antardasha Lord, in few minutes. Okay, but forget the past.Please start reading the discussions on these Forums, read why a astrologer replies what he has to anyone, and search for the logic behind it, by making the chart at your end, to which he has replied. You may start by reading all my replies of today to various natives. To illustrate you with a example at the moment would be a tedious job. anything else,please feel free to write back, but some homework to be done by you, before you write to me. basic rules for any planet to be good in Mahadasha or antardasha. 1) Must be benefic for the Ascendant. 2) Must be well placed. 3) Well conjuncted. 4) Exalted,in own house, but not debilitated. 5) Must be aspected well. 6) Must not behemmed between malefis. 7) Dispositor of the planet must be checked. 8) Constellation must be benefic . etc.etc. best wishes, Bhaskar. www.shrikrishnajyotish.com , " Rup Krishen Baqaya " <baqayarup wrote: > > Hi Friends, New member here.I would be grateful if learned members > of the group enlighten me on the following issue: > It is a well known rule that if a planet's own interperiod in its > mahadasha is good then the rest of the mahadasha will not be good;and > if the own interperiod is not good then the rest of the mahadasha will > be good.However i have not been able to find any rules in astrology > books as to how to determine by looking at a horoscope itself as to > whether the mahadasha of a particular planet will give good results in > its own bhukti or otherwise.This is something which has remained a > mystery to me inspite of having been a student of the subject for > about 25 years now. > All opinions in the matter are highly welcome.It would be even > better if the opinions are supported by examples. R.K. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.