Guest guest Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Tarun writing a long mail doesnt involve mush work as we tye we get the woords, but in a tech answer we have to cross check every datail and with my sight I need to be extra careful I have made of few errors no donbt due to it and corrected behing such a post say instead of enterig a date as 25 may enter 29 or 26 but rate. for any reading u want me to explain I can at the right time and place. now group peace comes 1st. and querists their answers. , ~~Tarun~~ <tarun_vst wrote: > > Prashant ji > > Sir..you got time to write so lengthy mail , > it was better if you have given answers to my query to you. > > I am not saying you to answer the non-astro people technically. .....its ur wish. > > but when being a astro literate...i need to know the answers for my question. and i certainly > expect a quality answer from the astrologer. > > I dont trust anything without any technical answer. > > and everyone has right to ask question if u r in PUBLIC FORUM....no one is small ..no one is big. > IF you feel yourself enough old aged... thts great > > > I hope to have technical answers from you in coming sessions of mails. > > My Honourable Regards to you. > > Tarun > > > > --- Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > > Tarun, > > > > well u r too small to know the reasons, and for any who want a tech view of what I post can > > still do it, ANYTIME > > > > the idea is 1st to spare a troubled person with tech stuff [is one] > > next is a few people take pleasure in downgrading the readings > > > > as unheard of > > > > preposterous > > > > senior astrologer is making mistakes and using wrong software etc. > > > > as if they r the ultimate authority in all the subjects > > > > i have NEVER questioned anyones readings even once max I do differ is on the system. never on > > what they write. gone r the days when we could see Vattem Krishna ji' posts. had so full of > > knowledge and a fool proof method > > > > prasna and regular horoscope readings were given and explained too, this forum lost him to such > > voracious attackers. > > > > I never claim such I know I have to learn every minute to stay useful in society > > > > MOST OF THEM DON'T USE THE WORKINGS HERE. > > > > and u have enuf feed backs on it WORKING if u search feedbacks in JR ITSELF > > > > but u may want to call it whatever u like > > > > i DON'T MIND IF U WANT TO KNOW THEM the ones with successful outcomes posted here to be > > explained by members wanting to know how i ARRIVED AT IT AS i HAVE GIVEN DATES OF the possible > > event and they must fit a period I can't cook any say if kuka-kuja is 4 m 27 days so is > > ketu-kuja or ketu-ketu and if I have given 3rd level of dasa also it is fixed. > > > > > > this much I can do > > > > I have guided many here and even otherwise who can wait and learn > > within my time constraints. > > > > > > Tarun <tarun_vst wrote: Dear Member Astrologers. > > > > this is jyotish discussion forum; and unfortunately - JR is losing > > credibility for serious astrologers unlike other forums - where > > jyotishi explains the rationale of their prediciton. and It enhances > > the quality of forum - as more and more jyotish students participates. > > > > If this forum is limited to only providing dates without explaining > > the reason behind it, JR will be termed as only timepass forum...not a > > JYOTISH forum. > > > > My post will not be liked by many but i am sure many will appreciate > > my effort as this forum is like our colony/society. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. > > Play Sims Stories at Games. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 okay prashnat ji..as u say. its better to close this thread..i understand your views. Regards, Tarun --- YOUR ONLINE ASTROLOGER <gbp_kumar wrote: > Tarun > > writing a long mail doesnt involve mush work as we tye we get the > woords, but in a tech answer we have to cross check every datail and > with my sight I need to be extra careful I have made of few errors no > donbt due to it and corrected behing such a post say instead of > enterig a date as 25 may enter 29 or 26 but rate. > > for any reading u want me to explain I can at the right time and > place. now group peace comes 1st. and querists their answers. > > > > > > , ~~Tarun~~ <tarun_vst wrote: > > > > Prashant ji > > > > Sir..you got time to write so lengthy mail , > > it was better if you have given answers to my query to you. > > > > I am not saying you to answer the non-astro people technically. > ....its ur wish. > > > > but when being a astro literate...i need to know the answers for my > question. and i certainly > > expect a quality answer from the astrologer. > > > > I dont trust anything without any technical answer. > > > > and everyone has right to ask question if u r in PUBLIC FORUM....no > one is small ..no one is big. > > IF you feel yourself enough old aged... thts great > > > > > > I hope to have technical answers from you in coming sessions of mails. > > > > My Honourable Regards to you. > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > --- Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > > > > Tarun, > > > > > > well u r too small to know the reasons, and for any who want a > tech view of what I post can > > > still do it, ANYTIME > > > > > > the idea is 1st to spare a troubled person with tech stuff [is one] > > > next is a few people take pleasure in downgrading the readings > > > > > > as unheard of > > > > > > preposterous > > > > > > senior astrologer is making mistakes and using wrong software etc. > > > > > > as if they r the ultimate authority in all the subjects > > > > > > i have NEVER questioned anyones readings even once max I do differ > is on the system. never on > > > what they write. gone r the days when we could see Vattem Krishna > ji' posts. had so full of > > > knowledge and a fool proof method > > > > > > prasna and regular horoscope readings were given and explained > too, this forum lost him to such > > > voracious attackers. > > > > > > I never claim such I know I have to learn every minute to stay > useful in society > > > > > > MOST OF THEM DON'T USE THE WORKINGS HERE. > > > > > > and u have enuf feed backs on it WORKING if u search feedbacks in > JR ITSELF > > > > > > but u may want to call it whatever u like > > > > > > i DON'T MIND IF U WANT TO KNOW THEM the ones with successful > outcomes posted here to be > > > explained by members wanting to know how i ARRIVED AT IT AS i HAVE > GIVEN DATES OF the possible > > > event and they must fit a period I can't cook any say if kuka-kuja > is 4 m 27 days so is > > > ketu-kuja or ketu-ketu and if I have given 3rd level of dasa also > it is fixed. > > > > > > > > > this much I can do > > > > > > I have guided many here and even otherwise who can wait and learn > > > within my time constraints. > > > > > > > > > Tarun <tarun_vst wrote: Dear > Member Astrologers. > > > > > > this is jyotish discussion forum; and unfortunately - JR is losing > > > credibility for serious astrologers unlike other forums - where > > > jyotishi explains the rationale of their prediciton. and It enhances > > > the quality of forum - as more and more jyotish students > participates. > > > > > > If this forum is limited to only providing dates without explaining > > > the reason behind it, JR will be termed as only timepass > forum...not a > > > JYOTISH forum. > > > > > > My post will not be liked by many but i am sure many will appreciate > > > my effort as this forum is like our colony/society. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your > story. > > > Play Sims Stories at Games. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.