Guest guest Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Dear Friends, Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's and predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors - 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off. 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied upon a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and withdrew. 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress " without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques, which may cause great blunders in his readings. 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear any untoward comment about the same. 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers, this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this". Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste. Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality, therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our standards of astrological acumen. In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon. Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not wanting to hurt him. But enough is enough. We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality readings. Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep mode, and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable to write here, but we shall await him always. The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr. from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids to spoil the destinies of our Group members.. I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and otherwise. regards, Bhaskar Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someone else take a second look and give the correct answer? regards tikka Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29 Notice - Jyotish Ganga Dear Friends, Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's and predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors - 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off. 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied upon a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and withdrew. 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress " without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques, which may cause great blunders in his readings. 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear any untoward comment about the same. 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers, this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this". Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste. Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality, therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our standards of astrological acumen. In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon. Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not wanting to hurt him. But enough is enough. We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality readings. Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep mode, and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable to write here, but we shall await him always. The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr. from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids to spoil the destinies of our Group members.. I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and otherwise. regards, Bhaskar Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 Dear Tikka, Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to you. regards/Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote: > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someone else take a second look and give the correct answer? > regards > tikka > > > > > ________________________________ > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29 > Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > Dear Friends, >  > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's and > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  - >  > 1) In another Group " Ancient Indian Astrology " he has just a two > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off. >  > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied upon > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and > withdrew. >  > 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress " > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques, which > may cause great blunders in his readings. >  > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear > any untoward comment about the same. >  > 5) For traditions and centuries the " KalaSarpa Yoga " and > " Shani sadesathi " which is well known even by non-astrologers, > this modern educated young man, says " Only quacks believe in this " . > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste. >  > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality, > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our > standards of astrological acumen. > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon. > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove > him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not wanting to > hurt him. But enough is enough. >  > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality readings. > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep mode, and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable to write here, but we shall await him always. >  > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr. from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids to spoil the destinies of our Group members.. >  > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and otherwise. >  > regards, > Bhaskar > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) . >  >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no. thanx and regards tikka Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18 Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga Dear Tikka,Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given toyou.regards/Bhaskar., Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:>> gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictionsthat he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he hadsaid, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someone else take a second look and give the correct answer?> regards> tikka>>>>> ____________ _________ _________ __> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > Sent: Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> Notice - Jyotish Ganga>>> Dear Friends,> Â> Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's and> predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  -> Â> 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> Â> 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied upon> a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> withdrew.> Â> 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress "> without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques, which> may cause great blunders in his readings.> Â> 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> any untoward comment about the same.> Â> 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> Â> Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> standards of astrological acumen.> In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.>> Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was notwanting to> hurt him. But enough is enough.> Â> We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality readings.>> Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover thereading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep mode,and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable towrite here, but we shall await him always.> Â> The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr..from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kidsto spoil the destinies of our Group members..> Â> I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology andotherwise.Â> Â> regards,> Bhaskar> Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> Â> Â> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Tikka, This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too, as to store it, or save it i mean. 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ? 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ? 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by you. regards, Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote: > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no. > thanx and regards > tikka > > > > > ________________________________ > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18 > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > Dear Tikka, > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to > you. > > regards/Bhaskar. > > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote: > > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someone > else take a second look and give the correct answer? > > regards > > tikka > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29 > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > Dear Friends, > >  > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's and > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  - > >  > > 1) In another Group " Ancient Indian Astrology " he has just a two > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off. > >  > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied upon > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and > > withdrew. > >  > > 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress " > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques, which > > may cause great blunders in his readings. > >  > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear > > any untoward comment about the same. > >  > > 5) For traditions and centuries the " KalaSarpa Yoga " and > > " Shani sadesathi " which is well known even by non-astrologers, > > this modern educated young man, says " Only quacks believe in this " . > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste. > >  > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality, > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our > > standards of astrological acumen. > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon. > > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove > > him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not > wanting to > > hurt him. But enough is enough. > >  > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality readings. > > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the > reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep mode, > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable to > write here, but we shall await him always. > >  > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr. > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids > to spoil the destinies of our Group members.. > >  > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and > otherwise. > >  > > regards, > > Bhaskar > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) . > >  > >  > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me. regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion. now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested? thanx and regards tikka Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42 Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga Tikka,This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,as to store it, or save it i mean.1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about thatastrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surelyyou can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on mycell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received byyou.regards,Bhaskar., Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:>> bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji hadgiven to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> thanx and regards> tikka>>>>> ____________ _________ _________ __> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga>>>> Dear Tikka,>> Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> you.>> regards/Bhaskar.>> , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...>wrote:> >> > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÂ> else take a second look and give the correct answer?> > regards> > tikka> >> >> >> >> > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> >> >> > Dear Friends,> > Â> > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning'sand> > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  -> > Â> > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > Â> > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studiedupon> > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > withdrew.> > Â> > 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress "> > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,Âwhich> > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > Â> > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > any untoward comment about the same.> > Â> > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > Â> > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > standards of astrological acumen.> > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> >> > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> wanting to> > hurt him. But enough is enough.> > Â> > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by qualityreadings.> >> > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleepmode,> and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unableto> write here, but we shall await him always.> > Â> > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > Â> > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> otherwise.Â> > Â> > regards,> > Bhaskar> > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > Â> > Â> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Thats great. 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate queries. 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you. 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good. 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply. So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she knows when someone is being taken for a ride. But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much to advice. Thats her prerogative. Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to know what actually " Tikka " stands for. best wishes, Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote:>> no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion.> now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> thanx and regards> tikka> > > > > ________________________________> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > Tikka,> > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,> as to store it, or save it i mean.> > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?> > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely> you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my> cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by> you.> > regards,> > Bhaskar.> > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> >> > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had> given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > thanx and regards> > tikka> >> >> >> >> > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> >> >> >> > Dear Tikka,> >> > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> > you.> >> > regards/Bhaskar.> >> > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...>> wrote:> > >> > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÂ> > else take a second look and give the correct answer?> > > regards> > > tikka> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > > Â> > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's> and> > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  -> > > Â> > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > > Â> > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied> upon> > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > withdrew.> > > Â> > > 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress "> > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,Â> which> > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > Â> > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > Â> > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > Â> > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> > >> > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > > him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> > wanting to> > > hurt him. But enough is enough.> > > Â> > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality> readings.> > >> > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> > reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> mode,> > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable> to> > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > Â> > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > Â> > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > otherwise.Â> > > Â> > > regards,> > > Bhaskar> > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > Â> > > Â> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 dear bhaskerji, going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who answered me for this. no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji. yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now. pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules. i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any reply i cannot force her to give me a reply. bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me. any way, it means "the younger prince" ( forget male or female , its an e-male) u strted this posting with " thats great"despite ur busy schedule u hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8. tikka Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09 Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga Thats great. 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate queries. 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you. 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good. 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply. So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she knows when someone is being taken for a ride. But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much to advice. Thats her prerogative. Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to know what actually " Tikka " stands for. best wishes, Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@. ..> wrote:>> no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion.> now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> thanx and regards> tikka> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > Tikka,> > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,> as to store it, or save it i mean.> > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?> > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely> you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my> cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by> you.> > regards,> > Bhaskar.> > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> >> > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had> given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > thanx and regards> > tikka> >> >> >> >> > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> >> >> >> > Dear Tikka,> >> > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> > you.> >> > regards/Bhaskar.> >> > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...>> wrote:> > >> > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÂ> > else take a second look and give the correct answer?> > > regards> > > tikka> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > > Â> > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's> and> > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors  -> > > Â> > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > > Â> > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same Group he worked and studied> upon> > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > withdrew.> > > Â> > > 3) He is using too many techniques and terms " To impress "> > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,Â> which> > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > Â> > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > Â> > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > Â> > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> > >> > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > > him since 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> > wanting to> > > hurt him. But enough is enough.> > > Â> > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure and abide by quality> readings.> > >> > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> > reading requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> mode,> > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable> to> > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > Â> > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > Â> > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > otherwise.Â> > > Â> > > regards,> > > Bhaskar> > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > Â> > > Â> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Tikka Tikka, I like your name., so I wrote it twice, I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male. Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote:>> dear bhaskerji,> going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who answered me for this.> no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji.> yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now.> pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules.> i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any reply i cannot force her to give me a reply.> bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me. any way, it means "the younger prince" ( forget male or female , its an e-male)> u strted this posting with " thats great"despite ur busy schedule u hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8.> tikka> > > > > ________________________________> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > Thats great.> 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate queries.> 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you.> 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good.> 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply.> So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she knows when someone is being taken for a ride.> But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much to advice.  Thats her prerogative.> Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to know what actually " Tikka " stands for.> best wishes,> Bhaskar.>  > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> >> > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion.> > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> > thanx and regards> > tikka> > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > > > > Tikka,> > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,> > as to store it, or save it i mean.> > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?> > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely> > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my> > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by> > you.> > > > regards,> > > > Bhaskar.> > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had> > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > > thanx and regards> > > tikka> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Tikka,> > >> > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> > > you.> > >> > > regards/Bhaskar.> > >> > > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...>> > wrote:> > > >> > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÃÆ'‚> > > else takeÃÆ'‚ a second look and give the correct answer?> > > > regards> > > > tikka> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Friends,> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's> > and> > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors ÃÆ'‚ -> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same GroupÃÆ'‚ he worked and studied> > upon> > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > > withdrew.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and termsÃÆ'‚ " To impress "> > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,ÃÆ'‚> > which> > > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> > > >> > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > > > him sinceÃÆ'‚ 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> > > wanting to> > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'‚ But enough is enough.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure andÃÆ'‚ abide by quality> > readings.> > > >> > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> > > readingÃÆ'‚ requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> > mode,> > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable> > to> > > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > > otherwise.ÃÆ'‚> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > regards,> > > > Bhaskar> > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > >> > >> >> > __._,_..___> Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic > Messages > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required) > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un > Recent Activity> *  268> New Members> *  9> New Photos> *  1> New DatabaseVisit Your Group > Give Back> for Good> Get inspired> by a good cause.> Y! Toolbar> Get it Free!> easy 1-click access> to your groups.> > Start a group> in 3 easy steps.> Connect with others.> .> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 ha-ha-ha.... bhaskerji, u cud not take the clue i gave..its like asking in those good old days, " the dog in the ad 4 HMV garmrphone co is a dog or a bich?" its a dog b'cos its HIS masters voice and not HER masters voice. i repeat tikka means "the younger prince and not the younger princes" i really don"t know what they call the younger princes? tikky , i suppose. if u really like my name then u can keep it , sir. apart frm kidding, i read something which really stunned me. i m talking abt the posting made by neelamji abt the slumdog milliniore. i hve not seen the film nor read the book. but the way neelam ji has written it is an eyeopener and what happens behind the scene.i thought that neelamji wud be a house wife blessed to take up astrology on a professional/ armature level. but her this posting reveals a different charecter. no mincing of words, clear cut ansd catagoric with superb command over language. this i know is not god gift, but years of traning and experince coupled with good upbringing and education. my gusses is she must be a spokesperson for some MNC or some bif organisation. kudose to u too madam. thanx and regards. tikka Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Friday, 27 February, 2009 23:12:11 Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga Tikka Tikka, I like your name., so I wrote it twice, I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male. Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@. ..> wrote:>> dear bhaskerji,> going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who answered me for this.> no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji.> yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now.> pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules.> i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any reply i cannot force her to give me a reply.> bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me. any way, it means "the younger prince" ( forget male or female , its an e-male)> u strted this posting with " thats great"despite ur busy schedule u hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8.> tikka> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > Thats great.> 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate queries.> 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you.> 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good.> 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply.> So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she knows when someone is being taken for a ride.> But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much to advice.  Thats her prerogative.> Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to know what actually " Tikka " stands for.> best wishes,> Bhaskar.>  > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> >> > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion.> > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> > thanx and regards> > tikka> > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > > > > Tikka,> > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,> > as to store it, or save it i mean.> > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?> > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely> > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my> > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by> > you.> > > > regards,> > > > Bhaskar.> > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had> > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > > thanx and regards> > > tikka> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Tikka,> > >> > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> > > you.> > >> > > regards/Bhaskar.> > >> > > , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...>> > wrote:> > > >> > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÃÆ'‚> > > else takeÃÆ'‚ a second look and give the correct answer?> > > > regards> > > > tikka> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > @ . com> > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Friends,> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's> > and> > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors ÃÆ'‚ -> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same GroupÃÆ'‚ he worked and studied> > upon> > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > > withdrew.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and termsÃÆ'‚ " To impress "> > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,ÃÆ'‚> > which> > > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> > > >> > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > > > him sinceÃÆ'‚ 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> > > wanting to> > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'‚ But enough is enough.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure andÃÆ'‚ abide by quality> > readings.> > > >> > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> > > readingÃÆ'‚ requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> > mode,> > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable> > to> > > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > > otherwise.ÃÆ'‚> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > regards,> > > > Bhaskar> > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > > ÃÆ'‚> > > >> > >> >> > __._,_..___> Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic > Messages > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required) > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un > Recent Activity> *  268> New Members> *  9> New Photos> *  1> New DatabaseVisit Your Group > Give Back> for Good> Get inspired> by a good cause.> Y! Toolbar> Get it Free!> easy 1-click access> to your groups.> > Start a group> in 3 easy steps.> Connect with others.> .> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 Ha-Ha-Ha. Dear Tikka Tikka fell in my trap and revealed himself. Your clue was very clear even to a blind person with no brains, but I wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, so I let out, the bait. You underestimated my understanding about understanding , what you wanted me to understand with the given clue. Yeah, You are right about Neelamji. best wshes, Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote:>> ha-ha-ha.... bhaskerji, u cud not take the clue i gave.its like asking in those good old days, " the dog in the ad 4 HMV garmrphone co is a dog or a bich?" its a dog b'cos its HIS masters voice and not HER masters voice. i repeat tikka means "the younger prince and not the younger princes" i really don"t know what they call the younger princes? tikky , i suppose.> if u really like my name then u can keep it , sir.> apart frm kidding, i read something which really stunned me. i m talking abt the posting made by neelamji abt the slumdog milliniore. i hve not seen the film nor read the book. but the way neelam ji has written it is an eyeopener and what happens behind the scene.i thought that neelamji wud be a house wife blessed to take up astrology on a professional/ armature level. but her this posting reveals a different charecter. no mincing of words, clear cut ansd catagoric with superb command over language. this i know is not god gift, but years of traning and experince coupled with good upbringing and education. my gusses is she must be a spokesperson for some MNC or some bif organisation.> kudose to u too madam.> thanx and regards.> tikka>  > > > > > ________________________________> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > Friday, 27 February, 2009 23:12:11> Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > Tikka Tikka,> I like your name., so I wrote it twice,> I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male.> Bhaskar. > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ..> wrote:> >> > dear bhaskerji,> > going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who answered me for this.> > no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji.> > yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now..> > pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules.> > i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any reply i cannot force her to give me a reply.> > bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me. any way, it means "the younger prince" ( forget male or female , its an e-male)> > u strted this posting with " thats great"despite ur busy schedule u hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8.> > tikka> > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > > Thats great.> > 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate queries.> > 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you.> > 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good.> > 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply.> > So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she knows when someone is being taken for a ride.> > But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much to advice.  Thats her prerogative.> > Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to know what actually " Tikka " stands for.> > best wishes,> > Bhaskar.> >  > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but what i don'nt find is the msg. no.. is it some where on the top of the mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> > > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill any other learned person gives a second opinion.> > > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> > > thanx and regards> > > tikka> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > > > > > > > > Tikka,> > > > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this much too,> > > as to store it, or save it i mean.> > > > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report now ?> > > > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> > > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then surely> > > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > > > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please on my> > > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply received by> > > you.> > > > > > regards,> > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > > @ .. com, Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji had> > > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > > > thanx and regards> > > > tikka> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Tikka,> > > >> > > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been given to> > > > you.> > > >> > > > regards/Bhaskar..> > > >> > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka..shah@ ...>> > > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his predictions> > > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what he had> > > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will someoneÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > else takeÃÆ'Æ'‚ a second look and give the correct answer?> > > > > regards> > > > > tikka> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological learning's> > > and> > > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors ÃÆ'Æ'‚ -> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a two> > > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a member> > > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed out> > > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken off.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same GroupÃÆ'Æ'‚ he worked and studied> > > upon> > > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > > > withdrew.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and termsÃÆ'Æ'‚ " To impress "> > > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these techniques,ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > which> > > > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time like> > > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in this".> > > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it daily> > > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in quality,> > > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself had> > > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a young> > > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " Power> > > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a Surgeon.> > > > >> > > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to remove> > > > > him sinceÃÆ'Æ'‚ 7-10 days due to his inconsistencies, but was not> > > > wanting to> > > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'Æ'‚ But enough is enough.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure andÃÆ'Æ'‚ abide by quality> > > readings.> > > > >> > > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover the> > > > readingÃÆ'Æ'‚ requests. Shri Sunil Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> > > mode,> > > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is unable> > > to> > > > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.> > > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish small kids> > > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > > > otherwise.ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > regards,> > > > > Bhaskar> > > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > __._,_..___> > Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic > > Messages > > > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required) > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional > > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un > > Recent Activity> > *  268> > New Members> > *  9> > New Photos> > *  1> > New DatabaseVisit Your Group > > Give Back> > for Good> > Get inspired> > by a good cause.> > Y! Toolbar> > Get it Free!> > easy 1-click access> > to your groups.> > > > Start a group> > in 3 easy steps.> > Connect with others.> > .> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 Thank you Tikka Tikka, if that's your pet name for the forum.//she must be a spokesperson for some MNC//I love to work for myself, my country and people. If I need to speak, it is for 'we the Indians', not for any MNC. RegardsNeelam2009/2/28 neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 //Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ?//You have no option now!! The camel will do what he has to...Got it? 2009/2/28 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Tikka Tikka, Good to know that You remember those old HMV records. I had plenty of them, the small ones and the big ones, Odeon and what not. I have forgotten the names. They never liked my collection of records at home, they never liked my collection of Music cassettes at home, and they all gave it to those ever changing servants for free, to make space of this " kachra " in their view. Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ? Bhaskar. , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Ha-Ha-Ha. Dear Tikka Tikka fell in my trap and revealed himself. > > Your clue was very clear even to a blind person with no brains, but I> wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, so I let out, the bait. You> underestimated my understanding about understanding , what you wanted me > to understand with the given clue.> > Yeah, You are right about Neelamji.> > best wshes,> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ wrote: > >> > ha-ha-ha.... bhaskerji, u cud not take the clue i gave.its like asking> in those good old days, " the dog in the ad 4 HMV garmrphone co is a dog> or a bich? " its a dog b'cos its HIS masters voice and not HER masters > voice. i repeat tikka means " the younger prince and not the younger> princes " i really don " t know what they call the younger princes? tikky ,> i suppose.> > if u really like my name then u can keep it , sir. > > apart frm kidding, i read something which really stunned me. i m> talking abt the posting made by neelamji abt the slumdog milliniore. i> hve not seen the film nor read the book. but the way neelam ji has > written it is an eyeopener and what happens behind the scene.i thought> that neelamji wud be a house wife blessed to take up astrology on a> professional/ armature level. but her this posting reveals a different > charecter. no mincing of words, clear cut ansd catagoric with> superb command over language. this i know is not god gift, but years of> traning and experince coupled with good upbringing and education. my > gusses is she must be a spokesperson for some MNC or some bif> organisation.> > kudose to u too madam.> > thanx and regards.> > tikka> > Â> >> > > >> >> > ________________________________> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > Friday, 27 February, 2009 23:12:11> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> >> >> > Tikka Tikka,> > I like your name., so I wrote it twice, > > I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male.> > Bhaskar.> >> > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ..>> wrote:> > > > > > dear bhaskerji,> > > going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain> respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u> ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 > seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who> answered me for this.> > > no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what> gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come > ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji.> > > yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now..> > > pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things> that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules. > > > i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her> perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any> reply i cannot force her to give me a reply.> > > bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a > well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a> command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me.> any way, it means " the younger prince " ( forget male or female , > its an e-male)> > > u strted this posting with " thats great " despite ur busy schedule u> hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8.> > > tikka> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09 > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > > Thats great.> > > 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate > queries. > > > 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you.> > > 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good.> > > 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not > call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply.> > > So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she> knows when someone is being taken for a ride.> > > But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much > to advice.  Thats her prerogative.> > > Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us> know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to> know what actually " Tikka " stands for. > > > best wishes,> > > Bhaskar.> > > ÂÂ> > >> > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ...>> wrote:> > > > > > > > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but> what i don'nt find is the msg. no.. is it some where on the top of the> mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then > i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> > > > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's> report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u > all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i> was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice> . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only > partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only> b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real> trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill> any other learned person gives a second opinion. > > > > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) > that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to> answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> > > > thanx and regards > > > > tikka> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Tikka,> > > >> > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this> much too,> > > > as to store it, or save it i mean. > > > >> > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report> now ?> > > >> > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that > > > > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then> surely> > > > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > > >> > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please > on my> > > > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply> received by> > > > you.> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > > > @ .. com, Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@> ...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji > had> > > > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > > > > thanx and regards> > > > > tikka> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Tikka,> > > > >> > > > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been> given to> > > > > you.> > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar..> > > > >> > > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka..shah@> ...>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his> predictions> > > > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what> he had> > > > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will > someoneÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > else takeÃÆ'Æ'‚ a second look and> give the correct answer?> > > > > > regards> > > > > > tikka > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership > > > > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological> learning's> > > > and> > > > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ - > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 1) In another Group " Ancient Indian Astrology " he has just a> two> > > > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a > member> > > > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed> out> > > > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken> off. > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same> GroupÃÆ'Æ'‚ he worked and studied> > > > upon > > > > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > > > > withdrew.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and > termsÃÆ'Æ'‚ " To impress " > > > > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these> techniques,ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > which > > > > > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time > like> > > > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > > > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ > > > > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the " KalaSarpa Yoga " and> > > > > > " Shani sadesathi " which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > > > > this modern educated young man, says " Only quacks believe in > this " .> > > > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it > daily> > > > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in> quality,> > > > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > > > > standards of astrological acumen. > > > > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself> had> > > > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a> young> > > > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " > Power> > > > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a> Surgeon. > > > > > >> > > > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to> remove> > > > > > him sinceÃÆ'Æ'‚ 7-10 days due to > his inconsistencies, but was not> > > > > wanting to> > > > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'Æ'‚ But enough is> enough.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ > > > > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure> andÃÆ'Æ'‚ abide by quality> > > > readings.> > > > > >> > > > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover > the> > > > > readingÃÆ'Æ'‚ requests. Shri Sunil> Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> > > > mode,> > > > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is > unable> > > > to> > > > > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.Gaurav > Ghosh> > > > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish> small kids> > > > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ > > > > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > > > > otherwise.ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > Bhaskar> > > > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > __._,_..___> > > Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic> > > Messages > > >> > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required)> > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch> format to Traditional> > > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un > > > Recent Activity> > > *  268> > > New Members> > > *  9> > > New Photos> > > *  1> > > New DatabaseVisit Your Group > > > Give Back > > > for Good> > > Get inspired> > > by a good cause.> > > Y! Toolbar> > > Get it Free!> > > easy 1-click access> > > to your groups. > > > > > > Start a group> > > in 3 easy steps.> > > Connect with others.> > > .> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 neelamji, i m still tikka. the 2nd tikka is given to me by bhaskerji. he said he liked my name so i offered him . instead he has send it bk to me. no probs. i take it as his blessings. thanx and regards tikka--- On Sat, 28/2/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote: neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga Date: Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 5:04 PM Thank you Tikka Tikka, if that's your pet name for the forum.//she must be a spokesperson for some MNC//I love to work for myself, my country and people. If I need to speak, it is for 'we the Indians', not for any MNC.RegardsNeelam 2009/2/28 neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> //Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ?//You have no option now!! The camel will do what he has to...Got it? 2009/2/28 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> Tikka Tikka, Good to know that You remember those old HMV records. I had plenty of them, the small ones and the big ones, Odeon and what not. I have forgotten the names. They never liked my collection of records at home, they never liked my collection of Music cassettes at home, and they all gave it to those ever changing servants for free, to make space of this " kachra " in their view. Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ? Bhaskar. , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Ha-Ha-Ha. Dear Tikka Tikka fell in my trap and revealed himself.> > Your clue was very clear even to a blind person with no brains, but I> wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, so I let out, the bait. You> underestimated my understanding about understanding , what you wanted me> to understand with the given clue.> > Yeah, You are right about Neelamji.> > best wshes,> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ wrote:> >> > ha-ha-ha.... bhaskerji, u cud not take the clue i gave.its like asking> in those good old days, " the dog in the ad 4 HMV garmrphone co is a dog> or a bich?" its a dog b'cos its HIS masters voice and not HER masters> voice. i repeat tikka means "the younger prince and not the younger> princes" i really don"t know what they call the younger princes? tikky ,> i suppose.> > if u really like my name then u can keep it , sir.> > apart frm kidding, i read something which really stunned me. i m> talking abt the posting made by neelamji abt the slumdog milliniore. i> hve not seen the film nor read the book. but the way neelam ji has> written it is an eyeopener and what happens behind the scene.i thought> that neelamji wud be a house wife blessed to take up astrology on a> professional/ armature level. but her this posting reveals a different> charecter. no mincing of words, clear cut ansd catagoric with> superb command over language. this i know is not god gift, but years of> traning and experince coupled with good upbringing and education. my> gusses is she must be a spokesperson for some MNC or some bif> organisation.> > kudose to u too madam.> > thanx and regards.> > tikka> > Â> >> >> >> >> > ____________ _________ _________ __> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > > Friday, 27 February, 2009 23:12:11> > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> >> >> > Tikka Tikka,> > I like your name., so I wrote it twice,> > I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male.> > Bhaskar.> >> > @ . com, Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ..>> wrote:> > >> > > dear bhaskerji,> > > going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain> respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u> ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2> seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who> answered me for this.> > > no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what> gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come> ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji.> > > yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now..> > > pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things> that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules.> > > i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her> perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any> reply i cannot force her to give me a reply.> > > bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a> well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a> command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me.> any way, it means "the younger prince" ( forget male or female ,> its an e-male)> > > u strted this posting with " thats great"despite ur busy schedule u> hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8.> > > tikka> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09> > > Subject: Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > >> > >> > > Thats great.> > > 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate > queries.> > > 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you.> > > 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good.> > > 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not> call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply.> > > So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she> knows when someone is being taken for a ride.> > > But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much> to advice.  Thats her prerogative.> > > Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us> know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to> know what actually " Tikka " stands for.> > > best wishes,> > > Bhaskar.> > > ÂÂ> > >> > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ...>> wrote:> > > >> > > > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but> what i don'nt find is the msg. no.. is it some where on the top of the> mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then> i can 4ward the reply which gaurav ji had given me.> > > > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's> report, let me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u> all, not 4 my TP or judge all u learned persons, but i> was sure that u people wud give me some concrete advice> . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only> partially) . i put the second querry 4 my driver only> b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real> trouble. i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill> any other learned person gives a second opinion.> > > > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason) > that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamji to> answer. i wonder if shee will be interested?> > > > thanx and regards> > > > tikka> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42> > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Tikka,> > > >> > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this> much too,> > > > as to store it, or save it i mean.> > > >> > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report> now ?> > > >> > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that> > > > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then> surely> > > > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ?> > > >> > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please> on my> > > > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply> received by> > > > you.> > > >> > > > regards,> > > >> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > > > @ . . com, Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@> ...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji> had> > > > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no.> > > > > thanx and regards> > > > > tikka> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18> > > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Tikka,> > > > >> > > > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been> given to> > > > > you.> > > > >> > > > > regards/Bhaskar. .> > > > >> > > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka..shah@> ...>> > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his> predictions> > > > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what> he had> > > > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will> someoneÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > else takeÃÆ'Æ'‚ a second look and> give the correct answer?> > > > > > regards> > > > > > tikka> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29> > > > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership> > > > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological> learning's> > > > and> > > > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ -> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 1) In another Group "Ancient Indian Astrology" he has just a> two> > > > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a> member> > > > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed> out> > > > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken> off.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same> GroupÃÆ'Æ'‚ he worked and studied> > > > upon> > > > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and> > > > > > withdrew.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and> termsÃÆ'Æ'‚ " To impress "> > > > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these> techniques,ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > which> > > > > > may cause great blunders in his readings.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time> like> > > > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear> > > > > > any untoward comment about the same..> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the "KalaSarpa Yoga" and> > > > > > "Shani sadesathi" which is well known even by non-astrologers,> > > > > > this modern educated young man, says "Only quacks believe in> this".> > > > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it> daily> > > > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in> quality,> > > > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our> > > > > > standards of astrological acumen.> > > > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself> had> > > > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a> young> > > > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that "> Power> > > > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do> > > > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a> Surgeon.> > > > > >> > > > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to> remove> > > > > > him sinceÃÆ'Æ'‚ 7-10 days due to> his inconsistencies, but was not> > > > > wanting to> > > > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'Æ'‚ But enough is> enough.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure> andÃÆ'Æ'‚ abide by quality> > > > readings.> > > > > >> > > > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover> the> > > > > readingÃÆ'Æ'‚ requests. Shri Sunil> Nairji, I believe is in a sleep> > > > mode,> > > > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is> unable> > > > to> > > > > write here, but we shall await him always.> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.Gaurav> Ghosh> > > > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish> small kids> > > > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members..> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and> > > > > otherwise.ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > regards,> > > > > > Bhaskar> > > > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) .> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > __._,_..___> > > Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic> > > Messages> > >> > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required)> > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch> format to Traditional> > > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un> > > Recent Activity> > > *  268> > > New Members> > > *  9> > > New Photos> > > *  1> > > New DatabaseVisit Your Group> > > Give Back> > > for Good> > > Get inspired> > > by a good cause.> > > Y! Toolbar> > > Get it Free!> > > easy 1-click access> > > to your groups.> > > > > > Start a group> > > in 3 easy steps.> > > Connect with others.> > > .> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Iwould prefer to call You Tikka Tikka, because this sounds nice, and if you dont like it, then you will have to reveal your identity for me to change your name, in the address. Whatever comes with love, is always " blessings " . best wishes, Bhaskar. , Tikka Shah <tikka.shah wrote: > > neelamji, > i m still tikka. the 2nd tikka is given to me by bhaskerji. he said he liked my name so i offered him . instead he has send it bk to me. no probs. i take it as his blessings. > thanx and regards > tikka > > --- On Sat, 28/2/09, neelam gupta neelamgupta07 wrote: > > neelam gupta neelamgupta07 > Re: Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 5:04 PM Thank you Tikka Tikka, if that's your pet name for the forum. > > //she must be a spokesperson for some MNC// > I love to work for myself, my country and people. If I need to speak, it is for 'we the Indians', not for any MNC. > > Regards > Neelam > > > > > 2009/2/28 neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> > > //Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ?// > > You have no option now!! The camel will do what he has to... > Got it? > > > > 2009/2/28 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > Tikka Tikka, > Good to know that You remember those old HMV records. I had plenty of them, the small ones and the big ones, Odeon and what not. I have forgotten the names. They never liked my collection of records at home, they never liked my collection of Music cassettes at home, and they all gave it to those ever changing servants for free, to make space of this " kachra " in their view. Now they want to remove my books and CD's. What to do ? > Bhaskar. > > > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ....> wrote: > > > > > > Ha-Ha-Ha. Dear Tikka Tikka fell in my trap and revealed himself. > > > > Your clue was very clear even to a blind person with no brains, but I > > wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, so I let out, the bait. You > > underestimated my understanding about understanding , what you wanted me > > to understand with the given clue. > > > > Yeah, You are right about Neelamji. > > > > best wshes, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ wrote: > > > > > > ha-ha-ha.... bhaskerji, u cud not take the clue i gave.its like asking > > in those good old days, " the dog in the ad 4 HMV garmrphone co is a dog > > or a bich? " its a dog b'cos its HIS masters voice and not HER masters > > voice. i repeat tikka means " the younger prince and not the younger > > princes " i really don " t know what they call the younger princes? tikky , > > i suppose. > > > if u really like my name then u can keep it , sir. > > > apart frm kidding, i read something which really stunned me. i m > > talking abt the posting made by neelamji abt the slumdog milliniore. i > > hve not seen the film nor read the book. but the way neelam ji has > > written it is an eyeopener and what happens behind the scene.i thought > > that neelamji wud be a house wife blessed to take up astrology on a > > professional/ armature level. but her this posting reveals a different > > charecter. no mincing of words, clear cut ansd catagoric with > > superb command over language. this i know is not god gift, but years of > > traning and experince coupled with good upbringing and education. my > > gusses is she must be a spokesperson for some MNC or some bif > > organisation. > > > kudose to u too madam. > > > thanx and regards. > > > tikka > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ > > > > > > Friday, 27 February, 2009 23:12:11 > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > > > > Tikka Tikka, > > > I like your name., so I wrote it twice, > > > I can guarantee that you are not a e male, but a fe male. > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ..> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > dear bhaskerji, > > > > going thro' the postings in the forum , i have developed a certain > > respect for u. i take it as my duty to clarify as mush frm my side if u > > ask me any thing.i don't deny that i m lucky to get 2 replies to 2 > > seperate questions.i m thankful to the forum and to the gentleman who > > answered me for this. > > > > no, i m not looking to any confirmation. i m holding to what > > gauravji had told. i hve told to my driver that his brother wud come > > ater 19 dec2009 as told by gauravji. > > > > yes sir, thats correct. i cannot call u now.. > > > > pl don't break any rule for me or anyone. one of the things > > that i respect u is for ur ability to sustain ur rules. > > > > i know neelamji, just as i hve come to know u. definately its her > > perrogative. i hve already had 2 replies, even if i did not hve any > > reply i cannot force her to give me a reply. > > > > bhaskerhi, u r a indepth astrologer.u must also be a > > well read man. it is also evedent frm ur posting that u hve a > > command over language.asking me meaning of tikka is like testing me. > > any way, it means " the younger prince " ( forget male or female , > > its an e-male) > > > > u strted this posting with " thats great " despite ur busy schedule u > > hve been communicating with me. THIS IS GR8. > > > > tikka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > Thursday, 26 February, 2009 21:41:09 > > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats great. > > > > 1) You have already been served two replies on two seperate > > queries. > > > > 2) You wanted confirmation for the reply to be given to you. > > > > 3) But You cannot contact me for some reasons ??? Good. > > > > 4) Since as per my own rule, i will not answer anyone who does not > > call me, That leaves only Neelamji to reply. > > > > So will you get a reply ? I doubt, as far as I know Neelamji, she > > knows when someone is being taken for a ride. > > > > But I dare not suggest any such angle to her, I respect her too much > > to advice.  Thats her prerogative. > > > > Tikkaji, This forum has given you some answers. You must let us > > know, that you are a male or female at least. I am too much curious to > > know what actually " Tikka " stands for. > > > > best wishes, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > >  > > > > > > > > , Tikka Shah tikka.shah@ ....> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > no sir. thats not the case . i hve both the answers with me. but > > what i don'nt find is the msg. no.. is it some where on the top of the > > mssg or elsewhere? u had asked me to give msg no but if u ment msg then > > i can 4ward theÃÆ'‚ reply which gaurav ji had given me. > > > > > regarding guarantee as to wether i will value other person's > > report, letÃÆ'‚ me tell u bhaskerji, that i hve written to u > > all, not 4 myÃÆ'‚ TP or judge all u learned persons, but i > > was sureÃÆ'‚ that u people wud give me some concrete advice > > . i believed in what gauravji had told me ( though i understood it only > > partially)ÃÆ'‚ . i put the second querry 4 my driver only > > b'cause i had faith in ur forum and the poor guy was in real > > trouble.ÃÆ'‚ i still rely on what gaurav ji had told untill > > any other learned person gives a second opinion. > > > > > now i cannot call u on cell fone (4 some reason)ÃÆ'‚ > > that leaves the only other active astrologer neelamjiÃÆ'‚ to > > answer. i wonder if shee will be interested? > > > > > thanx and regards > > > > > tikka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, 25 February, 2009 21:27:42 > > > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tikka, > > > > > > > > > > This means that you did not value this gentelmans report, this > > much too, > > > > > as to store it, or save it i mean. > > > > > > > > > > 1) Whats the guarantee that you will value another persons report > > now ? > > > > > > > > > > 2) If You can search for the Notice given to the group about that > > > > > astrologer who was removed, and reply about that message, then > > surely > > > > > you can also search for the reply from that astrologer to you ? > > > > > > > > > > 3) You will have to call me from your personal cell number please > > on my > > > > > cell no, in order to receive a second opinion on the reply > > received by > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > @ . . com, Tikka Shah <tikka.shah@ > > ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > bhaskar ji has asked 4 the msg no. of the reply that Gaurav ji > > had > > > > > given to me. can any one tell me how to find the msg no. > > > > > > thanx and regards > > > > > > tikka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 24 February, 2009 23:27:18 > > > > > > Re: Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tikka, > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me have the msg no. and we will see what reply has been > > given to > > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. . > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tikka Shah <tikka..shah@ > > ...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gauravji has been removed from this forum. what abt his > > predictions > > > > > > that he has given? do they still hold? i just believed in what > > he had > > > > > > said, thinking he is a learned member of the forum. will > > someoneÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > else takeÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ a second look and > > give the correct answer? > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > tikka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, 23 February, 2009 17:02:29 > > > > > > > Notice - Jyotish Ganga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > Mr. has been removed from the Forum Membership > > > > > > > in light of certain inconsistencies in his astrological > > learning's > > > > > and > > > > > > > predictions, as witnessed by many of us seniors > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ - > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > 1) In another Group " Ancient Indian Astrology " he has just a > > two > > > > > > > weeks ago given utter erroneous gem recommendations to a > > member > > > > > > > of the forum asking for which gems to wear. This was pointed > > out > > > > > > > by another senior astrologer after which, the mail was taken > > off. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > 2) Just 2-3 days ago in the same > > GroupÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ he worked and studied > > > > > upon > > > > > > > a wrongly calculated chart, which mistake too he accepted and > > > > > > > withdrew. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > 3) He is using too many techniques and > > termsÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ " To impress " > > > > > > > without proper study and amalgamation of these > > techniques,ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > which > > > > > > > may cause great blunders in his readings. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > 4) He has been disrespectful towards Stalwarts of our time > > like > > > > > > > Shri KN Rao, etc., whom we respect very much and cannot hear > > > > > > > any untoward comment about the same.. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > 5) For traditions and centuries the " KalaSarpa Yoga " and > > > > > > > " Shani sadesathi " which is well known even by non-astrologers, > > > > > > > this modern educated young man, says " Only quacks believe in > > this " . > > > > > > > Such utter mauling of our ancestors is not in good taste. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > Jyotish Ganga has got at least 10 astrologers approaching it > > daily > > > > > > > to began reading here for the members, but we believe in > > quality, > > > > > > > therefore we do not allow anybody who is not on par with our > > > > > > > standards of astrological acumen. > > > > > > > In this case, we had not invited , but he himself > > had > > > > > > > offered an taken permission to write her,e and he being a > > young > > > > > > > boy just in his middle 20's, I allowed him , forgetting that " > > Power > > > > > > > Corrupts " and must not be given in hands of small kids who do > > > > > > > not know how to use the knife, but are given the title of a > > Surgeon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway its better late than never, and I have been wanting to > > remove > > > > > > > him sinceÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ 7-10 days due to > > his inconsistencies, but was not > > > > > > wanting to > > > > > > > hurt him.ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ But enough is > > enough. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > We here in Jyotish_Ganga are pure > > andÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ abide by quality > > > > > readings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Presently myself and Respected Neelamji are enough to cover > > the > > > > > > readingÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ requests. Shri Sunil > > Nairji, I believe is in a sleep > > > > > mode, > > > > > > and his PC is probably giving him troubles due to which he is > > unable > > > > > to > > > > > > write here, but we shall await him always. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > The above mail was to inform you of the exclusion of Mr.Gaurav > > Ghosh > > > > > > from the panel of astrologers in this group. We do not wish > > small kids > > > > > > to spoil the destinies of our Group members.. > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > I wish him all the best for his studies in astrology and > > > > > > otherwise.ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Bhaskar > > > > > > > Moderator (Jyotish_Ganga) . > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __._,_..___ > > > > Messages in this topic (7) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic > > > > Messages > > > > > > > > Change settings via the Web ( ID required) > > > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch > > format to Traditional > > > > Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un > > > > Recent Activity > > > > *  268 > > > > New Members > > > > *  9 > > > > New Photos > > > > *  1 > > > > New DatabaseVisit Your Group > > > > Give Back > > > > for Good > > > > Get inspired > > > > by a good cause. > > > > Y! Toolbar > > > > Get it Free! > > > > easy 1-click access > > > > to your groups. > > > > > > > > Start a group > > > > in 3 easy steps. > > > > Connect with others. > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.