siddhartha here sir from bhopal

February 14, 2009

Dear Mr BhaskarI admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone you always keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1 schemes of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it comes to seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of charge and tell things for at least an hour if not two.In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a human being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is concerned- astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12 rashis,9 planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub-sub lord if you do practice KP paddhati.And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when talking to a person

dealing in predictions,if we upset him we are harming ourselves because his intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe that after all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so is his intuition and how he has developed it.I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book "my experiences in astrology" and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on this earth who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp. I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep doing what you are .warm regardssiddhartha saxena This mail is sent by siddhartha.Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM Re: bhaskar behave properly

Dear Friends,

Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so that their vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I cannit change my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me and Icannot call him a " Shrimant".

Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and then talk.

We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what are their credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in serving the society ?

If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise, or else they are free to leave.

But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is sent to the person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use diplomatic language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

Bhaskar.

, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Dear Rekha Rao,> > Please introduce yourself.> > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so thats why i> am not crossing the limuts.> > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.> > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > , "rekharao47" rekharao47@> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> > ----- Forwarded Message ----> > Rekha Rao rekharao47@> > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM> > abaaaaaaaaaaaa> >> >> > Mr.> > Bhaskar you

dont have manners as u say that you are a astrologer> > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply ignore> > the mail> > insted you use very valgur words> >> > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS> > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD> > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS> >> > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME> > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH THEIR> > MARRIED LIFE .> > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE> >> > CHALLENGE> >> > REGARDS> > R.RAO> >> > ANSWER THIS> >>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

February 14, 2009

Dear Mr Siddartha Saxena,//I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my experiences in

astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on this

earth who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to

his planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.//Can you please give us the basis of this statement. I am not at all denying that BV Raman has been one of the greatest contemporary astrologers. But your statement other indications also which are not very clear. Please be kind enough to explain.

RegardsNeelam2009/2/14 siddhartha saxaena <numerology_works

Dear Mr BhaskarI admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone you always keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.

Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1 schemes of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it comes to seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of charge and tell things for at least an hour if not two.

In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a human being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is concerned- astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12 rashis,9 planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub-sub lord if you do practice KP paddhati.

And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when talking to a person

dealing in predictions,if we upset him we are harming ourselves because his intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe that after all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so is his intuition and how he has developed it.

I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my experiences in astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on this earth who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.

I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep doing what you are .warm regardssiddhartha saxena This mail is sent by siddhartha.

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM Re: bhaskar behave properly

Dear Friends,

Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so that their vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I cannit change my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me and Icannot call him a " Shrimant " .

Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and then talk.

We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what are their credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in serving the society ?

If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise, or else they are free to leave.

But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is sent to the person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use diplomatic language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

Bhaskar.

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Dear Rekha Rao,> > Please introduce yourself.> > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so thats why i

> am not crossing the limuts.> > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.> > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.> > Bhaskar.> > >

> > > > , " rekharao47 " rekharao47@> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> > ----- Forwarded Message ----

> > Rekha Rao rekharao47@> > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM> > abaaaaaaaaaaaa> >> >> > Mr.

> > Bhaskar you

dont have manners as u say that you are a astrologer> > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply ignore> > the mail> > insted you use very valgur words> >

> > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS> > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD> > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS> >> > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME

> > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH THEIR> > MARRIED LIFE .> > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE> >> > CHALLENGE> >

> > REGARDS> > R.RAO> >> > ANSWER THIS> >>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

February 14, 2009

If participants in the discussions here cannot observe the dignity and decorum expected of them, while soliciting free advice from the group owner, rendering yeoman service to the varied querries from all over the globe, such participants could very well keep away rather than creating an atmosphere of discord in this harmonious group.

Bhaskarji, you are doing a wonderful job within your limitations of time and energy, and it would be better to ignore such postings of derogatory language, and continue the contributions uninterruptedly.

Regards--- On Sat, 2/14/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote:

neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: siddhartha here sir from bhopal Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 9:26 PM

Dear Mr Siddartha Saxena,//I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book "my experiences in astrology" and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on this earth who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.//Can you please give us the basis of this statement. I am not at all denying that BV Raman has been one of the greatest contemporary astrologers. But your statement other indications also which are not very clear. Please be kind enough to explain.RegardsNeelam

2009/2/14 siddhartha saxaena <numerology_works@ >

Dear Mr BhaskarI admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone you always keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1 schemes of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it comes to seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of charge and tell things for at least an hour if not two.In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a human being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is concerned- astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12 rashis,9 planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub- sub lord if you do practice KP paddhati.And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when talking to a person dealing in predictions, if we upset him we are harming ourselves because his

intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe that after all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so is his intuition and how he has developed it.I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book "my experiences in astrology" and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on this earth who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp. I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep doing what you are .warm regardssiddhartha saxena

This mail is sent by siddhartha.

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM Re: bhaskar behave properly

Dear Friends,

Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so that their vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I cannit change my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me and Icannot call him a " Shrimant".

Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and then talk.

We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what are their credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in serving the society ?

If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise, or else they are free to leave.

But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is sent to the person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use diplomatic language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

Bhaskar.

, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Dear Rekha Rao,> > Please introduce yourself.> > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so thats why i> am not crossing the limuts.> > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.> > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > , "rekharao47" rekharao47@> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> > ----- Forwarded Message ----> > Rekha Rao rekharao47@> > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM> > abaaaaaaaaaaaa> >> >> > Mr.> > Bhaskar

you dont have manners as u say that you are a astrologer> > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply ignore> > the mail> > insted you use very valgur words> >> > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS> > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD> > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS> >> > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME> > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH THEIR> > MARRIED LIFE .> > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE> >> > CHALLENGE> >> > REGARDS> > R.RAO> >> > ANSWER THIS> >>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

February 14, 2009

Neelamji,

Actually through his message, Mr.Saxena wants to convey that barring

Late Dr.BV Raman, no one is a *true believer of astrology*.

Did I get you correct Mr.Saxena?

Thank you,

Gaurav.

, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07

wrote:

>

> Dear Mr Siddartha Saxena,

>

> //I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my experiences in

> astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him *the only person on

this earth

> who truly believed in astrology *and did everything acccording to his

> planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.//

>

> Can you please give us the basis of this statement. I am not at all

denying

> that BV Raman has been one of the greatest contemporary astrologers. But

> your statement other indications also which are not very clear.

Please be

> kind enough to explain.

>

> Regards

> Neelam

>

> 2009/2/14 siddhartha saxaena <numerology_works

>

> > Dear Mr Bhaskar

> >

> > I admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone

you always

> > keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.

> > Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1

schemes

> > of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it comes to

> > seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of

charge and

> > tell things for at least an hour if not two.

> > In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a

human

> > being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is concerned-

> > astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12

rashis,9

> > planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub-sub lord if you do

practice KP

> > paddhati.

> > And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when

talking to a

> > person dealing in predictions,if we upset him we are harming ourselves

> > because his intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe

that after

> > all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so

is his

> > intuition and how he has developed it.

> > I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my experiences in

> > astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on

this earth

> > who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his

> > planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.

> >

> > I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep

doing what

> > you are .

> >

> > warm regards

> > siddhartha saxena

> >

> > This mail is sent by siddhartha.

> >

> > ------------------------------

> > ** Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> > *To:*

> > *Sent:* Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM

> > *Subject:* Re: bhaskar behave properly

> >

> > Dear Friends,

> >

> > Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so

that their

> > vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I

cannit change

> > my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me

and Icannot

> > call him a " Shrimant " .

> >

> > Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and

then

> > talk.

> >

> > We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

> >

> > Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what

are their

> > credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in

serving the

> > society ?

> >

> > If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise,

or else

> > they are free to leave.

> >

> > But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is

sent to the

> > person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use

diplomatic

> > language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

> >

> > And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> > , " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Rekha Rao,

> > >

> > > Please introduce yourself.

> > >

> > > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so

thats why i

> > > am not crossing the limuts.

> > >

> > > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.

> > >

> > > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > , " rekharao47 " rekharao47@

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----

> > > > Rekha Rao rekharao47@

> > > >

> > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM

> > > > abaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > >

> > > > Mr.

> > > > Bhaskar you dont have manners as u say that you are a astrologer

> > > > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply

ignore

> > > > the mail

> > > > insted you use very valgur words

> > > >

> > > > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS

> > > > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD

> > > > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS

> > > >

> > > > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME

> > > > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH

THEIR

> > > > MARRIED LIFE .

> > > > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE

> > > >

> > > > CHALLENGE

> > > >

> > > > REGARDS

> > > > R.RAO

> > > >

> > > > ANSWER THIS

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > ------------------------------

> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them

now.<http://in.rd./tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger./invi\

te/>

> >

>

February 15, 2009

Dear respected Mr Guarav/Ms Neelam jiI never wanted to hurt feelings of anyone regarding that belief of Lt.Shri B.V.Raman,my simple point is in his book he himself states that although his father in law was offering him a job but he denied it and with permission of his grand father he decided to follow what his stars had for him .How many people do we see like him in these times?I havent seen any except him (read-i mean)In times when everyone is running for money by whatever means and having no value for our great culture and knowledge I think he is the only one who stood by the ancient knowledge of our saints.There should be many but I was able to read him only in this regard.I am extremely sorry if that has hurted you people in anyway.Further i had written that astrology is a very

difficult brain game: I tried learning my self and ended up confused and back to zero.I had metioned "intution" in that note of mine which i strongly believe and is again also supported by Lt.Mr Raman that we have to have the seed in us then only we can grow it into a tree.You leave astrology -take music,take scientists,take filmmakers,take sports-everywhere the endpoint is that at the Apex only those have reached who not only had an undying spirit but also "God gift" which turns to "intuition" if prediction is concerned.A.R.Rehman,Sachin Tendulkar,Clint Eastwood,Amitabh bachchan,Naushad,Javed akhtar,Arnold schwarzenegger,Sylvester Stallone(I am sorry but i am a big big movie/music buff), and for that matter Gautam Buddha,Samrat Ashok,Vikramaditya,Akbar are all examples of never say die spirit in their own fields..I believe in "Purusharth" no doubt ,but can you imagine sachin tendulkar running ad agency,or amitabh bachchan being pilot or taxi

driver,etc etc it is not like that because it wasnt supposed to be -thats it.and they grew what they had in them.The seed is the most important thing..For some people the direction is already determined more clearly that for others.They keep pursuing it.There can be thousands of debates on this which is not the purview of this mail.By the way Neelamji i had mailed you too my query of 1 question .but i got reply from bhaskarji and a very detailed one .i know you poeple there are really busy ,i can understand that.please keep doing this good work.you might not know but it does gives a great inner support worth more than any money /riches for people in desperate need .My most warm regardssidhartha saxena This mail is sent by siddhartha. <gaurav.ghosh Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 9:51:09 PM Re: siddhartha here sir from bhopal

Neelamji,

Actually through his message, Mr.Saxena wants to convey that barring

Late Dr.BV Raman, no one is a *true believer of astrology*.

Did I get you correct Mr.Saxena?

Thank you,

Gaurav.

, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ ...>

wrote:

>

> Dear Mr Siddartha Saxena,

>

> //I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book "my experiences in

> astrology" and to my utteu dismay i find him *the only person on

this earth

> who truly believed in astrology *and did everything acccording to his

> planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.//

>

> Can you please give us the basis of this statement. I am not at all

denying

> that BV Raman has been one of the greatest contemporary astrologers. But

> your statement other indications also which are not very clear.

Please be

> kind enough to explain.

>

> Regards

> Neelam

>

> 2009/2/14 siddhartha saxaena <numerology_ works >

>

> > Dear Mr Bhaskar

> >

> > I admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone

you always

> > keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.

> > Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1

schemes

> > of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it comes to

> > seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of

charge and

> > tell things for at least an hour if not two.

> > In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a

human

> > being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is concerned-

> > astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12

rashis,9

> > planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub- sub lord if you do

practice KP

> > paddhati.

> > And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when

talking to a

> > person dealing in predictions, if we upset him we are harming ourselves

> > because his intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe

that after

> > all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so

is his

> > intuition and how he has developed it.

> > I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book "my experiences in

> > astrology" and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on

this earth

> > who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to his

> > planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.

> >

> > I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep

doing what

> > you are .

> >

> > warm regards

> > siddhartha saxena

> >

> > This mail is sent by siddhartha.

> >

> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

> > *To:*

> > *Sent:* Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM

> > *Subject:* Re: bhaskar behave properly

> >

> > Dear Friends,

> >

> > Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so

that their

> > vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I

cannit change

> > my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me

and Icannot

> > call him a " Shrimant".

> >

> > Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and

then

> > talk.

> >

> > We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

> >

> > Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what

are their

> > credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in

serving the

> > society ?

> >

> > If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise,

or else

> > they are free to leave.

> >

> > But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is

sent to the

> > person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use

diplomatic

> > language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

> >

> > And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

> >

> > Bhaskar..

> >

> > , "Bhaskar"

<bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Rekha Rao,

> > >

> > > Please introduce yourself.

> > >

> > > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so

thats why i

> > > am not crossing the limuts.

> > >

> > > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.

> > >

> > > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > , "rekharao47" rekharao47@

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----

> > > > Rekha Rao rekharao47@

> > > >

> > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM

> > > > abaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > >

> > > > Mr.

> > > > Bhaskar you dont have manners as u say that you are a astrologer

> > > > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply

ignore

> > > > the mail

> > > > insted you use very valgur words

> > > >

> > > > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS

> > > > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD

> > > > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS

> > > >

> > > > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME

> > > > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH

THEIR

> > > > MARRIED LIFE .

> > > > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE

> > > >

> > > > CHALLENGE

> > > >

> > > > REGARDS

> > > > R.RAO

> > > >

> > > > ANSWER THIS

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them

now.<http://in.rd. / tagline_messenge r_6/*http: //messenger. / invite/>

> >

>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

February 15, 2009

Dear Siddarthaji,

// By the way Neelamji i had mailed you too my query of 1 question .but

i got reply from bhaskarji //

I though you had mailed your query to me. I am utmost sorry for replying

you then. You should have told me on phone that Your query is addressed

to Neelamji especially.

I do not think Neelamji will give you an additional reading now. I am

sure she would like to take up those cases which are unanswered.

regards,

Bhaskar.

, siddhartha saxaena

<numerology_works wrote:

>

> Dear respected Mr Guarav/Ms Neelam ji

>

> I never wanted to hurt feelings of anyone regarding that belief of

Lt.Shri B.V.Raman,my simple point is in his book he himself states that

although his father in law was offering him a job but he denied it and

with permission of his grand father he decided to follow what his stars

had for him .How many people do we see like him in these times?I havent

seen any except him (read-i mean)In times when everyone is running for

money by whatever means and having no value for our great culture and

knowledge I think he is the only one who stood by the ancient knowledge

of our saints.There should be many but I was able to read him only in

this regard.I am extremely sorry if that has hurted you people in

anyway.Further i had written that astrology is a very difficult brain

game: I tried learning my self and ended up confused and back to zero.I

had metioned " intution " in that note of mine which i strongly believe

and is again also supported by Lt.Mr Raman that we

> have to have the seed in us then only we can grow it into a tree.You

leave astrology -take music,take scientists,take filmmakers,take

sports-everywhere the endpoint is that at the Apex only those have

reached who not only had an undying spirit but also " God gift " which

turns to " intuition " if prediction is concerned.A.R.Rehman,Sachin

Tendulkar,Clint Eastwood,Amitabh bachchan,Naushad,Javed akhtar,Arnold

schwarzenegger,Sylvester Stallone(I am sorry but i am a big big

movie/music buff), and for that matter Gautam Buddha,Samrat

Ashok,Vikramaditya,Akbar are all examples of never say die spirit in

their own fields.

> I believe in " Purusharth " no doubt ,but can you imagine sachin

tendulkar running ad agency,or amitabh bachchan being pilot or taxi

driver,etc etc it is not like that because it wasnt supposed to be

-thats it.and they grew what they had in them.The seed is the most

important thing..

> For some people the direction is already determined more clearly that

for others.They keep pursuing it.

> There can be thousands of debates on this which is not the purview of

this mail.

>

> By the way Neelamji i had mailed you too my query of 1 question .but i

got reply from bhaskarji and a very detailed one .i know you poeple

there are really busy ,i can understand that.please keep doing this good

work.you might not know but it does gives a great inner support worth

more than any money /riches for people in desperate need .

>

> My most warm regards

> sidhartha saxena

>

> This mail is sent by siddhartha.

>

> ________________________________

> gaurav.ghosh

>

> Saturday, 14 February, 2009 9:51:09 PM

> Re: siddhartha here sir from bhopal

>

> Neelamji,

> Actually through his message, Mr.Saxena wants to convey that barring

> Late Dr.BV Raman, no one is a *true believer of astrology*.

> Did I get you correct Mr.Saxena?

> Thank you,

> Gaurav.

> , neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@

....>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mr Siddartha Saxena,

> >

> > //I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my

experiences in

> > astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him *the only person on

> this earth

> > who truly believed in astrology *and did everything acccording to

his

> > planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.//

> >

> > Can you please give us the basis of this statement. I am not at all

> denying

> > that BV Raman has been one of the greatest contemporary astrologers.

But

> > your statement other indications also which are not very clear.

> Please be

> > kind enough to explain.

> >

> > Regards

> > Neelam

> >

> > 2009/2/14 siddhartha saxaena <numerology_ works@ >

> >

> > > Dear Mr Bhaskar

> > >

> > > I admire your true sense of public service and the straight tone

> you always

> > > keep to diminish ambiguity of any sort..Kudos.

> > > Many people have a tendency to want everything for free be it 1+1

> schemes

> > > of clothes,onions potatoes or whatever and especially when it

comes to

> > > seeking advice of a astrologer everyone wants him to be free of

> charge and

> > > tell things for at least an hour if not two.

> > > In the meanwhile everyone forgets the fact that an astrologer is a

> human

> > > being first of all and as far as my general knowledge is

concerned-

> > > astrology is really a difficult brain game.27 stars,360 degrees,12

> rashis,9

> > > planets and the sublord, sub-sub lord,sub-sub- sub lord if you do

> practice KP

> > > paddhati.

> > > And above all one should always try to keep his tone low when

> talking to a

> > > person dealing in predictions, if we upset him we are harming

ourselves

> > > because his intution wont work correctly.thats it.I do believe

> that after

> > > all the maths the seperating factor for a true genius and not so

> is his

> > > intuition and how he has developed it.

> > > I also admire shri B.V.Raman and have read his book " my

experiences in

> > > astrology " and to my utteu dismay i find him the only person on

> this earth

> > > who truly believed in astrology and did everything acccording to

his

> > > planetary positions although he had a conflicting view about kp.

> > >

> > > I sincerely urge you to dont listen to these talkers and keep

> doing what

> > > you are .

> > >

> > > warm regards

> > > siddhartha saxena

> > >

> > > This mail is sent by siddhartha.

> > >

> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> > > ** Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

> > > *To:*

> > > *Sent:* Saturday, 14 February, 2009 12:22:36 AM

> > > *Subject:* Re: bhaskar behave properly

> > >

> > > Dear Friends,

> > >

> > > Those who find my language vulgar may please leave the Group, so

> that their

> > > vocabulary is not spoilt, but just to please a few members I

> cannit change

> > > my stance and stand. A beggar will always remain a beggar for me

> and Icannot

> > > call him a " Shrimant " .

> > >

> > > Those who are trying to teach me manners, must sit in my place and

> then

> > > talk.

> > >

> > > We shall see whether they are justified, or I am justified.

> > >

> > > Those who are asking me to use better language, I ask them, what

> are their

> > > credentuials, and how much time are they spending in the day in

> serving the

> > > society ?

> > >

> > > If they are spending more time then me, let them talk and avise,

> or else

> > > they are free to leave.

> > >

> > > But I cannot change. I have to talk clear, so that my point is

> sent to the

> > > person concerned and there are no two views about it. IfI I use

> diplomatic

> > > language or camaflouge my intentions then I am not honest.

> > >

> > > And I wish to remain honest always. Take it or leave it.

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > , " Bhaskar "

> <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Rekha Rao,

> > > >

> > > > Please introduce yourself.

> > > >

> > > > You have not seen my vulgarity yet. This is my own Forum so

> thats why i

> > > > am not crossing the limuts.

> > > >

> > > > Please let me know why am I bound to answer You.

> > > >

> > > > And I dont accept challenges from women, young or old.

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > > , " rekharao47 " rekharao47@

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----

> > > > > Rekha Rao rekharao47@

> > > > >

> > > > > Friday, February 13, 2009 11:00:46 PM

> > > > > abaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > > >

> > > > > Mr.

> > > > > Bhaskar you dont have manners as u say that you are a

astrologer

> > > > > learn some manners if you dont want to answer them dont reply

> ignore

> > > > > the mail

> > > > > insted you use very valgur words

> > > > >

> > > > > BEHAVE AND LEARN MANNERS

> > > > > U ARE NOT THE GURU OF ASTROLOGY AND NOT THE ONLY IN THIS WORLD

> > > > > EVEN WE CAN USE BETTER VOLGUR WORDS

> > > > >

> > > > > I ASK U ONE QUESTION IF U ARE AN ASTROLOGER TELL ME

> > > > > WHY DID GANDHIJI.NEHRU, LORD RAMA.RAVANA, WERE NOT HAPPY WITH

> THEIR

> > > > > MARRIED LIFE .

> > > > > WHICH STARS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR UNHAPPY ,MARRIED LIFE

> > > > >

> > > > > CHALLENGE

> > > > >

> > > > > REGARDS

> > > > > R.RAO

> > > > >

> > > > > ANSWER THIS

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them

> now.<http://in.rd. / tagline_messenge r_6/*http: //messenger.

/ invite/>

> > >

> Connect with friends all over the world. Get India Messenger at

http://in.messenger./?wm=n/

>

February 15, 2009

Dear BhaskarjiI had called you personally ,for my reading .i had posted the query in the group and on her id also.i needed reading from you that`s why i had called.I had mailed her too on her id and now that you have answered my query -i was just telling her that i had mailed her .my wish is fulfilled sir-you did the reading for me. I am not saying that anyone is better or not -i wanted you to do the reading..but i had mailed her also thinking that may be you might slip my mail.thats all.warm regardsThis mail is sent by siddhartha.Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Sunday, 15 February, 2009 8:33:27 PM Re: siddhartha here sir from bhopal

Dear Siddarthaji,

// By the way Neelamji i had mailed you too my query of 1 question .but

i got reply from bhaskarji //

I though you had mailed your query to me. I am utmost sorry for replying

you then. You should have told me on phone that Your query is addressed

to Neelamji especially.

I do not think Neelamji will give you an additional reading now. I am

sure she would like to take up those cases which are unanswered.

regards,

Bhaskar.

, siddhartha saxaena

<numerology_ works > wrote: