Aspect

January 13, 2006

Third is the strongest IMO, as it is the nearest. This is just my

experience,experts can shed more light,

Parag.

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia>

wrote:

>

> Dear friends,

>

> In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226

given a horary chart.

> in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and

MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra

marriage took place.

>

> But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th

cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and

aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.

>

> In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic

aspect and SAT also in RP .

>

> can any one throw light which aspect is important?

>

> regards

> kanak

>

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

> Photos

> Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in

your hands ASAP.

>

January 13, 2006

Dear Kanakji As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house. apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the significator of any of the houses 2,7,11 good LuckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect

and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

--------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608

raichuranant

USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 ---------

Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

January 13, 2006

Dear Raichur ji, SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D. But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with Moon. But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe Count SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is on cusp 2,7,11? If both which aspect is important? In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by A,B,C,D but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give result. regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Kanakji As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that

Planet also becomes the Significator of that house. apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the significator of any of the houses 2,7,11 good LuckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also

in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!

January 13, 2006

Dear Kanak, Pls go through that chart. without signification only the aspect never do the event. if that sat's star or sub is the significatore of 2,7,11 then sat antra wil act. othwer wise that chart and thoery are wrong. my opinion is if we give lot of importent to aspect then the result wil go wrong. if peple need then i can explain where we want to use aspect. Swami Omkar Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check

aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.

January 14, 2006

Dear KanakSince Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn, Saturn becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact his aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his periods.good luckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D. But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with Moon. But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe Count SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is on cusp 2,7,11? If both which aspect is important? In

my experiance some time planet not signfies house by A,B,C,D but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give result. regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Kanakji As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house. apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the significator of any of the houses 2,7,11 good LuckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and

Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it!

--------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608

raichuranant

USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 ---------

Photos Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.

January 14, 2006

Dear raichur ji, Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT aspect on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of 2,7,11 ? Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable reply. Regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear KanakSince Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn, Saturn becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact his aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his periods.good luckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D. But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with Moon. But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe Count SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is on cusp 2,7,11? If both which aspect is important? In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by A,B,C,D but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give result. regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Kanakji As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per rules. Now

if any of these Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house. apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the significator of any of the houses 2,7,11 good LuckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a

strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcoverPhoto Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it! --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosRing in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

January 15, 2006

Dear Swami ji, In this group we are always ready to help each other.recently i need Lon.Let for one city of Japan and you see i am got it very correctly and i am able to pridict Atlas-5 Launching. So no need for waiting for request of members You can explain in details it will help many members. In this casedetails is as under: Horary no: 110 Time: 03.27PM Place Coimbatore SAT is in Makar 6 Deg. 40Mnt. so in SAT-KETU-MER and MER and KETU is in Signifacator. Can you explain in detials? regards kanakswami omkar <swamiomkar wrote: Dear Kanak, Pls go through that chart. without signification only the aspect never do

the event. if that sat's star or sub is the significatore of 2,7,11 then sat antra wil act. othwer wise that chart and thoery are wrong. my opinion is if we give lot of importent to aspect then the result wil go wrong. if peple need then i can explain where we want to use aspect. Swami Omkar Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and

aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.

January 15, 2006

Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of the Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered as a significator for 2,7,11. Good Luck Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear raichur ji, Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT aspect on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of 2,7,11 ? Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable reply. Regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear KanakSince Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn, Saturn becomes a

Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact his aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his periods.good luckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji, SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D. But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with Moon. But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe Count SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is on cusp 2,7,11? If both which aspect is important? In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by A,B,C,D but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11)

give result. regards kanakanant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Kanakji As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house. apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the significator of any of the houses 2,7,11 good LuckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear friends, In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no: 226 given a horary chart. in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT

aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place. But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect. In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP . can any one throw light which aspect is important? regards kanak >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcoverPhoto Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it! --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- PhotosRing in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << PhotosGot holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

--------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608

raichuranant

USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 ---------

Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!

January 16, 2006

Dear All,

I am new to this group and have very recently joined the group.

Can some one inform me as to where can the

READERS 1 to 6 by KSK be available for purchase

(or download if available free).

RC

--- anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:

> Dear List

> It appears that I am wrong in respect of E, by ignoring the

> planets, that aspect these

> houses in question.

>

> TW853 has done a very good study. We could use this criteria

> as given on Page

> 110 of Reader 4, as Real KSK guides, and then check wether

> the reasons given

> confirm to these being the significators.

>

> However, we note that Signification by aspect is of the

> lowest order. So, if none of the higher order significators,

> become available, these become important.

>

> Good work TW853

>

> tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

>

> Sri Raichur's remark regarding aspects ( " E " in order of

> importance

> for Significators) is worthy to note with reference to the

> obsevation below.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> I. PLANETS " ASPECTING " SIGNIFICATORS

>

> I-A. PAGE 109 OF K.P. READER IV (MAY 1971/AUGUST 1974 EDITION)

> (p

> 110, June 1984 Edition)

> E - PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.

>

> I-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996

> 5. PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION. (Exactly the

> same as

> above)

>

> I-C. PAGE 47 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2000 (SW printout)

> D-House Lord Planets aspecting by western aspects within orbs

>

> PAGE 26 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2002 (SW printout)

> E-Planets aspecting by Western aspects

>

> I-D. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH REBUTTAL,

> By Sat

> Siri Khalsa, THE ACVA JOURNAL Vol. 5 No.1, Summer 1999 (KP

> Group

> Msg#924/1552)

> Dr. Raghunath gets it wrong when he also includes planets

> " conjoined

> with or aspected by " the above; he should say planets

> " conjoined

> with or aspecting " the above. In any event, that last type of

> significator can indeed open the window to confusion, for that

> very

> reason Krishnamurti gave it little emphasis in his writings,

> using

> it only when it elucidated rather than obscured a particular

> point.

>

> I-E. Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati (Andrew Lynn) (KP

> Group

> Msg#1552)

> http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm

> 5) The last significator is the planets closely aspecting any

> of the

> above significators. Once again my third house has a 4th house

>

> aspect of Mars so this again confirms a mental outlook that is

>

> aggressive. These are the core rules of how the KP system

> judges a

> house.

>

> II. PLANETS " ASPECTED " BY SIGNIFICATORS

>

> II-A. PAGE 172 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)

> (a) The lords of the sign, star and the sub where the cusp the

> house

> falls.

> --------------

> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significators and

> also

> planets receiving aspects from the significators.

>

> II-B. PAGE 174 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)

> 5. the planets conjoined with the significators, and

> 6. those receiving aspect from the significators.

>

> II-C. PAGE 118 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of those found

> out in

> the previous four conditions.

>

> II-D. PAGE 128 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> e. planets conjoined with them, or

> f. planets aspected by them---

>

> II-E. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> (5) planets who are conjoined with or aspected by the

> significators.

>

> II-F. PAGE 149 OF K.P. READER V (SEPT 1983 EDITION)

> To note the order of the significators, this is the rule.

> (5) Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> planets

> conjoined with or aspected by the significators found out

> already.

>

> II-G. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER V (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> (e) planets conjoined with any of the above significators or

> aspected by any of the above.

>

> II-H. PAGE 157 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> (e) Those which are conjoined with the significators or

> aspected by

> them, thereby having connection with those matters.

>

> II-I. PAGE 197 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> (e) those which are conjoined with these significators, or

> (f) those receivibg spects from the indicators.

>

> II-J. PAGE 247 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> (5) Planets who are in conjunction with or aspected by the

> significators.

>

> II-K. PAGE 149 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> II The planets which are conjoined with or aspected by any of

> the

> above significators of that Bhava. (Western system of aspects

> is be

> followed.)

>

> II-L. PAGE 237 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> 5) Planets which are conjoined with or aspected by

> significators.

>

> II-M. PAGE 17 OF BHATT'S NAKSHATRA CHINTAMANI

> A planet in conj. or association with, or aspected by a

> significator

> gives the result of the house or houses denoted by that

> significator.

>

> II-N. PAGE 42 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1995 (How to Judge a Nativity

> by

> K.S.K)

> PAGE 6 OF HOW TO JUDGE A NATIVITY BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> planets

> conjoined with or aspected by significators found out already.

>

> II-O. PAGE 161 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996 (Reply by K.S.K.)

> E) The planets conjoined with them; or

> F) Those aspected by significators.

>

> II-P. PAGE 72 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2004/ PAGE 28 OF KP YEAR BOOK,

> 2005

> E- Planets aspected by A,B,C and D. (RAICHUR & KPASTRO SW

> print-out)

>

> II-Q. Sandy Crowther's http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp

> 5. Planet in Conjunction Or Aspect:

> (a) A planet in conjunction or association with, or aspected

> by a

> significator gives the results of the house or houses denoted

> by

> that significator. So the last preference should be given to

> the

> planet in conj. Or aspect with that significator.

> (b) A planet aspecting the house may be considered as the

> significator of that house.

> 6. A planet in the star of the planet aspecting the house. For

>

> example: Say Saturn in the 5th aspects the 7th, 11th, and 2nd.

> So

> the planet in the star of Saturn will give the results of the

> 2nd,

> 7th, and 11th.

>

> II-R. PAGE 82/194 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significator and

> also

> planets receiving aspect

> from the significator.

>

> II-S. PAGE 167 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> 5. Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above.

>

> II-T. PAGE 187 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> (6) Those with whom the significators are conjoined with, or

> whom

> they aspect.

>

> II-U. PAGE 40 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999

> 6. Planets aspected by the strong significator.

>

> II-V. PAGE 104 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999

> PAGE 82/88 OF MY EXPERIMENTS WITH KP BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of the

> significators.

>

> II-W. PAGE 39/43/62 OF EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS & KP BY K.

> HARIHARAN,

> 2002

> (5) Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above

> significators.

>

> II-X. Wealth Karma Website

> (E) Those which are conjoined with the sign factors or

> aspected by

> them.

>

> III. NOT MENTIONED AFTER FOURTH ORDER OF SIGNIFICATORS

>

> III-A. PAGE 276 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

>

> III-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK 1995, INDO/AMERICAN- K.P.

> PREDICTIONS BY SAT SIRI KAUR

> (E) not mentioned.

>

> , anant raichur

> wrote:

> >

> > Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of the

> Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered as

> a

> significator for 2,7,11.

> > Good Luck

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > Dear raichur ji,

> >

> > Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT

> aspect

> on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of

>

> 2,7,11 ?

> >

> > Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable

> reply.

> >

> > Regards

> > kanak

> >

> > anant raichur wrote:

> > Dear Kanak

> > Since Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn,

> Saturn

> becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.

> > His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact

> his

> aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.

> > Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his

> periods.

> > good luck

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji,

> >

> > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.

> > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with

> Moon.

> > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for

> marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe

> Count

> SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is

> on cusp

> 2,7,11?

> > If both which aspect is important?

> >

> > In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by

> A,B,C,D

> but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give

> result.

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > anant raichur wrote:

> > Dear Kanakji

> > As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per

> rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another

> Planet, the

> that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house.

> > apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the

> significator of any of the houses 2,7,11

> > good Luck

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > Dear friends,

> >

> > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no:

> 226

> given a horary chart.

> > in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR

> and

> MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra

> marriage took place.

> >

> > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect

> 7th

> cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect

> and

> aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.

> >

> > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to

> vedic

> aspect and SAT also in RP .

> >

> > can any one throw light which aspect is important?

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> <<

> >

> > Photos

> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> in your

> hands ASAP.

> >

> > ---------

> > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > anant_1608

> > raichuranant

> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > ---------

> >

> > Photos

> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> in your

> hands ASAP.

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> <<

> >

> > Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover

> > Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it!

> >

> > ---------

> > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > anant_1608

> > raichuranant

> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > ---------

> >

> > Photos

> > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos,

> events,

> holidays, whatever.

> >

> > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> <<

> >

> > Photos

> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> in your

> hands ASAP.

> >

> > Visit your group " " on the web.

> >

January 16, 2006

Dear Kanak ji, Thanks. Will there be any difference in

the answer given on the basis of (1)horary kundali

prepared on the basis of time of putting question ( no

number given) and (2) horary kundali prepared on the

basis of a number (1 to 249 ). If at a point of time

there is only one querent and one specific question

and if we prepare a kundali for that moment without

asking for a number and susequently the same question

is put by giving a horary number; both the kundalies

may have different Ascs and the RPs may also

differ.Will answer to such a question be the same in

both the cases ? Regards, Hansraj.

--- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear hansraj ji,

>

> You are mix two part of KP horary astrology.

> RP means Lagna lord,Star lord of lagna lord,Moon

> lord,Starlord of moon lord, daylord.

>

> Horay number asc has nothing with RP Calculation

> only the Time when we cast Hoary Chart is Important

> for RP.

>

> Only sognificatore we calculet from KP Horary

> chart.

>

> Hope it will help you

>

> regards

> Kanak

>

> hansraj vyas <hansraj_vyas wrote:

> Dear Kanak ji, Thanks for the reply. Regarding

> your

> last comments on RPs, I would make myself more

> clear.

> I know that the chart prepared for 3.27 pm-Coimbtore

> and the number chart for 110 differ. The time chart

> gives Asc-Aqu.14deg.05'40 " whereas the number chart

> gives Asc-Virgo-07deg.0'00 " .The RPs for the first

> chart based on time gives Rahu as the star lord of

> the Asc.and hence an imp.RP whereas the RPs as per

> number chart does not have Rahu at all. My question

> is- what is the significance of the chart worked out

> on time basis particularly because the softwares do

> show Rahu as RP, the book also makes mention of Aqu.

> lagna but when it comes to RPs,only number chart is

> considered and Rahu does not figure in them. If RPs

> are worked out on the basis of number chart, as has

> been done, why the book mentions about Aqu.lagna and

> the softwares are wrong in showing Rahu as

> RP.Regards,Hansraj.

>

> --- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

>

> > Dear hansraj ji,

> > My comment in bold*******

> >

> > hansraj vyas <hansraj_vyas wrote:

> > Dear Kanakji,

> > I have the first edition of the book you have

> > reffered to. The page no.265 has the example

> > marriage

> > horary chart.I observe that rapt conjunction of

> Moon

> > and Saturn causes Punarphoo-the only yoga/dosha

> > which

> > is recognised in KP. s/o late Shri K.S.K.Shri

> > K.Subramaniam has written a book on the subject of

> > Punarphoo

> >

> > Please Read PREFACE of this book the Authore is

> > VAIKARI RAMAMURTY not K.Subramaniyam

> >

> > wherein he has categorically stated that

> > this dosha causes obstacles not only during

> marriage

> > negotiations but also at the time of of marriage.

> > Regarding Saturn's placement in the 5th house and

> > his

> > aspects on 7th,11th and 2nd, he states that this

> > causes delay in the wedding till the native gets

> > disgusted and dejected. It is surprising that

> there

> > is

> > no effect shown of this dosha in the example

> chart,

> > instead, marriage took place in Saturn's anthra.

> >

> > Yes you are very correct. I am not check this

> > point. this is PUNARPHOO DOSA Case but result come

> > withim 3 months.and No efect of Punarphoo dosa

> seen.

> >

> > There

> > is one more point on which I seek clarification. I

> > use

> > KP ASTRO and ASTROKUNDALI softwares. When I worked

> > out

> > example chart, both programmes show Rahu as the

> > first

> > RP. This is because lagna at 3.27 pm was that of

> > Kumbha though as per number chart for 110 it is

> > Kanya

> > lagna. Even in the above book below the chart,

> while

> > listing the RPS the lagna is shown as Kumbha. So

> > whether Rahu is to be taken as RP or not?

> >

> > RP Asc. is the Asc. of the time of Judgement and

> > Horary Numbar Asc.is deffer thing. so there is

> > nothing wroning mention in book.

> > kindly check the Asc. for 3.27 PM Coimbatore

> Date

> > 16,10,1991 you will get same result as in book.

> >

> > regards

> > kanak

> >

> > Regards,

> > Hansraj.--- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

> > wrote:

> >

> > > Dear Raichur ji,

> > >

> > > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.

> > > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and

> SAT

> > > Conj. with Moon.

> > > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all

> > three

> > > house for marriage and question also about

> > Marriage.

> > > SAT in RP too. SoWe Count SAT as Significator as

> > > conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is on cusp

> > > 2,7,11?

> > > If both which aspect is important?

> > >

> > > In my experiance some time planet not signfies

> > > house by A,B,C,D but it's aspect on cusp ( like

> > For

> > > marriage 2,7,11) give result.

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:

> > > Dear Kanakji

> > > As far as I know, You find the Significators

> > > A,B,C,D as per rules. Now if any of these

> > > Significators ASPECTs another Planet, the that

> > > Planet also becomes the Significator of that

> > house.

> > > apply this principle, and see wether Saturn

> > > becomes the significator of any of the houses

> > 2,7,11

> > > good Luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> > > Dear friends,

> > >

> > > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty

> > part-1

> > > page no: 226 given a horary chart.

> > > in this case SAT is not in significator but

> SAT

> > > aspect MAR and MER(Both in significator).and

> due

> > to

> > > this aspect in SAT Antra marriage took place.

> > >

> > > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic

> > aspect

> > > SAT aspect 7th cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect

> on

> > > 11th cusp as per 7th aspect and aspect on 2 cusp

> > as

> > > per 10th aspect.

> > >

> > > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of

> > > 2,7,11due to vedic aspect and SAT also in RP .

> > >

> > > can any one throw light which aspect is

> > important?

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can

> See

> > > Me Crying <<

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get

> > quality

> > > prints in your hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > ---------

> > > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > > anant_1608

> > > raichuranant

> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > > ---------

>

=== message truncated ===

January 17, 2006

Try the files in the group"Rajesh - PMP, CSQA, Lead-Audit" <rchawda wrote: Dear All,I am new to this group and have very recently joined the group.Can some one inform me as to where can the READERS 1 to 6 by KSK be available for purchase (or download if available free).RC--- anant raichur wrote:> Dear List> It appears that I am wrong in respect of E, by ignoring the> planets, that aspect these > houses in question.> > TW853 has done a very good study. We could use this criteria> as given on Page > 110 of Reader 4, as Real KSK guides, and then check wether> the reasons given> confirm to these being the significators. > > However, we note that

Signification by aspect is of the> lowest order. So, if none of the higher order significators,> become available, these become important.> > Good work TW853> > > tw853 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> > Sri Raichur's remark regarding aspects ("E" in order of> importance > for Significators) is worthy to note with reference to the > obsevation below.> > Regards,> > tw> > > I. PLANETS "ASPECTING" SIGNIFICATORS> > I-A. PAGE 109 OF K.P. READER IV (MAY 1971/AUGUST 1974 EDITION)> (p > 110, June 1984 Edition)> E - PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.> > I-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996> 5. PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.

(Exactly the> same as > above)> > I-C. PAGE 47 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2000 (SW printout)> D-House Lord Planets aspecting by western aspects within orbs> > PAGE 26 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2002 (SW printout)> E-Planets aspecting by Western aspects > > I-D. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH REBUTTAL,> By Sat> Siri Khalsa, THE ACVA JOURNAL Vol. 5 No.1, Summer 1999 (KP> Group > Msg#924/1552)> Dr. Raghunath gets it wrong when he also includes planets> "conjoined > with or aspected by" the above; he should say planets> "conjoined > with or aspecting" the above. In any event, that last type of > significator can indeed open the window to confusion, for that> very > reason Krishnamurti gave it little emphasis in his writings,> using > it only when it elucidated rather than obscured a particular> point.> >

I-E. Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati (Andrew Lynn) (KP> Group > Msg#1552)> http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm> 5) The last significator is the planets closely aspecting any> of the > above significators. Once again my third house has a 4th house> > aspect of Mars so this again confirms a mental outlook that is> > aggressive. These are the core rules of how the KP system> judges a > house. > > > > II. PLANETS "ASPECTED" BY SIGNIFICATORS> > II-A. PAGE 172 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)> (a) The lords of the sign, star and the sub where the cusp the> house > falls.> --------------> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significators and> also > planets receiving aspects from the significators.> > II-B. PAGE 174 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984

EDITION)> 5. the planets conjoined with the significators, and> 6. those receiving aspect from the significators.> > II-C. PAGE 118 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of those found> out in > the previous four conditions.> > II-D. PAGE 128 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> e. planets conjoined with them, or > f. planets aspected by them---> > II-E. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> (5) planets who are conjoined with or aspected by the> significators.> > II-F. PAGE 149 OF K.P. READER V (SEPT 1983 EDITION)> To note the order of the significators, this is the rule.> (5) Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those> planets > conjoined with or aspected by the significators found out> already.> > II-G. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER V (AUG 1984

EDITION)> (e) planets conjoined with any of the above significators or > aspected by any of the above.> > II-H. PAGE 157 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> (e) Those which are conjoined with the significators or> aspected by > them, thereby having connection with those matters.> > II-I. PAGE 197 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> (e) those which are conjoined with these significators, or > (f) those receivibg spects from the indicators.> > II-J. PAGE 247 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION) > (5) Planets who are in conjunction with or aspected by the > significators.> > II-K. PAGE 149 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003> II The planets which are conjoined with or aspected by any of> the > above significators of that Bhava. (Western system of aspects> is be > followed.) > > II-L. PAGE 237 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART

II, 2003> 5) Planets which are conjoined with or aspected by> significators.> > II-M. PAGE 17 OF BHATT'S NAKSHATRA CHINTAMANI> A planet in conj. or association with, or aspected by a> significator > gives the result of the house or houses denoted by that > significator. > > II-N. PAGE 42 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1995 (How to Judge a Nativity> by > K.S.K)> PAGE 6 OF HOW TO JUDGE A NATIVITY BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995> Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those> planets > conjoined with or aspected by significators found out already.> > II-O. PAGE 161 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996 (Reply by K.S.K.)> E) The planets conjoined with them; or> F) Those aspected by significators. > > II-P. PAGE 72 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2004/ PAGE 28 OF KP YEAR BOOK,> 2005> E- Planets aspected by A,B,C and D. (RAICHUR & KPASTRO SW>

print-out)> > II-Q. Sandy Crowther's http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp> 5. Planet in Conjunction Or Aspect:> (a) A planet in conjunction or association with, or aspected> by a > significator gives the results of the house or houses denoted> by > that significator. So the last preference should be given to> the > planet in conj. Or aspect with that significator.> (b) A planet aspecting the house may be considered as the > significator of that house.> 6. A planet in the star of the planet aspecting the house. For> > example: Say Saturn in the 5th aspects the 7th, 11th, and 2nd.> So > the planet in the star of Saturn will give the results of the> 2nd, > 7th, and 11th.> > II-R. PAGE 82/194 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significator and> also > planets receiving aspect

> from the significator.> > II-S. PAGE 167 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> 5. Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above.> > II-T. PAGE 187 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> (6) Those with whom the significators are conjoined with, or> whom > they aspect.> > II-U. PAGE 40 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999> 6. Planets aspected by the strong significator.> > II-V. PAGE 104 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999> PAGE 82/88 OF MY EXPERIMENTS WITH KP BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995> 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of the> significators.> > II-W. PAGE 39/43/62 OF EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS & KP BY K.> HARIHARAN, > 2002> (5) Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above> significators.> > II-X. Wealth Karma Website> (E) Those which are conjoined with the sign

factors or> aspected by > them.> > > III. NOT MENTIONED AFTER FOURTH ORDER OF SIGNIFICATORS> > III-A. PAGE 276 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> > III-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK 1995, INDO/AMERICAN- K.P. > PREDICTIONS BY SAT SIRI KAUR> (E) not mentioned.> > > > > , anant raichur > wrote:> >> > Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of the > Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered as> a > significator for 2,7,11.> > Good Luck> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:> > Dear raichur ji,> > > > Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT> aspect > on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of> > 2,7,11 ?> > > > Your Reply will

help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable> reply.> > > > Regards> > kanak> > > > anant raichur wrote:> > Dear Kanak> > Since Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn,> Saturn > becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.> > His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact> his > aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.> > Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his> periods.> > good luck> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji,> > > > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.> > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with> Moon.> > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for > marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe> Count > SAT as Significator as conj

with Moon or as aspect of SAT is> on cusp > 2,7,11?> > If both which aspect is important?> > > > In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by> A,B,C,D > but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give> result.> > > > regards> > kanak> > > > anant raichur wrote:> > Dear Kanakji> > As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per > rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another> Planet, the > that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house.> > apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the > significator of any of the houses 2,7,11> > good Luck> > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:> > Dear friends,> > > > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no:> 226 > given a horary

chart.> > in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR> and > MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra > marriage took place.> > > > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect> 7th > cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect> and > aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.> > > > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to> vedic > aspect and SAT also in RP .> > > > can any one throw light which aspect is important? > > > > regards> > kanak> > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your

> hands ASAP. > > > > > > > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay> > anant_1608 > > raichuranant> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY> > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > ---------> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your > hands ASAP. > > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > > > Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover> > Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it! >

> > > > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay> > anant_1608 > > raichuranant> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY> > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > ---------> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Photos> > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos,> events, > holidays, whatever. > > > > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your > hands ASAP. > > > >

> > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web.> > > >

January 17, 2006

Dear RAjesh; KP Readers are available at Krishnamurthi Publications, F-21A,First floor, Spencer Plaza, 769 Anna Salai Chennai 600 022 All the best Sankar Dear All,I am new to this group and have very recently joined the group.Can some one inform me as to where can the READERS 1 to 6 by KSK be available for purchase (or download if available free).RC--- anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:> Dear List> It appears that I am wrong in respect of E, by ignoring the> planets, that aspect these > houses in question.> > TW853 has done a very good study. We could use this criteria> as given on Page > 110 of

Reader 4, as Real KSK guides, and then check wether> the reasons given> confirm to these being the significators. > > However, we note that Signification by aspect is of the> lowest order. So, if none of the higher order significators,> become available, these become important.> > Good work TW853> > > tw853 <tw853 wrote:> Dear Kanak,> > Sri Raichur's remark regarding aspects ("E" in order of> importance > for Significators) is worthy to note with reference to the > obsevation below.> > Regards,> > tw> > > I. PLANETS "ASPECTING" SIGNIFICATORS> > I-A. PAGE 109 OF K.P. READER IV (MAY 1971/AUGUST 1974 EDITION)> (p > 110, June 1984 Edition)> E - PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH

OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.> > I-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996> 5. PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE> SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION. (Exactly the> same as > above)> > I-C. PAGE 47 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2000 (SW printout)> D-House Lord Planets aspecting by western aspects within orbs> > PAGE 26 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2002 (SW printout)> E-Planets aspecting by Western aspects > > I-D. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH REBUTTAL,> By Sat> Siri Khalsa, THE ACVA JOURNAL Vol. 5 No.1, Summer 1999 (KP> Group > Msg#924/1552)> Dr. Raghunath gets it wrong when he also includes planets> "conjoined > with or aspected by" the above; he should say planets> "conjoined > with or aspecting" the above. In any event, that last type of >

significator can indeed open the window to confusion, for that> very > reason Krishnamurti gave it little emphasis in his writings,> using > it only when it elucidated rather than obscured a particular> point.> > I-E. Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati (Andrew Lynn) (KP> Group > Msg#1552)> http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm> 5) The last significator is the planets closely aspecting any> of the > above significators. Once again my third house has a 4th house> > aspect of Mars so this again confirms a mental outlook that is> > aggressive. These are the core rules of how the KP system> judges a > house. > > > > II. PLANETS "ASPECTED" BY SIGNIFICATORS> > II-A. PAGE 172 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)> (a) The lords

of the sign, star and the sub where the cusp the> house > falls.> --------------> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significators and> also > planets receiving aspects from the significators.> > II-B. PAGE 174 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)> 5. the planets conjoined with the significators, and> 6. those receiving aspect from the significators.> > II-C. PAGE 118 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of those found> out in > the previous four conditions.> > II-D. PAGE 128 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> e. planets conjoined with them, or > f. planets aspected by them---> > II-E. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)> (5) planets who are conjoined with or aspected by the> significators.> > II-F. PAGE 149 OF K.P. READER V (SEPT 1983

EDITION)> To note the order of the significators, this is the rule.> (5) Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those> planets > conjoined with or aspected by the significators found out> already.> > II-G. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER V (AUG 1984 EDITION)> (e) planets conjoined with any of the above significators or > aspected by any of the above.> > II-H. PAGE 157 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> (e) Those which are conjoined with the significators or> aspected by > them, thereby having connection with those matters.> > II-I. PAGE 197 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> (e) those which are conjoined with these significators, or > (f) those receivibg spects from the indicators.> > II-J. PAGE 247 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION) > (5) Planets who are in conjunction with or aspected by the > significators.> >

II-K. PAGE 149 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003> II The planets which are conjoined with or aspected by any of> the > above significators of that Bhava. (Western system of aspects> is be > followed.) > > II-L. PAGE 237 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003> 5) Planets which are conjoined with or aspected by> significators.> > II-M. PAGE 17 OF BHATT'S NAKSHATRA CHINTAMANI> A planet in conj. or association with, or aspected by a> significator > gives the result of the house or houses denoted by that > significator. > > II-N. PAGE 42 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1995 (How to Judge a Nativity> by > K.S.K)> PAGE 6 OF HOW TO JUDGE A NATIVITY BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995> Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those> planets > conjoined with or aspected by significators found out already.> > II-O. PAGE 161 OF KP

YEAR BOOK, 1996 (Reply by K.S.K.)> E) The planets conjoined with them; or> F) Those aspected by significators. > > II-P. PAGE 72 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2004/ PAGE 28 OF KP YEAR BOOK,> 2005> E- Planets aspected by A,B,C and D. (RAICHUR & KPASTRO SW> print-out)> > II-Q. Sandy Crowther's http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp> 5. Planet in Conjunction Or Aspect:> (a) A planet in conjunction or association with, or aspected> by a > significator gives the results of the house or houses denoted> by > that significator. So the last preference should be given to> the > planet in conj. Or aspect with that significator.> (b) A planet aspecting the house may be considered as the > significator of that house.> 6. A planet in the star of the planet aspecting the house. For> > example: Say Saturn in the 5th

aspects the 7th, 11th, and 2nd.> So > the planet in the star of Saturn will give the results of the> 2nd, > 7th, and 11th.> > II-R. PAGE 82/194 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significator and> also > planets receiving aspect > from the significator.> > II-S. PAGE 167 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> 5. Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above.> > II-T. PAGE 187 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002> (6) Those with whom the significators are conjoined with, or> whom > they aspect.> > II-U. PAGE 40 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999> 6. Planets aspected by the strong significator.> > II-V. PAGE 104 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999> PAGE 82/88 OF MY EXPERIMENTS WITH KP BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995> 5. Planets conjoined with or

aspected by any of the> significators.> > II-W. PAGE 39/43/62 OF EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS & KP BY K.> HARIHARAN, > 2002> (5) Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above> significators.> > II-X. Wealth Karma Website> (E) Those which are conjoined with the sign factors or> aspected by > them.> > > III. NOT MENTIONED AFTER FOURTH ORDER OF SIGNIFICATORS> > III-A. PAGE 276 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)> > III-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK 1995, INDO/AMERICAN- K.P. > PREDICTIONS BY SAT SIRI KAUR> (E) not mentioned.> > > > > , anant raichur > wrote:> >> > Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of the > Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered as> a > significator for 2,7,11.> > Good

Luck> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:> > Dear raichur ji,> > > > Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT> aspect > on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of> > 2,7,11 ?> > > > Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable> reply.> > > > Regards> > kanak> > > > anant raichur wrote:> > Dear Kanak> > Since Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn,> Saturn > becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.> > His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact> his > aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.> > Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his> periods.> > good luck> > > > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji,>

> > > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.> > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with> Moon.> > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for > marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe> Count > SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is> on cusp > 2,7,11?> > If both which aspect is important?> > > > In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by> A,B,C,D > but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give> result.> > > > regards> > kanak> > > > anant raichur wrote:> > Dear Kanakji> > As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per > rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another> Planet, the > that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house.> >

apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the > significator of any of the houses 2,7,11> > good Luck> > > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:> > Dear friends,> > > > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no:> 226 > given a horary chart.> > in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR> and > MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra > marriage took place.> > > > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect> 7th > cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect> and > aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.> > > > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to> vedic > aspect and SAT also in RP .> > > > can any one throw light which aspect is important? > > > >

regards> > kanak> > > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your > hands ASAP. > > > > > > > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay> > anant_1608 > > raichuranant> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY> > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > ---------> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your > hands ASAP. > > > >

> > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > > > Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover> > Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it! > > > > > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay> > anant_1608 > > raichuranant> > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY> > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > ---------> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Photos> > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos,> events, > holidays, whatever. > > > > > > > > >> I

Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying> <<> > > > > > Photos> > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints> in your > hands ASAP. > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web.> > > >

January 17, 2006

KP Readers can be bought from reliable

Hasmukhrai J Mehta---

" Hasmukhrai J Mehta " <astroclinic

, anant raichur <anant_1608>

wrote:

>

> Try the files in the group

>

> " Rajesh - PMP, CSQA, Lead-Audit " <rchawda> wrote: Dear All,

>

> I am new to this group and have very recently joined the group.

>

> Can some one inform me as to where can the

> READERS 1 to 6 by KSK be available for purchase

> (or download if available free).

>

> RC

>

> --- anant raichur wrote:

>

> > Dear List

> > It appears that I am wrong in respect of E, by ignoring the

> > planets, that aspect these

> > houses in question.

> >

> > TW853 has done a very good study. We could use this criteria

> > as given on Page

> > 110 of Reader 4, as Real KSK guides, and then check wether

> > the reasons given

> > confirm to these being the significators.

> >

> > However, we note that Signification by aspect is of the

> > lowest order. So, if none of the higher order significators,

> > become available, these become important.

> >

> > Good work TW853

> >

> > tw853 wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> >

> > Sri Raichur's remark regarding aspects ( " E " in order of

> > importance

> > for Significators) is worthy to note with reference to the

> > obsevation below.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > I. PLANETS " ASPECTING " SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > I-A. PAGE 109 OF K.P. READER IV (MAY 1971/AUGUST 1974 EDITION)

> > (p

> > 110, June 1984 Edition)

> > E - PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> > SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.

> >

> > I-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996

> > 5. PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> > SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION. (Exactly the

> > same as

> > above)

> >

> > I-C. PAGE 47 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2000 (SW printout)

> > D-House Lord Planets aspecting by western aspects within orbs

> >

> > PAGE 26 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2002 (SW printout)

> > E-Planets aspecting by Western aspects

> >

> > I-D. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH REBUTTAL,

> > By Sat

> > Siri Khalsa, THE ACVA JOURNAL Vol. 5 No.1, Summer 1999 (KP

> > Group

> > Msg#924/1552)

> > Dr. Raghunath gets it wrong when he also includes planets

> > " conjoined

> > with or aspected by " the above; he should say planets

> > " conjoined

> > with or aspecting " the above. In any event, that last type of

> > significator can indeed open the window to confusion, for that

> > very

> > reason Krishnamurti gave it little emphasis in his writings,

> > using

> > it only when it elucidated rather than obscured a particular

> > point.

> >

> > I-E. Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati (Andrew Lynn) (KP

> > Group

> > Msg#1552)

> > http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm

> > 5) The last significator is the planets closely aspecting any

> > of the

> > above significators. Once again my third house has a 4th house

> >

> > aspect of Mars so this again confirms a mental outlook that is

> >

> > aggressive. These are the core rules of how the KP system

> > judges a

> > house.

> >

> > II. PLANETS " ASPECTED " BY SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > II-A. PAGE 172 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)

> > (a) The lords of the sign, star and the sub where the cusp the

> > house

> > falls.

> > --------------

> > (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significators and

> > also

> > planets receiving aspects from the significators.

> >

> > II-B. PAGE 174 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984 EDITION)

> > 5. the planets conjoined with the significators, and

> > 6. those receiving aspect from the significators.

> >

> > II-C. PAGE 118 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of those found

> > out in

> > the previous four conditions.

> >

> > II-D. PAGE 128 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > e. planets conjoined with them, or

> > f. planets aspected by them---

> >

> > II-E. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > (5) planets who are conjoined with or aspected by the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-F. PAGE 149 OF K.P. READER V (SEPT 1983 EDITION)

> > To note the order of the significators, this is the rule.

> > (5) Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> > planets

> > conjoined with or aspected by the significators found out

> > already.

> >

> > II-G. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER V (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > (e) planets conjoined with any of the above significators or

> > aspected by any of the above.

> >

> > II-H. PAGE 157 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (e) Those which are conjoined with the significators or

> > aspected by

> > them, thereby having connection with those matters.

> >

> > II-I. PAGE 197 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (e) those which are conjoined with these significators, or

> > (f) those receivibg spects from the indicators.

> >

> > II-J. PAGE 247 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (5) Planets who are in conjunction with or aspected by the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-K. PAGE 149 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> > II The planets which are conjoined with or aspected by any of

> > the

> > above significators of that Bhava. (Western system of aspects

> > is be

> > followed.)

> >

> > II-L. PAGE 237 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> > 5) Planets which are conjoined with or aspected by

> > significators.

> >

> > II-M. PAGE 17 OF BHATT'S NAKSHATRA CHINTAMANI

> > A planet in conj. or association with, or aspected by a

> > significator

> > gives the result of the house or houses denoted by that

> > significator.

> >

> > II-N. PAGE 42 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1995 (How to Judge a Nativity

> > by

> > K.S.K)

> > PAGE 6 OF HOW TO JUDGE A NATIVITY BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> > Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> > planets

> > conjoined with or aspected by significators found out already.

> >

> > II-O. PAGE 161 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996 (Reply by K.S.K.)

> > E) The planets conjoined with them; or

> > F) Those aspected by significators.

> >

> > II-P. PAGE 72 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2004/ PAGE 28 OF KP YEAR BOOK,

> > 2005

> > E- Planets aspected by A,B,C and D. (RAICHUR & KPASTRO SW

> > print-out)

> >

> > II-Q. Sandy Crowther's http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp

> > 5. Planet in Conjunction Or Aspect:

> > (a) A planet in conjunction or association with, or aspected

> > by a

> > significator gives the results of the house or houses denoted

> > by

> > that significator. So the last preference should be given to

> > the

> > planet in conj. Or aspect with that significator.

> > (b) A planet aspecting the house may be considered as the

> > significator of that house.

> > 6. A planet in the star of the planet aspecting the house. For

> >

> > example: Say Saturn in the 5th aspects the 7th, 11th, and 2nd.

> > So

> > the planet in the star of Saturn will give the results of the

> > 2nd,

> > 7th, and 11th.

> >

> > II-R. PAGE 82/194 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significator and

> > also

> > planets receiving aspect

> > from the significator.

> >

> > II-S. PAGE 167 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > 5. Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above.

> >

> > II-T. PAGE 187 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > (6) Those with whom the significators are conjoined with, or

> > whom

> > they aspect.

> >

> > II-U. PAGE 40 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999

> > 6. Planets aspected by the strong significator.

> >

> > II-V. PAGE 104 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN, 1999

> > PAGE 82/88 OF MY EXPERIMENTS WITH KP BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> > 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-W. PAGE 39/43/62 OF EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS & KP BY K.

> > HARIHARAN,

> > 2002

> > (5) Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above

> > significators.

> >

> > II-X. Wealth Karma Website

> > (E) Those which are conjoined with the sign factors or

> > aspected by

> > them.

> >

> > III. NOT MENTIONED AFTER FOURTH ORDER OF SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > III-A. PAGE 276 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> >

> > III-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK 1995, INDO/AMERICAN- K.P.

> > PREDICTIONS BY SAT SIRI KAUR

> > (E) not mentioned.

> >

> > , anant raichur

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of the

> > Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered as

> > a

> > significator for 2,7,11.

> > > Good Luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > > Dear raichur ji,

> > >

> > > Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT

> > aspect

> > on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator of

> >

> > 2,7,11 ?

> > >

> > > Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable

> > reply.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > anant raichur wrote:

> > > Dear Kanak

> > > Since Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn,

> > Saturn

> > becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.

> > > His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact

> > his

> > aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.

> > > Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his

> > periods.

> > > good luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji,

> > >

> > > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.

> > > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with

> > Moon.

> > > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house for

> > marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too. SoWe

> > Count

> > SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is

> > on cusp

> > 2,7,11?

> > > If both which aspect is important?

> > >

> > > In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by

> > A,B,C,D

> > but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give

> > result.

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > anant raichur wrote:

> > > Dear Kanakji

> > > As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as per

> > rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another

> > Planet, the

> > that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house.

> > > apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the

> > significator of any of the houses 2,7,11

> > > good Luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > > Dear friends,

> > >

> > > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page no:

> > 226

> > given a horary chart.

> > > in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR

> > and

> > MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT Antra

> > marriage took place.

> > >

> > > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT aspect

> > 7th

> > cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th aspect

> > and

> > aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.

> > >

> > > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to

> > vedic

> > aspect and SAT also in RP .

> > >

> > > can any one throw light which aspect is important?

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > ---------

> > > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > > anant_1608

> > > raichuranant

> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > > ---------

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover

> > > Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it!

> > >

> > > ---------

> > > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > > anant_1608

> > > raichuranant

> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > > ---------

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos,

> > events,

> > holidays, whatever.

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > Visit your group " " on the web.

> > >

January 18, 2006

That's Great

Thanks very much.

RC

--- siva sankar rao adigopula <sankar_kp_astro wrote:

> Dear RAjesh;

> KP Readers are available at

> Krishnamurthi Publications,

> F-21A,First floor, Spencer Plaza,

> 769 Anna Salai Chennai 600 022

> All the best

> Sankar

>

> Dear All,

>

> I am new to this group and have very recently joined the

> group.

>

> Can some one inform me as to where can the

> READERS 1 to 6 by KSK be available for purchase

> (or download if available free).

>

> RC

>

> --- anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:

>

> > Dear List

> > It appears that I am wrong in respect of E, by ignoring

> the

> > planets, that aspect these

> > houses in question.

> >

> > TW853 has done a very good study. We could use this

> criteria

> > as given on Page

> > 110 of Reader 4, as Real KSK guides, and then check wether

> > the reasons given

> > confirm to these being the significators.

> >

> > However, we note that Signification by aspect is of the

> > lowest order. So, if none of the higher order significators,

> > become available, these become important.

> >

> > Good work TW853

> >

> > tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> >

> > Sri Raichur's remark regarding aspects ( " E " in order of

> > importance

> > for Significators) is worthy to note with reference to the

> > obsevation below.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > I. PLANETS " ASPECTING " SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > I-A. PAGE 109 OF K.P. READER IV (MAY 1971/AUGUST 1974

> EDITION)

> > (p

> > 110, June 1984 Edition)

> > E - PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> > SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION.

> >

> > I-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996

> > 5. PLANET OR PLANETS CONJOINED WITH OR ASPECTING THE ABOVE

> > SIGNIFICAGTORS AND ALSO THE HOUSE IN QUESTION. (Exactly the

> > same as

> > above)

> >

> > I-C. PAGE 47 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2000 (SW printout)

> > D-House Lord Planets aspecting by western aspects within

> orbs

> >

> > PAGE 26 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2002 (SW printout)

> > E-Planets aspecting by Western aspects

> >

> > I-D. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH

> REBUTTAL,

> > By Sat

> > Siri Khalsa, THE ACVA JOURNAL Vol. 5 No.1, Summer 1999 (KP

> > Group

> > Msg#924/1552)

> > Dr. Raghunath gets it wrong when he also includes planets

> > " conjoined

> > with or aspected by " the above; he should say planets

> > " conjoined

> > with or aspecting " the above. In any event, that last type

> of

> > significator can indeed open the window to confusion, for

> that

> > very

> > reason Krishnamurti gave it little emphasis in his writings,

> > using

> > it only when it elucidated rather than obscured a particular

> > point.

> >

> > I-E. Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati (Andrew Lynn) (KP

> > Group

> > Msg#1552)

> > http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm

> > 5) The last significator is the planets closely aspecting

> any

> > of the

> > above significators. Once again my third house has a 4th

> house

> >

> > aspect of Mars so this again confirms a mental outlook that

> is

> >

> > aggressive. These are the core rules of how the KP system

> > judges a

> > house.

> >

> > II. PLANETS " ASPECTED " BY SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > II-A. PAGE 172 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984

> EDITION)

> > (a) The lords of the sign, star and the sub where the cusp

> the

> > house

> > falls.

> > --------------

> > (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significators and

> > also

> > planets receiving aspects from the significators.

> >

> > II-B. PAGE 174 OF K.P. READER III, Part 2 (JUNE 1984

> EDITION)

> > 5. the planets conjoined with the significators, and

> > 6. those receiving aspect from the significators.

> >

> > II-C. PAGE 118 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of those found

> > out in

> > the previous four conditions.

> >

> > II-D. PAGE 128 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > e. planets conjoined with them, or

> > f. planets aspected by them---

> >

> > II-E. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER IV (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > (5) planets who are conjoined with or aspected by the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-F. PAGE 149 OF K.P. READER V (SEPT 1983 EDITION)

> > To note the order of the significators, this is the rule.

> > (5) Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> > planets

> > conjoined with or aspected by the significators found out

> > already.

> >

> > II-G. PAGE 201 OF K.P. READER V (AUG 1984 EDITION)

> > (e) planets conjoined with any of the above significators or

>

> > aspected by any of the above.

> >

> > II-H. PAGE 157 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (e) Those which are conjoined with the significators or

> > aspected by

> > them, thereby having connection with those matters.

> >

> > II-I. PAGE 197 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (e) those which are conjoined with these significators, or

> > (f) those receivibg spects from the indicators.

> >

> > II-J. PAGE 247 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> > (5) Planets who are in conjunction with or aspected by the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-K. PAGE 149 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> > II The planets which are conjoined with or aspected by any

> of

> > the

> > above significators of that Bhava. (Western system of

> aspects

> > is be

> > followed.)

> >

> > II-L. PAGE 237 OF ASTROSECRETS & KP, PART II, 2003

> > 5) Planets which are conjoined with or aspected by

> > significators.

> >

> > II-M. PAGE 17 OF BHATT'S NAKSHATRA CHINTAMANI

> > A planet in conj. or association with, or aspected by a

> > significator

> > gives the result of the house or houses denoted by that

> > significator.

> >

> > II-N. PAGE 42 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1995 (How to Judge a Nativity

> > by

> > K.S.K)

> > PAGE 6 OF HOW TO JUDGE A NATIVITY BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> > Very weak but yet those connected with a bhava are those

> > planets

> > conjoined with or aspected by significators found out

> already.

> >

> > II-O. PAGE 161 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 1996 (Reply by K.S.K.)

> > E) The planets conjoined with them; or

> > F) Those aspected by significators.

> >

> > II-P. PAGE 72 OF KP YEAR BOOK, 2004/ PAGE 28 OF KP YEAR

> BOOK,

> > 2005

> > E- Planets aspected by A,B,C and D. (RAICHUR & KPASTRO SW

> > print-out)

> >

> > II-Q. Sandy Crowther's http://www.jupitersweb.com/kp

> > 5. Planet in Conjunction Or Aspect:

> > (a) A planet in conjunction or association with, or aspected

> > by a

> > significator gives the results of the house or houses

> denoted

> > by

> > that significator. So the last preference should be given to

> > the

> > planet in conj. Or aspect with that significator.

> > (b) A planet aspecting the house may be considered as the

> > significator of that house.

> > 6. A planet in the star of the planet aspecting the house.

> For

> >

> > example: Say Saturn in the 5th aspects the 7th, 11th, and

> 2nd.

> > So

> > the planet in the star of Saturn will give the results of

> the

> > 2nd,

> > 7th, and 11th.

> >

> > II-R. PAGE 82/194 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > (f) The planets conjoined with the strong significator and

> > also

> > planets receiving aspect

> > from the significator.

> >

> > II-S. PAGE 167 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > 5. Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above.

> >

> > II-T. PAGE 187 OF PROFESSION BY K. SUBRAMANIUM, 2002

> > (6) Those with whom the significators are conjoined with, or

> > whom

> > they aspect.

> >

> > II-U. PAGE 40 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN,

> 1999

> > 6. Planets aspected by the strong significator.

> >

> > II-V. PAGE 104 OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI BY K. HARIHARAN,

> 1999

> > PAGE 82/88 OF MY EXPERIMENTS WITH KP BY K. HARIHARAN, 1995

> > 5. Planets conjoined with or aspected by any of the

> > significators.

> >

> > II-W. PAGE 39/43/62 OF EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS & KP BY K.

> > HARIHARAN,

> > 2002

> > (5) Planets conjoined with, or aspected by the above

> > significators.

> >

> > II-X. Wealth Karma Website

> > (E) Those which are conjoined with the sign factors or

> > aspected by

> > them.

> >

> > III. NOT MENTIONED AFTER FOURTH ORDER OF SIGNIFICATORS

> >

> > III-A. PAGE 276 OF K.P. READER VI (1978 EDITION)

> >

> > III-B. PAGE 128 OF KP YEAR BOOK 1995, INDO/AMERICAN- K.P.

> > PREDICTIONS BY SAT SIRI KAUR

> > (E) not mentioned.

> >

> > , anant raichur

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Merely if Sat aspects 2,7,11 and not aspected by any of

> the

> > Significators of houses 2,7,or 11, he cannot be considered

> as

> > a

> > significator for 2,7,11.

> > > Good Luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > > Dear raichur ji,

> > >

> > > Thanks, but supposeSAT not conj with any planet but SAT

> > aspect

> > on 2,7,11 that it is worthy to consider SAT as significator

> of

> >

> > 2,7,11 ?

> > >

> > > Your Reply will help me lot.I am waiting for your valuable

> > reply.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > anant raichur wrote:

> > > Dear Kanak

> > > Since Moon a significator 11th is conjunct with Saturn,

> > Saturn

> > becomes a Significator of the 11th, as an agent of Moon.

> > > His aspecting 7th and 11th is only a coincidence. In fact

> > his

> > aspect to 7th, should Delay Marriage.

> > > Here Sat being Conjunct with Moon, acts Like Moon, in his

> > periods.

> > > good luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote: Dear Raichur ji,

> > >

> > > SAT is not significator in A,B,C,D.

> > > But MOON is strong signifivator of 11th and SAT Conj. with

> > Moon.

> > > But My question is SAT aspect on 2,7,11 all three house

> for

> > marriage and question also about Marriage. SAT in RP too.

> SoWe

> > Count

> > SAT as Significator as conj with Moon or as aspect of SAT is

> > on cusp

> > 2,7,11?

> > > If both which aspect is important?

> > >

> > > In my experiance some time planet not signfies house by

> > A,B,C,D

> > but it's aspect on cusp ( like For marriage 2,7,11) give

> > result.

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > anant raichur wrote:

> > > Dear Kanakji

> > > As far as I know, You find the Significators A,B,C,D as

> per

> > rules. Now if any of these Significators ASPECTs another

> > Planet, the

> > that Planet also becomes the Significator of that house.

> > > apply this principle, and see wether Saturn becomes the

> > significator of any of the houses 2,7,11

> > > good Luck

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia wrote:

> > > Dear friends,

> > >

> > > In Astro Secrets and Krishnamurty padhdhaty part-1 page

> no:

> > 226

> > given a horary chart.

> > > in this case SAT is not in significator but SAT aspect MAR

> > and

> > MER(Both in significator).and due to this aspect in SAT

> Antra

> > marriage took place.

> > >

> > > But if we check aspect of SAT as per Vedic aspect SAT

> aspect

> > 7th

> > cusp as per 3rd aspect, apsect on 11th cusp as per 7th

> aspect

> > and

> > aspect on 2 cusp as per 10th aspect.

> > >

> > > In my opinion SAT be a strong significator of 2,7,11due to

> > vedic

> > aspect and SAT also in RP .

> > >

> > > can any one throw light which aspect is important?

> > >

> > > regards

> > > kanak

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > ---------

> > > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > > anant_1608

> > > raichuranant

> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > > ---------

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos ï¿½ Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover

> > > Photo Books. You design it and weï¿½ll bind it!

> > >

> > > ---------

> > > A.R.Raichur bombay

> > > anant_1608

> > > raichuranant

> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY

> > > tel: 022-2506 2609

> > > ---------

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos,

> > events,

> > holidays, whatever.

> > >

> > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying

> > <<

> > >

> > > Photos

> > > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints

> > in your

> > hands ASAP.

> > >

> > > Visit your group " " on the web.

> > >

June 6, 2007

depends where the Lord of this House is seated .

If comfortable in his other sign , or friends sign

or in exalted sign, then this unoccupied house would

give good results if a benefic House for that lagna.

IF not so then otherwise.

regards,

Bhaskar.

www.shrikrishnajyotish.com

, " kashyapagotraja "

<kashyapagotraja wrote:

>

> If a house or bhava is unoccupied by any planets and no planets aspect

> such a bhava or house what will be the result of that house? Is it

> good or bad?

>

July 12, 2008

Dear Bhaskarji,

In a mutual aspect (7th) bet Jup and Sat who wins whom.

Ex;Jup-5H-Pcs and Sat-11H-Virgo

I specifically want to know if in Jup MD Sat disturbs the positive

results of Jup or in Sat MD Jup boosts Sat.

It might sound silly but i had only option to come to you

ramesh ojha

July 12, 2008

Dear Ramesh Bhai,

Any opposition aspect is not easy to explain unless the other

combinations aspecting the planets under consideration of this aspect,

and the Constellation brackets of the planets under comnsideration, are

not known.

But the most simple way to find out who will supercede is, to check

which planet is more confortable in its sign by being in its own house

as a owner, or in its exaltation sign, or in its friendly sign and the

aspects on it whether malefic or benefic, and the Dashas running

currently at the time of the Query.

Which planet distrubs the results of another planet, cannot be

dteremined with the isolated data given in Your example chart, and I

think i have already studied Your personal charts a number of times and

chatted with You, so You must figure out by now, on what must be in

reality, with the above clues given to You.

regards,

bhaskar.

, " rameshchojha " <rameshchojha

wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskarji,

> In a mutual aspect (7th) bet Jup and Sat who wins whom.

> Ex;Jup-5H-Pcs and Sat-11H-Virgo

> I specifically want to know if in Jup MD Sat disturbs the positive

> results of Jup or in Sat MD Jup boosts Sat.

> It might sound silly but i had only option to come to you

> ramesh ojha

>

Aspect

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups

Top Downloads