Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > toombaru the future needs the past......... to measure the mind..... and to be the future 'of'. ..b.b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > the future needs the past......... > > to measure the mind..... > > and to be the future 'of'. > > .b.b.b. > Wot ? .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > Wot ? > > > . what would the future be the future of without the past? it's not the future of 'now' 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. the mind as time...found by self within self time). mind IS time. 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > . > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > it's not the future of 'now' > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > mind IS time. > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > .b b.b. If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? Era Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > mind IS time. > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > Era who hurts? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > Era > > > who hurts? > > .b b.b. > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. LONELINESS ! thats[ wot <imnotsingingthisshit> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > Era > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > refreshing frankness! Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > refreshing frankness! > > Bill > Only no-mind can understand the aloneness/loneliness of Being. Only love could speak its truth. ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Only no-mind can understand the aloneness/loneliness of Being. Only love could speak its truth. ;-) The notes of your Lute, Anna, have taken a silvern quality, with shades of moonlight woven in the lustre of its voice. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > Era > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > Conceptual mind is self-imposed lonliness. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > Era > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > .b b.b. > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> Head On! Apply Directly to the Forehead! Head On! Apply Directly to the Forehead! Head On.. i hate your commercial... but i LOVE your product. can be applies to foreheads, yonis, voids or droids. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > refreshing frankness! > > Bill and equally refreshing eraness! but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. he could probably use a little eraness himself. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > Conceptual mind is self-imposed lonliness. > > > > toombaru > Ironic words! conceptual-mind (which does not exist) is imposed by self (which does not exist) on self (*still* does not exist). No wonder lonely, so busy hubbubing tween all doze no-places.... Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > Bill > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > .b b.b. ) would do him well I reckon! Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > ) > > would do him well I reckon! > > Bill > .....as opposed to.......? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > ) > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > Bill > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > toombaru as opposed to no-frank. no-frank doesn't need anything. except no things. ..b b.bv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > ) > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > Bill > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > toombaru > Hah! Got you! " opposed to " ???? DUALIST THINKING! Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > ) > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > Hah! Got you! > " opposed to " ???? > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > Bill > It's OK to engage in Dualist thinking, It's OK to use profanity, It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, It's OK to not be. It's OK To not be OK It's OK To not be OK With either being OK Or not being OK. It's OK to be completely clueless It's OK to be a raving lunatic It's OK to be mistaken It's OK to be a hypocrite It's OK to be an egomaniac. It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong It's OK for nothing to be OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > Bill > > > It's OK to engage in > > Dualist thinking, > > It's OK to use profanity, > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > It's OK to not be. > > > It's OK > > To not be OK > > It's OK > > To not be OK > > With either being OK > > Or not being OK. > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > It's OK to be mistaken > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK > some typist! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > Bill > > > It's OK to engage in > > Dualist thinking, > > It's OK to use profanity, > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > It's OK to not be. > > > It's OK > > To not be OK > > It's OK > > To not be OK > > With either being OK > > Or not being OK. > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > It's OK to be mistaken > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK speaks of you and to you...... you're ok and you're ok. it's even ok to be relaxed in a piss off at those who are pissed off. it's so..21rst century cool. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the > past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > It's OK to engage in > > > > Dualist thinking, > > > > It's OK to use profanity, > > > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > > > It's OK to not be. > > > > > > It's OK > > > > To not be OK > > > > It's OK > > > > To not be OK > > > > With either being OK > > > > Or not being OK. > > > > > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > > > It's OK to be mistaken > > > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK > > > > speaks of you and to you...... > > you're ok and you're ok. > > it's even ok to be relaxed in a piss off at those who are pissed off. > > it's so..21rst century cool. > > .b b.b. > it's OK to be so..21rst century cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the > past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > It's OK to engage in > > > > Dualist thinking, > > > > It's OK to use profanity, > > > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > > > It's OK to not be. > > > > > > It's OK > > > > To not be OK > > > > It's OK > > > > To not be OK > > > > With either being OK > > > > Or not being OK. > > > > > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > > > It's OK to be mistaken > > > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK > > > > speaks of you and to you...... > > you're ok and you're ok. > > it's even ok to be relaxed in a piss off at those who are pissed off. > > it's so..21rst century cool. > > .b b.b. > And it's OK To not be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the > future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the > > past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > It's OK to engage in > > > > > > Dualist thinking, > > > > > > It's OK to use profanity, > > > > > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > > > > > It's OK to not be. > > > > > > > > > It's OK > > > > > > To not be OK > > > > > > It's OK > > > > > > To not be OK > > > > > > With either being OK > > > > > > Or not being OK. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > > > > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > > > > > It's OK to be mistaken > > > > > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > > > > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > > > > > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK > > > > > > > > speaks of you and to you...... > > > > you're ok and you're ok. > > > > it's even ok to be relaxed in a piss off at those who are pissed off. > > > > it's so..21rst century cool. > > > > .b b.b. > > > And it's OK > > To not be > And it's OK To not be very clever And to just automatically Keep saying it's OK Like a parrot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " .b bobji baba " > > > > > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Era " <mi_nok@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mind needs the past.........to chart the > > future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the future needs the past......... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to measure the mind..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and to be the future 'of'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wot ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what would the future be the future of without the > > > past? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not the future of 'now' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'now' has no(w)tense..no future-past. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the future-past is nothing other than the > mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the mind as time...found by self within self > time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind IS time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'it's really no big deal...nothing at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing at all, why does it hurt so much ? > huh ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Era > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who hurts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -the freaking void, my yoni, the blackhole one.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LONELINESS ! thats[ wot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <imnotsingingthisshit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > refreshing frankness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and equally refreshing eraness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but frank's ok too..don't get me wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he could probably use a little eraness himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would do him well I reckon! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....as opposed to.......? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hah! Got you! > > > > > " opposed to " ???? > > > > > > > > > > DUALIST THINKING! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > It's OK to engage in > > > > > > > > Dualist thinking, > > > > > > > > It's OK to use profanity, > > > > > > > > It's OK to be perpetually pissed off, > > > > > > > > It's OK to not be. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK > > > > > > > > To not be OK > > > > > > > > It's OK > > > > > > > > To not be OK > > > > > > > > With either being OK > > > > > > > > Or not being OK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK to be completely clueless > > > > > > > > It's OK to be a raving lunatic > > > > > > > > It's OK to be mistaken > > > > > > > > It's OK to be a hypocrite > > > > > > > > It's OK to be an egomaniac. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK to be wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's OK for nothing to be OK > > > > > > > > > > > > speaks of you and to you...... > > > > > > you're ok and you're ok. > > > > > > it's even ok to be relaxed in a piss off at those who are pissed off. > > > > > > it's so..21rst century cool. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > And it's OK > > > > To not be > > > > > And it's OK > > To not be very clever > > And to just automatically > > Keep saying it's OK > > Like a parrot. you said it! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.