Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > Marc > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > lost. > > > > " Silver " > > yes > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except to > oneSelf...... > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > enjoy.... > > Marc Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les chandelles Eternelle! Vive la vie! " Silver " Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard > Time, > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > > lost. > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > yes > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except to > > oneSelf...... > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > enjoy.... > > > > Marc > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les chandelles > Eternelle! > > Vive la vie! > > " Silver " merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... la vie est une chandelle.... Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 - dennis_travis33 Nisargadatta Friday, December 30, 2005 6:36 AM Re: None Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard > Time, > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > > lost. > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > yes > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except to > > oneSelf...... > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > enjoy.... > > > > Marc > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les chandelles > Eternelle! > > Vive la vie! > > " Silver " merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... la vie est une chandelle.... Marc pour aimer est la conclusion d'éternité que je suis Je vous aime mes amis Je vous aimé à jamais et maintenant je vous rencontré. Ana ** If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: /mygroups?edit=1 Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > - > dennis_travis33 > Nisargadatta > Friday, December 30, 2005 6:36 AM > Re: None > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard > > Time, > > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > > > lost. > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > yes > > > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't > > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except > to > > > oneSelf...... > > > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > > > enjoy.... > > > > > > Marc > > > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les chandelles > > Eternelle! > > > > Vive la vie! > > > > " Silver " > > merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... > > la vie est une chandelle.... > > Marc > > pour aimer est la conclusion d'éternité que je suis > > Je vous aime mes amis > > Je vous aimé à jamais et maintenant je vous rencontré. > > > Ana aimer est l'unique façon de vrai vie.... je vous aime tous....et pour exprimer mon amour.... j'allume une chandelle....par le vrai Soi....en nous merci Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > - > dennis_travis33 > Nisargadatta > Friday, December 30, 2005 6:36 AM > Re: None > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard > > Time, > > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > > > lost. > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > yes > > > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't > > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except > to > > > oneSelf...... > > > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > > > enjoy.... > > > > > > Marc > > > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les chandelles > > Eternelle! > > > > Vive la vie! > > > > " Silver " > > merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... > > la vie est une chandelle.... > > Marc > > pour aimer est la conclusion d'éternité que je suis > > Je vous aime mes amis > > Je vous aimé à jamais et maintenant je vous rencontré. > > > Ana Et c'est une belle surprise, n'est ce pas? " Silver " Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > > > > - > > dennis_travis33 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, December 30, 2005 6:36 AM > > Re: None > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " > <silver- > > > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific > Standard > > > Time, > > > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never > be > > > > > lost. > > > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > yes > > > > > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which > didn't > > > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to > anybody.....except > > to > > > > oneSelf...... > > > > > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > > > > > enjoy.... > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les > chandelles > > > Eternelle! > > > > > > Vive la vie! > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... > > > > la vie est une chandelle.... > > > > Marc > > > > pour aimer est la conclusion d'éternité que je suis > > > > Je vous aime mes amis > > > > Je vous aimé à jamais et maintenant je vous rencontré. > > > > > > Ana > > aimer est l'unique façon de vrai vie.... > je vous aime tous....et pour exprimer mon amour.... > j'allume une chandelle....par le vrai Soi....en nous > > merci > > Marc > Beautiful! Absolutely beautiful! Translation: (surely not exact) Silver: Ah, yes, my dear friend, Marc. Let us burn Eternal candles! Celebrate the joy of Life! Marc: Thank you for this Light...of Life...Life is like a candle. Ana: To love is the conclusion of Eternity, which I Am. I love you, my friends. I have loved you fiercly and now I have met you. Marc: Loving is the unique way of Real Life...I love you all...and to express my love...I light a candle...in the name of Real Being...in the name of Us. Thank you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:52:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: epston Re: Re: None In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:41:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, silver-1069 writes: > > Right. Very good. Now, who do you imagine you are throwing fire and > brimstone at? It's a habit. Larry Habit or projection? Phil Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 The stories we make up about ourselves and others are truly ludicrous. None of it is true, not one word, and yet it all becomes mucho serious. Hehe. Phil In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:52:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-1069 Re: None And for the very first time I can truly laugh. I can't tell you who I am and yet, I understand who I am. How could I have " lost " that knowledge? I knew all along but I was unwilling to " see. " I might as well have believed that the sky is green and the grass is blue! It doesn't really matter. ROFLMAO!!!! " Silver " Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@A... wrote: > > > :::: Skipping, tripping, tumbling into Silvermind ::::: > Strange......I see none of that here. In fact, I see a growing peace from > only days ago. > > ::::: Hopping, dancing, prancing into Larrymind ::::: > Ahh, there it is......all of it. But it hides deep. Much is at stake. The > best of luck to you, friend. > > Phil > > > > In a message dated 12/29/2005 3:05:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > epston@a... > Re: Re: None > > It's a way to exert control by pretending not to have control, A game of > deception. > A pretense, a fraud to cover up the self-assumption of superiority by > playing > helpless. > > Larry > > In a message dated 12/29/2005 12:18:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, > illieusion@h... writes: > > > >Actually, it represents my absolute inability to describe the > > >Indescribable. > > > > So instead of describing the Indescribable, > > you attempt to describe your inability to > > describe it. Is that like showing up for a > > lecture and not knowing what to say, so you > > give a speech about not knowing what to say? > > > > Bill Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 3:10:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > > lost. > > > > " Silver " > > > > The right answer is: You could not have what you have never had. > > Larry That is also correct! Lol. " Silver " Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 In a message dated 12/30/2005 10:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 Re: None Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > Marc > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never be > lost. > > " Silver " yes one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which didn't know that it's impossible to burn a candle to anybody.....except to oneSelf...... so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which burn ....for ...and by....the Self enjoy.... Marc But try not to burn them on both ends......Very stressful. Phil Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 In a message dated 12/30/2005 10:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-1069 Re: None Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > dennis_travis33 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, December 30, 2005 6:36 AM > > Re: None > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " > <silver- > > > > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:19:31 AM Pacific > Standard > > > Time, > > > > > > > silver-1069@h... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How could I have " lost " that > > > > > > > > knowledge? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can answer that! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....this was the " right " answer?..... > > > > > > maybe the question was wrong so.... > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > The right answer is: I could not have found what can never > be > > > > > lost. > > > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > yes > > > > > > > > one could burn a candle for all the " lost " souls.....which > didn't > > > > know that it's impossible to burn a candle to > anybody.....except > > to > > > > oneSelf...... > > > > > > > > so let's appreciate the endless burning candles which > > > > burn ....for ...and by....the Self > > > > > > > > enjoy.... > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Ah, oui, mon cher ami, Marc. Lessons nous brulez les > chandelles > > > Eternelle! > > > > > > Vive la vie! > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > merci pour cette lumière...de vie.... > > > > la vie est une chandelle.... > > > > Marc > > > > pour aimer est la conclusion d'éternité que je suis > > > > Je vous aime mes amis > > > > Je vous aimé à jamais et maintenant je vous rencontré. > > > > > > Ana > > aimer est l'unique façon de vrai vie.... > je vous aime tous....et pour exprimer mon amour.... > j'allume une chandelle....par le vrai Soi....en nous > > merci > > Marc > Beautiful! Absolutely beautiful! Translation: (surely not exact) Silver: Ah, yes, my dear friend, Marc. Let us burn Eternal candles! Celebrate the joy of Life! Marc: Thank you for this Light...of Life...Life is like a candle. Ana: To love is the conclusion of Eternity, which I Am. I love you, my friends. I have loved you fiercly and now I have met you. Marc: Loving is the unique way of Real Life...I love you all...and to express my love...I light a candle...in the name of Real Being...in the name of Us. Thank you. Merci por la translacion.........Okay, don't speak French, but thanks. Would hate to have missed the conversation. Phil Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 30, 2005 In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:43:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, ADHHUB writes: > Habit or projection? > > Phil > Just a joke aimed at silver. Forget the Hehe. Larry Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige> wrote: > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > écrit : > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > veut dire aimer? > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > Patricia > hello Patricia, is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and love " with all.....? wish you inner peace Marc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 dear friend, listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are many reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love in action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a heartbeat one with existence of this, this, this moment... Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige> > wrote: > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > écrit : > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > veut dire aimer? > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > Patricia > > > > hello Patricia, > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > love " with all.....? > > wish you inner peace > > Marc > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > hello, depending on the " personal " view ....related to tendencies and Karma.....to loose.......yes, sure....one need to " care about " this love.....it can't be shared with " many " when the ego-mind is big........ because it's this same ego-mind who " see " this many....seperated to oneSelf..... this seperations are the cause of the " one love " missing..... i'm talking about this " one love " ...... in this " one love " .....there is " nobody " to love " anybody " .....it's just being..... this " one love " can't appear....if one try to " love all " .....because non-duality can't be lived......in doing dual " practice " thank you Marc > dear friend, > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are many > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love in > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a heartbeat > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > veut dire aimer? > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > Patricia > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > love " with all.....? > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > Marc > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Love is this, and Love is that, Love, love, love .. why don't we do it on the street ? When listening to your true self, it will tell you: " yada, yada, yada ... " Love is truth, wow, wow, wow ... Love is God, huh ? huh ? huh ? babble, babble. babble ... Werner Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > dear friend, > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are many > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love in > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a heartbeat > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > veut dire aimer? > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > Patricia > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > love " with all.....? > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > Marc > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: .....lol maybe i did the mistake to write something about " love all " last year....... seem that this was the wrong food....at wrong moment.... Marc > Love is this, and Love is that, > > Love, love, love .. why don't we do it on the street ? > > When listening to your true self, it will tell you: " yada, yada, > yada ... " > > Love is truth, wow, wow, wow ... > Love is God, huh ? huh ? huh ? > > babble, babble. babble ... > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > dear friend, > > > > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are > many > > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love > in > > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a > heartbeat > > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > <gdtige> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > > veut dire aimer? > > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > > love " with all.....? > > > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 it is happening on the street!!! lol where else? Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Love is this, and Love is that, > > Love, love, love .. why don't we do it on the street ? > > When listening to your true self, it will tell you: " yada, yada, > yada ... " > > Love is truth, wow, wow, wow ... > Love is God, huh ? huh ? huh ? > > babble, babble. babble ... > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > dear friend, > > > > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are > many > > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love > in > > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a > heartbeat > > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > <gdtige> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > > veut dire aimer? > > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > > love " with all.....? > > > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 All there is is...even when you run out of sugar for your coffee... Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > dear friend, > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are many > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love in > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a heartbeat > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > veut dire aimer? > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > Patricia > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > love " with all.....? > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > Marc > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Everybody appears to love themself.... As per Niz, " Love yourself wisely. " Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Love is this, and Love is that, > > Love, love, love .. why don't we do it on the street ? > > When listening to your true self, it will tell you: " yada, yada, > yada ... " > > Love is truth, wow, wow, wow ... > Love is God, huh ? huh ? huh ? > > babble, babble. babble ... > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > dear friend, > > > > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are > many > > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love > in > > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a > heartbeat > > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > <gdtige> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > > veut dire aimer? > > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > > love " with all.....? > > > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2006 thank YOU! Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: > > All there is is...even when you run out of sugar for your coffee... > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > dear friend, > > > > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are > many > > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, love > in > > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a > heartbeat > > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > <gdtige> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > > veut dire aimer? > > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace and > > > love " with all.....? > > > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 3, 2006 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: if you were aware of the Self.....there would be nobody " to love " .....except in the dream-world you are Feeling to " be " Marc > Everybody appears to love themself.... As per Niz, " Love yourself > wisely. " > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > wrote: > > > > Love is this, and Love is that, > > > > Love, love, love .. why don't we do it on the street ? > > > > When listening to your true self, it will tell you: " yada, yada, > > yada ... " > > > > Love is truth, wow, wow, wow ... > > Love is God, huh ? huh ? huh ? > > > > babble, babble. babble ... > > > > Werner > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > dear friend, > > > > > > > > > listening to the mind,to believes and identifications there are > > many > > > reasons not to love, because love is freedom, total freedom. > > > listening to our true Self there is no reason too, just love, > love > > in > > > action, being happy, making happy, in a living pulsation, a > > heartbeat > > > one with existence of this, this, this moment... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > > <gdtige> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > mais qu`est ce qu`aimer ? qui peut expliquer ce que > > > > > veut dire aimer? > > > > > Aimer c`est se repandre en l`autre . > > > > > Aimer c`est pouvoir saisir l`autre dans sa totalite . > > > > > Aimer serait donc relier, faire pond, perdre son Soi. > > > > > Aimer est le lien entre ce qui est en dualite.Aimer > > > > > est-un autre mot pour exprimer non-dualite? > > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello Patricia, > > > > > > > > is there any reason why one souldn't love all.....?...... > > > > how, ever, " you " could have peace....without being " in peace > and > > > > love " with all.....? > > > > > > > > wish you inner peace > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
