the thought called scumbag

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " sam_t_7 " <sam_t_7> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...>

> wrote:

> >

> > If there were such a thing as choice -- which there isn't because

it

> > is just a thought -- I would have taken the role of that ugly bug

so

> > that your ex-wife would have squashed me to WAKE ME up TO BE

the

> > Reality I AM -- and only this mind of mine keeps thinking

otherwise.

> > -- just thoughts

>

>

> sam: All that you're experiencing right Now is a thought.

> Thought = choice

>

> Creation + Thought + Choice = Gene Polotas

-=----------------------

 

Your equation is a simple error in mathematics that needs

subtraction and not additions:

This " Gene Polotas " is just a thought that is Nothing. This I know

for certain because I AM the same thought, Nothing.

 

The correct equation should be:

Nothing - thought- choice = a thought that is still nothing, like GP.

 

What this " still nothing " leaves is EVERYTHING or Atman that the

nothing called thoughts, words, will never be.

=-=

 

>

> Gene, your dream is turning into a nightmare. Wake up sweetie, wake

> up! What Alias are you talking to as a scumbag? What part of your

> dream? What non-doer are you talking to? You are taking things

so,

> so serious. This could create a chemical imbalance in your little

> nogin/head which could be highly entertaining if you want to go

that

> route. Yes then I would agree in your description of yourself as a

> phsycopath. If you accept what you say that you are Self and all

is

> Self than aren't you in fact calling your own self a scumbag? Or

just

> the thoughts? You confuse the word **choice** with 'reality and

dream

> illusion' as do most other seekers.

> Self creates out of thought + choice irregardless of whether or not

> it's a dream. Self doesn't care if it's a dream....and you're

being

> Here Now is proof of that.

>

> If you indeed accept what you say, that " I AM " then you would

accept

> that You have cast Your consciousness to some degree, albeit a

small

> one, into this human structure alias called Gene Polatos. People

> innately know that this I AM is what they are and that's why they

seek

> desperately to reconnect with that glimmer of what they are. If

there

> is only ONE Self then why do you negate the dream, be it a tree, a

> bird a human or a rock as anything other than Self? You speak of

it

> as something other than YourSelf, like a scumb bag that should

commit

> suicide. Is that your thoughts of your Self?

> ====================

Alias is a thought, as is the word scumbag. Why are " you, " another

thought, upset at a thought committing suicide?

 

Every word is just a thought, even " you, " and even the four letter

words.

 

To Accept that all words are the same -- Nothing but thoughts -- is

to be AWAKE to EVERYTHING, Atman, that ALL IS -- and the nothings

called thoughts will never be.

-- NOW

 

 

-========================

 

This is a dualistic

> thought about something other than You. If Self is in All and

> through all then wouldn't your dream people be classified as Self?

> You say you are Self but you want to separate aspects of your Self

> into compartments of 'other scumbags' and then use the excuse that

> people are just a dream and not real to hide behind? Do you get

the

> conflict between your words here as has been explained in the above

> few sentences? This serves to split you off further into this

> dualistic nature that you speak about.

>

> Then you get caught up in the debate about the dream and illusion.

> How can you both be Self and Not be Self at the same time? All

> dream is SElf --- there is No thing else. Self/ Consiousness

> (creation born of choice and transferred into thought and action -

yes

> doers irregardless if it's dream) and Void is what there is. Gene

> arises out of that. SElf/Void doesn't care if Gene is a dream.

> More importantly you may want to ask the question, " Why does Self

> dream and create (choose) illusion from thought? " " Is it important

to

> Self? " ...rather than getting caught up in the endless debate

about

> the dream which only spins your dream world into a greater chemical

> imbalance.