Guest guest Posted March 12, 2005 Report Share Posted March 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > >Gary: I propose we think of > > the word symbol " Self " as multi-agey. > > >Toombaru: Well....since it only exists within your own mind....you can think about it any way you > want............ > Since " Self " , just like its twin brothers, " God " and " Supreme " , are mere word symbols, signifying nothing, I don't really think about it (or them) very much at all. What would there be to think about anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2005 Report Share Posted March 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , " garyfalk1943 " <falkgw@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > > >Gary: I propose we think of > > > the word symbol " Self " as multi-agey. > > > > > >Toombaru: Well....since it only exists within your own mind....you > can think about it any way you > > want............ > > > > Since " Self " , just like its twin brothers, " God " and " Supreme " , are > mere word symbols, signifying nothing, I don't really think about it > (or them) very much at all. > > What would there be to think about anyway? devi: the Self or Atman, and Brahman which you can't have one without the other...is always there....and the Self contemplates the Self... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.