Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

inner lover

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Tim wrote:

> Love is not a

> feeling or an

> emotion -- however, imagining " lover " and " beloved " as

> apart and

> separate is one of the roots of suffering. There is no

> subject-

> object, no lover and beloved. Love only.

 

Any practical comment on how this inner belowed can be

called forward...what is a woman to do to be free from the

" dependence " of the outer man to lead her to god ?

A question perhaps asked by head....heart has the

answer...is my guess...but only a guess... I'd appreciate

answers from you guys, too.

caiti

 

 

 

Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

-

Caiti

Nisargadatta

Saturday, December 15, 2001 09:49 AM

inner lover

 

Tim wrote:> Love is not a> feeling or an > emotion -- however, imagining "lover" and "beloved" as> apart and > separate is one of the roots of suffering. There is no> subject-> object, no lover and beloved. Love only.Any practical comment on how this inner belowed can becalled forward...what is a woman to do to be free from the"dependence" of the outer man to lead her to god ?

 

 

---

 

 

See God as the outer man.

 

 

Zip-A Dee-Dah-Doo

 

 

Sandeep

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> See God as the outer man.

>

Sandeep my dear, that is exactly where I get stuck..they

are not always so trustable....and all gets kinda messed

up....I read: worship god in the outer man...that takes

some discernment..

yours

caiti bhakti figureitout

 

 

 

Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Catti,

 

 

-

Caiti

Nisargadatta

Saturday, December 15, 2001 05:34 PM

Re: inner lover

 

> > See God as the outer man.> Sandeep my dear, that is exactly where I get stuck..theyare not always so trustable....

 

 

The "untrustableness", the play in the moment.

 

 

and all gets kinda messedup....

 

 

The messing up, and resultant messed-up , the play in the moment.

 

 

I read: worship god in the outer man...that takessome discernment..

 

 

When the moment, is seen exactly as it is, there is no more inner or outer, no discernment, nothing to discern.

It is in the divisiveness of the moment, that the need to discern is born.

 

 

Otherwise it's Zubeida, zubeeee zubeeee

 

 

Sandeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandeep,

I am in a space where I need to be reminded of this over

and over again..keep at it man and thank you very much.

Hammer it in...until like anut i just crack open.

You' re a gift.

Zubeida who?

tell me more.

caiti :)

 

 

 

--- Sandeep Chatterjee <sandeepc wrote:

> Dear Catti,

>

> -

> Caiti

> Nisargadatta

> Saturday, December 15, 2001 05:34 PM

> Re: inner lover

>

>

>

> >

> > See God as the outer man.

> >

> Sandeep my dear, that is exactly where I get

> stuck..they

> are not always so trustable....

>

>

> The " untrustableness " , the play in the moment.

>

>

> and all gets kinda messed

> up....

>

>

> The messing up, and resultant messed-up , the play in

> the moment.

>

>

> I read: worship god in the outer man...that takes

> some discernment..

>

> When the moment, is seen exactly as it is, there is no

> more inner or outer, no discernment, nothing to discern.

> It is in the divisiveness of the moment, that the need

> to discern is born.

>

>

> Otherwise it's Zubeida, zubeeee zubeeee

>

> Sandeep

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hiya Catti,

 

 

-

Caiti

Nisargadatta

Saturday, December 15, 2001 07:33 PM

Re: inner lover

 

Sandeep,I am in a space where I need to be reminded of this overand over again..keep at it man and thank you very much.Hammer it in...until like anut i just crack open.

 

 

At your service maaa'm

Keep providing the nut, I'll keep providing the hammer.

 

You' re a gift.Zubeida who?tell me more.

 

 

LOL.

 

These days, there is a focus on increasing the craziness of the signoffs.

 

Zubeida was a Muslim princess, but that's about all.

 

La deeee Daaaaa Daaaa Deeeee

Sandeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandeep,

to possible annoyance for other listees I reply here...as

life is happening so right now...

 

the other day I asked a friend for a name..telling him:

dream out anything you'd like but I wouldn't like

Zubeida...

hmm.... princess...not bad...

 

iron my brain...

thank you dear hammer

your grateful

nut

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, Caiti <caitionline> wrote:

> Tim wrote:

> > Love is not a

> > feeling or an

> > emotion -- however, imagining " lover " and " beloved " as

> > apart and

> > separate is one of the roots of suffering. There is no

> > subject-

> > object, no lover and beloved. Love only.

>

> Any practical comment on how this inner belowed can be

> called forward...what is a woman to do to be free from the

> " dependence " of the outer man to lead her to god ?

> A question perhaps asked by head....heart has the

> answer...is my guess...but only a guess... I'd appreciate

> answers from you guys, too.

> caiti

 

If heart has the answer, that's more than a guess,

is my guess.

 

" Inner certainty " needn't be confirmed by an " outer man " ...

because it has no inside or outside.

 

When no distance for love to cross, what is the boundary

of self?

 

-- Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are looking naively for an outer image/being

to trust, God may well appear

as " the trickster " ...

 

But, what is " this " that appears so suddenly

that it can't be grasped, yet so constantly

that is never somewhere else?

 

This isn't the inner or outer man, nor woman ...

 

 

-- Dan

 

> >

> > See God as the outer man.

> >

> Sandeep my dear, that is exactly where I get stuck..they

> are not always so trustable....and all gets kinda messed

> up....I read: worship god in the outer man...that takes

> some discernment..

> yours

> caiti bhakti figureitout

>

>

>

> Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

> or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are looking naively

for an outer image/being

to trust,

 

God may well appear

as " the trickster " ...

 

Dan

 

-------------------

 

Yes, we all marry " the trickster " .

be it male or female or anyTHING

else.

 

Until " death " do " we " part.

 

What remains is " this " .

 

El

 

 

----

----

----

 

Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote:

> If you are looking naively for an outer image/being

> to trust, God may well appear

> as " the trickster " ...

>

> But, what is " this " that appears so suddenly

> that it can't be grasped, yet so constantly

> that is never somewhere else?

>

> This isn't the inner or outer man, nor woman ...

>

>

> -- Dan

>

> > >

> > > See God as the outer man.

> > >

> > Sandeep my dear, that is exactly where I get stuck..they

> > are not always so trustable....and all gets kinda messed

> > up....I read: worship god in the outer man...that takes

> > some discernment..

> > yours

> > caiti bhakti figureitout

> >

> >

 

> >

> > Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

> > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

> > or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Yes, we all marry " the trickster " .

> be it male or female or anyTHING

> else.

>

> Until " death " do " we " part.

>

> What remains is " this " .

>

> El

 

 

:-)

 

..

 

true of the marriages

of me and my body,

and I and my me,

as nothing and I, as well ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote:

>

> > Yes, we all marry " the trickster " .

> > be it male or female or anyTHING

> > else.

> >

> > Until " death " do " we " part.

> >

> > What remains is " this " .

> >

> > El

-----------------------------

>

> :-)

> true of the marriages

> of me and my body,

> and I and my me,

> as nothing and I, as well ...

 

Dan

-----------------------------

 

.... " and I and my me,

as nothing and I, as well ... "

Dan

 

 

Ah,

that's what makes

" the Trickster " so tricky!

El

 

 

..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Ah,

> that's what makes

> " the Trickster " so tricky!

> El

>

>

> .

 

What makes the Trickster really tricky,

is holding up a mirror and convincing

you that you see someone there ...

 

..

 

 

:-D an

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, Caiti <caitionline> wrote:

> Tim wrote:

> > Love is not a

> > feeling or an

> > emotion -- however, imagining " lover " and " beloved " as

> > apart and

> > separate is one of the roots of suffering. There is no

> > subject-

> > object, no lover and beloved. Love only.

>

> Any practical comment on how this inner belowed can be

> called forward...what is a woman to do to be free from the

> " dependence " of the outer man to lead her to god ?

 

**** Quite simply - knock it off! :-)

Look at what you're doing instead.

Playing co-dependent emotional games with some form of " other " is

pretty ridiculous wouldn't you say?

Why do you think they call it " self " realization? Ever thought of

that?

 

Hua!

 

Judi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Judi,

long time no hear...I hope that you are well. It wasn't

exactly the co-dependency stuff I had in mind here.....more

like the popular tantra games in vogue right now...

thanks for your comment ..there is a point to it, no doubt.

caiti

 

 

original message:

> **** Quite simply - knock it off! :-)

> Look at what you're doing instead.

> Playing co-dependent emotional games with some form of

> " other " is

> pretty ridiculous wouldn't you say?

> Why do you think they call it " self " realization? Ever

> thought of

> that?

>

> Hua!

>

> Judi

 

 

 

 

Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, Caiti <caitionline> wrote:

> Hey Judi,

> long time no hear...I hope that you are well. It wasn't

> exactly the co-dependency stuff I had in mind here.....more

> like the popular tantra games in vogue right now...

> thanks for your comment ..there is a point to it, no doubt.

> caiti

>

***** Yes, pleasure is what interests people, not the truth.

Nothing new there. Ho-hum.

 

Next.

 

Judi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>

> original message:

> > **** Quite simply - knock it off! :-)

> > Look at what you're doing instead.

> > Playing co-dependent emotional games with some form of

> > " other " is

> > pretty ridiculous wouldn't you say?

> > Why do you think they call it " self " realization? Ever

> > thought of

> > that?

> >

> > Hua!

> >

> > Judi

>

>

>

>

> Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of

> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at

> or bid at http://auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, " judirhodes " <judirhodes@e...> wrote:

> Nisargadatta, Caiti <caitionline> wrote:

> > Hey Judi,

> > long time no hear...I hope that you are well. It wasn't

> > exactly the co-dependency stuff I had in mind here.....more

> > like the popular tantra games in vogue right now...

> > thanks for your comment ..there is a point to it, no doubt.

> > caiti

> >

> ***** Yes, pleasure is what interests people, not the truth.

> Nothing new there. Ho-hum.

>

> Next.

>

> Judi

>

*******

Judi wrote:

 

Simply going along indulging yourself in life doesn't cut the

mustard. Every idiot and their brother does that. Nothing new there.

Realization, if there is to be any, lies in a specific process, which

is intelligence, which has nothing to do with indulgences, or the lack

of them.

 

Bruce wrote:

 

Right, and that intelligence can't be measured with an IQ test either

-- the world is awash in high-IQ fools fascinated by their own shallow

cleverness much like an ape entertaining itself by playing with its

own dung!

 

Krishnamurti often referred to intelligence that had nothing to do

with the activity of thought. It's like the Cher character in

" Moonstruck " yelling out " Get over it! " The " it " in this case is that

which craves indulgence or exults in its supposed absence.

 

 

Judi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It comes down to a matter of intelligence, of need. Of seeing thru

your own game so that it all falls apart. I guess it just comes down

to going around the block so many times until a person says to

themselves, now wait just a darn minute here, what am I doing?

 

So you keep going around the block and everytime you pass by I'll be

sitting here waiting for you with a glass of scotch.

 

And round and round they go!

 

Judi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...