A REAL SPIRITUAL SEEKER

[Guest guest]

Maharaj would say as long as the bodymind (or he would call it

the "food body" )is there, beingness is there.You must remember that Maharaj

even negated the sense of I am as beingness and

that Being transcended that. In I Am That, unfortunately things could

get confusing because Being and beingness, were never capitalized. The

made it confusing for me. However, Maharaj is not negating the Absolute,

only the personal. In sitting with Maharaj, he alway clarified that which

was abit confusing in the published book.

Cathy

 

The only thing that I ever thought seemed unusual about Nisargadatta

was his always referring to the Absolute or Brahman as a 'state'

(which it can't be, by definition or otherwise) -- I wonder if it has

to do with the translation...

 

Namaste,

 

Tim