Guest guest Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Dear Siva, You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > " schinnas " <schinnas > -owner > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > Dear all, > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a " Sunlit path " . In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category. > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it. > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them. > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > Jai Gurudev! > Siva. > > , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > There was some discussion on breathing exercises such as Sudarshan kriya taught at AOL courses. I do not want to comment on specific courses or techniques, but will make a comment on Raja yoga practices in general. > > > > Breathing is a very important activity and is connected to the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. It maintains the life force and emotional balance. Several breathing exercises are taught by various scriptures and traditions, such as praanaayaama taught by Baba Ramdev of Patanjali Yoga Foundation, Kriya yoga taught by Mahavatar Babaji and Paramahamsa Yogananda, Sudarsana kriya taught by Art Of Living foundation. > > > > All these fall under Raja yoga, in the four-fold division of Jnaana, Bhakti, Karma and Raja yogas. If these exercises are used as a means to regulate breathing and thoughts upto some level and keep the body fit, it is fine. They are quite useful. > > > > * * * > > > > I was watching a nice TV program of a Baba who popularized praanaayaamas like kapaalabhaati and anuloma-viloma among Indian masses. He talked about breathing in and out slowly and gradually reaching nirbeeja samadhi through it. I was amused. Most people have too many (and quite firm) impurities in their subtle bodies in the form of prior mental conditioning to be cleared just through breathing exercises and to reach samadhi - nirbeeja or sabeeja - just by doing praanaayaama. However, I like the praanaayaamas he teaches. In fact, things like anuloma-viloma praanaayaama and kapaalabhaati are badly needed in today's stressed out world. However, I see this as something that relieves physical and emotional stress and enables better spiritual sadhana, rather than something that enables spiritual realization. > > > > Of course, there are yogic techniques meant for raising Kundalini forcefully (e.g. bandhas such as Jalandhara bandha). But, with such techniques, one is playing with fire. Ramakrishna Paramahamsa discouraged his disciples (e.g. Swami Abhedananda and Swami Yogananda) from Hatha yoga and other Raja yoga practices, telling them to stay away from practices that emphasize the body and to absorb the mind in god'a name instead. He said that realizng god through practices that emphasize the body and its perfection, is nearly impossible in this age due to impurities present everywhere, in food, water, air and thinking. > > > > If one practices yama, niyama etc and attains perfect composure, then it may be possible to go into samadhi through the control of breathing. But it is unrealistic for most people. Suppose one has an ocean (samsaara) to cross and a boat (body) is given to one. If one is close to the bank (liberation), one can just jump out of the boat and land on the bank. If one in the middle of an ocean jumps out of the boat, one will only sink in the ocean! In jnaana yoga, bhakti yoga or karma yoga, one uses knowledge or faith or ability to work without expectations as a rudder to steer the boat towards the bank. In raaja yoga, one takes control like a raja (king) and just jumps out of the boat. That will work if one is close to the bank, i.e. already quite elevated. Otherwise, just jumping out of the boat is very risky. Raja yoga requires a lot of preparation. One in Raja yoga practices needs a good guru to gauge one's progress and prescribe the next steps at every stage. If some things are done too early, it may result in irreversible damage. > > > > Bottomline: Use various praanaayaamas, kriyas and other exercises for physical and emotional health and to create an environment conducive to spiritual sadhana. But do not be under an impression that you can realize god through such activities alone. That may have been possible in the past, but it nearly impossible for most people today. > > > > * * * > > > > Regarding charging a lot of money for such things, one should realize that Ramakrishna and Ramana maharshi stayed away from money for a reason. When Srila Prabhupada initiated so many people into mahamantra, he did not charge any fee. He had faith in Krishna and ended up building a really big organization, though he did not demand any fee for his lectures or initiations and did not keep his teachings secretive. > > > > If Ramakrishna Mutt is doing great service even today, it is because the organization was built by Swami Vivekananda, Swami Brahmananda, Swami Shivananda and Swami Premananda with a lot of sattwa guna and they kept rajas and tamas at bay. They suffered in the beginning and it took a long time to build, but it will last a long time. Things built with tamas or rajas do not last too long and do not take people to god. One intending to build an organization to fulfil one's dharma should try to ensure that sattwa drives the activities and not rajas or tamas. Usually, money brings rajas or even tamas into picture and that is why great masters have been wary. > > > > There may be exceptions of course. All activities of a fully realized and liberated soul without any self-identification are guided by sattwa. If such a person builds an organization based on selling divine knowledge, it means that Nature wanted him/her to sell divine knowledge for some reason. Such things are possible but rare. In general, you see great souls like Ramakrishna, Ramana Maharshi and Srila Prabhupada operating within their means and not charging for spiritual knowledge. > > > > Best regards, > > Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Dear Siva, Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik. Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. -Regards Rajarshi The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra--- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas Cc: schinnasDate: Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM Dear Siva,You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future!Best regards,Narasimha------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpanaSpirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdomFree Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.orgJyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tingsSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000> "schinnas" <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> - owner@ s.com> AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas> > Dear all,> Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha.> As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding.> > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a "Sunlit path". In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more.> > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and> > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category.> > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc.> > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly> recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers.> > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs.> > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage.> > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established.> > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed.> > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form.> > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people.> > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid.> > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons.> > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it.> > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them.> > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy.> > Jai Gurudev!> Siva.> > , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote:> >> > Namaste,> >> > There was some discussion on breathing exercises such as Sudarshan kriya taught at AOL courses. I do not want to comment on specific courses or techniques, but will make a comment on Raja yoga practices in general.> >> > Breathing is a very important activity and is connected to the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. It maintains the life force and emotional balance. Several breathing exercises are taught by various scriptures and traditions, such as praanaayaama taught by Baba Ramdev of Patanjali Yoga Foundation, Kriya yoga taught by Mahavatar Babaji and Paramahamsa Yogananda, Sudarsana kriya taught by Art Of Living foundation.> >> > All these fall under Raja yoga, in the four-fold division of Jnaana, Bhakti, Karma and Raja yogas. If these exercises are used as a means to regulate breathing and thoughts upto some level and keep the body fit, it is fine. They are quite useful.> >> > * * *> >> > I was watching a nice TV program of a Baba who popularized praanaayaamas like kapaalabhaati and anuloma-viloma among Indian masses. He talked about breathing in and out slowly and gradually reaching nirbeeja samadhi through it. I was amused. Most people have too many (and quite firm) impurities in their subtle bodies in the form of prior mental conditioning to be cleared just through breathing exercises and to reach samadhi - nirbeeja or sabeeja - just by doing praanaayaama. However, I like the praanaayaamas he teaches. In fact, things like anuloma-viloma praanaayaama and kapaalabhaati are badly needed in today's stressed out world. However, I see this as something that relieves physical and emotional stress and enables better spiritual sadhana, rather than something that enables spiritual realization.> >> > Of course, there are yogic techniques meant for raising Kundalini forcefully (e.g. bandhas such as Jalandhara bandha). But, with such techniques, one is playing with fire. Ramakrishna Paramahamsa discouraged his disciples (e.g. Swami Abhedananda and Swami Yogananda) from Hatha yoga and other Raja yoga practices, telling them to stay away from practices that emphasize the body and to absorb the mind in god'a name instead. He said that realizng god through practices that emphasize the body and its perfection, is nearly impossible in this age due to impurities present everywhere, in food, water, air and thinking.> >> > If one practices yama, niyama etc and attains perfect composure, then it may be possible to go into samadhi through the control of breathing. But it is unrealistic for most people. Suppose one has an ocean (samsaara) to cross and a boat (body) is given to one. If one is close to the bank (liberation) , one can just jump out of the boat and land on the bank. If one in the middle of an ocean jumps out of the boat, one will only sink in the ocean! In jnaana yoga, bhakti yoga or karma yoga, one uses knowledge or faith or ability to work without expectations as a rudder to steer the boat towards the bank. In raaja yoga, one takes control like a raja (king) and just jumps out of the boat. That will work if one is close to the bank, i.e. already quite elevated. Otherwise, just jumping out of the boat is very risky. Raja yoga requires a lot of preparation. One in Raja yoga practices needs a good guru to gauge one's progress and prescribe the next steps at every stage. If some things are done too early, it may result in irreversible damage.> >> > Bottomline: Use various praanaayaamas, kriyas and other exercises for physical and emotional health and to create an environment conducive to spiritual sadhana. But do not be under an impression that you can realize god through such activities alone. That may have been possible in the past, but it nearly impossible for most people today.> >> > * * *> >> > Regarding charging a lot of money for such things, one should realize that Ramakrishna and Ramana maharshi stayed away from money for a reason. When Srila Prabhupada initiated so many people into mahamantra, he did not charge any fee. He had faith in Krishna and ended up building a really big organization, though he did not demand any fee for his lectures or initiations and did not keep his teachings secretive.> >> > If Ramakrishna Mutt is doing great service even today, it is because the organization was built by Swami Vivekananda, Swami Brahmananda, Swami Shivananda and Swami Premananda with a lot of sattwa guna and they kept rajas and tamas at bay. They suffered in the beginning and it took a long time to build, but it will last a long time. Things built with tamas or rajas do not last too long and do not take people to god. One intending to build an organization to fulfil one's dharma should try to ensure that sattwa drives the activities and not rajas or tamas. Usually, money brings rajas or even tamas into picture and that is why great masters have been wary.> >> > There may be exceptions of course. All activities of a fully realized and liberated soul without any self-identification are guided by sattwa. If such a person builds an organization based on selling divine knowledge, it means that Nature wanted him/her to sell divine knowledge for some reason. Such things are possible but rare. In general, you see great souls like Ramakrishna, Ramana Maharshi and Srila Prabhupada operating within their means and not charging for spiritual knowledge.> >> > Best regards,> > Narasimha Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Dear Narasimha, namaste and pranaamsWhat is sahaja samadhi and how is it different from nirvikalpa samadhi?best regardsHari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Dear Rajarshi, Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf? The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago! One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. ************ The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. Sri Sri always practices " experience first and explanation and knowledge later " principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna's life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus! Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. Jai Gurudev! Siva. , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14 wrote: > > Dear Siva, >  >  > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik. >  > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? >  > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. >  > -Regards >  Rajarshi >  > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > Cc: schinnas > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM > > >  > > > > Dear Siva, > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! > > Best regards, > Narasimha > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > " schinnas " <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > > - owner@ s.com > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > Dear all, > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a " Sunlit path " . In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category. > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it. > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them. > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Dear Siva, Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. * * * > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! If he "never debates on Truth", why did he agree to take part in the debate? > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > anything else. One can "show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready" without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. If one answers only when there is "sincerity in the heart of the questioner", why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is known to not have "sincerity in the heart" and who only wants to ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is different from a "questioner" or a disciple seeking spiritual direction. > The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in > Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > discussion. If a yogi has such stature, one can do "justice to the topic" without even taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. * * * When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance with "polite words". They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. Best regards,NarasimhaDo a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpanaSpirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.orgJyotish writings: JyotishWritingsSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org , "schinnas" <schinnas wrote:>> Dear Rajarshi,> Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf?> > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago!> > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > ************> > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > Sri Sri always practices "experience first and explanation and knowledge later" principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna's life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus!> > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > Jai Gurudev!> Siva.> > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote:> >> > Dear Siva,> >  > >  > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik.> >  > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? > >  > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went.> >  > > -Regards> >  Rajarshi> >  > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra> > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@>> > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas> > > > Cc: schinnas@> > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM> > > > > >  > > > > > > > > Dear Siva,> > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future!> > > > Best regards,> > Narasimha> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam> > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana> > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom> > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net> > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org> > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings> > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000> > > "schinnas" <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> > > - owner@ s.com> > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas> > > > > > Dear all,> > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha.> > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding.> > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a "Sunlit path". In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more.> > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and> > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category.> > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc.> > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly> > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers.> > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs.> > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage.> > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established.> > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed.> > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form.> > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people.> > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid.> > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons.> > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it.> > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them.> > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy.> > > > > > Jai Gurudev!> > > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Dear Siva, I strongly wish that this message of Narasimha should reach Sri Sri. I mayself strongly believe that Sri Sri is a spiritual giant but these are the noteworthy points mentioned by him. even i was not convinced with what you have written in defence of Sri Sri. Please, if you can, get the response from Sri Sri Ravishankar. Best Regards, Utpal , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > > Dear Siva, > > Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. > > * * * > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! > > If he " never debates on Truth " , why did he agree to take part in the debate? > > > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. > > One can " show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready " without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > > > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. > > If one answers only when there is " sincerity in the heart of the questioner " , why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is known to not have " sincerity in the heart " and who only wants to ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is different from a " questioner " or a disciple seeking spiritual direction. > > > The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in > > Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " > > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > > discussion. > > If a yogi has such stature, one can do " justice to the topic " without even taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. > > * * * > > When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance with " polite words " . They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. > > Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > , " schinnas " <schinnas@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rajarshi, > > Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf? > > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago! > > > > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > > > ************ > > > > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > > > Sri Sri always practices " experience first and explanation and knowledge later " principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! > > > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna's life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus! > > > > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. > > > > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > >  > > >  > > > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik. > > >  > > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? > > >  > > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. > > >  > > > -Regards > > >  Rajarshi > > >  > > > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > > > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > Cc: schinnas@ > > > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > > > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > > > " schinnas " <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > > > > - owner@ s.com > > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > > > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > > > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a " Sunlit path " . In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and > > > > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category. > > > > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > > > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > > > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > > > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > > > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > > > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > > > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it. > > > > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them. > > > > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > > > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > > > Siva. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 but a hindu saint must have mastered 7 philosophiesand must be proficient in tarka sastramvallalar or swami vivekanada or Ramana Maharishi never failed in a argumentNarasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 8:49:20 AM Re: AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas Dear Siva, Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. * * * > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! If he "never debates on Truth", why did he agree to take part in the debate? > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > anything else. One can "show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready" without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. If one answers only when there is "sincerity in the heart of the questioner", why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is known to not have "sincerity in the heart" and who only wants to ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is different from a "questioner" or a disciple seeking spiritual direction. > The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in > Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > discussion. If a yogi has such stature, one can do "justice to the topic" without even taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. * * * When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance with "polite words". They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. Best regards,Narasimha------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpanaSpirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdomFree Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.orgJyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tingsSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- , "schinnas" <schinnas wrote:>> Dear Rajarshi,> Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf?> > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago!> > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > ************> > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > Sri Sri always practices "experience first and explanation and knowledge later" principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna' s life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus!> > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > Jai Gurudev!> Siva.> > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote:> >> > Dear Siva,> >  > >  > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik.> >  > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? > >  > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went.> >  > > -Regards> >  Rajarshi> >  > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra> > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@>> > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas> > > > Cc: schinnas@> > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM> > > > > >  > > > > > > > > Dear Siva,> > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future!> > > > Best regards,> > Narasimha> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam> > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana> > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom> > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net> > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org> > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings> > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org> > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000> > > "schinnas" <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> > > - owner@ s.com> > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas> > > > > > Dear all,> > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha.> > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding.> > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a "Sunlit path". In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more.> > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and> > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category.> > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc.> > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly> > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers.> > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs.> > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage.> > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established.> > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed.> > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form.> > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people.> > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid.> > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons.> > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it.> > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them.> > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy.> > > > > > Jai Gurudev!> > > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Namaste, A Hindu saint need not really master 6 darshanas and be proficient in Tarka. The one and only goal of a Hindu saint is to experience god. One may master other things such as shad-darshanas on the path to experiencing god, but that is not necessary. However, people who have realized Self and whose individual ego has been effaced and suffused with the Divine usually carry such Light and Knowledge with them that they can fulfil their dharma even if they have not formally read any books. No wonder Vallalar or Swami Vivekananda or Ramana Maharshi never failed in an argument as you said. They would never enter a debate unless they see it as their dharma. Once they enter a debate, they would not waver or be unsure. Some saints may not debate or even talk. Ramana Maharshi was silent for much of the time and yet people around him received so much peace, bliss and knowledge. It is not at all necessary for a saint to debate and defeat others. But one would hardly see a great saint agree to a debate and then evade the questions with polite words. I am sorry, but that sounds like a confused Arjuna just before the Kurukshetra war. Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Spirituality writings: Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana ---- Se Am <mahalaxmyey wrote: > but a hindu saint must have mastered 7 philosophies > and must be proficient in tarka sastram > vallalar or swami vivekanada or Ramana Maharishi never failed in a argument > > ________________________________ > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr > > Wed, November 18, 2009 8:49:20 AM > Re: AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > Dear Siva, > > Respectfully, I want to offer a different > perspective. > > * > * * > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He > never debates on Truth! > > If he " never debates on Truth " , why did he agree to > take part in the debate? > > > To him Truth / God is not an article of > debate. He can show the way > > to Realization of Truth to those that are > ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. > > One can " show the way to > Realization of Truth to those that are ready " without accepting to take > part in a debate like that! > > > He answers only when there is sincerity in the > heart > > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some > polite words and > > let it pass, however big the occasion may > be. > > If one answers only when there is " sincerity in the > heart of the questioner " , why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater > who is known to not have " sincerity in the heart " and who only wants to > ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is > different from a " questioner " or a disciple seeking spiritual > direction. > > > The topic of the meeting was something like > " Concept of God in > > Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice > to the topic by " BEING " > > an embodiment of the very thing that was > supposedly the topic of > > discussion. > > If a yogi has such stature, one can do > " justice to the topic " without even taking part in the debate and just by being > oneself. > > * > * * > > When people of little or no understanding were > debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped > in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or > recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of > steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that > would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and > ignorance with " polite words " . They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the > sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. > > Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the > heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely > saattwik. > > Best > regards, > Narasimha > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > Do > a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > Do > Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > Free > Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > Free > Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > Jyotish > writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > Sri > Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > , > " schinnas " <schinnas wrote: > > > > Dear > Rajarshi, > > Very good question. In fact, this is a > question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. > In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody > like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an > authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the > Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who > gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics > under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his > home turf? > > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never > debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show > the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the > questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however > big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting > were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & > discourses year ago! > > > > One may ask why then did he go to this > meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept > of God in Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. > Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > > > ************ > > > > The below part is not for > Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are > intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > > > > Sri Sri always practices " experience first and explanation and knowledge later " > principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of > people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes > and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those > that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people > trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening > up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. > Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of > words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, > there is no point in talking! > > > > It is a great privilege and an > immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri > or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead > of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna' s life, there are innumerable examples of very > simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big > intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. > Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign > ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it > would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an > illiterate and ignoramus! > > > > Without an accompanying experience > (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating > knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and > will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and > dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's > empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., > stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. > > > > , > rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear > Siva, > > >  > > >  > > > > > > Nice mail. > However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the > infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master > but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a > couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, > not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir > Naik. > > >  > > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to > debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a > representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, > it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with > debating why did you even take it up? > > >  > > > I am sorry > if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a > fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see > how that debate went. > > >  > > > -Regards > > >  > Rajarshi > > >  > > > > > > The upsurge (of > consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > > > > > --- On Thu, > 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> > > > Subject: > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana > Yogas > > > > > > > Cc: schinnas@ > > > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 > AM > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > > > > > You sent this > mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel > free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > ------------ > --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Do a Short > Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > > > Spirituality: http://groups. / > group/vedic- wisdom > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / > group/JyotishWri tings > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > > > > " schinnas " <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) > com> > > > > - owner@ s.com > > > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Namaskarams. I occasionally > visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email > from Shri. Narasimha. > > > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual > practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to > clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > > > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of > Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, > etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make > it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, > it is a " Sunlit path " . In this path one does not suddenly emerge into > SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the > sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, > Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just > doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and > Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing > for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for > rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya > removes / breaks old patterns and > > > > > > > > AOL > includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of > asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part > II or advance courses fall under this category. > > > > > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, > bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj > samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > > > > > The > Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti > Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri > Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His > commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available > commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study > of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > > > recommended. Learning and > contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of > Living teachers. > > > > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises > on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans > are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > > > > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a > Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > > > > > Let me clarify > from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened > Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of > devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. > Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), > some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these > guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, > the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on > various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where > conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > > > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) > are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness > at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, > but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and > when needed. > > > > > > > > It is very easy to accept > those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri > Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency > to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest > volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri > Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable > activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up > veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and > teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL > teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even > dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when > the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > > > > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their > lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, > terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. > with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two > reasons. > > > > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that > those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It > is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because > they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL > courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and > were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, > AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses > for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a > show of it. > > > > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and > not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers > who still may have some doership in them. > > > > > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express > the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a > path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > > > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > > > > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Dear Shri. Narasimha, I was giving an explanation from my understanding, but it was still at my mental level. The actions of an englightened master established in Sahaja Samadhi does not need to satisfy our mental concepts of how things should be. For example, when Sri Krishna - an Avatar of the highest order, ran away from the battlefield when Jarasandh attacked Mathura instead of fighting and defeating Jarasandh. Sri Krishna himself years later would advice Arjuna against dropping arms in a fight. Can we give a satisfying intellectual answer to it if people raise questions? Sri Aurobindo gave a beautiful explanation about it. It was something like: If Krishna were constrained to win all times, that would be a limitation in itself! An Avatar chooses even defeat if it is necessary for a larger and more complete victory in the scheme of the lela. You ofcourse have to read the original to get his exact words.. I read it long ago. Another instance that comes to mind - Some thieves came and beat up Ramana Maharishi and made a big nuisance in his Ashram. Ramana Maharishi bore it with equanimity. Sri Ramana was the Spiritual head of the Ashram and one can intellectually argue that it was his dharma to protect the ashram and inmates from the thieves. Besides, there were certain things that I did not want to put in an public email. Some clues - AOL silverjubilee with over 2 million people meditating and doing sudarhsn Kriya together happened around Feb 16, 2006. There were several threats from certain militants from one community about planting bombs or disrupting it in other ways police security provided was not sufficient for that sized gathering. The concerned debate where lot of SIMI members were among the participants happened few weeks earlier on Jan 21, 2006. Some people believe Sri Sri's presence in the event changed the heart of some miscreants. Many does not know that Sri Sri had cancelled meetings with the future head of state of a superpower few minutes before the meeting was to happen. Sometimes he attends some events which cannot be explained logically by his disciples such as the debate with Zakir Naik. The beauty about an enlightened Master living in Sahaja Samadhi is that we cannot contain them in our mind. They operate from a plane of consciousness that is much higher. As the Mother would say if something is beyond our mental understanding, we can maintain a respectable silence about it. I do not expect my answers to satisfy all the questions. I feel I have said everything I had to say. In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an intellectual explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually understood. I did want to object to some statements saying Sri Sri did not know what do say or was confused. It was a judgement of those without any knowledge or understanding of Sri Sri, just as someone who does not understand Sri Krishna might judge him differently for several of His acts which could not be intellectually explained. Having observed him in person with questions several times tricker than what Zakir Naik said, I can confidently say that it was not true. Best regards, -Siva. , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > > Dear Siva, > > Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. > > * * * > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! > > If he " never debates on Truth " , why did he agree to take part in the debate? > > > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. > > One can " show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready " without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > > > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. > > If one answers only when there is " sincerity in the heart of the questioner " , why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is known to not have " sincerity in the heart " and who only wants to ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is different from a " questioner " or a disciple seeking spiritual direction. > > > The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in > > Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " > > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > > discussion. > > If a yogi has such stature, one can do " justice to the topic " without even taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. > > * * * > > When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance with " polite words " . They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. > > Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > , " schinnas " <schinnas@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rajarshi, > > Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf? > > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago! > > > > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > > > ************ > > > > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > > > Sri Sri always practices " experience first and explanation and knowledge later " principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! > > > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna's life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus! > > > > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. > > > > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > >  > > >  > > > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik. > > >  > > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? > > >  > > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. > > >  > > > -Regards > > >  Rajarshi > > >  > > > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > > > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > Cc: schinnas@ > > > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > > > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > > > " schinnas " <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > > > > - owner@ s.com > > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > > > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > > > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a " Sunlit path " . In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and > > > > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category. > > > > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > > > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > > > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > > > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > > > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > > > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > > > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it. > > > > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them. > > > > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > > > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > > > Siva. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 lord krishna knew past and future and knew destiny was not to fight with jarsandh and he ran away to let karma do its workramana maharishi was never the head of the ashram. people built it around himhe has no belongings. he even did not have any sisyas and he told people had him as a guru and he did not have any disciplesbeing cornered by a terrorist religious leader of a religion which swami vivekanada has already proclaimed that prophet has spoilt a whole civilisation for his personal benefit.i lost faith in him after i read the youtube debate last monthi used to recommend his yoga class and sudarsana kriyabut hereafter i will notschinnas <schinnas Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 4:20:56 AM Re: AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas Dear Shri. Narasimha, I was giving an explanation from my understanding, but it was still at my mental level. The actions of an englightened master established in Sahaja Samadhi does not need to satisfy our mental concepts of how things should be. For example, when Sri Krishna - an Avatar of the highest order, ran away from the battlefield when Jarasandh attacked Mathura instead of fighting and defeating Jarasandh. Sri Krishna himself years later would advice Arjuna against dropping arms in a fight. Can we give a satisfying intellectual answer to it if people raise questions? Sri Aurobindo gave a beautiful explanation about it. It was something like: If Krishna were constrained to win all times, that would be a limitation in itself! An Avatar chooses even defeat if it is necessary for a larger and more complete victory in the scheme of the lela. You ofcourse have to read the original to get his exact words.. I read it long ago. Another instance that comes to mind - Some thieves came and beat up Ramana Maharishi and made a big nuisance in his Ashram. Ramana Maharishi bore it with equanimity. Sri Ramana was the Spiritual head of the Ashram and one can intellectually argue that it was his dharma to protect the ashram and inmates from the thieves. Besides, there were certain things that I did not want to put in an public email. Some clues - AOL silverjubilee with over 2 million people meditating and doing sudarhsn Kriya together happened around Feb 16, 2006. There were several threats from certain militants from one community about planting bombs or disrupting it in other ways police security provided was not sufficient for that sized gathering. The concerned debate where lot of SIMI members were among the participants happened few weeks earlier on Jan 21, 2006. Some people believe Sri Sri's presence in the event changed the heart of some miscreants. Many does not know that Sri Sri had cancelled meetings with the future head of state of a superpower few minutes before the meeting was to happen. Sometimes he attends some events which cannot be explained logically by his disciples such as the debate with Zakir Naik. The beauty about an enlightened Master living in Sahaja Samadhi is that we cannot contain them in our mind. They operate from a plane of consciousness that is much higher. As the Mother would say if something is beyond our mental understanding, we can maintain a respectable silence about it. I do not expect my answers to satisfy all the questions. I feel I have said everything I had to say. In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an intellectual explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually understood. I did want to object to some statements saying Sri Sri did not know what do say or was confused. It was a judgement of those without any knowledge or understanding of Sri Sri, just as someone who does not understand Sri Krishna might judge him differently for several of His acts which could not be intellectually explained. Having observed him in person with questions several times tricker than what Zakir Naik said, I can confidently say that it was not true. Best regards, -Siva. , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Siva, > > Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. > > * * * > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! > > If he "never debates on Truth", why did he agree to take part in the debate? > > > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. > > One can "show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready" without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > > > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. > > If one answers only when there is "sincerity in the heart of the questioner", why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is known to not have "sincerity in the heart" and who only wants to ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate is different from a "questioner" or a disciple seeking spiritual direction. > > > The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in > > Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" > > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > > discussion. > > If a yogi has such stature, one can do "justice to the topic" without even taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. > > * * * > > When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance with "polite words". They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword of detached, and yet firm, actions. > > Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > , "schinnas" <schinnas@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rajarshi, > > Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining some simple questions that are about his home turf? > > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his various commentaries & discourses year ago! > > > > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The topic of the meeting was something like "Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam". IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by "BEING" an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have benefited. > > > > ************ > > > > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, especially those among us that are intellectually curious about spirituality than practicing it. > > > > Sri Sri always practices "experience first and explanation and knowledge later" principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, there is no point in talking! > > > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri Ramakrishna' s life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an illiterate and ignoramus! > > > > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. > > > > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@ > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > >  > > >  > > > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir Naik. > > >  > > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with debating why did you even take it up? > > >  > > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. > > >  > > > -Regards > > >  Rajarshi > > >  > > > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > > > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > Cc: schinnas@ > > > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > > > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual matters in future! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > > > "schinnas" <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > > > > - owner@ s.com > > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > > > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to the extent of my understanding. > > > > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a "Sunlit path". In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old patterns and > > > > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this category. > > > > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > > > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL satsangs. > > > > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru can be established. > > > > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > > > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of people. > > > > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > > > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance that no deserving person should be denied a course because they cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of it. > > > > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have some doership in them. > > > > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, we are happy. > > > > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > > > Siva. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Dear Siva, My sincere apologies if I offended you or offend you now. * * * Krishna ran away because Jarasandh should not be killed by him and was destined to be killed by Bheema. But please note that it was *Jarasandh* who attacked. In the case of the debate in question, it was agreed to by *both* the sides, pre-planned as a mega event, rules were laid out, it was advertized well and 50,000 people showed up! Many more must have watched it. Zakir Naik is someone who claimed *on TV* that 9/11 was an insider's job done by George Bush himself so that Bush could then attack oil-rich countries. When he was visiting Cardiff, Welsh MP David Davies described him as a " hate-monger " and said his views did not deserve a " public platform " . Khushwant Singh, a highly prominent Indian journalist, used the word to " " juvenile " to describe Naik's arguments and said that " they seldom rise above the level of undergraduate college debates, where contestants vie with each other to score brownie points " . When Dr Naik offered to engage in a live public debate with Pope Benedict XVI, the Pope ignored him and did not even dignify him with a response. This is the kind of opponent we are talking about. When a person like this wants to debate one on religion, one should ideally ignore him. If one actually engages him, one should tear him to pieces and put him in his place, which is quite possible to do without stooping down or losing one's class. At the very least, one should hold one's own. Sri Sri was like a fish of out water, came across as being clueless, did not even utilize all of his allotted time, and allowed himself to be destroyed by the ruthless Dr Naik. He cut a sorry figure. If Dr Naik later shot up to Number 3 on the Indian Express list of " Top 10 Spiritual Gurus of India " , it was most probably due to the debate with Sri Sri. I am not saying these ratings matter, but the bottomline is that Sri Sri's utter failure in the debate increased following for a person with crazy and fanatical views (e.g. see above), who misunderstands sanatana dharma and yet puts it down very emphatically and enthusiastically. And this debate was not forced on Sri Sri, but he pre-agreed and they pre-planned this as a mega event! Yes, an avatar may choose to lose if it is necessary for a larger purpose in the leela as you said, but I fail to see any " larger purpose " in this thing yet. * * * > In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an > intellectual > explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually > understood. Thanks for admitting that you yourself have not yet intellectually understood it! Because of your *faith* that Sri Sri is a yogi in " sahaja samadhi " , you believe that there must be some higher purpose served by this action of his. I respect your faith. Faith not supported by logic and intellectual understanding cannot be discussed further. As you believe, Sri Sri may indeed be someone in " sahaja samadhi " and there may be a higher purpose to be served by his action. But there are other possibilities as well. * * * Bottomline is that we are discussing things intellectually when we use vaikhari (*tangible* words - written or spoken) to communicate. We are not communicating here using para or pasyanti or madhyama modes. Of course, even in the debate, Sri Sri and Dr Naik seemed to be using vaikhari only. Sometimes, you see some great masters communicating at levels higher than vaikhari. There is something unsaid (para, pasyanti or madhyama) that lies behind the said words (vaikhari) and gets into the mind of the listener and creates an indelible effect on the mind. Swami Vivekananda's historic 1893 speech at Chicago, for example, had a far more mesmerizing effect on the audience present there than you would expect those mere words to have. Though he was not in sahaja samadhi at that stage, he had a high level of realization. Moreover, he accumulated shakti by controlling his mind from desires, attachments, likes, dislikes and shadripus for several years. He also received the shakti accumulated likewise by his master, before the latter left body. Due to all that shakti, his thoughts directly touched the minds of people around him. If master debaters like Swami Vivekananda or Aadi Shankara had debated someone of the stature of Dr Naik, I can imagine what they would have done. Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org - " schinnas " <schinnas Wednesday, November 18, 2009 5:50 PM Re: AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas Dear Shri. Narasimha, I was giving an explanation from my understanding, but it was still at my mental level. The actions of an englightened master established in Sahaja Samadhi does not need to satisfy our mental concepts of how things should be. For example, when Sri Krishna - an Avatar of the highest order, ran away from the battlefield when Jarasandh attacked Mathura instead of fighting and defeating Jarasandh. Sri Krishna himself years later would advice Arjuna against dropping arms in a fight. Can we give a satisfying intellectual answer to it if people raise questions? Sri Aurobindo gave a beautiful explanation about it. It was something like: If Krishna were constrained to win all times, that would be a limitation in itself! An Avatar chooses even defeat if it is necessary for a larger and more complete victory in the scheme of the lela. You ofcourse have to read the original to get his exact words.. I read it long ago. Another instance that comes to mind - Some thieves came and beat up Ramana Maharishi and made a big nuisance in his Ashram. Ramana Maharishi bore it with equanimity. Sri Ramana was the Spiritual head of the Ashram and one can intellectually argue that it was his dharma to protect the ashram and inmates from the thieves. Besides, there were certain things that I did not want to put in an public email. Some clues - AOL silverjubilee with over 2 million people meditating and doing sudarhsn Kriya together happened around Feb 16, 2006. There were several threats from certain militants from one community about planting bombs or disrupting it in other ways police security provided was not sufficient for that sized gathering. The concerned debate where lot of SIMI members were among the participants happened few weeks earlier on Jan 21, 2006. Some people believe Sri Sri's presence in the event changed the heart of some miscreants. Many does not know that Sri Sri had cancelled meetings with the future head of state of a superpower few minutes before the meeting was to happen. Sometimes he attends some events which cannot be explained logically by his disciples such as the debate with Zakir Naik. The beauty about an enlightened Master living in Sahaja Samadhi is that we cannot contain them in our mind. They operate from a plane of consciousness that is much higher. As the Mother would say if something is beyond our mental understanding, we can maintain a respectable silence about it. I do not expect my answers to satisfy all the questions. I feel I have said everything I had to say. In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an intellectual explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually understood. I did want to object to some statements saying Sri Sri did not know what do say or was confused. It was a judgement of those without any knowledge or understanding of Sri Sri, just as someone who does not understand Sri Krishna might judge him differently for several of His acts which could not be intellectually explained. Having observed him in person with questions several times tricker than what Zakir Naik said, I can confidently say that it was not true. Best regards, -Siva. , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > > Dear Siva, > > Respectfully, I want to offer a different perspective. > > * * * > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! > > If he " never debates on Truth " , why did he agree to take part in the > debate? > > > To him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way > > to Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. > > One can " show the way to Realization of Truth to those that are ready " > without accepting to take part in a debate like that! > > > He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart > > of the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and > > let it pass, however big the occasion may be. > > If one answers only when there is " sincerity in the heart of the > questioner " , why would one then agree to debate a ruthless debater who is > known to not have " sincerity in the heart " and who only wants to > ruthlessly destroy the views of opponents? After all, opponent in a debate > is different from a " questioner " or a disciple seeking spiritual > direction. > > > The topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in > > Hinduism and Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " > > an embodiment of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of > > discussion. > > If a yogi has such stature, one can do " justice to the topic " without even > taking part in the debate and just by being oneself. > > * * * > > When people of little or no understanding were debating Truth/God and > misleading the world, great teachers in the past stepped in and directed > the debate in the right direction, whether it is rishis or recently Aadi > Shankaracharya or Swami Vivekananda. They had the knack of steering the > debate in a direction that they wanted - a direction that would help > establish sanatana dharma. They did not tolerate adharma and ignorance > with " polite words " . They destroyed adharma and ignorance with the sword > of detached, and yet firm, actions. > > Fighting with hatred or anger or agitation in the heart is bad. But, > fighting with a calm and equanimous mind is completely saattwik. > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > , " schinnas " <schinnas@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rajarshi, > > Very good question. In fact, this is a question that was raised by > > disciples of Sri Sri than those that dont know him. In fact, if one > > looks into it, one will be dumbfounded! How is it that somebody like Sri > > Sri, who has commented exhaustively on several scriptures, who is an > > authority on vedanta both by his inner Realization and learning, who > > recited the Bhagavad Gita when he was 4 years old without anybody > > teaching him, and who gives impromptu discourses in various forums > > across the world on all topics under the sun shy away from explaining > > some simple questions that are about his home turf? > > > > The answer is that Sri Sri did not debate. He never debates on Truth! To > > him Truth / God is not an article of debate. He can show the way to > > Realization of Truth to those that are ready. He is not interested in > > anything else. He answers only when there is sincerity in the heart of > > the questioner. Otherwise he would say some polite words and let it > > pass, however big the occasion may be. Most of the questions that were > > raised in that meeting were answered elaborately by Sri Sri in his > > various commentaries & discourses year ago! > > > > One may ask why then did he go to this meeting or whatever it was? The > > topic of the meeting was something like " Concept of God in Hinduism and > > Islam " . IMHO, Sri Sri did justice to the topic by " BEING " an embodiment > > of the very thing that was supposedly the topic of discussion. Those > > that were ready to benefit from it from the audience would have > > benefited. > > > > ************ > > > > The below part is not for Rajarshi but may be of interest to everyone, > > especially those among us that are intellectually curious about > > spirituality than practicing it. > > > > Sri Sri always practices " experience first and explanation and knowledge > > later " principle. Sometimes in AOL, there will be big congregation of > > thousands of people and Sri Sri will only say very simple things or > > share some simple jokes and laughs, but his presence would convey what > > needs to be conveyed for those that are receptive. A Master may not be > > interested in getting 100,000 people trading one mental concept for > > another, but prefers one sincere person opening up to Truth in silence. > > A Masters mere presence is enough for that to happen. Words are > > secondary and optional. In spiritual discussions, the point of words is > > to create inner silence or illumination and if that is not created, > > there is no point in talking! > > > > It is a great privilege and an immense blessing to be in the presence of > > a living Master whether it is Sri Sri or someone else. We gain immensely > > if we listen to them from our Being instead of our mind. In Sri > > Ramakrishna's life, there are innumerable examples of very simple people > > benefiting from his mere looks & presence while big intellectuals would > > debate with him and miss the opportunity of a lifetime. Sometimes when > > he countered insincere queries, Sri Ramakrishna would feign ignorance > > and say what would I know - I am an illiterate! What a disaster it would > > have been for a seeker if he were to label Sri Ramakrishna as an > > illiterate and ignoramus! > > > > Without an accompanying experience (at least a small glimpse or even a > > fragment of an experience) accumulating knowledge can be very dangerous > > as it will become yet another mental concept and will actually be a > > hindrance to the Sadhak. Some of the most subtle and dangerous > > hindrances for a sadhak are created by none other than the sadhak's > > empty concepts of spirituality and God! Things like lust, greed, anger, > > etc., stand out conspicuously and are in that way less dangerous. > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > Siva. > > > > , rajarshi nandy <rajarshi14@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > >  > > >  > > > > > > Nice mail. However I have one issue with Sri Ravishankar. Why did he > > > accept to debate the infamous Zakir Naik on Hinduism? Sri Sri > > > Ravishankar maybe an enlightened master but he just cannot debate. If > > > you see the vedios of that debate that happened a couple of years > > > back, you will find Sri Ravishanker utterly clueless on stage, not > > > knowing what and how to counter the polemical queries of the Zakir > > > Naik. > > >  > > > Now when Sri Sri choses to accept an offer to debate Naik on stage, he > > > does not go there merely in his own capacity but as a representative > > > of the religion - Hinduism. And when he fails miserably on stage, it > > > becomes shameful to watch for hindus. I mean, if you are not good with > > > debating why did you even take it up? > > >  > > > I am sorry if this mail sounds a little strong, but everything I have > > > stated here is a fact. The vedios are available for free on youtube, > > > for anyone who wants to see how that debate went. > > >  > > > -Regards > > >  Rajarshi > > >  > > > > > > The upsurge (of consciousness) is Bhairava - Shiva Sutra > > > > > > --- On Thu, 5/11/09, Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and > > > Gnana Yogas > > > > > > Cc: schinnas@ > > > Thursday, 5 November, 2009, 5:12 AM > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Siva, > > > > > > You sent this mail to me instead of the list. I am forwarding this to > > > the list. Please feel free to write directly to the list on spiritual > > > matters in future! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > > > > > > > Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:18:24 -0000 > > > > " schinnas " <schinnas (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > > > > - owner@ s.com > > > > AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Namaskarams. I occasionally visit this forum. I happened to see > > > > several emails about AOL and the below email from Shri. Narasimha. > > > > As a follower of AOL's spiritual practices and as a disciple and > > > > devotee of Sri Sri Ravishankar, I want to clarify a few things to > > > > the extent of my understanding. > > > > > > > > There are several paths each leading to the destination of > > > > Sat-Chit-Ananda. Some are ritualistic, some use austerities, some > > > > use devotion, etc. AOL is a path, where the path to Bliss is also > > > > blissful. That does not make it in any way inferior to paths of > > > > austerities. As Sri Aurobindo would call it, it is a " Sunlit path " . > > > > In this path one does not suddenly emerge into SatChitAnanda. The > > > > personality of the sadhak is transformed slowly and the sadhak > > > > radiates more and more as they progress more and more. > > > > > > > > In my experience, AOL is a seamless blend of Raja yoga, Bhakti yoga, > > > > Karma yoga and Gnana yoga. Spritual practice in AOL is not just > > > > doing Sudarshan Kriya everyday as it is commonly (mis)understood. > > > > Pranayams and Sudarshan Kriya are done for cleansing and settling of > > > > the mind and preparing for meditation and doing other spiritual > > > > practices of contemplation, Seva for rest of the day wit the right > > > > attitude. Regular practice of Sudarshan Kriya removes / breaks old > > > > patterns and > > > > > > > > AOL includes some yoga asanas to prepare the body (the Padma Sadhana > > > > sequence of asanas taught in DSN course and Sun Salutations (Surya > > > > Namaskar) taught in Part II or advance courses fall under this > > > > category. > > > > > > > > The raja yoga practices include all the pranayams, Sudarshan Kriya, > > > > mudras, bandhas, meditations taught in Art of Living course, advance > > > > courses, Sahaj samadhi meditation course, etc. > > > > > > > > The Knowledge part includes deep contemplative study and imbibing of > > > > Narada Bhakti Sutras, Patanjali Yoga Sutras, Ashtavakra Gita and > > > > Bhagavat Gita. Sri Sri Ravishankar has given very elaborate > > > > commentary on all of the above. His commentary on Bhakti Sutras runs > > > > to 30 or so tapes and the publicly available commentary on > > > > Ashtavakra gita runs to over 33 DVD episodes! Besides daily study of > > > > Yoga Vashishtam is highly > > > > recommended. Learning and contemplation of this Wisdom is mandatory > > > > for those that strive to become Art of Living teachers. > > > > > > > > The path of AOL emphasises on Surrender and Seva. Guru puja to Guru > > > > parampara, nama sankeertan and bhajans are a standard feature of AOL > > > > satsangs. > > > > > > > > Some wonder why AOL charges for these courses and some wonder about > > > > lack of a Sadhguru at every stage. > > > > > > > > Let me clarify from my personal experiences that Sri Sri Ravishankar > > > > is a fully Enlightened Master living in Sahaj Samadhi all times. He > > > > is capable of guiding millions of devotees in every step of the > > > > sadhana without having to be near them in person. Several get > > > > necessary guidance in dreams (I myself had that experience twice), > > > > some in person and several via various other ways. However, to get > > > > these guidance, an inner connection with the Master is essential. > > > > Until that stage, the various AOL courses, Sri Sri's elaborate and > > > > in-depth commentaries on various Knowledge are more than enough to > > > > guide disciples to a stage where conscious inner communion with Guru > > > > can be established. > > > > > > > > Several of the senior AOL teachers (mostly Swamis and Rishis) are > > > > yogis of a very high order capable of reaching SatChitAnanda > > > > consciousness at will during meditation. They may be not fully > > > > established in it like Sri Sri, but act as channels of the SatGuru > > > > and can appropriate guide a Sadhak as and when needed. > > > > > > > > It is very easy to accept those that left their body as having > > > > achieved highest realization such as Sri Aurobindo or Sri > > > > Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharishi. However it is a human tendency to > > > > doubt them when they are in physical form. > > > > > > > > Regarding AOL charging money for its courses: AOL is world's largest > > > > volunteer run organization. Neither AOL teachers nor its founder Sri > > > > Sri Ravishankar make monitory profits. All the proceeds go to the > > > > charitable activities again run by volunteers. Many of the full time > > > > teachers have given up veyr lucrative careers and millions worth in > > > > property to become teachers and teach for free. Sri Sri Ravishankar > > > > neither needs all the money. All senior AOL teachers including Sri > > > > Sri have went through very bad and sometimes even dangerous > > > > conditions to bring the Knowledge to the masses. This is a time when > > > > the highest Knowledge needs to be revealed to maximum number of > > > > people. > > > > > > > > Senior AOL teachers have faced danger to their lives by going > > > > without any help or guidance to areas infested with naxalites, > > > > terrorists in North East, Kashmir, Iraq, Palestine, Pakitan, Sri > > > > Lanka, etc. with nothing but love and Divine Grace as their aid. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, money is charged in AOL courses for two reasons. > > > > > > > > 1) Past experience showed that those that paid for the courses seem > > > > to follow the practices more diligently. It is Sri Sri's guidance > > > > that no deserving person should be denied a course because they > > > > cannot afford to pay. As a volunteer, I was part of organizing > > > > several AOL courses and know first hand many cases where people took > > > > courses for free and were also provided free accommodation, etc. > > > > Whenever natural disaster strikes, AOL teachers go there paying from > > > > their own pocket or by AOL and teach courses for free and provide > > > > healing to the victims. AOL does not advertise it or make a show of > > > > it. > > > > > > > > 2) This is my understanding and not AOl position. It removes the > > > > Karmic debt to the AOL teachers and volunteers who still may have > > > > some doership in them. > > > > > > > > Finally, Sri Sri is only interested in getting everyone turn inwards > > > > and express the love, joy and compassion that is inside everyone. As > > > > long as one follows a path, any path and surrenders to any Sat Guru, > > > > we are happy. > > > > > > > > Jai Gurudev! > > > > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Dear Shri. Narasimha, , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > > Dear Siva, > > My sincere apologies if I offended you or offend you now. > Thanks for your sincerity. I am grateful for you to be giving your sincere opinions on this topic. There is nothing for me to get offended. My faith in Sri Sri is based on my personal experiences and feelings from my heart. Opinions of other sadhaks or scholars, however experienced they are, are not my experiences and I neither feel elated nor depressed based on their views. I ventured into this discussion as this question was asked to me specifically and I felt I could clarify some aspects of it. > * * * > > Krishna ran away because Jarasandh should not be killed by him and was > destined to be killed by Bheema. But please note that it was *Jarasandh* who > attacked. > > In the case of the debate in question, it was agreed to by *both* the sides, > pre-planned as a mega event, rules were laid out, it was advertized well and > 50,000 people showed up! Many more must have watched it. .... .... .... > Yes, an avatar may choose to lose if it is necessary for a larger purpose in > the leela as you said, but I fail to see any " larger purpose " in this thing > yet. You see a larger purpose in Sri Krishna's act because you have faith in Him as a Purna Avatar. If you were a non believer in Sri Krishna, you could not have agreed to these arguments that justify Sri Krishnas' act. Similarly, a believer in Sri Sri may see a higher reason in this episode. He might say that Sri Sri being a trikal gnani knew this had to happen and voluntarily went through this with equanimity. You have to use the same yardstick in both sides of the argument. Faith free logic is not possible in Spirituality...at least not till the end. At some point a leap has to be made, which may be different from person to person. > * * * > > > In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an > > intellectual > > explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually > > understood. > > Thanks for admitting that you yourself have not yet intellectually > understood it! > It has been my position that this incident cannot be intellectually understood. > Because of your *faith* that Sri Sri is a yogi in " sahaja samadhi " , you > believe that there must be some higher purpose served by this action of his. > I respect your faith. Faith not supported by logic and intellectual > understanding cannot be discussed further. " A faith that is not blind is not a faith at all " . Didn't Sri Ramakrishna and Sri Aurobindo say this? (exact words may be different) If you are looking for a faith supported by logic / intellectual understanding, then that " faith " could not be complete / integral faith, imho. > * * * > > Bottomline is that we are discussing things intellectually when we use > vaikhari (*tangible* words - written or spoken) to communicate. We are not > communicating here using para or pasyanti or madhyama modes. Of course, even > in the debate, Sri Sri and Dr Naik seemed to be using vaikhari only. > How do we know that? Dr. Naik was using vaikhari as was evident from his body language. Sri Sri was totally composed throughout the meeting and afterwards, which is not possible for someone not established in equanimity. Para, pasyanti, madhyama will work only to the extent of sincerity / receptivity of the listeners. I have several first hand experiences of such instances with Sri Sri, where something he seemed to have said very casually shook up my being, sometimes immediately or sometimes much later. I was/am a very logical person living in the mind.. it was/is not easy for me to have such experiences. > Sometimes, you see some great masters communicating at levels higher than > vaikhari. There is something unsaid (para, pasyanti or madhyama) that lies > behind the said words (vaikhari) and gets into the mind of the listener and > creates an indelible effect on the mind. Swami Vivekananda's historic 1893 > speech at Chicago, for example, had a far more mesmerizing effect on the > audience present there than you would expect those mere words to have. The mechanism differs from Master to Master. Vivekanda's speech and writings are powerful. For Sri Sri, it is his presence. Few years ago in D.C, while Sri Sri was giving a talk, a well built American suddenly came running towards hims menacingly shouting " Anti Christ " and some other abuses. As he hurled towards him, Sri Sri just looked at him with total compassion and within a fraction of a second, that person fell at Sri Sri's feet sobbing. Now he is one of the sadhaks of AOL. There are several several such instances where people have transformative effect just in his mere presence. He may not even look at them or talk to them. It can arguably said that during a comparable time period, Sri Sri has had mesmerizing effect on several times more people than Swami Vivekananda had. Several muslim terrorists, naxalites have embraced Art of Living. There are Art of Living teachers among Pakistani muslims and Iraqis! Do you suppose it is possible with pure logical arguments? .... .... .... > > If master debaters like Swami Vivekananda or Aadi Shankara had debated > someone of the stature of Dr Naik, I can imagine what they would have done. I disagree. Each Master's way is different. An englightened Master that has come down for a Mission is not just a personality that reacts to situations in some pre-set way. They are manifestations of their mission. There is such an integrity in their whole being that every act, breath, word and body language will radiate one vibration which is the core of their mission. Swami Vivekananda came down to awaken India and her youth. His mission was to give the Shakthi to a comotose Hindu soul of that time. So naturally his very being radiated a Force needed for that mission. Sri Sri on the other hand has come down with a different mission - that of creating a one world family and reviving spiritual values in a manner that cuts across religions. His mission is to spread harmony, love, joy, and lightness everywhere and unite people that way. His very personality is harmonious, soft and his being radiates such an unconditional love. Whatever act he does, his very being will radiate harmony, love, joy and light. One needs to be in his presence for some time to realize this. IMHO, it is foolish to compare Masters for this very reason. Even though they both could have come from the same source, Vivekananda is not Sri Sri and for him to do the work of Sri Sri, he has to come down as another Sri Sri (personality wise)! Vice versa is true as well. Btw, that is one reason why Sri Krishna is called Purna Avatar because he radiated with all possible vibrations to its full effect in one life time! > > Best regards, > Narasimha Love, Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Namaste, As I said, faith cannot be debated. So I will not comment on your faith. But, I will justify one point I made which you questioned. >> Bottomline is that we are discussing things intellectually when we use >> vaikhari (*tangible* words - written or spoken) to communicate. We are >> not >> communicating here using para or pasyanti or madhyama modes. Of course, >> even >> in the debate, Sri Sri and Dr Naik seemed to be using vaikhari only. > > How do we know that? Dr. Naik was using vaikhari as was evident from > his body language. Sri Sri was totally composed throughout the meeting and > afterwards, which is not possible for someone not established in > equanimity. One can be seething with anger or sinking in shame internally and look totally composed externally. Body language after the debate does not mean much. Let me tell you how I concluded that vaikhari " seemed to be " predominant in the debate. Look at the reactions to the debate. After the debate, a lot of Hindus who watched it were very disappointed and disillusioned. Many average Hindus thought their religion was perhaps meaningless if somebody of the stature of Ravishankar was unable to explain inconsistencies even when given time and stage. Dr Naik was using Hindu scruptures to support his forceful and destructive points against Hinduism and Ravishankar was unable to counter him. You agreed earlier that several of even AOL members were disappointed and confused. As I said earlier, Dr Naik was rated as #3 spiritual teacher of India in a poll later. Basically, reactions of people were entirely along the lines expected based on an intellectual analysis of the tangible words spoken. That suggests that the communication was mostly in vaikhari (tangible words). If the intangible force behind the words was strong, there would've been an impact on people that cannot be captured by an intellectual analysis of the tangible words spoken alone. As an example, I mentioned Swami Vivekananda. When he finally mustered courage and spoke at the Chicago parliament of religions, thousands of people rose to their feet and cheered. Hundreds rushed towards the stage to have a closer look at him. One person who was present there described later that an indescribable excitement captured the hearts of many. If you intellectually analyze his spoken words, that reaction cannot be explained. People were reacting to something intangible in his speech! While tangible words are vaikhari, that intangible force behind the words is madhyama, pasyanti and para, in an increasing order of the power of impact. One does encounter some works where there is an intangible force behind the written/spoken words. While many may have a capability to touch *a few* people with an intangible force when they speak, based on the rinas, very very few masters have the ability to touch *many* people at the same time with an intangible force when they speak or write. I cannot comment on Sri Sri overall, but he seemed to lack such ability on that fateful day when he walked onto the stage as the representative of Hinduism. Best regards, Narasimha - Free Jyotish Software, Free Jyotish Lessons, Jyotish Writings, " Do It Yourself " ritual manuals for short Homam and Pitri Tarpana: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Films that make a difference: http://SaraswatiFilms.org Spirituality: Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings - - " schinnas " <schinnas Monday, November 30, 2009 9:44 PM Re: AOL: Seamless blend of Raja, Karma, Bhakti and Gnana Yogas > Dear Shri. Narasimha, > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr > wrote: >> >> Dear Siva, >> >> My sincere apologies if I offended you or offend you now. >> > > Thanks for your sincerity. I am grateful for you to be giving your sincere > opinions on this topic. There is nothing for me to get offended. My faith > in Sri Sri is based on my personal experiences and feelings from my heart. > Opinions of other sadhaks or scholars, however experienced they are, are > not my experiences and I neither feel elated nor depressed based on their > views. I ventured into this discussion as this question was asked to me > specifically and I felt I could clarify some aspects of it. > >> * * * >> >> Krishna ran away because Jarasandh should not be killed by him and was >> destined to be killed by Bheema. But please note that it was *Jarasandh* >> who >> attacked. >> >> In the case of the debate in question, it was agreed to by *both* the >> sides, >> pre-planned as a mega event, rules were laid out, it was advertized well >> and >> 50,000 people showed up! Many more must have watched it. > > ... > ... > ... > >> Yes, an avatar may choose to lose if it is necessary for a larger purpose >> in >> the leela as you said, but I fail to see any " larger purpose " in this >> thing >> yet. > > You see a larger purpose in Sri Krishna's act because you have faith in > Him as a Purna Avatar. If you were a non believer in Sri Krishna, you > could not have agreed to these arguments that justify Sri Krishnas' act. > Similarly, a believer in Sri Sri may see a higher reason in this episode. > He might say that Sri Sri being a trikal gnani knew this had to happen and > voluntarily went through this with equanimity. You have to use the same > yardstick in both sides of the argument. Faith free logic is not possible > in Spirituality...at least not till the end. At some point a leap has to > be made, which may be different from person to person. > >> * * * >> >> > In hind sight, I realize that I should not have ventured to give an >> > intellectual >> > explanation for something that I myself have not yet intellectually >> > understood. >> >> Thanks for admitting that you yourself have not yet intellectually >> understood it! >> > > It has been my position that this incident cannot be intellectually > understood. > >> Because of your *faith* that Sri Sri is a yogi in " sahaja samadhi " , you >> believe that there must be some higher purpose served by this action of >> his. >> I respect your faith. Faith not supported by logic and intellectual >> understanding cannot be discussed further. > > " A faith that is not blind is not a faith at all " . Didn't Sri Ramakrishna > and Sri Aurobindo say this? (exact words may be different) If you are > looking for a faith supported by logic / intellectual understanding, then > that " faith " could not be complete / integral faith, imho. > >> * * * >> >> Bottomline is that we are discussing things intellectually when we use >> vaikhari (*tangible* words - written or spoken) to communicate. We are >> not >> communicating here using para or pasyanti or madhyama modes. Of course, >> even >> in the debate, Sri Sri and Dr Naik seemed to be using vaikhari only. >> > > How do we know that? Dr. Naik was using vaikhari as was evident from his > body language. Sri Sri was totally composed throughout the meeting and > afterwards, which is not possible for someone not established in > equanimity. Para, pasyanti, madhyama will work only to the extent of > sincerity / receptivity of the listeners. I have several first hand > experiences of such instances with Sri Sri, where something he seemed to > have said very casually shook up my being, sometimes immediately or > sometimes much later. I was/am a very logical person living in the mind.. > it was/is not easy for me to have such experiences. > >> Sometimes, you see some great masters communicating at levels higher than >> vaikhari. There is something unsaid (para, pasyanti or madhyama) that >> lies >> behind the said words (vaikhari) and gets into the mind of the listener >> and >> creates an indelible effect on the mind. Swami Vivekananda's historic >> 1893 >> speech at Chicago, for example, had a far more mesmerizing effect on the >> audience present there than you would expect those mere words to have. > > The mechanism differs from Master to Master. Vivekanda's speech and > writings are powerful. For Sri Sri, it is his presence. Few years ago in > D.C, while Sri Sri was giving a talk, a well built American suddenly came > running towards hims menacingly shouting " Anti Christ " and some other > abuses. As he hurled towards him, Sri Sri just looked at him with total > compassion and within a fraction of a second, that person fell at Sri > Sri's feet sobbing. Now he is one of the sadhaks of AOL. There are several > several such instances where people have transformative effect just in his > mere presence. He may not even look at them or talk to them. It can > arguably said that during a comparable time period, Sri Sri has had > mesmerizing effect on several times more people than Swami Vivekananda > had. Several muslim terrorists, naxalites have embraced Art of Living. > There are Art of Living teachers among Pakistani muslims and Iraqis! Do > you suppose it is possible with pure logical arguments? > > ... > ... > ... >> >> If master debaters like Swami Vivekananda or Aadi Shankara had debated >> someone of the stature of Dr Naik, I can imagine what they would have >> done. > > I disagree. Each Master's way is different. An englightened Master that > has come down for a Mission is not just a personality that reacts to > situations in some pre-set way. They are manifestations of their mission. > There is such an integrity in their whole being that every act, breath, > word and body language will radiate one vibration which is the core of > their mission. > > Swami Vivekananda came down to awaken India and her youth. His mission was > to give the Shakthi to a comotose Hindu soul of that time. So naturally > his very being radiated a Force needed for that mission. > > Sri Sri on the other hand has come down with a different mission - that of > creating a one world family and reviving spiritual values in a manner that > cuts across religions. His mission is to spread harmony, love, joy, and > lightness everywhere and unite people that way. His very personality is > harmonious, soft and his being radiates such an unconditional love. > Whatever act he does, his very being will radiate harmony, love, joy and > light. One needs to be in his presence for some time to realize this. > > IMHO, it is foolish to compare Masters for this very reason. Even though > they both could have come from the same source, Vivekananda is not Sri Sri > and for him to do the work of Sri Sri, he has to come down as another Sri > Sri (personality wise)! Vice versa is true as well. > > Btw, that is one reason why Sri Krishna is called Purna Avatar because he > radiated with all possible vibrations to its full effect in one life time! > >> Best regards, >> Narasimha > > Love, > Siva. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.