Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[proudHindu] Wold strange silence on Hindu holocaust

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

 

The concept of HATRED AGAINST PEOPLE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT A SECTION BELIEVES

is introduced to the human race jews and judaism, who/which gave birth to

christianity and islam.  So, basically church is also not interested to raise

any hue and cry over non-christian sects, especially in India because

christianity still is fighting THE CONCEPT OF ADWAITHAM to get a foothold in

indian minds.  The earlier the hindus are wiped off the face of the earth, the

better for these EXCLUSIVE " BLIND-FAITH " followers.

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 6/11/09, Bhailal Patel <bhailal wrote:

 

 

Strange silence on Islamist terror

 

Richard L Benkin

 

Obama should have spoken up for the Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh who face

terrible atrocities. But he has chosen to remain stunningly silent on South

Asia’s ‘Hindu Holocaust’

 

There is growing concern in the United States over President Barack Obama’s

foreign policy, especially in South Asia and West Asia. Although Mr Obama still

enjoys media support and spillover goodwill from the election, more Americans

are questioning his policies’ wisdom. He is alienating friends and trying to

woo enemies; pushing away his strongest allies in the war against Islamist

extremism, Israel and India, and pretending that nations behind global jihad

(Iran and Pakistan) will help defeat it.

 

Even members of his own party are wary. When Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

recently appeared before the US House Appropriations Committee to deliver the

Obama line on Israel, it was Democrat Nita Lowey (along with Republican Mark

Kirk) who replied that if the Administration was going to tie Israel’s hands,

the House would counter by “restricting aid to the Palestinian Authorityâ€.

 

Missing in the debate thus far has been concern for the developing ‘Hindu

Holocaust’ in South Asia. In several policy pronouncements numerous speeches

about the situation in South Asia, Mr Obama never once mentioned the human

rights disaster that is rapidly bringing an end to the remaining Pakistani Hindu

community. Nor has protecting 13,000,000 Bangladeshi Hindus ever figured in his

grand design for South Asia.

 

While President Obama speaks of the need for international support and regional

cooperation, he never once suggested that international aid be sent to care for

the thousands of Pakistani Hindus who have been streaming into Indian Punjab. He

has never challenged human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human

Rights Watch to investigate regularly-reported atrocities against Bangladeshi

Hindus and the ensuing refugee nightmare; nor has he ever suggested that

Bangladesh’s Vested Property Act is a racist law that is incompatible with his

vision of peace in South Asia.

 

To be sure, the destruction of Pakistan’s Hindus has taken several decades,

and it has taken three decades to reduce Hindus from under one in five

Bangladeshis to under one in 10; so, silence about it cannot be laid at Mr

Obama’s feet alone. But in Mr Barack Obama, Americans have a leader with a

grand scheme for what he expects to be the future of South Asia to be —

evidently a South Asia that tolerates anti-Hindu ethnic cleansing by Muslim

radicals. At the very least, Mr Obama should be demanding help for the victims

— no less so than that given the ‘Palestinian refugees’ who have an entire

UN agency devoted to them.

 

Evidence of atrocities continues to pour in almost20daily. If the US and India

tolerate it, we can hardly expect the weak civilian Governments of Pakistan and

Bangladesh to act. In March, I interviewed several victims in West Bengal

myself. Most poignant was the testimony of a Hindu family that had crossed into

India only 22 days earlier with their 14-year-old daughter who told me about

being gang-raped by Islamist radicals in Bangladesh. The ‘Hindu Holocaust’

is real and it is happening now. Will an outraged world act or do what it

normally does and cry for the victims only after their death?

 

In 1941, Western Allies began getting intelligence about the Nazi Holocaust

against the Jews and others. Some initially dismissed the reports but eventually

recognised their veracity. In the end, though, they said the best way to help

the victims was to win the war and so did nothing. If that’s Mr Obama’s

guide, he had better check his history. Because the vast majority of Holocaust

victims were murdered after the Allies decided to help the victims by ignoring

them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...