Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

India: A weakening civilisation??? (A nice article by a french journalist)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

India: A weakening civilisation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Francois Gautier

http://www.francoisgautier.com

 

 

 

July 28, 2008

Since

time immemorial smaller nations without a strong soul, or which are on

the decline, have copied -- - and often blindly aped -- the strong

prevailing civilisations of that moment. In that manner, when Rome was

at its peak satellite nations copied the Roman style of democracy,

clothes, food, mannerisms... And so it was for Egypt, Greece,

Mesopotamia when they dominated, or even for ancient India whose

dances, temples, customs, martial arts, were replicated all the way to

China on one side and down to Greece on the other (many Greek gods are

derived from Hindu deities).

One cannot call today's India a declining civilisation, although it

has suffered tremendously from invasions in the last 1,500 years.

Indeed, India is one of the few civilisations today which has managed

-- albeit in a diluted manner -- to retain intact much of her culture

and spirituality from the Vedic ages. If you look at civilisations like

Greece, Egypt or Italy [images]

(erstwhile Rome) today, not much has come down from their times of

domination and greatness -- whereas in India the knowledge of karma, of

yoga, of the avatars and the hidden realities behind life are still

there in teachers, gurus, ashrams, individuals, for us to learn from.

Why is it, then, that at the moment India seems to be paralysed into

inaction in the face of an all-out war against Indian liberties and

values by Islamic terrorists? Why is it that Indians are aping so much

the Western type of democracy without caring to adapt it to the Indian

psyche and conditions, that anybody can twist the system, cheat and win

in the end? Why is it that it appears at this very moment that there

never has been so much corruption, debasement and selfishness in Indian

politics?

Why it that the Indian government appears hell-bent to impose upon the nation a

nuclear deal,

which will neutralise India's weapons of nuclear deterrence in the face

of China's and Pakistan's aggressive nuclear weaponisation and castrate

India's independence in foreign policy, as well as bring with it

immense Westernisation, not to mention a strong influx of Christian

missionaries? Why is it that sections of Indian journalism seem to have

touched a new low just to get more ratings?

Look how the United Progressive Alliance won the vote of confidence

in Parliament, with the connivance of the press and Indian politicians,

and the ways and means which were used to secure that vote.

Look at the role of Speaker Somnath Chatterjee [images]? Should he not have

satisfied himself

about the veracity of allegations of bribery before undertaking further

proceedings in Parliament? If votes were procured in a brazen manner,

affecting a crucial outcome for the nation, should he not have deferred

the trust vote?

Posterity will also judge him on the history museum he built in

Parliament annex at a cost of Rs 100 crore from the taxpayer's money

and which shows Indian history starting with Ashoka, continuing with

Akbar, and more or less jumping to Subhas Chandra Bose and Nehru,

without any mention of the great Hindu political and spiritual leaders

from Kalidasa to Sri Aurobindo, from the great Sri Krishnadeva Raya,

the last king of the last great Hindu empire of Vijayanagar, to Bal

Gangadhar Tilak, a true nationalist. So much for the Communists' view

of Indian history.

Look at the silence of the business community on the ethics of what

has just happened in the last two weeks. One can understand the silence

of an Anil Ambani who stands to benefit from the Amar Singh-UPA entente.

But what about others like Ratan Tata, the Jindals, Hindujas, Birlas,

who may be swayed by the prospect of doing big business with the

Americans, or by the possibility of the government going in for

last-minute liberalisation after it got rid of the Communists' hurdle?

Do any of these tycoons first think Indian and not of profit for

themselves? Do they think for a minute of the price, or shall we say in

a more Indian manner the karmic price that India, their country, will

have to pay sooner or later for the manner in which the nuclear deal

has been won and the low depths to which Indian politics and ethics

have sunk to in the process?

Look at the inertia of the government and the press after the Bangalore blasts

and then the horrible Ahmedabad blasts.

Does the UPA think the common citizen of India is a nitwit and that he

does not understand that on one hand, if the Government of India keeps pointing

fingers at Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence,

or at some Bangladesh outfit, it is to deflect the fact that most of

the recent terror attacks have been perpetrated by Indian Muslims, with

or without Pakistani or Bangladeshi (or Al Qaeda [images]) help?

It is not only a matter of vote banks in times of coming elections,

but also a fact that politicians in India want to keep a blindfold on

their citizens and pretend that nothing is happening. Does not the

government, on the other hand, understand that we have all become

cynical to its usual conduct on these occasions when it: a. condemns

'in the strongest terms' this 'barbarous act'; b. appeals for calm and

'communal harmony'; c. gives a few lakhs each to the families of the

deceased or injured, so that they shut up; and d. never catches the

culprits and goes on as before till the next terrorist act.

But look at America, the most hated and targeted country in the world: it has

not suffered a single terrorist attack since September 11, 2001. Which Indian

politician will have the courage to call a spade a spade and tackle terrorism

with courage and determination?

Is it not time that India reminds itself that it is still a great

civilisation with a composite society that has always accepted

diversity? That it has entered another period of Renaissance and that

it needs to think Indian, to protect its borders, its women and

children, to retain, in the true Spirit of the Bhagavad Gita, the will

to fight, physically if necessary, for the preservation of dharma and

knowledge?

Yes, India can borrow what is good from the West in terms of

technological advancement and ecological conservation, but it should

not discard all the great things that come down from ancient India and

make this country so unique, so wonderful.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...