Guest guest Posted May 28, 2008 Report Share Posted May 28, 2008 Namste, In response to requests, I will post a little about Kundalni shakti. Most people & books explain Kundalni as some sort of weird psychic/sexual energy that can be harnessed & controlled in the same way as electricity or wind. They dont realise the true nature of Kundalni as the power of conciousness, which cannot be controlled by us, as it is " us " , the one trying to control. Shiva is the Unmanifest absolute state, beyond time, space & cause.He is not only unknown, but unknowable. For unknown reasons, a part of the vast, unknowable Shiv temporairily separates from him. It is a not a separation in our sense, as this Shakti still identifies with Shiv. This shakti is called Adi-shakti, or the primal force. Everything in the manifest world, from rocks to Gods are created by this shakti. She doesnt create as we create, rather she expands in her own conciousness. This Adi shakti has 2 main forms: Chit shakti & Maya Shakti. Chit(Conciousness) Shakti identifies with the Unmanifest Shiva, while Maya Shakti identifies with the manifest world. These 2 shaktis are related, & can never be completely separated. So even a stone has some conciousness, while even the higest Gods like Brahma-Vishnu-Rudra have some Maya(although from our point of view, these higher Gods are free of Maya, yet from the point of view of the Unmanifest, they are not). As long as anyone wants to play in the manifest world, they have to accept Adi Shaktis rules- this includes the Gods, Rishis, Siddhas, except in their case they are free to leave the game anytime they want, while we are not. This force exists in our body as well. Since most people identify with their petty body/mind, the force of Maya is stronger, & is called Ahankar(ego). When this force starts to awaken & identify with Adi Shakti(who is always one with Shiv), the same force is called Kundalni Shakti or Chit Shakti. Some people shout " Everything is Maya! Run Away from the world! " . They are insulting Adi Shakti, as Maya is their own Shakti. Ma Shakti gives us what we want- if we want to identify with the limited world, she appears as Maya Shakti, & if we want to identify with the Universal Shiva, she appears as Kundalni. But in every case she gives us what we want- as only a mother can. Yet we attack her! Kundalni Shakti is best represented by the Goddess Kali. Kali is a mysterious Goddess, & her form is full of iconograhpy(which Ive written in earlier posts). For the time being, I'll wrote about her tongue, which is hanging out & red with blood. This has been interprested in many ways, including that Kali wants a blood sacrifice, for which many people are happy to murder helpless dumb animals, & sometimes humans too. Yet as the Vedas say, " The Gods hate that which is obvious, & love the mysterious " . Kali wants blood, but it is our blood. Our Ahankaar or ego identifies strongly with the body. The strongest link to our body is our Pran, & the physical counterpart(or closest to it) is blood. Kali wants our blood, so she can drink it, purify it, & return it to us. In a way she does want blood & sacrifice- our own. She wants us to die in the physical world, so we can be born in the spiritual. The chopped head in her hand represents the ego, violently severed from the body. Yet since most people love their ego(no matter what they claim), they see Kali as a fearful Goddess, & not the loving Mother she is. Kali is the eternal beauty of God, the beauty we would to kill ourself for. She is the power of our Conciousness- Chit Shakti. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2008 Report Share Posted May 28, 2008 , shanracer <no_reply wrote: Dear Shantanuji, Namaste! Every paragraph is brimming with immense knowledge, thanks. With warm wishes, Sudhakar HARI OM TAT SAT! Cheers! ) > Namste, > > In response to requests, I will post a little about Kundalni shakti. > > Most people & books explain Kundalni as some sort of weird > psychic/sexual energy that can be harnessed & controlled in the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Dear Shantnuji, Great and fantastic exposition on Kundalini, it not only elicit the vedic/upanishadic insights in a scintillating manner but also does not contradict any insights of Ancient Indian Thought. Thanks. Congratulations. May God bless you! Keep on producing such creative thoughts here please! With love and regards, M.S.Thimmappa , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > Shiva is the Unmanifest absolute state, beyond time, space & cause.He > is not only unknown, but unknowable. For unknown reasons, a part of > the vast, unknowable Shiv temporairily separates from him. It is a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > Namste, > > In response to requests, I will post a little about Kundalni shakti. > > Most people & books explain Kundalni as some sort of weird > psychic/sexual energy that can be harnessed & controlled in the same > way as electricity or wind. They dont realise the true nature of Be blessed... this is a spiritual poetry in text. Write something more. also tell The boundaries of chita shakti and of kundalini...(means upto which spiritual level they work...like does vishnu have chit or kundalini? blessings Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > this looks like deep philosophy as most of it passed over my head (lolz). I will have to read 5/6 times to understand it. Will you tell out of chit and kundalini shakti which one is greater? also why do we worship kundalini shakti and no one cares for chit shakti? ansuya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Hari Om! A wonderful explanation of kundalini I have ever had. I request for a little more explanation on Maya. What is the purpose of Adi Sakthi showing herself as Maya? Does Maya mean a delusion that you are finite, whereas the actual self is infinite? Why should Shakti lull them into that sense of disbelief? Is it through this delusion of finitism or ahankar that she enacts the purpose of creation- the drama of love, hate; attachment and feuds? What should we do to come out of the clutches of Maya? Mere intellectual understanding of the infinite nature of the Self will not help in liberating the self. Will it? Awareness of the kundalini and raising it to the Agna where the Sakthi, as you said, merges with the unmanifest Siva,through sadhana alone will open the door to the infinite gnana. One more question. You have said Siva is the unmanifest being and out of His loving kindness, a part of Him descends into the universe in the form Adi Sakthi, which in turn manifests itself into two forms like Kundalini and Maya. My question is why is that even the kundalini sakti remains unmanifest and much of the science is not able to prove its existence through empirical means, whereas the sakti which is known as Maya manifest itself in various proven forms like kaamasakti and various other rupas as described in the Devi Mahatmayam. Again my sincere thanks for the elucidation of Kundalini. It gives a lot of impetus for the beginners among sadhaks like me, to be on the right track with right understanding. Hari Om tat sat. ulaganathan p , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > Namste, > > In response to requests, I will post a little about Kundalni shakti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 HARE KRISHAN ,HARE RAMA > > Everything in the manifest world, from rocks to Gods are created by > this shakti. She doesnt create as we create, rather she expands in her > own conciousness. This Adi shakti has 2 main forms: Chit shakti & Maya > Shakti. Sir Ji , first of all i am really very much thankfull to you for the posting . now my quiries 1. You mean Maan Kundalini is the part (ANS) of Maan Maha Kaali only or Maan Kundalini has more role ,...... 2. what is the role of the Parvati Maan , Durga Maan . where would you place . 3. you have written that Maan Kaali is Chit Shakti ( means Adi Shakti BECAUSE Maan Chit Shakti and maya Shakti are inseperable to each other) than what about Maan Maha Lakshmi and Maan Maha Saraswati . HARE KRISHAN ,HARE KRISHAN ,KRISHAN KRISHAN ,HARE HARE ,HARE RAM ,HARE RAM ,RAM RAM ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 > Will you tell out of chit and kundalini shakti which one is greater? > also why do we worship kundalini shakti and no one cares for chit > shakti? Anusuyaji, Kundalni Shakti is Chit Shakti- there is no difference between them. When it is said that Kundalni stays in Muladhar, it doesnt mean literally there is a snake sleeping there(though Hatha Yogis do say there is some energy source there, but their descriptions dont agree with each other). Muladhar(the lowest chakra) represents the Earth element or gross physical world. The fact our Kundalni is in Muladhar means we can only interact with the gross physical world. This is because Chit Shakti, our power of awareness, is stuck in the gross world. To raise the Kundalni is to raise the conciousness to higher planes of existence- & not just a technical matter of putting some Bandhas & doing some pranayam. Another way of putting is that the Power of God, Adi Shakti, is working through our lowest Chakra. To raise the Kundalni is to surrender to this Shakti, so she can start working through our higher chakras. As such the Kundalni doesnt go anywhere, it is we, through our surrender, who raise our conciousness. Nobody cares for Chit shakti, as they dont realise the true nature of the Goddess, they only see her lower forms, which give them Siddhis, powers etc. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 > 1. You mean Maan Kundalini is the part (ANS) of Maan Maha Kaali only > > or Maan Kundalini has more role ,...... Jitendarji, all Devis are form of the original Adi-Shakti - there is no difference between them. > 2. what is the role of the Parvati Maan , Durga Maan . where would > you place . The same Shakti in her different roles becomes one of these- as the loving Mother/wife, she is Parvati. As the fierce protector, she is Durga. As the creator & destroyer of Time & Space she is Kali. And so on for all other Goddesses as well. > 3. you have written that Maan Kaali is Chit Shakti ( means Adi Shakti > BECAUSE Maan Chit Shakti and maya Shakti are inseperable to each > other) than what about Maan Maha Lakshmi and Maan Maha Saraswati . There is no difference between them. But Kali, in her fierce form, is a closer representation of Kundalni. These forms of the Goddess are not her true form, which is one of pure awareness-bliss. Maybe I will write on this more later. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 > also tell The boundaries of chita shakti and of kundalini...(means > upto which spiritual level they work...like does vishnu have chit or > kundalini? Aumji, for higher Gods, its a bit more subtle. As long as Vishnu identifies himself as Vishnu, he is under Maya. If he identifies with the Absoulte, he is not. Vishnu is shown as sleeping under a snakes head, which shows he has full control over his Kundalni shakti. But Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh also die at Maha-pralaya, which occurs in timescales impossibly large for us to even imagine, which means they are not complete. I think anybody that has a name & form is under control of some Maya, even if it is very subtle. But in Ishwars case, or in the case of Rishis & Siddhas, they voluntarily accept this subtle binding to help souls get freedom. I dont believe in the later Puranic theory of Brahma as creator, Vishnu as preserver, Rudra as destroyer(although it is good for normal people). In Vedic times these 3 jobs were done by the same person, called variously Prajapati or Ishwar. Ishwar is the proper name as per Yoga. Later on this 1 God was divided into 3, & then further divided into millions. The job of Ishwar is not to run or create the world, but to help souls get Moskha. If you look at any Avtaar of God, that was their main focus, killing demons etc has always been secondary. As the Yoga Sutras say " Ishwar is Om. He is the Guru of Gurus " . So coming back to the original question, the Unmanifest Shiv, decides to relfect himself in his own Shakti as Ishwar or God. Since this is a reflection of him, it can never be complete. Yet, going through Ishwar is the only way to reach the final state. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > > > As long as Vishnu identifies himself as Vishnu, he is under Maya. Thanks... so in such it is still called Maya or this subtle maya has some other names subtler than Maya ? Yes Tantra also confirms that that there is Only one Ishwar Tattwa.. Tantra never mentions brahma, vishnu mahesh etc. love always Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 , " Ulaganathan P " <apunathan > little more explanation on Maya. What is the purpose of Adi Sakthi > showing herself as Maya? Does Maya mean a delusion that you are Ulaganathanji, Maya as illusion is a later invention. In original Vedic times, Maya was used as creative power or magic of God. Maya is the creative power that makes one appear as many, but this is not an illusion. > > What should we do to come out of the clutches of Maya? Mere The easiest way is to ask shakti herself to guide you. But if go running to the jungles saying all is Maya, dont expect too much help! > like Kundalini and Maya. My question is why is that even the > kundalini sakti remains unmanifest and much of the science is not > able to prove its existence through empirical means, whereas the Science will never prove Kundalni- for one science is objective- it says " This is me, that is the world, I can study the world as separate from me " . Yoga says the exact opposite- it says " I am that which I worship/study " . Mind you Quantum Mechanics(QM) physics has proven normal " objectivity " of science wrong, as it has shown that the person conducting the experiment affects the results. So far however, scientists have not changed their viewpoint- avoiding QM altogther, or hiding behind complex maths. There is a reason the Goddess is sometimes called a Virgin( & not just in India- look at Virgin Mary). The Goddess cannot be enjoyed or grasped as an object- we can only become the Goddess. Trying to study Shakti objectively, we can only study her lower forms like electricity, or the subtle forms of these energies, which is how Siddhi masters show their " miracles " . But the highest Shakti can only be worshipped by becoming her. " Only a God can worship the Gods " says the Tantra. This is the esoteric meaning of Mary being a virgin even though she gave birth to Christ- Shakti exists before the manifest world, when there is no " you " & " I " - as such she herself is both the Father & mother. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 HARE KRISHAN , HARE RAM >The same Shakti in her different roles becomes one of these- as the THANKS SIR JI i agree that God is everything and God is one also God reflects himself in various forms , names , etc....... but we should understand the God in His forms too exactly how is He or How the God is in sagun form Hence i think we should concentrate on the forms of Mother Adi Shakti in a way which could satisfy the domain of our knowing (whatever we know , we see,......) i think we should believe in Lord Brahma , Lord Vishnu and Lord Mahesh because we can not deny that we get birth with the grace of Lord Brahmha , and we live here on the mercy of Lord Vishnu and we die with the grace of the Lord Rudra .. we can not deny that we have origin , middle and end whatever it is if it is physical body or somethingelse ,....... we can not deny the fact that we are living under three Gunas , Hence it is my request to you Sir Ji , we should first believe and we should know the God in his saguna form also . though it is our choice to believe , but i am following the path where i have to pass from SAGUNA form the Lord . Hence it is my request to all of you that please share the knowledge of the God of the Saguna form ALSO becaue i know all of you are the master of the Hinduism and Hence Sagun form of the God also . because i think Saguna FOrm of the God is best described by Hindu religion , that is why it is also called the religion of many God's and Goddessess thanks HARE KRISHAN ,HARE KRISHAN ,KRISHAN KRISHAN ,HARE HARE ,HARE RAM , HARE RAM ,HARE RAM ,RAM RAM ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Yes Sir, Shantnuji, you are absolutely right when you say the maya in the original Vedas is different from the later brands! What is more, the very crux of the truth is as you have put it : to know Brahman is to be Brahman / brahmavid brahmaiva bhavati / there is no way of knowing. Science that uses other methods - cognitive/so called rational - can not comprehend the truth as it is and in wholesome way. Yet is is superbly experiential. Patanjali is a scientist, he teaches us to experience/be God. That is self-experimentation/self experiencing. Methods used to study Matter can not be applied to study Spirit. Even in the study of Matter, matter-scientist methods failed as you have hinted quoting QM. British Physicist, Sir Arthur Eddington, has said in the very early 20th Century itself : " Matter is mostly ghostly empty space " . " To be more precise " , as another Physicist, Peter Russell, says " it is 99.9999999 percent empty space " . Hans-Peter Durr, another great modern Physicist goes a step further to say " Matter is not made of matter " ! Yes indeed. Everything that exist consist of both matter ( apara ) and spirit ( para ),the latter being much, much more in 'substance' and power that the former. If you we want to know the reality as it is and in full, we must get into both and not just to become but to be. No Sir? Love to you and Ulaganathan who made you bring out from you! , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > Ulaganathanji, Maya as illusion is a later invention. In original Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 , " jitendra kumar " <jtin_ja wrote: > i agree that God is everything and God is one Yes Jitendarji, there has been a large debate if Nirguna(quality-less) or Saguna(with qualities) form of God is higher.... Gopiraj Kaviraj, a great Tantric Yogi said that most people who argue like this are stuck in duality- like is male better then female, light better than dark, Ida Nadi better than Pingala etc. Like all Yogis, we have to go beyond all dualities, & that includes Nirguna/Saguna forms of God. We have to get Siddhi of both these forms of God to get complete Moksha. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 HARE KRISHAN ,HARE RAM Yes Jitendarji, there has been a large debate if Nirguna(quality-less) > or Saguna(with qualities) form of God is higher.... Gopiraj Kaviraj, Thnaks Sir Ji for response Sir ji my question was not to debate which form of the God is heigher Saguna or Nirguna i know Nirguna form is at heigher altitute than Saguna form , if i am climbing on the path of spiritualism , my concern was that i am passing on a path which has a station of Saguna form of the God to reach to Nirguna form . there is bypass path which leaves Saguna form of the God and directly reaches to nirguna form . i want to know the God in Sagun form also exacly How He is . Lord Krishna or Lord Shiva Brahmha , Vishnu , Mahesh ................ ........... ............ .................. .................. .............. ........................... .................. .Bhairav Nath ........ Maan Adi Shakti Maan Maha Saraswati Maan Maha Lakshmi Maan Maha Kali ....................... ............... ............. Maan Kali or Maan Parvati where do you place Maan Kundalini that is what i request to all please share HARE KRISHAN ,HARE KRISHAN ,KRISHAN KRISHAN ,HARE HARE ,HARE RAM ,HARE RAM ,RAM RAM ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 , " jitendra kumar " <jtin_ja wrote: want to know the God in Sagun form also exacly How He is . > > > Lord Krishna or Lord Shiva > > Brahmha , Vishnu , Mahesh > > > > Maan Adi Shakti > > Maan Maha Saraswati Maan Maha Lakshmi Maan Maha Kali > ....................... ............... ............. > > > Maan Kali or Maan Parvati > > where do you place Maan Kundalini > Dear Jitinder, I tyhink Shantnu wrote in his first post about it. Saguna form depends upon our faith and if we worship him as vishnu he will give darshan as vishnu , durga shiva etc... It is always Kundalini who takes form of our deity and gives darshan; Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 , aumji <no_reply wrote: Yes kundalini shakti is very important. But Will someone tell me why Shri Krishna never mentioned Kundalini yoga in Geeta. Krishna told about Bhakti, gyana, karma and yoga but never mentioned anything about Kundalini in Geeta WHY?? ansuya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 HARE KRISHAN ,HARE RAM > Dear Jitinder, I tyhink Shantnu wrote in his first post about it. > Saguna form depends upon our faith and if we worship him as vishnu > It is always Kundalini who takes form of our deity and gives darshan; > Sir Ji perhaps i am not able to convey my message . ok perhaps it will take some time for me but still once again i try my meaning is that if i am the owner of the automobile plant and i am running that plant where i am making cars, trucks , buses ,..........than what are the things which are needed to run the plant . to whom i would appoint for proper functioning of the plant . in the same way firstly i want to understand at lower level that How the God runs this universe and how many God's Goddess ( forms of God ) are working eg Lord Bramha runs the Brahma Lok , ...... what He does to run this universe . you mean He creates the world than what is needed for creation ,....................does Lord Brahma creates the world in the begining only or He works continously or He is creating the world at every moment ................. i want to fit all the God's and Godessess of Hindu religion according to their functions , locations , ...... and so many things and what are our responsibilities for them . there are so many people who do not know How Sun God is important to Us . everybody things that it is the job of Sun to rise early in the morning and He looks like some heat source is radiating heat and gives energy to the world in the form of light .and the Sun is radiating freely because it is His job hence scientists called it as free energy ........... but my concern is that people should know that really what is the Sun and people should realize that what is our responsibility for the Sun ,.......................... . Sun is also a Hindu God . western peoPle generally make joke o fire is God , Cow is God . how stupid DO NOT YOU THINK SO THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO BALANCE THE WORLD (THROUGH AWARENESS ) FROM ENERGY POINT OF VIEW FOR PEACEFULL LIFE .FOR THAT WE SHOULD KNOW FIRST AND SHOULD HAVE CLEAR CUT TRUTH VISION ABOUT THE FORM/FORMS OF GOD /GODDESS IN SAGUN FORM . I AM SORRY IF I AM NOT ABLE TO CONVEY MAY BE IT WILL TAKE TIME FOR ME . MY EXPRESSIONS ARE NOT CLEAR ............. HARE KRISHAN ,HARE KRISHAN ,KRISHAN KRISHAN ,HARE HARE ,HARE RAM ,HARE RAM ,HARE RAM ,RAM RAM , HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: > Yes kundalini shakti is very important. But Will someone tell me >why Shri Krishna never mentioned Kundalini yoga in Geeta. Anusuyaji, Krishna was pressed for time as the war was about to start, so he spoke the bare minimum. His goal was to summarise the teachings of Vedas, Upanishads & related texts, not give practical instructions on how to realise the truths of these books, for which a Guru is needed. Krishna gave few or any practical techniques- things like concentrate on tip of nose etc. But his key message was to live the Vedic/Vedantic life. Another reason was, if the Gita had been made too technical, it would have lost its general nature which makes it suitable for a wide variety of students at different levels. Some time ago there was a man showing how the Gita could be used as a management handbook. A technical book with lots of descriptions would have hardly intersted anyone(like the Serpent Power by Arthur Avalon is the best book on Kundalni Yoga, yet few have read it as it is very difficult. It is based on Shat-Chakra-Nirupini, another rare but excellent text which is again very dense). The Gita is a very popular book, as it can be picked up with someone with no knowledge of Hinduism/Yoga, even no interest in it, & still learn something for it. It can also be read by someone who has been meditating for years, & still learn something new from it. This is due to the Gitas nature as a general text on spirituality, not a manual on Yoga. Another factor is, the Gita ia not a book by itself- it is a part of the Vedic teachings & cannot be understood apart from it. To really understand the Gita, one must also know the depth of Vedic teachings as well, which include all the meditation techniques, including Kundalni Yoga. Since it is a part of Vedas, it had to cater to all Vedic philosphies. The school of Yoga(which include Raj, Hatha & Kundalni Yoga) is just 1 of these schools. There are others like Sankhya, Uttam Mimasa(which may use some Yoga, but are not defind by it) & Purva Mimasa, which was only concerned with rituals, not Yoga. Finally, & mpst importantly, the ancient Indian teaching methods was to say as much as you can in fewest words. Hence Shlokas, & Sutras(which is a short, ungrammatical verse). Adding uneccesary details to make it more " commercial " was not their method. If something can be said in 10 words, say it in 3. with love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 The First Shloka of Fifteenth Chapter of SRIMAD BHAGVAT GITA. Urdhvamulah Adhah Shakhah........(the upside down tree) Its refering to the Kundalini. Regards, Anupam , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > Anusuyaji, Krishna was pressed for time as the war was about to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 does it mean that kundalini is Shakti and Soul is Shiva? & nbsp; --- On Fri, 30/5/08, aumji & lt;no_reply & gt; wrote: & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & gt; & nbsp; It is always Kundalini who takes form of our deity and gives darshan; Aum Chocoholics & #39; paradise! Enter here - http://in.search./search? & fr=na_onnetwork_mail_taglines & ei=UTF-8 & rd=r1 & \ p=chocolates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 , " Anupam " <anupamshil wrote: > > The First Shloka of Fifteenth Chapter of SRIMAD BHAGVAT GITA. > > Urdhvamulah Adhah Shakhah........(the upside down tree) > > Its refering to the Kundalini. > > Regards, > Anupam Dear Anupam will you please elaborate it further, so that all understand this properly as to how the upside down tree is compared with kundalini. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 , so hum <jigyaasuu wrote: > > does it mean that kundalini is Shakti and Soul is Shiva? & nbsp; Dear sohum, I am so happy to see you back in Sadhna. Yes in general terms we can say Kundalini is unmanifested Adi-shakti and SOUL (not individual soul)represents shiva. But deeper Tantric philosophies deny even that universal consciousness who we refer as shiva is also shakti. It is shakti which first awakens /becomes conscious as shiva.... because where ever there is name and form, it is shakti. Turiya Tattwa, as tantra explains is beyond consciousness, bliss etc... and is not defineable. as per 36 tattwas of tantra the Turiya or Brahmm differentiates as Turiya => ParamShiva=>Sadashiva+shakti=> Ishwar tattwa + Vidya Tattawa=> Maya, avidya and all other Tattwas. When shakti awakens first in Turiya, it sees himself as Paramshiva, shakti beings its own part...but the consciousness of paramshiva is of Adi-shakti. I dont know if i explained or confused you further...LOL Love always Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.