Guest guest Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 RAM RAM Hence is it true that Lord Shiva is the Lord Brahma ,Lord Vishnu ,Lord Mahesha if it is so than the Supreme Lord is different . what do you say Sir's HARE KRISHNA ,HAER KRISHNA ,KRISHNA KRISHNA ,HARE HARE ,HARE RAMA ,HARE RAMA ,RAMA RAMA ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 , " jitendra kumar " <jtin_ja wrote: > > RAM RAM > > Hence is it true that Lord Shiva is the Lord Brahma ,Lord Vishnu ,Lord > Mahesha if it is so than the Supreme Lord is different . what do you > say Sir's In a way your presumption is right, and in another way it is incorrect. Your mother calls you Beta, your wife calls you Patiji, your children call you Papa and your employer calls you employee... now can you say the real jitinder is someone different from that beta, pati or papa ? Real jitinder is inclusive of all these small small duties. God's consciousness uses a small part for manifestation, and shakti gives that part a name Brahmaa.... but can we say Brahmaa is different from God ? Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 , " Aum " <beirut_ka_baba wrote: Dear Aum, Namaste! The explanation given here was brilliant. I enjoy both your and Shaan's posting very much. I feel both must be having JUPITER placed in an enviable position in your horoscope to give such explanation. Ofcourse that does not mean i am taking away credit from you two's contribution. Just assumption. Thanks and regards Sudhakar HARI OM TAT SAT! Cheers! ) > In a way your presumption is right, and in another way it is > incorrect. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 , " spbyoga9 " <spbyoga9 wrote: >! > > The explanation given here was brilliant. I enjoy both your > and Shaan's posting very much. I feel both must be having > JUPITER placed in an enviable position in your horoscope LOL...thanks Sudhakarji, but i expected some more gems from you too on this subject. Aum: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 , " jitendra kumar " <jtin_ja wrote: > " sab kuch main hi huin , par Vastava main mera aatma sabhi main > nahin hai " . ab batao aap ki kya kya hai Sir ji > > OK SO what is the difference between parmatma and parmeshwar Jitinder ji you could not grasp the gist of my msg or you are trying to confuse me like Farah and Ansuya ....LOL What is Mera Atma ? There is no mera or tera Atma... there is only one Atma. What we call jivatama is actually the ego. The differentiation of the soul is as follows " Turiya =====> ParamShiva + shakti in latent state Paramshiva =====> Sadashiva + Adishakti =====> Iswar + Vidya + Maya We can say for logical reasons that Paramtama manifests as Parameshwara... parameshwar is another name for Sadashiva or Mahavishnu....who manifests as Ishwara Tattwa which is the actual Trinity of Brahmaa, Vishnu, Rudra. I suggest instead of going into the nomenclature of the gods.. we should understand the real story behind the leela. Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 > > > > OK SO what is the difference between parmatma and parmeshwar > >> I suggest instead of going into the nomenclature of the gods.. we > should understand the real story behind the leela. > Sir ji first thing is that i am not trying to confuse you but i said whatever i was knowing , right or wrong i do not know . i do not know everything Sir ji . i was not knowing anything about spiritualism Ramayana , Mahabharat before 1 year . i started from question/answer . But Thanks Sir you have added something to my present knowledge . i learned so many things from You Sir ji ok for the present topic if jeevatma is the ego , then it is destructable in nature .till we would not dissolve our ego we can not get the freedom . Lord Sri Krishna himself described in Sri Mad Bhagwad Geeta that we are made up of Buddhi ,ahenkar , jeevatma ,.............. bla bla bla . i think ego and jeevatma are different . please further enlighten me. i may be wrong in above statement because of the limited knowledge , but Sir ji you can enlighten me . I have to tell my true state of knowledge , accordingly Sir ji i will recieve maximum knowledge with your grace / DAYA . HARE KRISHNA ,HARE KRISHAN KRISHAN KRISHAN ,HARE HARE,HARE RAMA ,HARE RAMA ,RAMA RAMA ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 > Jitinder ji you could not grasp the gist of my msg or you are trying > to confuse me like Farah and Ansuya ....LOL > LOL i try to poke you so that you can give more wisdom. otherwise you keep quiet so i have to use my tricks Ha ha ha to get more and more out of you and other wise friends ansuya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.