Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 I am enjoying the discussion and finally Aradhana and Deito are also back ! I came to YA and then here and i swear i got real knowledge here from you all. This question is for all of you here. Jehadis are ramming planes into buildings and killing people. They are doing their Dharma, as their religion tells them that they will go to heaven if they die for their religion. Krishna also told Arjuna to fight for Dharma and told him that if he dies he will go to heaven. So Jehadis are equal to Arjuna ? dont mind this question it is not against any religion but just curiosity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: Hello Ansuyaji, Namaste! Arjuna definitely went to heaven and of this there is a reference in Mahabharatha. Finally it was God incarnate himself asked arjuna to kill kauravas but that is not the case with the jehaadis. For them it was just an ordinary fanatic preacher who instigated them to jam the planes etc., I don't believe they are in heaven, it is definitely hell for them because they allowed themselves to be deluded by a fanatic unlike arjuna who listened to god himself. Besides lord krishna had shown him the vishwa swarup did the misguided preacher show his vishwa swarup to the jehadis? It is definitely NO NO NO. Hope this satisfies your doubts. With warm wishes Sudhakar HARI OM TAT SAT! Cheers! ) .. > > This question is for all of you here. Jehadis are ramming planes into > buildings and killing people. They are doing their Dharma, as their > religion tells them that they will go to heaven if they die for their > religion. > > Krishna also told Arjuna to fight for Dharma and told him that if he > dies he will go to heaven. So Jehadis are equal to Arjuna ? > > dont mind this question it is not against any religion but just > curiosity > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 > Krishna also told Arjuna to fight for Dharma and told him that if he > dies he will go to heaven. So Jehadis are equal to Arjuna ? Anusuyaji, we can better understand this problem if we understand that Jehadis are also part of the Divine Plan. Like Babaji wrote the other day, when terrorists attacked India, America said " Talk to terrorists, find peaceful solution " . When US was attacked, suddenly they were invading countries left, right & center! How else will Mother Nature treat uncaring people to care for others peoples misery than by making them suffer same fate. Yes, Jehadis will goto heaven. After all, " heaven " , where most religons want to go, is just a level on the astral plane, sort of a temporary resting place for souls between rebirths(not everyone goes there- some goto Pitri Lok or Land of Ancestors, & some to " hells " ). It doesnt matter that we think they are wrong- as long as they follow the tenets of their religon faithfully, they are guranteed to be allowed entry to their " heaven " . But Arjun got more than going to heaven- he got Moksha- full knowledge of the Highest form of Godhead, & freedom from rebirth. The difference b/w him & jehadis is- he knew he was working for the Divine Plan, that it was not his personal ego he was killing for, but for the greater Divine Plan. Now this realistion must not be mental, but spiritual(ie just thinkning " I am doing Gods job " isnt enough). Its entirely possible some jehadis like Laden are aware of the fact that they are part of the Divine Plan, in which case they will not get bad karma, as it was not them who carried out the attacks, but God through them. But if they are doing it to bloat their ego, become famous or goto heaven & do everything they arent allowed to on earth, then they are responsible for their actions, & they will have to pay the price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: > > I am enjoying the discussion and finally Aradhana and Deito are also > back ! Dear Anusuya ji can you tell me when I wasnt here or which day that you think I have come back!! lol It shocks me and I am really taken aback terribly with the thing you said that jehadis are doing dharma !! But of course I am not offended but just not happy with that which you said.I really get irritated and shocked if a Hindu starts speaking in favour of this " jehad " which is terrorism and no jehad at all For example..There are numerous people on earth who say that its ok to be a non vegetarian for health and this and that and some say that this is food chain or that if we dont eat animals they will double.. Even they can claim that its natural, o.k or their dharma etc etc. If someone is habitual of eating non vegetarian food and that too for some mere enjoyment and excuses himself on one or other pretext that doesnt mean he is not being violent, atrocious, wrong, selfish, thoughtless... but this is a smaller thing and can no where be compared to terrorisism Tell us the reason why you think that the terrorists are doing dharma?? What dharma do you think they are doing and for what purpose and what is the inspiration you think they are doing this? Jehad as in Muslim religion and thier Holy Quaran means the war against evil - the inner war waged to triumph over the misleading and wrong in ones self. Jehad is about God ans religion.Islam nowgere teaches violence and murder and useless wars and quarrels like other religions it speaks of doing things for Allah.If terrorists call killing people jehaad that doesnt become jehaad or religious war.Honestly speaking I dont really believe in this religion thing because Hari is one and belongs to all and the Islam is also his religion.So I am saying about both religions hindu and muslim and not about any one. As for our Sanatana Dharma the very foundation of our religion is compassion, mercy and non violence. Only to teach this so many incarnations have been there till now in Kaliyuga and will be there in future too and maybe more. There is not one incarnation that didnot talk again and again and do much for unity of religions, talk of One God,speak and do things against fanaticism, against social prejudices that were practiced in name of caste system.These are the worst things of kaliyuga as our shastras says- " kaliyuga is the age of quarrel and hypocrisy " So its important to understand that all this difference on basis of religion and things like so called " jehad " is a game of ego, hypocrisy , sheer nonsense.here is absolutely no basis for them because the fact is that all relgions say similar things and if people see differences then its thier foolishness and blindness. Krishna avoided the mahabharata for a long time and was averese to war.When there was no choice and war was a necessity mahabharata was fought. But mahabharata was a war of dharma /righteousness and not for power, manipulation etc We cant compare a great dharam yudha like mahabharat which was fought under the direct supervision of Krishna with murders and efforts of destroying peace of people. And Arjuna was a kshatriya not an animal Mahabhaats purpose was only good future and ere establishment of justice and dharma and eliminetion of that which was bad for the world and society You tell us what dharma you think is being carried out by terrorists and what they are doing and for what reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 > Its entirely possible some jehadis like Laden are aware of the fact I agree that Jehadis are a part of divine plan. But everything is a part of divine plan. lol but dear brother Shantanu you are suggesting something akin to that Osama Bin Laden is a great gyaani who knows he is working for God???? some man who doesnt have the basic sense of right and wrong and no compassion , kindness, virtue etc and thinks its divine plan to create havoc in the world ???? by saying tht he will go to heaven you have confused me But the divine plan is actually that all religions except sanatana dharma are going to perish by end of kali. And Islam is one of them I really dont think that in the war between Laden and West- such people are more than pawns in the hand of fate I dont think terrorists can go to heaven infact they might not even go to hell for that which they are doing in name of jehad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: > Jehadis are ramming planes into > buildings and killing people. Dear sister Ansuya If you spoke to most Muslims, they see these people you speak of, as nothing but a total disgrace & an embarassment to their religion. True followers of Islam advocate peace & tolerance. It is only the ignorant & corrupt who fly planes into buildings, or who plant bombs in public places & then claim it is in the name of their religion. These people are a small minority. It just so happens that they gain a lot of publicity by their negative action, but this does not mean they represent any more than a tiny section of a much more peaceful majority. With love & peace Farah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: > Krishna also told Arjuna to fight for Dharma and told him that if he > dies he will go to heaven. So Jehadis are equal to Arjuna ? > Congratulations ansuya for this most cunning question. From the answers so far, i can see how people have been tricked by you. Great question I must say. Let me try...but i am not sure, if i will also be trapped by this intelligent question. Rules made by Prophets are often garbled by the religions when on a later stage, organised religion is started. Now Mohammed is not there to clarify his sayings, nor is Jesus there. and these Abrahmic religions are so closed minded, and allow no alteration or interpretation to their sacred books....hence all these confusions arise. First you have to understand the difference between Dharma and religion. Dharma is not religion. A religion can say OK kill people and you will get to heaven....but the followers will not go to heaven. Heaven is not decided by prophets and books....there is a universal Dharma for human beings....and dharma is different from religions. Jehadis are not killing tormentors or asuras...they are killing innocent people, who have not done any harm to anyone. Recently in a bomb blast, a saw half body of a baby..... now even if Mohammed comes down and tells me that those terrorist will go to heaven for killing that little kid... i will refute him too. These type of people get to some lower astral levels and then are born to face the consequences....they either see their own nears and dears killed or they themselves suffer pains. On the other hand Arjuna did not kill any innocent woman or child. He went to a direct war with the enemy and in war he killed...or lost his nears and dears. I will refrain from saying that hindu way of killing takes to heaven and muslim way of killing takes to hell (Otherwise Farah will take me straight on).... it is not the religion which decides...it is the Karma as per Dharma which decides yr fate in heaven. Killing like a coward by hiding or blowing self or by gorilla way ...that too the innocent women and children is wrong by the perspective of Universal Dharma. So there is no comparison between Arjuna and jehadis....hope you will further dissect and will try to confuse me.. or trick me LOL Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 , " i_free_spirit " <i_free_spirit wrote: > >> but just not happy with that which you said.I really get irritated and > shocked if a Hindu starts speaking in favour of this " jehad " which is > terrorism and no jehad at all Dear Aradhana you should not be irritated and shocked... you were also tricked into this great question... read my reply and then re-think over this question. thanks for your other beautiful messages..safal hogi teri aradhana Aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 > > you should not be irritated and shocked... you were also tricked into > this great question... read my reply and then re-think over this > question. > I was also talking of righteousness or dharma and not religion....or maybe I am not understanding what is that you are pointing at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 , " Aum " <beirut_ka_baba wrote: > > I will refrain from saying that hindu way of killing takes to > heaven and muslim way of killing takes to hell (Otherwise Farah > will take me straight on).... Dearest Aum Lol - I will always take anyone 'on' (including you) & speak up for those who do not have a voice, whether they are Muslim, christian, Hindu, Buddhist etc. I like Aradhana's concept of looking beyond religion & seeing that we are all worshiping the same God anyway. It would be sad if we only spoke up for our 'own.' We are all human. Anyway, if we only spoke up for our 'own', who on earth would I speak up for?? Have you heard this quote, its lovely... First they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up, because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me. Martin Niemoller, 1945 With love Farah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 , " Aum " <beirut_ka_baba wrote: > > Congratulations ansuya for this most cunning question. From the > answers so far, i can see how people have been tricked by you. > Great question I must say. LOL thanks Aumji (blushes). Earlier i had doubt but now i am sure you can read minds. at least with me this is true. I had thought the same answer when i was writing this question and you wrote it word by word as i thought will you teach me how to read minds ? ansuya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 RAM RAM RAM, DISCLOSURE : JUST TO GET THE INSIGHT AND NOT TO HURT OR OFFEND. > Killing like a coward by hiding or blowing self or by gorilla > way ...that too the innocent women and children is wrong by the > perspective of Universal Dharma. > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? ***DISCLOSURE : JUST TO GET THE INSIGHT AND NOT TO HURT OR OFFEND.*** Ram Ram Ram pls forgive me to ask this question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 When you told Deito was back, i wanted to speak to you, but yur question sparked an interest in me, so as to silently watch , what all people may say and what may be there way of perceiving, and if anyone perceived it in absolute sense.. So to absorve this i did not reply, and as you say Aum has satisfied your intellect, so here i am saying you : Thanks for warm welcome my dear sister, How are you, is everythign fine, are you happy, are you dancing .... i always wish you all the best .. May lord bestow his blessing and expand intellect as i always see you very interested in intellectual understaidng and comprehension. Your question made me write, a sanskrit para which i present to you, but its meaning is same as others have translated, so i am just giving you the para, which autopmatically came out as a poetic composition, by his grace, offcourse only intended to be offered at the lotus feet of Hari. I have kept its name as " Eko Margadarshanam. Ekoham Sarva Saadhanam " . its name is purposely wihtout explicit name of Hari, because its nature is itself implicit to hari alone. Hope you all like it, and it also gives the fate of anyone, including mine, My flower's, yours ... and everyone else in existance.. from the hisgest of beings till the lowes strate of Existence, including your subject " Jehadis " -- who are also proceeding from the energy of all eternal hari. ------------------------------ Eko Margadarshanam. Ekoham Sarva Saadhanam. ----------- Paramatma swarupena. Harihi Vasayathi Hridayat ! thad Harihi, Nirdaryathi Karmani, Dadhathi Phalani ! Sarwaani Tasya karmani twam ekam Karanam Cha, Sarwaani Tasya Karmaanusaarena, Phalam Bhogayathi ! Satkarmaani SatPhalam Dadati, DusKarnamani Dushpalam deyathi, Etaha Karmaha duskarmaha, etaha karmaha Satkarmaha , Swasya Hridyayat Stitah Vasudeva, Nirdaryathi ! Vasudeva Nirdaryathi Dharmam, Vasudeva Nirdaryathi Karyam, Vasudeva Nirdaryathi Karmam, vasudeva Nirdaryathi Artham, Vasudeva Nirdaryathi phalanupalam, Vasudeva Nirdaryathi Moksham ! twam drisyathi sarvam, twam sruyathe sarvam, twam vyapyathe sakalam ! tasya darshaman, sarvasya MargaDarshanam ! ------------------------------ Warm Regards, -- Deito Harirnama Harirnama Harirnama Kevalam. , ansuya80 <no_reply wrote: > LOL thanks Aumji (blushes). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an > accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? my dear friend if you understand Dharma then you will find that dharmas are infinite and they clashed sometimes then one has to choose one and the Lord had choosen the dharma of a friend that time , if you see clearly . HARE KRISHNA ,HARE KRISHNA KRISHNA KRISHNA ,HARE HARE,HARE RAMA ,HARE RAMA ,RAMA RAMA ,HARE HARE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an > accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? Senthilji- 2 points. 1, Vali was not entirely innocent. 2nd- Rama had to suffer for this bad Karma in next life as Krishna, when he was killed by a fisherman, who was Vali incarnated. So God showed that even He himself is not free from Law of Karma, even he has to suffer, so what about us ordinary mortals? love Shantnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 Om Namah Shivaya. > if you understand Dharma then you will find that dharmas are > infinite and they clashed sometimes then one has to choose one and > the Lord had choosen the dharma of a friend that time , if you see > clearly . JitendraJi, This is exactly happened to Karna, the dharma to Support Dhuryodhana. Shivaya Namah Aum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 Om Namah Shivaya. > So God showed that even He himself is not free from Law of Karma, even > he has to suffer, so what about us ordinary mortals? Thanks ShantnuJi. What Karma of ours made us meet and discuss in this very forum!!!? Thanks again ShanJi. Shivaya Namah Aum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: > > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an > accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? It was not Ram's way of killing people. Only when he saw Vali was a tyrannt, a sinner and had been wrongly sitting on the throne he killed him. Hiding in this case was necessary as vali had a boon that no one who faces him can kill him. It can not be compared with the coward work of terrorists who kill in disguise, the innocent people. Vali was not innocent...so he deserved it. In Ramayan Rama fought the main war face to face with Ravan without any hiding. Secondly Rama was an avtar..now if any of his follower start killing people by hiding and thinks he will go to heaven is pure stupidity. aum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 Om Namah Shivaya. Dear Babaji, Pranam. No way i made an idoitic comparision. No way to disprove Ram Avatar's greatness. I just wanted the catch " freindship Dharma " as pointed out by JitendraJi, to prove Karna's freindship with Dhuryodhna. I Sincierly appologies if i had unintentionally made a wrong remark about Ram Avatar. Sorry Again. N.B: Babaji i could see your angry face! pls cool down. Shivaya Namah Aum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 When one understands that everything proceeds equally form Hari, and everythign exists in one Tranquil Hari, there is no sinner, and there is no punishment, whatever one sees is a proceeding of manifestation of divine will, and on his own energy. Because there is no energy apart fomr his energy and there is no will apart from his will, that is existance. When one understands this firmly, will he know that eternal hari.. May be bali or May be ravana, everything is part of one eternal hari, his own force manifesting, as part of his leela, such discussions whcih enlarge induvidiality are worthless, my dear brothers.. There is no one who is a sinner, there is no one who is meritarious , only he is real one, and his nature is really what is there... -- Humble Deito Harirnama Harirnama Harirnama Kevalam. , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: No way i made an idoitic comparision. > No way to disprove Ram Avatar's greatness. > I just wanted the catch " freindship Dharma " as pointed out by > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: > > > > N.B: Babaji i could see your angry face! pls cool down. > Dear Senthil, I assure you i am not angry.... nor did i write such language....which showed my anger. Rather i am grateful to you to have brought out such point, where i could think of...and could read Shanracer's excellent reply to. AUM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2007 Report Share Posted October 26, 2007 Vaali was a hypnotist. Hypnotism was /is one of the martial arts mastered by special persons who want to defeat the enemy by a deceitful trick. Sugriv could fight only with a mace. Shriram was not taught this art and other arts like wrestling and boxing. So Vali was practising unethical warfare. Though Shriram is Vishnu incarnate HE could not learn every art as HE is a " HUMAN " incarnate. Humans can not practise any art not taught by Guru. Therefore Shriram eliminated the unethical warrior Vali by an arrow from behind. Dear Saadhaks please give your feedback thanks i.j.swamy Aum <beirut_ka_baba wrote: , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: > > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an > accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 , shanracer <no_reply wrote: > > > > Babaji, Ram Killed Vali hidding behind, and how come this is an > > accepted Dharma by an AVATAR? > > Senthilji- 2 points. 1, Vali was not entirely innocent. 2nd- Rama had > to suffer for this bad Karma in next life as Krishna, when he was > killed by a fisherman, who was Vali incarnated. > > So God showed that even He himself is not free from Law of Karma, even > he has to suffer, so what about us ordinary mortals? > > love > Shantnu > Fantastic Shantnu I could never relate these two. Thanks Jai Gurudev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 , " Senthil " <senthil_sym wrote: > > Om Namah Shivaya. > > > if you understand Dharma then you will find that dharmas are > > infinite and they clashed sometimes then one has to choose one and > > the Lord had choosen the dharma of a friend that time , if you see > > clearly . > > JitendraJi, > This is exactly happened to Karna, the dharma to Support Dhuryodhana. > > Shivaya Namah Aum. > There two episodes are quite different. Bali did a wrong thing - He kicked out his brother without much fault of his and kept his wife. It is a grave mistate, it would sin, to sleep with younger brothers wife. So, Lord Ram did nothing wrong killing Bali. Whereas Pandavas did nothing wrong against Karna. Moreover, Karna had bad feeling for Pandavas even before he knew that he is a son of Kunti or that he is a Kshatriya. To me, the Freindship Dharma is not in supporting a friend in his bad Karmas rather to prevent him from doing wrongs. First advise him, then use some force. Even then if he does not change his bad ways, I will prefer to leave such a friend. If I support my friend in his bad ways, then somewhere I also want to do the same but cannot afford to do so for want of power, position, money etc. If Karna would have done so, Duryodhan could lead a better life. He would have not gone to war without Karna's support. It is also said that Karna did not have Krishna on his side to correct advice. This itself shows that Karna was not a good person otherwise Krishna, the Lord, would never leave him without support. Jai Gurudev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 Om Namah Shivaya. > To me, the Freindship Dharma is not in supporting a friend in his bad > Karmas rather to prevent him from doing wrongs. First advise him, > then use some force. Even then if he does not change his bad ways, I > will prefer to leave such a friend. If I support my friend in his bad > ways, then somewhere I also want to do the same but cannot afford to > do so for want of power, position, money etc. > If Karna would have done so, Duryodhan could lead a better life. PradeepJI, Thanks.You hit the final nail in the cofin. I understand my wrong opinion. Yes I clearly understand freindship dharma. Thanks again, you proved the freindship dharma and cleared your freind's wrong beleif/faith, PradeepJi even though i was repeatedly fighting for Karnas generosity( wrong!). Shivaya Namah Aum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.