Guest guest Posted September 15, 2007 Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 Namaste:-) Baba ji is correct as usual he he Those who say bhakti is easy are terribly mistaken. Because bhakti is all about sacrifices and pain of seperation The different yogas shouldnt be compared because they are one. In Kaliyuga contamination is great so bhakti is recommended for this reason and some other reasons as best for kaliyuga (thats why other yogas are not so suitable for people of kaliyuga as they are too fallen)but that doesnt mean its easy.All yogas are one and the same and as baba ji say following any one gives the result of both. Deito I am scared that you are reading some ISKCON books.That day u interpreted Harer nama Harer namaiva kevalam kalau nasty eva gatir anyatha as karma yoga, gyaana yoga etc can not succeeed. Personally I dont agree with it. The literal meaning of this verse doesnt reject the other yogas anywhere.It means- " In the age of kaliyuga the name of Lord is the only means to save ones self there is no other " Which is true.In Kaliuga name is the only saviour. " Nasty eva " I think means that the name is destroyer of kaliyuga Balaji bhakti doesnt reject anyother yogas but for bbhaktas its not advisable and not even possible to shift to other yogas AND THINK ABOUT AATMA, BRAHM ETC. tHE NATURE OF BHAKTI IS TO GROW AND ABSORB THE BHAKTA COMPLETELY AND THEN THE MIND IS PURIFIED WHICH LEADS TO GYAANA.bhakti fulfills itself through bhakti alone thats its nature.Bhaktas do not deny that they are aatma but they dont wish to be detatched from love and its emotions. Jigyasu ka gyaan ho tum Yogi hriday mein dhyaan ho tum apney sevakon ke pran ho tum Tere charnon mein lakhon pranam(GURU MAHIMA) IT MEANS O LORD YOU ARE THE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE WHO DESIRE KNOWLEDGE YOU ARE THE MEDITATION IN THE HEART OF THE YOGIS YOU ARE THE LIFE OF YOUR DEVOTEES A LAKH PRANAAMS UNTO YOUR FEET So all these are worshippers of God. There is no real difference between the various yogas .Lord Krishna also says- " the one who gets situauted in any gets the fruit of both " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 15, 2007 Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 Thanks for those words of clarity Aradhana, and lol.. no i am not reading ISkon books .. Thank you and regards, -- Deito Harirnama Harirnama Harirnama Kevalam. , " i_free_spirit " <i_free_spirit wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.