What is the real relationship between Radha-Krushna ?

[Guest guest]

Krushna belonged to the royal dynasty while Radha to an

ordinary milkman's family. Like Sita, She too was born out of a

resolve (sankalpa). Radha is the manifest form of devotion unto

Krushna.Radha's spiritual love (priti), that is devotion unto

Krushna has been misinterpreted as love in the Radha-Krushna

relationship. Its futility will be realised if one considers

Krushna's age at that time. When Krushna left Gokul permanently He

was only seven years old; thus His relationship with Radha was only

during the period when He was three to seven years old

The sound of the flute means the anahat sound. That sound

had maddened all the gopis (wives of the cowherds). So one will

realise how highly spiritually evolved they were. When leaving

Gokul, Krushna gave His flute to Radha and never played it again.

Thus He made sure that She constantly got the spiritual experience

of Absoluteness (Purnatva) which is superior to anahat sound.

 

Read more in details :

http://www.hindujagruti.org/hinduism/knowledge/article/what-is-the-

real-relationship-between-radha-krushna.html

[Guest guest]

, " prithviraj_kanade "

<prithviraj_kanade wrote:

 

 

Thanks prithviraj,

 

You are very right. In fact on YA many hindus even

misrepresented Radha and Krishna's relations.

 

It was an innocent love between a naughty, loving child and a

young bride of the village, which has been colored by our romantic

poets. But still there is no harm as long as the relation is viewed

by Bhakti yoga... when it comes to logics problems starts

 

Krishna had with him three manifestations of Adi shakti viz.

Radha, Rukmini and Draupadi. Radha was manifestation of Apra

Prakriti who separates (apparantely) from the supreme bliss and

feels the pain of separation and manifests her pain as universe

 

Rukmini was manifestation of Para prakriti who is always with the

lord and serving him.

 

Draupadi was manifestation of Mahakali, who helped Krishna in

bringing out the great destruction through Mahabharat. Besides

Krishna, Draupadi was the only one who could have stopped this

war...but she ensured by her actions, that the enemity increased and

the war becomes imminent.

 

with love

[Guest guest]

Rev. Gurudev, Obeisances.

 

Bhgavan Yogeshwara was 'The Whole Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Purna

Parabrahma Himself'. His coming to this earth was never for destruction. It was

the over ambitiousness of the arrogant Kshatriyas at that time that lead

themselves to end their lives by their own deeds. Except actual Asuras or

incarnations of Asuras(Demons), Bhagavan had not killed anybody directly. The

killed ones were so mighty and mayavi that none on the earth at that time was

more powerful than them. It was also not killing but liberation of their soul

from demonic bodies and thoughts. If one studies Shrimad Bhagavatam, Bhagavan

was never enraged or angry when in action but was calm and smiling, i.e. in

pleasant mood demonstrating others that the way / method of liberation is a

ceremony. The word 'destruction' implies enragious excitement of mind to do that

activity at the peak of angry feeling, knowingly and purposefully with intention

to eridicate the opponent / counterpart, thoroughly.

 

There is every chance to loose mental equilibrium during such actions and a

godly/pious person also becomes a demon for a while. In case of Bhagavan

Krishna, this had seldom quoted/stated. We may use the word 'reduction'

insstead. Pardon me if anything out of place/context. Heartful regards.

= Keshav.

[Guest guest]

, keshav daund <keshav_daund wrote:

 

I agree keshavji

 

Destruction may be a little harsh word...but shri Krishna was

Mahakaal himself and he came to remove negativity prevailing.

 

He himself was never angry or had any hatered towards anyone. In

Mahabharata,when his bua's son shishupal is born with extra limbs and

eye, sages told that if some one picks the boy and the extra eye and

limbs vanish, that person will be his killer. Krishna picked the boy

and limbs vanished. His bua asked krishna - will you kill your own

brother ?

 

Krishna replied - You call it killing ?? it is called Moksha in my

language !!

 

Hari Aum