Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 No Kumarji, nothing was missing and nothing remained unsaid! :-) ***************** Bhavas are on the earth/earth dependent Rashis are in the sky, in the heavens! Jyotish uses a zodiac that is sidereal and is in the sky! Western astrology uses a zodiac that is earth-based (depends on earth- seasons with first point of Aries coinciding with the vernal equinox in the northern hemisphere!) ***************** , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Rear RRji > > I guess u missed a line just b4 the last para/line u c an still put it thru. > for easy ref I am inserting some dots there. > > sorry that i am using Net jargon not English here. sure I know u will manage that. > > > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani wrote: Kumar ji, > > I do not wish to light a candle in this august forum bristling with > perfect individuals each as brilliant as a thousand SUNs, but those > thinking about bhava and rashi and wondering why western astrology > takes bhavas so seriously, all twenty+ of those (!), whereas jyotish > typically has not or not very vociferously would be advised by me to > take a pause and think back at something! > > Bhavas are on the earth/earth dependent > Rashis are in the sky, in the heavens! > > Jyotish uses a zodiac that is sidereal and is in the sky! > > Western astrology uses a zodiac that is earth-based (depends on earth- > seasons with first point of Aries coinciding with the vernal equinox > in the northern hemisphere!) > > ....... may be on virtues of using earth based bhavas u had some info2share? > > ...... > My apologies for distracting busy people on this forum!! > > RR > > , Prashant Kumar G B > <gbp_kumar@> wrote: > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > it is just one issue of AM back which RRji is referring to and > quite often it can help reading 2 sides of a coin. choice is ours by > experience to use whats works best. reason Bhava is higher as it > covers the local place as minutely as possible as Rasi chart can > cover almost whole of the region say N. INDIA OR S, INDIA, E india > born I am excluding W here as it is not so broad and fits within N. > > > > for countries like USA, CIS, Au etc it is worse with such huge > areas Bhavas matter more than rasi chart for precession and when we > limit the yogas that can turn Topsy turvy as we go closer to the > Poles. > > more of astrology is written for people born between 0-60 deg latd > PROBABLY AS THE NO OF HOUSES THAT MERGED IN ONE RASI CAN BE MIND > BOGGLING AND SURE KP users will have a lot more of significators that > cover a single question anytime. > > > > best wishes > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: Shri RRji, > > > > Sir Who has time to watch the world go by ? > > We do not have time to even read our families > > charts properly, then who is going to search for > > old issue and read ? For me this is no > > issue(Quandary) at all to spend my energies and > > time for. > > > > I think what You are saying is that in the Februray > > issue (Monthly magazine) something else is written. > > So be it then. > > > > Kind regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar, > > > > > > This is a beautiful example of reality as it unfolds for most of > us > > > jyotishis! > > > > > > You have read the part two of the article in A.M. March 2007 > which > > > you just happened to acquire after a long time just because you > > > needed change! > > > > > > And I just happened to read part one of that same editorial in > the > > > February issue and simply because the issue was gifted to me, > and > > > just after my 2006 subscription expired (after nearly 20+ years > of > > > non-subscription!)! > > > > > > The right thing to do to resolve this quandary would be for you > to > > > read the February issue and for me to read the March issue! > > > > > > Neither of the above may happen, but does this make sense, what > I > > am > > > suggesting? I pray and hope that it does!! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Shri RRji, > > > > > > > > The stance has not been changed. > > > > > > > > I have not read the February issue. > > > > > > > > I too have mentioned Raashi and Bhava. > > > > A Yoga which is not produced in Rashi cannot be produced > > > > in Bhava ,thats right, we are not talking > > > > of this, we say that if the Yoga is present in the Raashi > > > > chart, but not present in the Bhava ,then not neceessarily > > > > would that Yoga fructify. > > > > > > > > And I also said that aspects have to be viewed from > > > > Raashi only. > > > > > > > > So theres been no change actually if what I > > > > have written is mentioned in the February > > > > issue too. > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Rohiniranjan" > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar ji, > > > > > > > > > > This is interesting, since in the February 2007 issue in > Rasi > > and > > > > > Bhava, Not Rasi or Bhava the statements indicate > differently. > > For > > > > > example on page 164: A yoga that is not produced in rasi > cannot > > > be > > > > > said to be produced in bhava. The results of the Yoga can be > > > > > experienced only if the yoga occurs in the rasi chart > [stated > > in > > > > the > > > > > specific context of gajakeshari yoga]. > > > > > > > > > > And on page 165 under the caption of Aspects from Rasi > Chart, > > > > Gaytri > > > > > ji wrote: For all practical purposes and this is based on > our > > > > humble > > > > > experience ... the aspects are to be taken only according to > > the > > > > Rasi > > > > > chart...] This was followed by an example using mars and > saturn > > > > which > > > > > removes any misunderstanding if still exists. She > recommended > > the > > > > use > > > > > of Rasi NOT Bhava. > > > > > > > > > > And yet the stance changed completely as you mentioned, in > the > > > > March > > > > > issue! Hmmm... > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > Since last 10 years I have never purchased any astrological > > > > > > magazine, primarily due to lack of time, and secondarily > due > > > > > > to desire of doing only targetted reading. Today I > > > > > > required some change against Rs.500 Note I was having, > > > > > > and happened to buy one Magazine, and was blessed. > > > > > > > > > > > > For a long time I have been a lone crusader on The > > > > > > Astrology Forums, trying to bring to notice,the importance, > > > > > > in minds of most astrologers that its always good to > > > > > > view and read any chart from the Bhava Chalit too. > > > > > > I have also mantained that many Yogas like Pancha > Mahapurusha, > > > > > > Gajakesari do not work in full if not present in Bhava > Chalit > > > too. > > > > > > Also have pointed in my analysis that I view aspects from > the > > > > > > Raashi chart only. > > > > > > > > > > > > All the above, is confirmed by The Editorial Message in > > > > > > March 2007 issue of "The Astrological Magazine " > > > > > > published by respected Gayatri Dev Vasudev . > > > > > > I wish all the interested readers get an opportunity to > read > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Prashantkumar G B > > > > -*- The services of this astrologer are free on > group but > > off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone. > > Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also > > > > Personal ID astro.prashantkumar@ > > 09840051861 > > > > > > > > > > > > Never miss an email again! > > Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it > out. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.