Raashi and Bhava Charts 22/2

[Guest guest]

Bhaskar,

 

it is just one issue of AM back which RRji is referring to and quite often it can help reading 2 sides of a coin. choice is ours by experience to use whats works best. reason Bhava is higher as it covers the local place as minutely as possible as Rasi chart can cover almost whole of the region say N. INDIA OR S, INDIA, E india born I am excluding W here as it is not so broad and fits within N.

 

for countries like USA, CIS, Au etc it is worse with such huge areas Bhavas matter more than rasi chart for precession and when we limit the yogas that can turn Topsy turvy as we go closer to the Poles.

more of astrology is written for people born between 0-60 deg latd PROBABLY AS THE NO OF HOUSES THAT MERGED IN ONE RASI CAN BE MIND BOGGLING AND SURE KP users will have a lot more of significators that cover a single question anytime.

 

best wishes

 

 

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Shri RRji,

 

Sir Who has time to watch the world go by ?

We do not have time to even read our families

charts properly, then who is going to search for

old issue and read ? For me this is no

issue(Quandary) at all to spend my energies and

time for.

 

I think what You are saying is that in the Februray

issue (Monthly magazine) something else is written.

So be it then.

 

Kind regards,

Bhaskar.

 

, "Rohiniranjan"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar,

>

> This is a beautiful example of reality as it unfolds for most of us

> jyotishis!

>

> You have read the part two of the article in A.M. March 2007 which

> you just happened to acquire after a long time just because you

> needed change!

>

> And I just happened to read part one of that same editorial in the

> February issue and simply because the issue was gifted to me, and

> just after my 2006 subscription expired (after nearly 20+ years of

> non-subscription!)!

>

> The right thing to do to resolve this quandary would be for you to

> read the February issue and for me to read the March issue!

>

> Neither of the above may happen, but does this make sense, what I

am

> suggesting? I pray and hope that it does!!

>

> RR

>

> , "Bhaskar"

> <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> >

> > Shri RRji,

> >

> > The stance has not been changed.

> >

> > I have not read the February issue.

> >

> > I too have mentioned Raashi and Bhava.

> > A Yoga which is not produced in Rashi cannot be produced

> > in Bhava ,thats right, we are not talking

> > of this, we say that if the Yoga is present in the Raashi

> > chart, but not present in the Bhava ,then not neceessarily

> > would that Yoga fructify.

> >

> > And I also said that aspects have to be viewed from

> > Raashi only.

> >

> > So theres been no change actually if what I

> > have written is mentioned in the February

> > issue too.

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> > , "Rohiniranjan"

> > <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > This is interesting, since in the February 2007 issue in Rasi

and

> > > Bhava, Not Rasi or Bhava the statements indicate differently.

For

> > > example on page 164: A yoga that is not produced in rasi cannot

> be

> > > said to be produced in bhava. The results of the Yoga can be

> > > experienced only if the yoga occurs in the rasi chart [stated

in

> > the

> > > specific context of gajakeshari yoga].

> > >

> > > And on page 165 under the caption of Aspects from Rasi Chart,

> > Gaytri

> > > ji wrote: For all practical purposes and this is based on our

> > humble

> > > experience ... the aspects are to be taken only according to

the

> > Rasi

> > > chart...] This was followed by an example using mars and saturn

> > which

> > > removes any misunderstanding if still exists. She recommended

the

> > use

> > > of Rasi NOT Bhava.

> > >

> > > And yet the stance changed completely as you mentioned, in the

> > March

> > > issue! Hmmm...

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > >

> > > , "Bhaskar"

> > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear friends,

> > > >

> > > > Since last 10 years I have never purchased any astrological

> > > > magazine, primarily due to lack of time, and secondarily due

> > > > to desire of doing only targetted reading. Today I

> > > > required some change against Rs.500 Note I was having,

> > > > and happened to buy one Magazine, and was blessed.

> > > >

> > > > For a long time I have been a lone crusader on The

> > > > Astrology Forums, trying to bring to notice,the importance,

> > > > in minds of most astrologers that its always good to

> > > > view and read any chart from the Bhava Chalit too.

> > > > I have also mantained that many Yogas like Pancha Mahapurusha,

> > > > Gajakesari do not work in full if not present in Bhava Chalit

> too.

> > > > Also have pointed in my analysis that I view aspects from the

> > > > Raashi chart only.

> > > >

> > > > All the above, is confirmed by The Editorial Message in

> > > > March 2007 issue of "The Astrological Magazine "

> > > > published by respected Gayatri Dev Vasudev .

> > > > I wish all the interested readers get an opportunity to read

> this.

> > > >

> > > > Best wishes,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

Prashantkumar G B

-*- The services of this astrologer are free on group but

off the group consultations are chargeable by chat, mail or phone.

Please fix times for this in advance -*- and Pay Pal ID also

Personal ID astro.prashantkumar

09840051861

 

 

 

 

 

Never miss an email again!

Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.