Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 Dear everyone, There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should not wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not good and may cause harm. Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols or is it prohibited to do so. So does gender reallt matter in this issue? Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 Dear Madam, I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal ash coloured. This gives us the clue. It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in pure state of existence all the time, during daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. and at such time the symbols if touched with impure hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they were first put there.So better forget it. This goes with Gents as well as ladies. Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold or silver. regards, Bhaskar. , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI <gyathri1983 wrote: > > Dear everyone, > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should not wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not good and may cause harm. > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols or is it prohibited to do so. > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 dear friends any person making a statement in a public group on the net enforcing a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and have bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that narrate the significance of these rudraksha. shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus says: "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam sadaiva rudraksha" there are so many other classics which clearly mention that rudraksha can be worn by any person without any gender bias. since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste and religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that is written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and each rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be energised as per the puranas. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Madam, > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > pure state of existence all the time, during > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > were first put there.So better forget it. > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > or silver. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should not > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not good > and may cause harm. > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols or > is it prohibited to do so. > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 Dear Panditji, I have not quoted any classics. I have mentioned my personal observations only, which may be accepted or rejected, depending on the individual. Since Your goodself had quoted classics and the Rudraksha as You mentioned can be worn even by a "STREE" , we shall take that as correct. But I still mantain that i have never seen any women wearing Rudrakhsa. In the same way if I take the classical quote "Shudra Ganwar Pashu Naari " sakal taadna ke adhikari, I would certainly not subject my wife to taadna because it was quoted in the classics. In the same way if classics have to be adhered to in complete then, i would not watch the face of my new born if born in a particular Nakshatra, and not blend my modern thinking and twist them, as per my convenience. If I have to abide by classics only, then i would abide by all injunctions mentioned for Gadanta births etc. Anyway, this is subjective as well as relative and also individualistic approach to matters. best wishes, Bhaskar. , "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > any person making a statement in a public group on the net enforcing > a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical > corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and have > bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that narrate > the significance of these rudraksha. > > shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus says: > > "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam sadaiva > rudraksha" > > there are so many other classics which clearly mention that rudraksha > can be worn by any person without any gender bias. > > since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste and > religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear > energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that is > written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and each > rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be energised > as per the puranas. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > , "Bhaskar" > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Dear Madam, > > > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > > pure state of existence all the time, during > > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > > were first put there.So better forget it. > > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > > or silver. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should not > > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not > good > > and may cause harm. > > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols > or > > is it prohibited to do so. > > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > http://uk.messenger. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 ll HARE RAM ll Dear Bhaskar Bhai, RAM RAM, There are vast meaning of TAADNA as - To beat & To keep close watch & To understand.Therefore Baba Tulsidaas Ji used this word keeping in mind its different usages for individual.As far as Rudraksha is concern any one can use but it is not in pratice in our society to wear it by STREE except SANYASIN. God bless Shashie Shekhar Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Panditji, I have not quoted any classics. I have mentioned my personal observations only, which may be accepted or rejected, depending on the individual. Since Your goodself had quoted classics and the Rudraksha as You mentioned can be worn even by a "STREE" , we shall take that as correct. But I still mantain that i have never seen any women wearing Rudrakhsa. In the same way if I take the classical quote "Shudra Ganwar Pashu Naari " sakal taadna ke adhikari, I would certainly not subject my wife to taadna because it was quoted in the classics. In the same way if classics have to be adhered to in complete then, i would not watch the face of my new born if born in a particular Nakshatra, and not blend my modern thinking and twist them, as per my convenience. If I have to abide by classics only, then i would abide by all injunctions mentioned for Gadanta births etc. Anyway, this is subjective as well as relative and also individualistic approach to matters. best wishes, Bhaskar. , "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > any person making a statement in a public group on the net enforcing > a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical > corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and have > bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that narrate > the significance of these rudraksha. > > shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus says: > > "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam sadaiva > rudraksha" > > there are so many other classics which clearly mention that rudraksha > can be worn by any person without any gender bias. > > since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste and > religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear > energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that is > written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and each > rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be energised > as per the puranas. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > , "Bhaskar" > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Dear Madam, > > > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > > pure state of existence all the time, during > > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > > were first put there.So better forget it. > > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > > or silver. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should not > > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not > good > > and may cause harm. > > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols > or > > is it prohibited to do so. > > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > http://uk.messenger. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 dear friends to remove any confusion over the ambivalent views of scriptures, i agree with what bhaskarji said that each person has his own views, practices, faith and beliefs. neither me nor anyone can enforce a code as such. as rightly observed by many, the shastras have so many ambivalent rules. for example the shivapurana says that rudraksha are available in four colours and shall be worn by the four castes respectively. till date i have not seen white and black round rudrakshas. most rudrakha available are only red and yellow. if this rule has to be strictly followed, all brahmins and shudras cannot wear any rudraksha because thier respective white and black colour rudraskhas are not available. so this rule has become redundant due to non availability of these two coloured rudrakhas. in another verse in shivapurana it is mentioned that a wearer of rudraksha must not eat nonveg and garlic. when the same shivapurana mentions that rudraksha can be worn by all four castes including kshatriyas and shudras who invariably eat nonveg, this rule too has become redundant. hence let us all take a holistic approach and let natives have thier own decisions to make based on what they think is feasible and correct. we are here only to impart information and it is up to the natives to reckon what they want. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com , Shashie Shekhar <polite_astro wrote: > > ll HARE RAM ll > Dear Bhaskar Bhai, > RAM RAM, > There are vast meaning of TAADNA as - To beat & To keep close watch & To understand.Therefore Baba Tulsidaas Ji used this word keeping in mind its different usages for individual.As far as Rudraksha is concern any one can use but it is not in pratice in our society to wear it by STREE except SANYASIN. > > God bless > Shashie Shekhar > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > Dear Panditji, > > I have not quoted any classics. > I have mentioned my personal observations only, > which may be accepted or rejected, > depending on the individual. > Since Your goodself had quoted classics and the Rudraksha as > You mentioned can be worn even by a "STREE" , we shall > take that as correct. > But I still mantain that i have never seen any > women wearing Rudrakhsa. > In the same way if I take the classical > quote > "Shudra Ganwar Pashu Naari " > sakal taadna ke adhikari, > I would certainly not subject my wife to taadna > because it was quoted in the classics. > In the same way if classics have to be adhered to in > complete then, i would not watch the face > of my new born if born in a particular Nakshatra, > and not blend my modern thinking and twist them, > as per my convenience. If I have to abide by classics only, > then i would abide by all injunctions mentioned for > Gadanta births etc. > > Anyway, this is subjective as well as relative > and also individualistic approach to matters. > > best wishes, > Bhaskar. > > , "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > any person making a statement in a public group on the net > enforcing > > a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical > > corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and have > > bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that narrate > > the significance of these rudraksha. > > > > shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus > says: > > > > "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam > sadaiva > > rudraksha" > > > > there are so many other classics which clearly mention that > rudraksha > > can be worn by any person without any gender bias. > > > > since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste > and > > religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear > > energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that > is > > written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and each > > rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be energised > > as per the puranas. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Madam, > > > > > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > > > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > > > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > > > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > > > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > > > > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > > > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > > > pure state of existence all the time, during > > > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > > > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > > > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > > > were first put there.So better forget it. > > > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > > > > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > > > or silver. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > > > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should > not > > > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not > > good > > > and may cause harm. > > > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols > > or > > > is it prohibited to do so. > > > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > > http://uk.messenger. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 Sir, Pranams. Very truly said. At least when it comes from a person like you, then we know that it is authentic. Next time if a lady asks me about Rudraksha, I can tell her with authenticity based on your quote, that she can wear the same.When such discussions are done, then some tathya (Fact) comes out like the above where you proved through Shastras that yes it can be done. Thank You, affectionately, Bhaskar. , "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > to remove any confusion over the ambivalent views of scriptures, i > agree with what bhaskarji said that each person has his own views, > practices, faith and beliefs. neither me nor anyone can enforce a > code as such. > > as rightly observed by many, the shastras have so many ambivalent > rules. for example the shivapurana says that rudraksha are available > in four colours and shall be worn by the four castes respectively. > till date i have not seen white and black round rudrakshas. most > rudrakha available are only red and yellow. if this rule has to be > strictly followed, all brahmins and shudras cannot wear any rudraksha > because thier respective white and black colour rudraskhas are not > available. so this rule has become redundant due to non availability > of these two coloured rudrakhas. > > in another verse in shivapurana it is mentioned that a wearer of > rudraksha must not eat nonveg and garlic. when the same shivapurana > mentions that rudraksha can be worn by all four castes including > kshatriyas and shudras who invariably eat nonveg, this rule too has > become redundant. > > hence let us all take a holistic approach and let natives have thier > own decisions to make based on what they think is feasible and > correct. > > we are here only to impart information and it is up to the natives to > reckon what they want. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > , Shashie Shekhar > <polite_astro@> wrote: > > > > ll HARE RAM ll > > Dear Bhaskar Bhai, > > RAM RAM, > > There are vast meaning of TAADNA as - To beat & To keep close > watch & To understand.Therefore Baba Tulsidaas Ji used this word > keeping in mind its different usages for individual.As far as > Rudraksha is concern any one can use but it is not in pratice in our > society to wear it by STREE except SANYASIN. > > > > God bless > > Shashie Shekhar > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > Dear Panditji, > > > > I have not quoted any classics. > > I have mentioned my personal observations only, > > which may be accepted or rejected, > > depending on the individual. > > Since Your goodself had quoted classics and the Rudraksha as > > You mentioned can be worn even by a "STREE" , we shall > > take that as correct. > > But I still mantain that i have never seen any > > women wearing Rudrakhsa. > > In the same way if I take the classical > > quote > > "Shudra Ganwar Pashu Naari " > > sakal taadna ke adhikari, > > I would certainly not subject my wife to taadna > > because it was quoted in the classics. > > In the same way if classics have to be adhered to in > > complete then, i would not watch the face > > of my new born if born in a particular Nakshatra, > > and not blend my modern thinking and twist them, > > as per my convenience. If I have to abide by classics only, > > then i would abide by all injunctions mentioned for > > Gadanta births etc. > > > > Anyway, this is subjective as well as relative > > and also individualistic approach to matters. > > > > best wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > any person making a statement in a public group on the net > > enforcing > > > a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical > > > corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and > have > > > bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that > narrate > > > the significance of these rudraksha. > > > > > > shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus > > says: > > > > > > "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam > > sadaiva > > > rudraksha" > > > > > > there are so many other classics which clearly mention that > > rudraksha > > > can be worn by any person without any gender bias. > > > > > > since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste > > and > > > religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear > > > energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that > > is > > > written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and > each > > > rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be > energised > > > as per the puranas. > > > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > > pandit arjun > > > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Madam, > > > > > > > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > > > > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > > > > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > > > > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > > > > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > > > > > > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > > > > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > > > > pure state of existence all the time, during > > > > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > > > > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > > > > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > > > > were first put there.So better forget it. > > > > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > > > > > > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > > > > or silver. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > > > > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > > > > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should > > not > > > > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > > > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not > > > good > > > > and may cause harm. > > > > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols > > > or > > > > is it prohibited to do so. > > > > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > > > http://uk.messenger. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 Dear Shashie Bhai, RAM RAM Sir I agree taadna has got vast meaning and interpretation can be done in many ways.Physical taadna,mental taadna, taadna due to financial incapability, due to torture through speech etc. Taadna also means to keep watch as you said, to get the meaning,to understand, to gauge, to go beyond, to fathom the depts,to keep under check, etc. Baba TulsiDasji ki Jai ho. aur aapki bhi, for putting the record right. But when i used the taadna word, good came out of that. See you have posted me a reply after such a long time on JR. Thank You. Yours, Bhaskar. , Shashie Shekhar <polite_astro wrote: > > ll HARE RAM ll > Dear Bhaskar Bhai, > RAM RAM, > There are vast meaning of TAADNA as - To beat & To keep close watch & To understand.Therefore Baba Tulsidaas Ji used this word keeping in mind its different usages for individual.As far as Rudraksha is concern any one can use but it is not in pratice in our society to wear it by STREE except SANYASIN. > > God bless > Shashie Shekhar > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > Dear Panditji, > > I have not quoted any classics. > I have mentioned my personal observations only, > which may be accepted or rejected, > depending on the individual. > Since Your goodself had quoted classics and the Rudraksha as > You mentioned can be worn even by a "STREE" , we shall > take that as correct. > But I still mantain that i have never seen any > women wearing Rudrakhsa. > In the same way if I take the classical > quote > "Shudra Ganwar Pashu Naari " > sakal taadna ke adhikari, > I would certainly not subject my wife to taadna > because it was quoted in the classics. > In the same way if classics have to be adhered to in > complete then, i would not watch the face > of my new born if born in a particular Nakshatra, > and not blend my modern thinking and twist them, > as per my convenience. If I have to abide by classics only, > then i would abide by all injunctions mentioned for > Gadanta births etc. > > Anyway, this is subjective as well as relative > and also individualistic approach to matters. > > best wishes, > Bhaskar. > > , "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > any person making a statement in a public group on the net > enforcing > > a code based on gender bias owes stantiation through classical > > corroboration. i have done extensive research on rudraksha and have > > bought and assimilated various puranas and upanishads that narrate > > the significance of these rudraksha. > > > > shivapurana, vidveshwara samhita, 25th chapter, 46th verse thus > says: > > > > "sarvashramanam varnanam STREE shudranam, shivajnaya dharyam > sadaiva > > rudraksha" > > > > there are so many other classics which clearly mention that > rudraksha > > can be worn by any person without any gender bias. > > > > since the shastras clearly mentioned that any native of any caste > and > > religion, man or woman, can wear rudrakshas, natives may wear > > energised rudraksha and get the benefits. the only condition that > is > > written is that since lord shiva dwells in these rudraksha and each > > rudraksha is attached to certain dieties, they need to be energised > > as per the puranas. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > > > , "Bhaskar" > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Madam, > > > > > > I do not think I have seen any girl or lady wearing Rudrakhsa > > > till today. So I feel it may not be right for one to wear. > > > If You notice in Devi temples too, for ladies another bowl > > > of red Vibhuti/Sindoor is kept while for Gents the normal > > > ash coloured. This gives us the clue. > > > > > > It is better not to tattoo symbols of Aum,Hanumanji > > > and such other ones, on ones body, cause we are not in > > > pure state of existence all the time, during > > > daily ablutions, during conjugal state etc. > > > and at such time the symbols if touched with impure > > > hands ,may loose the efficiacy for which they > > > were first put there.So better forget it. > > > This goes with Gents as well as ladies. > > > > > > Ladies may alternatively wear Tulsi Mala.studded in Gold > > > or silver. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , GYATHRI PATANJOTHI > > > <gyathri1983@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear everyone, > > > > > > > > There is always suggestions from my folks that girls should > not > > > wear rudrakshas and aum symbols. > > > > It is also said that aum symbols tattoed to the body is not > > good > > > and may cause harm. > > > > Is this true and can a girl tattoo her body with holy symbols > > or > > > is it prohibited to do so. > > > > So does gender reallt matter in this issue? > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > > http://uk.messenger. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.