Guest guest Posted February 23, 2007 Report Share Posted February 23, 2007 In olden days, if a patient visits a Vaidya, he used to diagnose most complex diseases just by pulse and few other simple tests suggested by ayurveda. On the other hand, todays doctors, despite modern pathology labs, sophisticated imported machinery, x-rays, ultrasound pictures, CT Scans, ECG, and angiography, are unable to reach a definite conclusion about the disease and its treatment. The reason for this sad state of health care system is that 70% of these (nearly 40,000) diagnostic labs have absence of qualified staff. Only 60 have government accredition. While we have an elaborate procedures to obtain accredition for starting a medical college, we do not have well defined rules and standards for starting a pathology lab or diagnostic unit. Many labs do not have requisite technical staff and those who have, to carry out tests, a MD visists only to sign the reports at the end of working day. Old equipment, cheaper chemicals, inexperienced staff, you can imagine how much realism will exist in pathology reports. The maximum unreliability is seen in blood sugar reports. Today, nearly 35 million diabetic patients exist in India. Diabetes gives maximum turnover to the labs, doctors and pharmaceuticals. One expereience is worth mentioning. A patient changed to ayurveda after following allopathy for 4-5 years. Just a day before she had blood sugar tested 225 mg/dl. She was started on ayurvedic medicines, and to have easy transition, allopathic medication was also continued. During one month medication she had noted increase in health (hunger, digestion, elimination, energy levels, need to visit bathroom during night, pains in extremeties, itching etc) on all fronts. She was very happy and to satisfy curiosity that sugar was really reduced, she visited usual laboratory after a month. Since she was regular customer, and on the remark that she seems improved by usual technician, she gave a smile and told, "I have added ayurvedic medication also now!". That day evening she received a report of Fasting glucose 300 mg/dl. "How this can happen?" she enquired. Her pulse, acupressure points were all singing the health only, sugar points were not sore. "I feel there may be something wrong, when I feel OK how sugar could have increased? " she remarked. When this author had no answer, she gave a broad smile and said, "don't worry doctor, I guessed something is wrong with this report, and I went to another lab and had another test, see the report." 173 mg/dl. She had taken both tests after equal number of hours after dinner, and no change in food. Author has kept both report with him, should another case like this arise. He does not think it was a deliberate mistake on the laboratory part, but this kind of things happen when health is defined by numbers! Health is a personal experience, as much as bliss after meditation is. Which laboratory to trust and which method to trust is a open question for a patient. If you visit an ultrasound lab for assessing urinary calculi or gall stone size you will get two different sizes, perhaps depending on the sensitivity of the equipment, skill of the testing person, and few other reasons, typical to modern medicine practice. When hospital has its own laboratory, perhaps this kind of unreliability may reduce, but since many small hospitals have mushroomed in metros, they have to depend on the private laboratories only. Now multinationals have also jumped in this lucrative field. This field is growing at an annual rate of 50%. Thanks to our technology blinded society. Many charity NGOs arrange mass scale testing through these MNC labs and the real purpose of labs is to expand the patient market. While a sick person goes for tests, only limited market can exist, but when apparently healthy person goes for testing, much bigger turnover comes as many employers wish their employees should be certified healthy. And our policies are also encouraging medical tourism! Kidneys, ovaries, surrogacy etc are available at rates far cheaper than rest of the world. Unfortunately the cost of health care to poor man has increased very much. Hence several government and public sector companies are thinking of switching over to medical insurance rather than contributory health service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.