Why Are Muslim Killing Sprees in US Being Covered Up?

[Guest guest]

Why Are Muslim Killing Sprees in US Being Covered Up? Also why are Islamic terror attacks in India ignored by US media? I think its because the media is bought out and maintaining the 'proper' mood in order to promote the Islamic Manchaurian Candidate, Barak Hussein Obama. In both of his electoral wins, it was the scandals that embroiled his rivals that led him to victory and not his own abilities or track record. This fact alone is enough to question his worthiness. Riding on cultivated white American guilt and black American hope, he is being artificially insinuated into the leadership of America.

Although Indonesia is regarded as a moderate Muslim state, the U.S. intelligence community has determined that today most of these schools are financed by the Saudi Arabian government and they teach a Wahhabi doctrine that denies the rights of non-Muslims. http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/01/hillary_camp_ag.html

The cover up has begun since mid jan. Besides CNN's alleged 'proof' that Obama's school was secular, in which they took the word of a former classmate and the VP of the school as all the eveidence required to confirm what they wanted to promote.....

below we see part of the cover up. The original article clearly states:

"Obama's religious background has come under scrutiny because he attended a Muslim school in Indonesia from age 6 to 10. Obama, who was born in Hawaii, lived in Indonesia with his mother and stepfather from 1967 to 1971 and subsequently returned to Hawaii to live with his maternal grandparents." Feb 11, 2007 3:14 pm

http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/local_story_042162812.html

By the next day the same article has no mention of his attending muslim school:

Obama, who was born in Hawaii, lived in mostly Muslim Indonesia with his mother and stepfather from 1967 to 1971. Article Launched: 02/12/2007 03:07:54 http://www.elpasotimes.com/ci_5212560

"Me going to school in Indonesia for two years at a public school there at the age of 7 and 8 is probably not going to be endangering in some way the people of America." Obama on NBC's Today Show

Now within the past week it is revealed he attended to not just any old school in Indonesia, at the age of 7 and 8, but rather an Islamic school from ages 6 to 10 yrs of age. Why is he misleading us, the people he claims to want to serve?

And what happened to this story. Its less than a month old but no longer available from . http://news./s/realclearpolitics/20070119/cm_rcp/obamas_religion1

In it he states: "There are aspects of Christian tradition that I'm comfortable with and aspects that I'm not. There are passages of the Bible that make perfect sense to me and others that I go, 'Ya know, I'm not sure about that,'" he said, shrugging and stammering slightly. (Perfectly fits the Wahabi mindset that believes Islam is the perfected message of Abraham and the Jesus.)

Heres the original story buried in a blog

http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/01/obamas_religion.html

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2006/12/barack_hussein.html Obama's "Debunking" of Islamic Background Raises More Questions Printer Friendly

By Debbie Schlussel

I've been getting a lot of e-mails from ostriches, in light of yesterday's stories in which Senator Barack Hussein Obama allegedly "debunks" the Insight Magazine story and other charges--first made on this site--about his Muslim background.

But apparently ostriches can't read. Because Obama's alleged "debunking" didn't debunk a thing. It raised more questions. For starters, many have cited an AP story and a CNN story, both of which sent "reporters" to check into the Muslim school that Obama attended. All of Al-AP's Muslim "reporters" in Indonesia tell us that the school, SDN Menteng 1, is a public school, NOT an Islamic school or madrassa (which literally means "academy"), as Hillary Clinton's camp claims in the Insight Story.

The vice principal of the school, Akmed Solichin, tells AP that

Most of our students are Muslim, but there are Christians as well. Everyone's welcome here. . . it's a public school. And we should trust him because Muslims never lie or propagandize. Taqiyyah-lying for the casue of Islam, is a concept in Hinduism or maybe atheism? The same goes for the denials of Indonesia's Islamofascist-dominated Ministry of Religious Affairs, which denies the school is Islamic. They hate America and would love one of their own in the White House, but they would never lie.

More important, in his own two autobiographies, Obama writes that his teacher at the school sent a note home to his mother that Obama made trouble by making faces while the class was studying the Koran. Uh, sorry, but public schools DO NOT study the Koran. Islamic schools do. And which suras was Obama studying? How about the many suras that preach deception and killing of Infidels? It's doubtful that the school didn't teach those. It's more likely that they did. And which violent Hadiths did the school teach? We'll never know. And Obama won't be trumpeting them.

So Christians and others are welcome at the Muslim school Obama attended. That proves nothing. Everyone (except women) would be welcome in most Islamic schools around the world--a great opportunity to indoctrinate and convert them. How do you think Adam Gadahn a/k/a Azzam Al-Amriki learned about Islam before he became a fully converted, educated Muslim? It wasn't by osmosis.

And finally, there is the glaring red flag on Obama's attendance at Fransiskus Assisi, a Catholic school.

AP reports this:

At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisi, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather. The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering _ Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. Gibbs said he wasn't sure why the document had Obama listed as a Muslim.

Gee, if he wasn't a Muslim, but a Catholic, why would a Catholic identify as a Muslim in a Catholic school? He and his parents were trying to hide his Catholic background from a Catholic school?

I don't know about him, but when my parents enrolled me--a Jew--at Akiva Hebrew Day School, they didn't tell Rabbi Schostak that I, Debbie Schlussel, am a Muslim . . . just to make me sound more exotic.

And I doubt that's the reason Obama self-identified as a Muslim at Catholic school.

The real reason might just be the logical one: that it's the truth. That he actually was a Muslim.

One other thing: Obama told NBC's Today Show:

Me going to school in Indonesia for two years at a public school there at the age of 7 and 8 is probably not going to be endangering in some way the people of America. Well, that depends on what they taught him there. If we shouldn't be worried about what Obama learned in a school that he admits taught him the Koran (shortly before he self-identified as a Muslim at a Catholic school), then we should stop worrying about Palestinian Authority TV training kids at age 3 to kill Jews and Americans and become homicide bombers.

After all, what they learn when they are young and impressionable doesn't matter. Does it? . .

 

Salt Lake Jihad? - February 15, 2007 Posted by: "EagleSM23" eaglesm23 Eaglesm23 Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:52 pm (PST) http://www.frontpag emag.com/ Articles/ ReadArticle. asp?ID=26961

Salt Lake Jihad? - February 15, 2007

by Robert Spencer

 

When Sulejmen Talovic entered the Trolley Square mall

in Salt Lake City Monday night with a shotgun, a

pistol, and a backpack full of ammunition, he intended

to “kill a large number of people,” according to Salt

Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank. Talovic killed

five people and wounded four before he himself was

killed by an off-duty Ogden police officer who

happened to be in the mall.

 

Why did Talovic do it? No one knows. Talovic’s aunt,

Ajka Omerovic, told reporters: “We want to know what

happened, just like you guys. We have no idea...We

know him as a good boy. He liked everybody, so I don’t

know what happened.” Talovic, who was eighteen at the

time of the murders, was a Bosnian Muslim who came to

the United States with his family in 1998. Could he

have been motivated by jihadist sympathies?

 

FBI special agent Patrick Kiernan discounted that

possibility. “We’re working closely with the Salt Lake

P.D. and we’re obviously aware that that [terrorism]

is a potential issue out there,” he explained. “But at

this point there is nothing that is leading us down

this road.” And with Talovic dead and apparently

having acted alone, unless something he wrote

explaining his actions is discovered, it is unlikely

that his motive will ever be definitively known.

 

But was Kiernan really correct that “there is nothing

that is leading us down this road”? Unfortunately, he

didn’t explain how he came to this conclusion. Talovic

joins an unfortunately growing list of Muslims who

have committed random acts of violence, only for

officials to assure us that their actions have nothing

to do with terrorism. Maybe none of them do, but the

list is full of troubling details:

 

On January 31, Ismail Yassin Mohamed, 22, stole a car

in Minneapolis. He went on a rampage, ramming the

stolen car into other cars and then stealing a van and

continuing to ram other cars, injuring one person. His

father told officials that Mohamed was suffering from

mental problems; his mother added he had been

depressed and hadn’t been taking his medication.

During his rampage, Mohamed repeatedly yelled, “Die,

die, die, kill, kill, kill,” and when asked why he did

all this, he replied, “Allah made me do it.”

 

Omeed Aziz Popal, a Muslim from Afghanistan, who

killed one person and injured fourteen during a

murderous drive through San Francisco city streets in

August 2006, during which he targeted people on

crosswalks and sidewalks, identified himself as a

terrorist after his rampage, according to Rob Roth of

San Francisco’s KTVU. Later the murders were ascribed

to Popal’s mental problems, and to stress arising from

his impending arranged marriage.

 

On July 28, 2006, a Muslim named Naveed Afzal Haq

forced his way into the Jewish Federation of Greater

Seattle. Once inside, Haq announced, “I’m a Muslim

American; I’m angry at Israel,” and then began

shooting, killing one woman and injuring five more.

FBI assistant special agent David Gomez stated: “We

believe...it’ s a lone individual acting out his

antagonism. There’s nothing to indicate that it’s

terrorism-related. But we're monitoring the entire

situation.”

 

In March 2006, a twenty-two-year- old Iranian student

named Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV onto the

campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel

Hill, deliberately trying to kill people and

succeeding in injuring nine. After the incident, he

seemed singularly pleased with himself, smiling and

waving to crowds after a court appearance on Monday,

at which he explained that he was “thankful for the

opportunity to spread the will of Allah.” Officials

here again dismissed the possibility of terrorism,

even after Taheri-azar wrote a series of letters to

the UNC campus newspaper detailing the Qur’anic

justification for warfare against unbelievers, and

explaining why he believed his attacks were justified

from an Islamic perspective.

 

None of these were terrorist attacks in the sense that

they were planned and executed by al-Qaeda agents. And

it is possible that all of them were products of

nothing more ideologically significant than a

disturbed mental state, although it is at least

noteworthy that each attacker explained his actions in

terms of Islamic terrorism. As such attacks grow in

number, it would behoove authorities at very least to

consider the possibility that these attacks were

inspired by the jihadist ideology of Islamic

supremacism, and to step up pressure on American

Muslim advocacy groups to renounce that ideology

definitively and begin extensive programs to teach

against it in American Islamic schools and mosques.

 

In October 2006, a pro-jihad internet site published a

“Guide for Individual Jihad,” explaining to jihadists

“how to fight alone.” It recommended, among other

things, assassination with guns and running people

over. Is it possible that Sulejmen Talovic and some of

these others were waging this jihad of one? It is

indeed, but with law enforcement officials trained

only to look for signs of membership in al-Qaeda or

other jihad groups, and to discount terrorism as a

factor if those signs aren’t there, it is a

possibility that investigators will continue to

overlook.

 

 

 

 

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Answers.